9/11 Conspiracy

We know those buildings were hit by large, fast-moving passenger jets.

If you know so much why don't you tell us how much the building deflected due to the impact?

psik
another useless fact .
We know those buildings were hit by large, fast-moving passenger jets.

If you know so much why don't you tell us how much the building deflected due to the impact?

psik
Why impact would have the same effect as explosives.
 
another useless fact .

Why impact would have the same effect as explosives.


That is the nature of believers in the 9/11 Religion. Can't do the physics well enough to figure out what is relevant.

If it is useless then why did the NIST include a graph of the deflection and four minute oscillation after the impact?

You are free to explain how explosives could be applied to produce the effect and yet not be noticed as an explosion.

psik
 
another useless fact .

Why impact would have the same effect as explosives.


That is the nature of believers in the 9/11 Religion. Can't do the physics well enough to figure out what is relevant.

If it is useless then why did the NIST include a graph of the deflection and four minute oscillation after the impact?

You are free to explain how explosives could be applied to produce the effect and yet not be noticed as an explosion.

psik
it's a false dilemma...
the deflection and oscillation are effect not CAUSE. NIST included all the info it had it's s.o.p.

oscillation
[ ˌäsəˈlāSHən ]
http://www.usmessageboard.com/javascript:void(0)
NOUN
noun: oscillation · plural noun: oscillations
  1. movement back and forth at a regular speed:
    "the natural oscillation of a spring
in other words, if we are talking about seven or 1 and 2 they got their bell rung.
nothing nefarious about it.
 
it's a false dilemma...
the deflection and oscillation are effect not CAUSE. NIST included all the info it had it's s.o.p.

But did the NIST try to get all of the information it needed to analyse the problem?

In three places in the NIST report they admit that they needed the distribution of weight to analyse the effect of the impact. But they never even specify the total amount of concrete but give that specification for the steel in three places. So we do not have distribution of mass for steel and concrete to this day.

The NIST report is scientifically schizoid. But considering that the Empire State Building was 70 years old on 9/11 and 50 skyscrapers over 1000 feet tall have been built around the world since 9/11 this should not be a difficult problem.

So no matter what the truth is it should have been resolved in 2002.

That is the problem of the 9/11 Affair. Who actually did what and why is irrelevant.

Physics is Forever! But since 9/11 Physics is History! :badgrin:

psik
 
it's a false dilemma...
the deflection and oscillation are effect not CAUSE. NIST included all the info it had it's s.o.p.

But did the NIST try to get all of the information it needed to analyse the problem?

In three places in the NIST report they admit that they needed the distribution of weight to analyse the effect of the impact. But they never even specify the total amount of concrete but give that specification for the steel in three places. So we do not have distribution of mass for steel and concrete to this day.

The NIST report is scientifically schizoid. But considering that the Empire State Building was 70 years old on 9/11 and 50 skyscrapers over 1000 feet tall have been built around the world since 9/11 this should not be a difficult problem.

So no matter what the truth is it should have been resolved in 2002.

That is the problem of the 9/11 Affair. Who actually did what and why is irrelevant.

Physics is Forever! But since 9/11 Physics is History! :badgrin:

psik
you're talking a lot but not saying anything.
 
You are free to explain how explosives could be applied to produce the effect and yet not be noticed as an explosion.

Wait ... are you now suggesting that some nefarious cabal managed to prep those buildings for demo without anyone noticing, convince some Jihadists to slam a couple of passenger jets into them at high speed and then initiate a CD?
 
You are free to explain how explosives could be applied to produce the effect and yet not be noticed as an explosion.

Wait ... are you now suggesting that some nefarious cabal managed to prep those buildings for demo without anyone noticing, convince some Jihadists to slam a couple of passenger jets into them at high speed and then initiate a CD?
yes that and other fantasies...
 
Pedestrianism Plasticity

During the Roman Empire, Arabs were involved in cooking up coordinated strikes that were deemed as acts of vagrant terror (this suggestion was linked to the story of Spartacus).

During the British Empire, once again, Arabia was involved in strikes against the colonial regime (this suggestion was linked to the story of T.E. Lawrence).

Now, in the time of the American Empire, we saw that on 9/11, Arabs (the Taliban) coordinated a devastating strike against the World Trade Center in New York City. This time, the linked characters were President Bush and the unnamed 'civil servant' (the Wall Street stockbroker).

Why are Arabs so sensitive to the problems of empire? It seems that 9/11 was certainly a signpost that modern era consumerism (i.e., global free market) has yielded various levels of discontentment and power games.

Was 9/11 the first signal that there is a modern empire economics related 'social customs' disease?

I think that the surprising antidote is populism dialogue. Why not hoist the fictional American comic book superhero Captain America (Marvel Comics), a modern civilization symbol of pedestrianism festivity, as the valuable totem of 'negotiations narcotics?'



:afro:

Captain America (Marvel Comics)


poster.jpg
 
Pedestrianism Plasticity

During the Roman Empire, Arabs were involved in cooking up coordinated strikes that were deemed as acts of vagrant terror (this suggestion was linked to the story of Spartacus).

During the British Empire, once again, Arabia was involved in strikes against the colonial regime (this suggestion was linked to the story of T.E. Lawrence).

Now, in the time of the American Empire, we saw that on 9/11, Arabs (the Taliban) coordinated a devastating strike against the World Trade Center in New York City. This time, the linked characters were President Bush and the unnamed 'civil servant' (the Wall Street stockbroker).

Why are Arabs so sensitive to the problems of empire? It seems that 9/11 was certainly a signpost that modern era consumerism (i.e., global free market) has yielded various levels of discontentment and power games.

Was 9/11 the first signal that there is a modern empire economics related 'social customs' disease?

I think that the surprising antidote is populism dialogue. Why not hoist the fictional American comic book superhero Captain America (Marvel Comics), a modern civilization symbol of pedestrianism festivity, as the valuable totem of 'negotiations narcotics?'



:afro:

Captain America (Marvel Comics)


View attachment 44683
this moment of nonsense was brought to you by Xanax
 
I am confused------what did arabs have to do with SPARTACUS???
does Kirk Douglas know???
 

Forum List

Back
Top