75% of economists saying doing nothing will cost dramatically more than acting on global warming

[Crick]

Another consensus argument from an organization that benefits from the bogus narrative.

There is NO climate concern to worry about.

Please explain how economists benefit from the acceptance of AGW to the extent that a large majority of them would choose to lie.

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

How much do we need to raise taxes by this time to fix this?

none

We need to cut spending

Leftists do not know how to do that.

Tax and spend.

On gender self identification freedoms.

 

[Crick]

https://policyintegrity.org/files/publications/Economic_Consensus_on_Climate.pdf

Just like we've been telling you deniers for the last ten years.

they are full of shit

Environmentalists write the summary first then produce a survey to match their conclusions

What a brilliant piece of repartee. I just don't know how to counter such a pithy dollop of intellectual superiority.

 

[progressive hunter]

Another consensus argument from an organization that benefits from the bogus narrative.

There is NO climate concern to worry about.

Please explain how economists benefit from the acceptance of AGW to the extent that a large majority of them would choose to lie.

basing you opinion on lies isnt lying,,

 

[Crick]

https://policyintegrity.org/files/publications/Economic_Consensus_on_Climate.pdf

Just like we've been telling you deniers for the last ten years.

How much would US CO2 drop if we deported 20 million illegal aliens?

Who cares Todd?

 

[Uncensored2008]

an economic one based on lies,,

AGW is a religion. It has no relationship to science. Professing faith in the leftist religion is required for anyone seeking a degree or any sort of standing with academia.

 

[Crick]

https://policyintegrity.org/files/publications/Economic_Consensus_on_Climate.pdf

Just like we've been telling you deniers for the last ten years.

How much would US CO2 drop if we deported 20 million illegal aliens?

better yet deport 30 million illegal aliens

Best yet: deport everyone below a certain IQ.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Who cares Todd?

If you actually believed the cave man religion you promote, you would.

But the Gaia cult exists to impress conformity and beguile the stupid. No one actually believes this shit. Not you, not me, not that vapid scumbag Krugman.

 

[jbrownson0831]

https://policyintegrity.org/files/publications/Economic_Consensus_on_Climate.pdf

Just like we've been telling you deniers for the last ten years.

Economists? Hahahahahahahaha

I suspect the joke here would be your qualifications in economics.

I suspect it would be that you are listening to economists tell you about the weather. That seems funnier to me.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Best yet: deport everyone below a certain IQ.

So, the democrats then.

 

[Crick]

https://policyintegrity.org/files/publications/Economic_Consensus_on_Climate.pdf

Just like we've been telling you deniers for the last ten years.

How much do we need to raise taxes by this time to fix this?

It will cost a great deal to fix. It's a big problem. But it will cost MORE to ignore it. Is that over your head?

 

[Crick]

How much do we need to raise taxes by this time to fix this?

none

We need to cut spending

To offset the revenue lost to tax cuts for the top 1%? Got it. Conservatives seem to have lost the ability to decipher whether or not given actions are or are not in their best interest.

 

[Stryder50]

Another consensus argument from an organization that benefits from the bogus narrative.

There is NO climate concern to worry about.

Please explain how economists benefit from the acceptance of AGW to the extent that a large majority of them would choose to lie.

Grant funding. Duh!

 

[Crick]

Yes, all those economists are also degree'd experts in climatology.

Economics is real science.

"Climatology" is on the level of astrology or phrenology.

Which tells me you probably dropped out of high school.

 

[Uncensored2008]

To offset the revenue lost to tax cuts for the top 1%? Got it. Conservatives seem to have lost the ability to decipher whether or not given actions are or are not in their best interest.

Your cave man religion is not in the best interests of anyone but fascists and shamans.

 

[jbrownson0831]

Another consensus argument from an organization that benefits from the bogus narrative.

There is NO climate concern to worry about.

Please explain how economists benefit from the acceptance of AGW to the extent that a large majority of them would choose to lie.

Uhh, for money?

 

[Crick]

Economists? Hahahahahahahaha

In other words Paul Krugman and the Baghdad Bob's of the NY Times.

From the OP's linked document:

We invited 2,169 Ph.D. economists to take a 15-question online survey focused on climate change risks, economic damage estimates, and emissions abatement. Of this pool, 738 participated, a response rate of 34% (not all respondents submitted a response to every survey question, so the sample for some questions is smaller). These economists have all published an article related to climate change in a leading economics, environmental economics, or development economics journal, and their areas of expertise cover a wide range of issues in climate economics. The survey design and related analysis sought to minimize selection bias, response bias, and anchoring bias.

 

[Stryder50]

https://policyintegrity.org/files/publications/Economic_Consensus_on_Climate.pdf

Just like we've been telling you deniers for the last ten years.

Economists? Hahahahahahahaha

I suspect the joke here would be your qualifications in economics.

Best qualification in economics is to start a business, provide jobs, and do so profitably. Few economists have ever walked this walk. Most economists provide hot air at taxpayer expense.

 

[jbrownson0831]

How much do we need to raise taxes by this time to fix this?

none

We need to cut spending

To offset the revenue lost to tax cuts for the top 1%? Got it. Conservatives seem to have lost the ability to decipher whether or not given actions are or are not in their best interest.

Giving money to a hoax is not in our best interests.

 

[Crick]

https://policyintegrity.org/files/publications/Economic_Consensus_on_Climate.pdf

Just like we've been telling you deniers for the last ten years.

ten yrs my ass,,

you fucks have been howling for almost 50 yrs about this subject,, and youve been wrong 100% of the time,,

That's not what reality tells the world's scientists. To what have you been listening?

theyve been wrong for 50 yrs,, not seeing any credibility here,,

and its ponly been a select few scientist,,

To what "select few scientists" do you refer?