92 State Legislators Sign Letter Demanding 50-State Election Audit, Decertification

[Lastamender]

People are serious about election integrity. It's a good start.

BREAKING: 92 State Legislators Sign Letter Demanding 50-State Election Audit, Decertification

"We call on each state to decertify its electors where it has been shown the elections were certified prematurely and inaccurately."

nationalfile.com

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

People are serious about election integrity. It's a good start.

BREAKING: 92 State Legislators Sign Letter Demanding 50-State Election Audit, Decertification

"We call on each state to decertify its electors where it has been shown the elections were certified prematurely and inaccurately."

nationalfile.com

So that's what? Almost 2 legislators per state "demanding" an audit and decertification a YEAR after the election based on a fraudulent audit in one state...based on no evidence.
Hint...we'll laugh just as hard now as we did back in January.

 

[occupied]

People are serious about election integrity. It's a good start.

BREAKING: 92 State Legislators Sign Letter Demanding 50-State Election Audit, Decertification

"We call on each state to decertify its electors where it has been shown the elections were certified prematurely and inaccurately."

nationalfile.com

That's like 92 used car salesmen releasing a statement.

 

[BlindBoo]

I call on everyone of them to resign. They are a disgrace to the entire country and everyone who has ever lived as an American.

 

[badger2]

So that's what? Almost 2 legislators per state "demanding" an audit and decertification a YEAR after the election based on a fraudulent audit in one state...based on no evidence.
Hint...we'll laugh just as hard now as we did back in January.

IQs that legitimately voted are no laughing matter.

 

[MisterBeale]

I call on everyone of them to resign. They are a disgrace to the entire country and everyone who has ever lived as an American.

How very authoritarian of you.

They still represent the electorate.

So you don't like them, or their point of view, they still represent a significant portion of the nation. I guess that is a portion of the nation you would just prefer didn't exist. . .You want that portion of the nation rounded up and put into re-education camps next, is that it?

You want them denied representation in government, is that it?

What if the shoe were on the other foot, in fact, at one time, it was.

I remember learning about the "red scare" of the 1950's. When, at one time, it was basically illegal to identify as a communist politically. In retrospect, having your career destroyed over one's political belief's, that is insane. Haven't we learned anything?

You may believe their politics are insane, stupid, or even dangerous. . . but that is no reason to oppress them, or marginalize them.

We have been here before, we will get beyond this. But we can't do it by destroying what the nation is.

 

[Lastamender]

So that's what? Almost 2 legislators per state "demanding" an audit and decertification a YEAR after the election based on a fraudulent audit in one state...based on no evidence.
Hint...we'll laugh just as hard now as we did back in January.

Election integrity? You want to know what that is? I do. AZ. proved there is none.

 

[Lastamender]

I call on everyone of them to resign. They are a disgrace to the entire country and everyone who has ever lived as an American.

You are far from an expert in anything American.

 

[occupied]

How very authoritarian of you.

They still represent the electorate.

So you don't like them, or their point of view, they still represent a significant portion of the nation. I guess that is a portion of the nation you would just prefer didn't exist. . .You want that portion of the nation rounded up and put into re-education camps next, is that it?

You want them denied representation in government, is that it?

What if the shoe were on the other foot, in fact, at one time, it was.

I remember learning about the "red scare" of the 1950's. When, at one time, it was basically illegal to identify as a communist politically. In retrospect, having your career destroyed over one's political belief's, that is insane. Haven't we learned anything?

You may believe their politics are insane, stupid, or even dangerous. . . but that is no reason to oppress them, or marginalize them.

We have been here before, we will get beyond this. But we can't do it by destroying what the nation is.

Do you know what taking the high road in a political knife fight gets you? It gets you stabbed that's what.

 

[BlindBoo]

How very authoritarian of you.

They still represent the electorate.

So you don't like them, or their point of view, they still represent a significant portion of the nation. I guess that is a portion of the nation you would just prefer didn't exist. . .You want that portion of the nation rounded up and put into re-education camps next, is that it?

