Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah, Iām intimately familiar with the fact that costs can be shifted, however shifted costs donāt mean that those costs VANISH, theyāre still there and what youāre proposing doesnāt solve the problem since it doesnāt address the root cause of rising costs, it EXACERBATES them by further disconnecting the consumer from the cost of service and encouraging OVER-CONSUMPTION, insufficient supply meet artificially induced increased demand.What do you do about the problem of medical care over-consumption and under-supply resulting in price inflation thatās already happening under existing government health insurance systems? What about the costs associated with implementing such a system, just go further into debt to fund it?In the richest nation on earth. Thatās a lot of poor suffering Americans.
What a great country!
Pandemic Swells Medicaid Enrollment to 80 Million People, a āHigh-Water Markā
Pretty good indication we need universal healthcare like the UK, Europe, Scandinavia, Israel, Canada, Austrailia and the Gulf States.
The countries/continents you pointed out donāt carry our current debt and structural deficit burdens, not to mention the fact that theyāre in part relying on U.S. obligations to provide for their national defense and thus carry a lower burden in that department as well. They also have their own scarcity issues of medical care along with the fact that they enjoy lower drug prices thanks the fact that American consumers shoulder the lions share of the burden of pharma R & D costs for them.
āUniversal careā isnāt the silver bullet that some make it out to be, there are A LOT of questions that need to be addressed before traveling down that road.
Do you know what cost shifting is? Have you noticed private insurance premiums going up? You are already paying for seniors, indigents and million dollar premature infants.
Its all about priorities or maybe we really aren't smart enough or compassionate enough to pull it off.
Lots more Medicaid coming across the border
Over consumption is rampant in populations that already have āuniversal careā namely MEDICAID, that drives up costs for everybody else, the consumer is completely disconnected from the cost of service. As far as Administrative costs itās GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE in the market place that are the principle drivers of those and younger populations eventually become OLDER populations and thus costs increase over time, especially when we have to be concerned about huge generations like millenials.Yeah, Iām intimately familiar with the fact that costs can be shifted, however shifted costs donāt mean that those costs VANISH, theyāre still there and what youāre proposing doesnāt solve the problem since it doesnāt address the root cause of rising costs, it EXACERBATES them by further disconnecting the consumer from the cost of service and encouraging OVER-CONSUMPTION, insufficient supply meet artificially induced increased demand.What do you do about the problem of medical care over-consumption and under-supply resulting in price inflation thatās already happening under existing government health insurance systems? What about the costs associated with implementing such a system, just go further into debt to fund it?In the richest nation on earth. Thatās a lot of poor suffering Americans.
What a great country!
Pandemic Swells Medicaid Enrollment to 80 Million People, a āHigh-Water Markā
Pretty good indication we need universal healthcare like the UK, Europe, Scandinavia, Israel, Canada, Austrailia and the Gulf States.
The countries/continents you pointed out donāt carry our current debt and structural deficit burdens, not to mention the fact that theyāre in part relying on U.S. obligations to provide for their national defense and thus carry a lower burden in that department as well. They also have their own scarcity issues of medical care along with the fact that they enjoy lower drug prices thanks the fact that American consumers shoulder the lions share of the burden of pharma R & D costs for them.
āUniversal careā isnāt the silver bullet that some make it out to be, there are A LOT of questions that need to be addressed before traveling down that road.
Do you know what cost shifting is? Have you noticed private insurance premiums going up? You are already paying for seniors, indigents and million dollar premature infants.
Its all about priorities or maybe we really aren't smart enough or compassionate enough to pull it off.
25 -30% of costs goes into administrative costs and paperwork. Over consumption? Nope. Healthy young families use less than 40% of the healthcare dollar.. 60% goes to seniors , the chroically ill and premature babies.
Besides, doctors prefer to treat you early than wait until its a full blown conflagration... Besides, its cheaper and has a better success rate.
America is already history.Without a massive domestic conflict....America is history
Bad news Bootney, Valhalla went under centuries ago, all the deficit spending on partying finally destroyed its currency and left the Norse Gods without the means to fund the āfreeā Valkyrie Transport.America is already history.Without a massive domestic conflict....America is history
All I can do now is preserve Texas and I will do so or go to Valhalla.
View attachment 503210
Are they? Why arenāt they being enacted? He has total control of Congress. Please wake up. Heās no different from dumb Don.Not true at all. Bidenās tax plans are well known.And the Ds will gladly support that.Planning more tax cuts for the billionaires no doubt.And what are your beloved Rs doing about this?
It's all they know.
You do know Joe kept Donās tax cut right?
