50 potential jurors in Trump porn case already dismissed saying they COULD NOT be impartial

I think this is huge. Of course they can't find an impartial jury for Trump. People hate him. That's why these charges are all bullshit.
All you have to do is look at this message board members' predetermined mindsets and multiply that by 10,000 message boards to really grasp how effective the media is.
 
He did have sex with Daniels.
So you claim. Zero evidence.
He did falsify business records.
So you claim. Zero evidence
Now, yes, he could try for Jury nullification by getting the jury to like him, but not the way he's carrying on.
Nobody is discussing jury nullification other than you, you hack troll

If a fair jury judges the evidence (a the lack of evidence) on the level; and applies reasonable and fair findings of fact to the actual law, then we shouldn’t want jury nullification. An acquittal would suffice.
 
I'm guessing he wants to do Barron a favor by keeping his shit-human father from ruining the graduation.

Everyone should enjoy the irony. Trump is now at trial for actions concerning the porn star he was screwing because his wife had just given birth to Barron. This is the person that the Trump cultists are defending.

And needless to say, a jury will be seated. And Trump will be convicted. The evidence is just too rock-solid. The tears of the Trump cult losers will not be able to warp reality.
^ from the “inappropriate showers with Daddy” Party
 
Seriously? I’d say the longer a jury selection takes, the happier the Brandon henchthugs are. The goal is election interference. A prolonged trial is right up their alley.
But it could shove the federal case past election day... Trump can't be in two courtrooms at the same time...
The tampering will go on no matter what... but to avoid the federal case till Trump can pardon himself is a win...
 
They are the lib loons who can’t think
When I was on hearing panels for MD Real Estate Commission and had prior experiences with defendant or prosecution, the question was “Can you render an impartial verdict ,as if you had no prior , based on the testimony and evidence presented
Being a thinker the answer was of course I could . Dem emoters can’t
 
LOL, in NYC, a FAIR JURY? First they have to come up with an actual crime before they can come up with evidence. They can't even find an impartial judge.
I’m sure they could have found an impartial judge.

No doubt they didn’t (maybe because they saw no good from even making the effort). A true judge would have already dismissed these ridiculous charges based on the inspection of the grand jury minutes and the persecutions alleged legal “theory of the case.”
 
But it could shove the federal case past election day...
yes. Unlikely. But possible. And my point is Brandon and his hench thugs would be fine having the opponent ON TRIAL for alleged criminal behavior ON Election Day.
Trump can't be in two courtrooms at the same time...
Of course he can’t. And?
The tampering will go on no matter what... but to avoid the federal case till Trump can pardon himself is a win...
If he is elected and inaugurated prior to the federal cases, he won’t have to pardon himself. He will simply order the federal indictments to be dismissed by the persecutor.
 

Forum List

Back
Top