ThoughtCrimes
Old Navy Vet
Just broke on the news, so details are few at this moment. What will 9th Circuit do? If they follow the 4th Circuit, that will be hard getting it to be heard by SCOTUS!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump keeps winning! Vindicated!Just broke on the news, so details are few at this moment. What will 9th Circuit do? If they follow the 4th Circuit, that will be hard getting it to be heard by SCOTUS!
Poor Orange Hitler, he can only win in Israel.Just broke on the news, so details are few at this moment. What will 9th Circuit do? If they follow the 4th Circuit, that will be hard getting it to be heard by SCOTUS!
The Orange One has claimed the unitary power of the Executive to ban entry to the US by aliens. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has slapped that ill conceived notion down by stating that, "...power is not absolute". So the Liar-in-Chief has been slapped down again in Federal Court.
"Trump has insisted that the measure is necessary to prevent possible terrorist attacks and protect national security. But opponents, and courts in previous rulings blocking its enforcement, have cited past statements from Trump and his advisors signaling that it may target Muslims.
The 4th Circuit ruling said it was "unconvinced" that the order "has more to do with national security than it does with effectuating the president's proposed Muslim ban."
~~ Federal appeals court upholds block on Trump's travel ban ~~
Can you cite an expert saying that the fourth circuit leans "heavily to the left"? (The Gateway Pundit doesn't count).The Orange One has claimed the unitary power of the Executive to ban entry to the US by aliens. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has slapped that ill conceived notion down by stating that, "...power is not absolute". So the Liar-in-Chief has been slapped down again in Federal Court.
"Trump has insisted that the measure is necessary to prevent possible terrorist attacks and protect national security. But opponents, and courts in previous rulings blocking its enforcement, have cited past statements from Trump and his advisors signaling that it may target Muslims.
The 4th Circuit ruling said it was "unconvinced" that the order "has more to do with national security than it does with effectuating the president's proposed Muslim ban."
~~ Federal appeals court upholds block on Trump's travel ban ~~
Hate to burst your bubble, TC but the 4th Circuit Court leans heavily to the left. It would be shocking if they HADN'T ruled that way. The travel ban will be decided in the Supreme Court on appeal..
Really? Heavily LEFT? The talking heads on TV said the 4th Circuit leaned heavily RIGHT until Obama got a few of his Court nomination through the Congress a few years back. But I'm not going to run the numbers down now. BTW, OS, the Court decision there in VIRGINIA was 10-3 given the case was heard en banc.The Orange One has claimed the unitary power of the Executive to ban entry to the US by aliens. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has slapped that ill conceived notion down by stating that, "...power is not absolute". So the Liar-in-Chief has been slapped down again in Federal Court.
"Trump has insisted that the measure is necessary to prevent possible terrorist attacks and protect national security. But opponents, and courts in previous rulings blocking its enforcement, have cited past statements from Trump and his advisors signaling that it may target Muslims.
The 4th Circuit ruling said it was "unconvinced" that the order "has more to do with national security than it does with effectuating the president's proposed Muslim ban."
~~ Federal appeals court upholds block on Trump's travel ban ~~
Hate to burst your bubble, TC but the 4th Circuit Court leans heavily to the left. It would be shocking if they HADN'T ruled that way. The travel ban will be decided in the Supreme Court on appeal..
Really? Heavily LEFT? The talking heads on TV said the 4th Circuit leaned heavily RIGHT until Obama got a few of his Court nomination through the Congress a few years back. But I'm not going to run the numbers down now. BTW, OS, the Court decision there in VIRGINIA was 10-3 given the case was heard en banc.The Orange One has claimed the unitary power of the Executive to ban entry to the US by aliens. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has slapped that ill conceived notion down by stating that, "...power is not absolute". So the Liar-in-Chief has been slapped down again in Federal Court.
"Trump has insisted that the measure is necessary to prevent possible terrorist attacks and protect national security. But opponents, and courts in previous rulings blocking its enforcement, have cited past statements from Trump and his advisors signaling that it may target Muslims.
The 4th Circuit ruling said it was "unconvinced" that the order "has more to do with national security than it does with effectuating the president's proposed Muslim ban."
~~ Federal appeals court upholds block on Trump's travel ban ~~
Hate to burst your bubble, TC but the 4th Circuit Court leans heavily to the left. It would be shocking if they HADN'T ruled that way. The travel ban will be decided in the Supreme Court on appeal..
In any case, the Orange Clown keeps losing in Court!
Just broke on the news, so details are few at this moment. What will 9th Circuit do? If they follow the 4th Circuit, that will be hard getting it to be heard by SCOTUS!
You should recount there slick. Only nine (9) judges on that court were appointed by Clinton and Obama and eight (8) judges were appointed by Reagan and Bush. The decision on the Muslim ban was 10 to 3 to block the Orange Ones EO. That is an ACTUAL imbalance of ONE(1) rather than yours of six (6). I guess you're to lame to even tally the number of judges appointed by whom. It really sucks to be that damn mentally and intellectually challenged.I would say that with 11 out of the 17 active judges in that court being appointed by either Bill Clinton or Barack Obama...that would constitute "heavily left"! What talking heads were ignorant enough to claim otherwise?
You should recount there slick. Only nine (9) judges on that court were appointed by Clinton and Obama and eight (8) judges were appointed by Reagan and Bush. The decision on the Muslim ban was 10 to 3 to block the Orange Ones EO. That is an ACTUAL imbalance of ONE(1) rather than yours of six (6). I guess you're to lame to even tally the number of judges appointed by whom. It really sucks to be that damn mentally and intellectually challenged.I would say that with 11 out of the 17 active judges in that court being appointed by either Bill Clinton or Barack Obama...that would constitute "heavily left"! What talking heads were ignorant enough to claim otherwise?
I said I hadn't bothered to count the judges affiliations up, and NOT that I wouldn't, shit for brains, but your lie inspired me to do just that. I'm old enough to know the difference between a fairy tale and a sea story, dummy, and experienced enough not to fall for either!
Yes, because the ones who might be able to pull off a major attack - are already here.Hey libs! Just imagine the political fallout that will be deposited on your heads if a recent refugee who is an ISIS radical comes into this country and pulls off a major terrorist attack. Is that hard to imagine?
Yes, because the ones who might be able to pull off a major attack - are already here.Hey libs! Just imagine the political fallout that will be deposited on your heads if a recent refugee who is an ISIS radical comes into this country and pulls off a major terrorist attack. Is that hard to imagine?
Yes, because the ones who might be able to pull off a major attack - are already here.Hey libs! Just imagine the political fallout that will be deposited on your heads if a recent refugee who is an ISIS radical comes into this country and pulls off a major terrorist attack. Is that hard to imagine?
Yes, because the ones who might be able to pull off a major attack - are already here.Hey libs! Just imagine the political fallout that will be deposited on your heads if a recent refugee who is an ISIS radical comes into this country and pulls off a major terrorist attack. Is that hard to imagine?
The suicide bomber who just killed all those little girls in Manchester was born in Great Britain but traveled to Libya for training by ISIS before returning to carry out his attack. A travel ban such as Trump has suggested would have prevented him from doing so.
Time to tighten up our border, RT...forget the political talking points...this is simple common sense!
A little thing we call - history.Yes, because the ones who might be able to pull off a major attack - are already here.Hey libs! Just imagine the political fallout that will be deposited on your heads if a recent refugee who is an ISIS radical comes into this country and pulls off a major terrorist attack. Is that hard to imagine?
Why do you assume that?