9/11 Conspiracy

[n0spam4me]

Did anybody actually bother to look at the video I posted?
Did anybody actually consider the BTU/gallon of fuel available?
Did anybody actually consider that the argument "the tower wall was mostly glass" was totally bogus given the proof available from the blueprints.

The argument is stated "Islam destroyed the towers"
OK, by what means were the towers destroyed? The jet fuel has been shown to have had insufficient energy to cause the collapse, so what did cause the complete & total destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7?

 

[n0spam4me]

OK, so NOBODY is actually going to take the time to look up how many BTU/gallon of jet fuel is available, NOBODY is going to look up the fact that the wall(s) of the WTC towers were composed of more than 2/3 steel by area.

 

[daws101]

Did anybody actually bother to look at the video I posted?
Did anybody actually consider the BTU/gallon of fuel available?
Did anybody actually consider that the argument "the tower wall was mostly glass" was totally bogus given the proof available from the blueprints.

The argument is stated "Islam destroyed the towers"
OK, by what means were the towers destroyed? The jet fuel has been shown to have had insufficient energy to cause the collapse, so what did cause the complete & total destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7?

asked answered and debunked ...next..

 

[SAYIT]

OK, so NOBODY is actually going to take the time to look up how many BTU/gallon of jet fuel is available, NOBODY is going to look up the fact that the wall(s) of the WTC towers were composed of more than 2/3 steel by area.

Now you got it, Spammy. You blew whatever real scientific creds you had when you twice ran away from Gamelon and hid. Now you get no satisfaction 'cause you got nutin'. Nobody wants to play "Spammyscience" with you, Princess.

 

[daws101]

I think a spammy tantrum is a brewin'!
god will be mentioned shortly....

 

[SAYIT]

I think a spammy tantrum is a brewin'! god will be mentioned shortly....

I'm putting on my Hazmat suit as we speak.

 

[daws101]

I think a spammy tantrum is a brewin'! god will be mentioned shortly....

I'm putting on my Hazmat suit as we speak.

 

[n0spam4me]

apparently, personal attack suffices as rebuttal in some circles.

have fun kiddies

 

[daws101]

apparently, personal attack suffices as rebuttal in some circles.

have fun kiddies

spammy pulls up his skirt and runs away again!

 

[n0spam4me]

I'm here and willing to discuss the issues, its the opposition that has degenerated into personal attack as a substitute for actual debate.

 

[daws101]

I'm here and willing to discuss the issues, its the opposition that has degenerated into personal attack as a substitute for actual debate.

haven't you left yet?

 

[n0spam4me]

For the casual lurker
please note that personal attack is no substitute for debate.

I have provided facts & data.

If you want to discuss the facts, Please, lets get on with it,
but personal attack serves no purpose at all here.

A bit of additional data on this subject:
WTC7 s Free Fall Page 13 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[daws101]

For the casual lurker
please note that personal attack is no substitute for debate.

I have provided facts & data.

If you want to discuss the facts, Please, lets get on with it,
but personal attack serves no purpose at all here.

A bit of additional data on this subject:
WTC7 s Free Fall Page 13 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

to all sane readers the facts and data spammy say he's provided are the same debunked nonsense in the link he's posted.....

 

[n0spam4me]

debunked nonsense

OK, so you can point to a post where somebody presents facts in rebuttal to what I assert? Please bring it.....

 

[daws101]

pammy's favorite proclamation "there were no planes used on 911..."

911 aircraft debris from flight 11 175 - Bing Images

 

[n0spam4me]

The link in post # 655 points to a search that contains an assortment of pictures, some from the alleged "FLT77" crash, & some from events that were not even 9/11/2001. The real problem here is the fact, and it is a fact, that there isn't any proper documentation for any of the 4 alleged airliner crashes, has any bit been forensically identified and this data published?

So far, any attempt to show that there were actual airliners used in the attack, has been an exercise in futility. there is insufficient evidence to confirm any of the alleged airliners.

 

[daws101]

The link in post # 655 points to a search that contains an assortment of pictures, some from the alleged "FLT77" crash, & some from events that were not even 9/11/2001. The real problem here is the fact, and it is a fact, that there isn't any proper documentation for any of the 4 alleged airliner crashes, has any bit been forensically identified and this data published?

So far, any attempt to show that there were actual airliners used in the attack, has been an exercise in futility. there is insufficient evidence to confirm any of the alleged airliners.

bullshit spammy! there are enough photos flight 77 and all the others to prove beyond doubt (for any sane person ) that the chrashes happened.'
on the other hand, you are trying to prove a negative .
what that means is you have no evidence proving it did not happen.