Really? You might want to try objectively reading the post.Yet based on the recent ProPublica report, itās possible that you had a higher effective tax rate than the top 25 billionaires in the country. So instead of giving you a tax cut, what Trump really should have given you is access to those billionaires armies of attorneyās, accountants, financial advisors and lobbyists.I received a tax cut from Trump and Iām not a billionaire. Care to explain?Planning more tax cuts for the billionaires no doubt.And what are your beloved Rs doing about this?
It's all they know.
So much for our āprogressiveā tax code, huh?
Hahahahahaha. You have nothing.
Exactly, same corrupt system, different brand label on the box.Are they? Why arenāt they being enacted? He has total control of Congress. Please wake up. Heās no different from dumb Don.Not true at all. Bidenās tax plans are well known.And the Ds will gladly support that.Planning more tax cuts for the billionaires no doubt.And what are your beloved Rs doing about this?
It's all they know.
You do know Joe kept Donās tax cut right?
Exactly and the smoke and mirrors op works perfectly on D partisans. Their blind to the truth.Yes, Bidenās ātax plansā are well known, theyāre well known as āsmoke and mirrorsā, he just wants to raise top rates without doing much of anything to address all the means in our monstrosity known as the Federal Tax Code that those exposed to those top rates use to avoid paying them.Not true at all. Bidenās tax plans are well known.And the Ds will gladly support that.Planning more tax cuts for the billionaires no doubt.And what are your beloved Rs doing about this?
It's all they know.
You do know Joe kept Donās tax cut right?
They donāt consider that point or they donāt care.What if you haven't got and can't get a job?Working a job and paying for our own healthcare.And what are your beloved Rs doing about this?The democrats won't rest till it is 100% of Americans, except for those in government. No, they will have better.In the richest nation on earth. Thatās a lot of poor suffering Americans.
What a great country!
Pandemic Swells Medicaid Enrollment to 80 Million People, a āHigh-Water Markā
We know Joe wonāt do that, just as Don and Ears wouldnāt do it. Joe said heād veto such a bill, because heās owned by the ultra wealthy and they run the show. Heās just a lackey, like most recent presidents.In the richest nation on earth. Thatās a lot of poor suffering Americans.
What a great country!
Pandemic Swells Medicaid Enrollment to 80 Million People, a āHigh-Water Markā
Pretty good indication we need universal healthcare like the UK, Europe, Scandinavia, Israel, Canada, Austrailia and the Gulf States.
Please wake up. Learn to despise the Ds like you do the Rs. Theyāre the same after all.Not true at all. Bidenās tax plans are well known.And the Ds will gladly support that.Planning more tax cuts for the billionaires no doubt.And what are your beloved Rs doing about this?
It's all they know.
You do know Joe kept Donās tax cut right?
Over consumption is rampant in populations that already have āuniversal careā namely MEDICAID, that drives up costs for everybody else, the consumer is completely disconnected from the cost of service. As far as Administrative costs itās GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE in the market place that are the principle drivers of those and younger populations eventually become OLDER populations and thus costs increase over time, especially when we have to be concerned about huge generations like millenials.Yeah, Iām intimately familiar with the fact that costs can be shifted, however shifted costs donāt mean that those costs VANISH, theyāre still there and what youāre proposing doesnāt solve the problem since it doesnāt address the root cause of rising costs, it EXACERBATES them by further disconnecting the consumer from the cost of service and encouraging OVER-CONSUMPTION, insufficient supply meet artificially induced increased demand.What do you do about the problem of medical care over-consumption and under-supply resulting in price inflation thatās already happening under existing government health insurance systems? What about the costs associated with implementing such a system, just go further into debt to fund it?In the richest nation on earth. Thatās a lot of poor suffering Americans.
What a great country!
Pandemic Swells Medicaid Enrollment to 80 Million People, a āHigh-Water Markā
Pretty good indication we need universal healthcare like the UK, Europe, Scandinavia, Israel, Canada, Austrailia and the Gulf States.
The countries/continents you pointed out donāt carry our current debt and structural deficit burdens, not to mention the fact that theyāre in part relying on U.S. obligations to provide for their national defense and thus carry a lower burden in that department as well. They also have their own scarcity issues of medical care along with the fact that they enjoy lower drug prices thanks the fact that American consumers shoulder the lions share of the burden of pharma R & D costs for them.
āUniversal careā isnāt the silver bullet that some make it out to be, there are A LOT of questions that need to be addressed before traveling down that road.
Do you know what cost shifting is? Have you noticed private insurance premiums going up? You are already paying for seniors, indigents and million dollar premature infants.
Its all about priorities or maybe we really aren't smart enough or compassionate enough to pull it off.
25 -30% of costs goes into administrative costs and paperwork. Over consumption? Nope. Healthy young families use less than 40% of the healthcare dollar.. 60% goes to seniors , the chroically ill and premature babies.
Besides, doctors prefer to treat you early than wait until its a full blown conflagration... Besides, its cheaper and has a better success rate.
