A 193-Million-Year Old Nesting Ground With More Than 100 Dinosaur Eggs Offers Evidence They Lived In Herds

[progressive hunter]

A work of fiction isn't a documentary.

You actually believe that film is a documentary?

Wow.

you actually believe I think that was a documentary??

youre a bigger idiot than I thought,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Real science requires honest facts.


Like men with tits are women?

and observation,, cant observe something from a 193 million yrs ago,, you can only guess,, which is the same as makin shit up,,

 

[Dana7360]

its their claim,, they need to prove it not me,, just saying something doesnt make it true,,
and we all know carbon dating is flawed and not trustworthy because it was designed to give a pre determined result,,

If you actually took the time to READ THE ARTICLE, you will see that scientists already did do the research and tests to determine the age.

If they had not done that they wouldn't have been able to come up with a number for the age.

If you had not been so incredibly lazy, you would have read the article that includes the tests they did to determine the age.

Now, go read the article to find out the tests they did and how they determined the age.

Meanwhile, give me your proof that the age is a lie.

You have given ZERO proof while not reading the article to know the tests the scientists did to determine age.

Which makes you a fool.

 

[progressive hunter]

If you actually took the time to READ THE ARTICLE, you will see that scientists already did do the research and tests to determine the age.

If they had not done that they wouldn't have been able to come up with a number for the age.

If you had not been so incredibly lazy, you would have read the article that includes the tests they did to determine the age.

Now, go read the article to find out the tests they did and how they determined the age.

Meanwhile, give me your proof that the age is a lie.

You have given ZERO proof while not reading the article to know the tests the scientists did to determine age.

Which makes you a fool.

once you give me proof the age is real,, a test with a predetermined date isnt a real test,,

the first rule of science is observation,, when did they observe something 193 million yrs ago??

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

is only just now being discovered and theorized in Pantagonia


Bwaaaahhhaaaaaa.....Not that back in 1993 they were theorizing that the dinosaurs moved in herds..noooooo...Bwaaaahhhaaaaaa... Egad, that was just too ******* funny...Please stop, before you really make a fool out of yourself..

The recent discovery of a cache of Mosasaurus eggs in Pantagonia constitutes actual physical proof that dinosaurs lived in herds.
I wish I'd said it first but Jurassic Park was not a documentary!

You'd better check your dictionary and discover the difference between proof and supposition, dumb
******.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

once you give me proof the age is real,, a test with a predetermined date isnt a real test,,

the first rule of science is observation,, when did they observe something 193 million yrs ago??

What makes you imagine the date of those dinosaur eggs was made with a predetermined
age in mind? That's very goofy.

 

[progressive hunter]

What makes you imagine the date of those dinosaur eggs was made with a predetermined
age in mind? That's very goofy.

where did I say that,, in fact I was specific in my claim,, address that,,

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

where did I say that,, in fact I was specific in my claim,, address that,,

Your post #24 says that.
Where you get the idea that the dates determined by actual Paleontologists of Mosasaurus egs were "predetermined" is foolish and lunacy.

 

[progressive hunter]

Your post #24 says that.

not exactly,,
and after reading more of the article its worse than I thought, they didnt even test, they looked at rocks/minerals next to them and said yep 193 million yrs,,

biggest fraud ever,,

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

not exactly,,
and after reading more of the article its worse than I thought, they didnt even test, they looked at rocks/minerals next to them and said yep 193 million yrs,,

biggest fraud ever,,

How about quoting some of the exact text that leads you to that incredibly ignorant conclusion.

Take your time. I realize you can't be too anxious to prove what a lying dimwit you are

 

[progressive hunter]

How about quoting some of the exact text that leads you to that incredibly ignorant conclusion.

I just did,,

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

I just did,,

You did no such thing, liar! Maybe you don't know what it means
to quote exact text?

 

[progressive hunter]

You did no such thing, liar! Maybe you don't know what it means
to quote exact text?

" they looked at minerals next to the eggs and determined 193 million yrs"

not exact but close,, in other words they didnt test but guessed,,

 

[bodecea]

other than the false claim of 193 million yrs this is pretty cool,, not sure why its a surprise they lived in herds,, a lot of animals did,,

How is 193 million years a false claim?

 

[progressive hunter]

How is 193 million years a false claim?

it lacks proof,,
and as stated in the article the just guessed,,

 

[bodecea]

its their claim,, they need to prove it not me,, just saying something doesnt make it true,,
and we all know carbon dating is flawed and not trustworthy because it was designed to give a pre determined result,,

Who says carbon dating is flawed? BTW they don't use carbon dating for fossils.......

 

[progressive hunter]

Who says carbon dating is flawed? BTW they don't use carbon dating for fossils.......

the results say its flawed but they do use it for the rocks they use to determine fossil ages,,

 

[bodecea]

Is that the same science that is used to determine that men with tits are women?

All women AND men have tits. Didn't you know that?

 

[progressive hunter]

All women AND men have tits. Didn't you know that?

some men have tits that arent really tits,,

 

[bodecea]

" they looked at minerals next to the eggs and determined 193 million yrs"

not exact but close,, in other words they didnt test but guessed,,

No, they used radioactive dating of the minerals. Talk about someone who isn't knowledgable and yet is trying to mansplain all this.....