78% of America supports President Trump deporting illegal criminals.

[80zephyr]

What do they want?

Feds not shooting people in the back of the head would be a nice start.

Sick ***** like you enjoy that sort of thing so I doubt you’d understand.

Maybe if the Democrats in Minnesota would do their jobs, it would be as peacefully done as it is in other states.

 

[DonGlock26]

Once again, the Democrat party opposes the American people. Why are they actively attacking law enforcement to keep murderers and child rapists in their neighborhoods?’’

Because they hate America.

America voted to have the border sealed and the illegal aliens sent home.

 

[Nostra]

It would cause poltical problems for Red State governors, brown nose-tra.

Different tactics all together.

Dumb answer.

Try again. Not even close.

 

[candycorn]

Show me where you were against it.
You can't. So you won't.

From yesterday:

Post in thread 'Why Does ICE Continue to Arrest Persons Who Are Here Legally?'

Jan 25, 2026

People Iike me? You mean people who believe that federal law should be followed?

You didn’t on January 6.

I don’t care what color they are,

Sure....make me laugh harder.

if they are here illegally, they should be deported and attempt legal entry.

I agree.

My wife and her entire family are legal immigrants, so spare me about my lack of sympathy for immigrants. All of them have ZERO problem with what ICE is doing. Go figure.

More lies.

It has noting to do with the color of their skin. We have laws that must be followed and being non-white...

• candycorn

• 

 

[Nostra]

America voted to have the border sealed and the illegal aliens sent home.

Trump did one, and is doing the other.

That's what has the Cult going batcrap lunatic.

 

[Nostra]

View attachment 1211918

Doesn’t look like he’s fleeing brown nose-tra.

Where did I say he was fleeing, you idiot?

Quote me.

I say you are a lying sack of vermin shit.

Let's see the quote.

 

[Nostra]

To address the topic. Trump is now puttimh up

A majority of Americans disapprove of Trump in every multi-poll compilation by Real Clear Politics, a conservative website.

View attachment 1211922​

President Donald Trump Job Approval Ratings and Polls | RealClearPolling

Track President Trump's job approval with RealClearPolling. Gain valuable insights and stay informed on the latest ratings and political developments for a comprehensive view of the political landscape.

www.realclearpolling.com

President Trump Approval - Economy | RealClearPolling

President Trump Approval - Economy | RealClearPolling

www.realclearpolling.com

President Trump Job Approval - Foreign Policy | RealClearPolling

President Trump Job Approval - Foreign Policy | RealClearPolling

www.realclearpolling.com

President Trump Job Approval - Immigration | RealClearPolling

President Trump Job Approval - Immigration | RealClearPolling

www.realclearpolling.com

President Trump Job Approval - Inflation | RealClearPolling

President Trump Job Approval - Inflation | RealClearPolling

www.realclearpolling.com

President Trump Job Approval - Inflation | RealClearPolling

President Trump Job Approval - Inflation | RealClearPolling

www.realclearpolling.com

President Trump Approval - Crime | RealClearPolling

President Trump Approval - Crime | RealClearPolling

www.realclearpolling.com

President Trump Approval on Handling of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict | RealClearPolling

President Trump Approval on Handling of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict | RealClearPolling

www.realclearpolling.com

​

President Trump Approval on Handling of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict | RealClearPolling

President Trump Approval on Handling of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict | RealClearPolling

www.realclearpolling.com

Please identify your alternative, conflicting source of data.

What public surveys can you cite?

Cool story.

Now show some polls on what I actually said, Simp.



..

 

[candycorn]

Where did I say he was fleeing, you idiot?

Quote me.

I say you are a lying sack of vermin shit.

Let's see the quote.

So you’re saying he wasn’t fleeing?

The sad, pathetic “combat" vet protectionist says he was.

I wish you guys would get your lies straight.

 

[Nostra]

So you’re saying he wasn’t fleeing?

The sad, pathetic “combat" vet protectionist says he was.

I wish you guys would get your lies straight.

No quote, huh?

Makes you a lying sack.

 

[protectionist]

View attachment 1211917

Well, if it was accidentally triggered, that's not brutality.
It also isn't brutality to follow 60 years of police academy training that says regarding a suspect that has not yet been frisked, when the hand disappears, SHOOT, and shoot a lot.