You have to address that problem for any āuniversal healthcareā scheme to succeed in reducing overall costs while maintaining (or hopefully improving) the accessibility and quality of health care.
The system has to reconnect the consumer to the cost of service, MediCARE attempts to address that problem with gap insurance but the system is overly complicated and probably wonāt work with a system that covers the entire population. Along with that the system also has to lower the administrative burden thatās already been placed on it not just shift it to the Federal Bureacracy.
Some sort of premium sharing system is whatās called for, where the consumer actually sees a BILL every month that is commensurate with what they consume, I havenāt seen anything close to that in whatās been proposed. Along with that the system also has to lower the administrative burden thatās been placed on health care PROVIDERS, since theyāve been forced to often carry more administration costs than actual medical care costs. Lastly the system needs to address prescription drug costs which are out of control and the entire system is a MESS.
How about you paying your health care bills and I'll pay mine and you not be a greedy asshole that wants the government to take my money and give it to you?
How about you paying your health care bills and I'll pay mine and you not be a greedy asshole that wants the government to take my money and give it to you?
Cost shifting doesn't work that way..
Lots more Medicaid coming across the border
Prove it.
cis.org
You understand there are children in this country. Not all 320 million Americans are working age adults. Then theres our unemployable ghetto population created by the Democrat PartyLess than 150M working people out of 330M
You require a āhospital CEO or executiveā to āprove itā to you? How would that help your case for āuniversal healthcareā? How about instead you demand that politicians address the questions that Iāve raised and come up with a system that provides accessible, quality healthcare at a price thatās lower than the current one? Isnāt that what you want?Over consumption is rampant in populations that already have āuniversal careā namely MEDICAID, that drives up costs for everybody else, the consumer is completely disconnected from the cost of service. As far as Administrative costs itās GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE in the market place that are the principle drivers of those and younger populations eventually become OLDER populations and thus costs increase over time, especially when we have to be concerned about huge generations like millenials.Yeah, Iām intimately familiar with the fact that costs can be shifted, however shifted costs donāt mean that those costs VANISH, theyāre still there and what youāre proposing doesnāt solve the problem since it doesnāt address the root cause of rising costs, it EXACERBATES them by further disconnecting the consumer from the cost of service and encouraging OVER-CONSUMPTION, insufficient supply meet artificially induced increased demand.What do you do about the problem of medical care over-consumption and under-supply resulting in price inflation thatās already happening under existing government health insurance systems? What about the costs associated with implementing such a system, just go further into debt to fund it?In the richest nation on earth. Thatās a lot of poor suffering Americans.
What a great country!
Pandemic Swells Medicaid Enrollment to 80 Million People, a āHigh-Water Markā
Pretty good indication we need universal healthcare like the UK, Europe, Scandinavia, Israel, Canada, Austrailia and the Gulf States.
The countries/continents you pointed out donāt carry our current debt and structural deficit burdens, not to mention the fact that theyāre in part relying on U.S. obligations to provide for their national defense and thus carry a lower burden in that department as well. They also have their own scarcity issues of medical care along with the fact that they enjoy lower drug prices thanks the fact that American consumers shoulder the lions share of the burden of pharma R & D costs for them.
āUniversal careā isnāt the silver bullet that some make it out to be, there are A LOT of questions that need to be addressed before traveling down that road.
Do you know what cost shifting is? Have you noticed private insurance premiums going up? You are already paying for seniors, indigents and million dollar premature infants.
Its all about priorities or maybe we really aren't smart enough or compassionate enough to pull it off.
25 -30% of costs goes into administrative costs and paperwork. Over consumption? Nope. Healthy young families use less than 40% of the healthcare dollar.. 60% goes to seniors , the chroically ill and premature babies.
Besides, doctors prefer to treat you early than wait until its a full blown conflagration... Besides, its cheaper and has a better success rate.
You have to address that problem for any āuniversal healthcareā scheme to succeed in reducing overall costs while maintaining (or hopefully improving) the accessibility and quality of health care.
The system has to reconnect the consumer to the cost of service, MediCARE attempts to address that problem with gap insurance but the system is overly complicated and probably wonāt work with a system that covers the entire population. Along with that the system also has to lower the administrative burden thatās already been placed on it not just shift it to the Federal Bureacracy.
Some sort of premium sharing system is whatās called for, where the consumer actually sees a BILL every month that is commensurate with what they consume, I havenāt seen anything close to that in whatās been proposed. Along with that the system also has to lower the administrative burden thatās been placed on health care PROVIDERS, since theyāve been forced to often carry more administration costs than actual medical care costs. Lastly the system needs to address prescription drug costs which are out of control and the entire system is a MESS.
Prove it. Are you a hospital CEO or executive with one of the 800 pound gorillas?