You want them denied representation in government, is that it?

What if the shoe were on the other foot, in fact, at one time, it was.

I remember learning about the "red scare" of the 1950's. When, at one time, it was basically illegal to identify as a communist politically. In retrospect, having your career destroyed over one's political belief's, that is insane. Haven't we learned anything?

You may believe their politics are insane, stupid, or even dangerous. . . but that is no reason to oppress them, or marginalize them.

We have been here before, we will get beyond this. But we can't do it by destroying what the nation is.

What new evidence did they present? They represent a malignancy on our Democracy and Constitution. We have laws that their predecessors passed in every single state to deal with charges of election fraud. We have no laws that allow a desertification and certainly not a desertification based on hearsay and out right falsehoods that do not follow the established rule of law. No mob rule.

 

[toobfreak]

So that's what? Almost 2 legislators per state "demanding" an audit and decertification

Not enough for you Jack?

a YEAR after the election

Funny how everything the courts do takes YEARS AND YEARS, yet Trump was only given 35 days.

based on a fraudulent audit in one state...

One state audited, one state found fraudulent. Can't think of a better reason to audit more.

That's like 92 used car salesmen releasing a statement.

So state legislators are no better than used car salesmen.

I call on everyone of them to resign. They are a disgrace to the entire country and everyone who has ever lived as an American.

Yes. Anyone questioning the outcome of an election and wanting election integrity is a disgrace!

Except if you are a democrat spending 30 million and three years trying to prove Russia kept Hillary from winning!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

People are serious about election integrity. It's a good start.

BREAKING: 92 State Legislators Sign Letter Demanding 50-State Election Audit, Decertification

"We call on each state to decertify its electors where it has been shown the elections were certified prematurely and inaccurately."

nationalfile.com

Currently, there are 7,383 state legislators in the United States....92 of them signed your stupid fucking letter....that is a whopping 1.2% of the toatl....

That is a great start....only took 11 months to get up to 1.2% at this rate you will have enough by 2150!

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Currently, there are 7,383 state legislators in the United States....92 of them signed your stupid fucking letter....that is a whopping 1.2% of the toatl....

That is a great start....only took 11 months to get up to 1.2% at this rate you will have enough by 2150!

you mean 0.003%?

Your math sucks.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I call on everyone of them to resign.

Anyone that won office in the 2020 election that claims it was not valid should stepdown since they are saying their own wins were not valid

 

[Harpy Eagle]

you mean 0.003%?

Your math sucks.

No, I mean 1.25%....

dude you just owned yourself.

I misread the 92 and put 19, but even that is 0.26% which I rounded up.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

No, I mean 1.25%....

dude you just owned yourself.

I misread the 92 and put 19, but even that is 0.26% which I rounded up.

How do you misread 92 from 19?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

How do you misread 92 from 19?

really more of a misremembered

either way, my math was correct and you were way the fuck off.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

really more of a misremembered

either way, my math was correct and you were way the fuck off.

one percent of 7,000 is 70. How is 19 3% of 7,000?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

one percent of 7,000 is 70. How is 19 3% of 7,000?

I said 0.3%, not 3%.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Not enough for you Jack?


Funny how everything the courts do takes YEARS AND YEARS, yet Trump was only given 35 days.


One state audited, one state found fraudulent. Can't think of a better reason to audit more.


So state legislators are no better than used car salesmen.


Yes. Anyone questioning the outcome of an election and wanting election integrity is a disgrace!

Except if you are a democrat spending 30 million and three years trying to prove Russia kept Hillary from winning!

1.7 idiots in each state??? No, that doesn't even amount to the two old guys sitting in the balcony of the Muppets Show.
No fraud found Freaky. Can't think of a better reason for you to just let it go.
A disgrace? Nah..I'd say you're way beyond a disgrace. You're a whiny sore loser.