So they didn't teach that in your public school huh ? Mine neither. That's why I'm surprised 100 of these numbskulls haven't gotten shot by now.

 

[Care4all]

Once again, the Democrat party opposes the American people. Why are they actively attacking law enforcement to keep murderers and child rapists in their neighborhoods?’’

Because they hate America.

what professional pollster did the poll? When was it done? How many people were polled? Was it a phone call poll or an internet poll? Who were polled... R vs. D vs. I? Male vs female? Young vs old?

 

[protectionist]

So you’re saying he wasn’t fleeing?

The sad, pathetic “combat" vet protectionist says he was.

I wish you guys would get your lies straight.

Where did I say he was fleeing ? Are you getting YOUR lies straight ?

 

[Care4all]

60 years of police academy training that says regarding a suspect that has not yet been frisked, when the hand disappears, SHOOT, and shoot a lot

Lets see that claim in the police training manual. I think it's a lie you made up.

 

[schmidlap]

Cool story.

Now show some polls on what I actually said,



..

So, you can cite no public surveys that contradict the corroborative polls I cited.

Of course, I already knew that.

 

[Nostra]

So, you can cite no public surveys that contradict the corroborative polls I cited.

Of course, I already knew that.

Why would I?

They have nothing to do with what I posted, Shitlips.

 

[Care4all]

Well, if it was accidentally triggered, that's not brutality.
It also isn't brutality to follow 60 years of police academy training that says regarding a suspect that has not yet been frisked, when the hand disappears, SHOOT, and shoot a lot.

So they didn't teach that in your public school huh ? Mine neither. That's why I'm surprised 100 of these numbskulls haven't gotten shot by now.

I looked it up and what you said is FALSE.
______

A/I Gemini

No, an officer cannot shoot simply because a suspect's hands are out of sight.
Under the Fourth Amendment and the landmark case Tennessee v. Garner, police may only use deadly force if they have probable cause to believe the suspect poses an immediate threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. Losing sight of a suspect's hands is a safety concern that justifies commands or physical restraint, but it does not automatically meet the legal threshold for lethal force.


The standard used is "objective reasonableness," established by the Supreme Court in Graham v. Connor. This means an officer's actions are judged based on what a "reasonable officer" would do in the same situation, without the benefit of 20/20 hindsight.


Courts look at three main factors:

• The severity of the crime.
• Whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to anyone.
• Whether the suspect is actively resisting or attempting to flee.

An officer must perceive an actual, immediate danger—not just a possibility—before using deadly force. Simply hiding one's hands is considered a "suspicious" or "furtive" movement that justifies drawing a weapon or giving loud commands, but it isn't enough to pull the trigger on its own.

 

[schmidlap]

Why would I?

They have nothing to do with what I posted, Shitlips.

As noted, you cannot conjure up any public surveys that reflect your mindless devotion,

​

 

[22lcidw]

From yesterday:

View attachment 1211946

Post in thread 'Why Does ICE Continue to Arrest Persons Who Are Here Legally?'

Jan 25, 2026

People Iike me? You mean people who believe that federal law should be followed?

You didn’t on January 6.

I don’t care what color they are,

Sure....make me laugh harder.

if they are here illegally, they should be deported and attempt legal entry.

I agree.

My wife and her entire family are legal immigrants, so spare me about my lack of sympathy for immigrants. All of them have ZERO problem with what ICE is doing. Go figure.

More lies.

It has noting to do with the color of their skin. We have laws that must be followed and being non-white...

• candycorn

• 

It is very possible if things do not go your way that you guys will eventually do a real January 6.

 

[protectionist]

Lets see that claim in the police training manual. I think it's a lie you made up.

You can think anything you want. One court case after another have upheld it.
(Terrence Crutcher, Philando Castille, Daniel Shaver, et al)

The fact that you didn't know this, shows how inept our educational system is. What could be more important to teach than how to stay alive in a police confrontation ? Reason they don't teach it, is because the whole system is run by leftwing liberals who, like you, are clueless about guns & law enforcement.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

What do they want?

Feds not shooting people in the back of the head would be a nice start.

Sick ***** like you enjoy that sort of thing so I doubt you’d understand.

No people were shot by feds.