Cockpit recorders
According to the 9/11 Commission Report, the cockpit voice recorders (CVR) or flight data recorders (FDR), or "black boxes", from Flights 11 and 175 were not recovered from the remains of the WTC attack; however, two men, Michael Bellone and Nicholas DeMasi, who worked extensively in the wreckage of the World Trade Center, said in the book Behind-The-Scenes: Ground Zero[177] that they helped federal agents find three of the four "black boxes" from the jetliners:[178][179]

At one point, I was assigned to take Federal Agents around the site to search for the black boxes from the planes. We were getting ready to go out. My ATV was parked at the top of the stairs at the Brooks Brothers entrance area. We loaded up about a million dollars worth of equipment and strapped it into the ATV. There were a total of four black boxes. We found three.[180]


The cockpit voice recorder from Flight 77 was heavily damaged from the impact and resulting fire.
According to the 9/11 Commission Report, both black boxes from Flight 77 and both black boxes from Flight 93 were recovered. However, the CVR from Flight 77 was said to be too damaged to yield any data. On April 18, 2002, the FBI allowed the families of victims from Flight 93 to listen to the voice recordings.[181] In April 2006, a transcript of the CVR was released as part of the Zacarias Moussaoui trial.[182]

9 11 conspiracy theories - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[daws101]

to prove you are, as always, talking out your ass....flight 77 crash photos - Bing Images

 

[n0spam4me]

to prove you are, as always, talking out your ass....flight 77 crash photos - Bing Images

That link is yet another internet search engine collection of pix and as such it includes pictures that have nothing at all to do with "FLT77". Additionally mere pictures do NOT constitute DOCUMENTATION. How is it known that any of the bits in the pictures are actually fragments of "FLT77"?

 

[daws101]

to prove you are, as always, talking out your ass....flight 77 crash photos - Bing Images

That link is yet another internet search engine collection of pix and as such it includes pictures that have nothing at all to do with "FLT77". Additionally mere pictures do NOT constitute DOCUMENTATION. How is it known that any of the bits in the pictures are actually fragments of "FLT77"?

more BullShit rationalizing ...


Documentation is a set of documents provided on paper, or online, or on digital or analog media, such as audio tape or CDs. Example are user guides, white papers, on-line help, quick-reference guides. It is becoming less common to see paper (hard-copy) documentation. Documentation is distributed via websites, software products, and other on-line applications.

Professionals educated in this field are termed documentalists. This field changed its name to information science in 1968, but some uses of the term documentation still exists and there have been efforts to reintroduce the term documentation as a field of study.



Contents
[hide]

• 1 Principles for producing documentation
  • 1.1 Guidelines
  • 1.2 Procedures and techniques
• 2 Producing documentation
  • 2.1 Specializing documentation
  • 2.2 Indexing
• 3 Documentation in computer science
  • 3.1 Tools for documenting software
• 4 Documentation in criminal justice
• 5 Notes
• 6 See also
• 7 External links

Principles for producing documentation[edit]
While associated ISO standards are not easily available publicly, a guide from other sources for this topic may serve the purpose [1], [2],.[3] David Berger has provided several principles of document writing, regarding the terms used, procedure numbering and even lengths of sentences, etc.[4]

Guidelines[edit]
The following is a list of guides dealing with each specific field and type:

• documentation in health care [5]
• thesis writing [6], [7], [8]
  Further information: Dissertation
• papers for academic journal publishing (i.e. Journal of Food Science [9] and Analytical Chemistry [10])

Procedures and techniques[edit]
The procedures of documentation vary from one sector, or one type, to another. In general, these may involve document drafting, formatting, submitting, reviewing, approving, distributing, repositing and tracking, etc., and are convened by associated SOPs in a regulatory industry [11], [12], [13],.[14]

Producing documentation[edit]
Technical writers and corporate communicators are professionals whose field and work is documentation. Ideally, technical writers have a background in both the subject matter and also in writing and managing content (information architecture). Technical writers more commonly collaborate with subject matter experts (SMEs), such as engineers, medical professionals, or other types of clients to define and then create content (documentation) that meets the user's needs. Corporate communications includes other types of written documentation that is required for most companies.

Specializing documentation[edit]

• Marketing Communications (MarCom): MarCom writers endeavor to convey the company's value proposition through a variety of print, electronic, and social media. This area of corporate writing is often engaged in responding to proposals.
• Technical Communication (TechCom): Technical writers document a company's project or service. Technical publication include user guides, installation manuals, and troubleshooting/repair/replace procedures.
• Legal Writing: This type of documentation is often prepared by attorneys or paralegals who could be in private practice or retained as corporate council.
• Compliance documentation: This type of documentation codifies Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), for any regulatory compliance needs, as for safety approval, taxation, financing, technical approval, etc.

Indexing[edit]

• Index (database)