candycorn
Diamond Member
This is just a guess, of course, but somewhere around 48% of those who vote in November will be voting for Donald Trump. Without going into the laundry list of obvious examples or any of the standard talking points, there are certainly plenty of reasons not to. Yet he has a perfectly reasonable chance of winning.
Right now, polls show that about 43% of Americans approve of the job he's doing. This, after everything that has happened, and that number should be a very sobering indication of where this country is right now. Personally, I try to understand how these people can do this, but I still only understand some of it.
Anyway, here's the point: Elections are about contrasts. Choices. How can that many people support this disaster of a person? For many of them, they're looking at the alternative. And when those who provide their information and opinions for them point at things like PC and Identity Politics and Cancel Culture and an overall culture in decay, they can make reasonable points not to vote for the Democratic party. Even with, amazingly, this profoundly damaged person in the White House.
It's certainly too late to make any changes before November, but the Democratic party had a chance to take over the middle, and I don't see that happening. There is no excuse, zero, none, for the race to be this close. Regardless of who wins, the Democrats have too often allowed the wrong voices to represent them. It allows the Trumpsters to tie all the silliest crap coming from the hardcore Left to the milquetoast, feeble Biden.
This should be a learning experience, but I'm doubtful.
Well Biden has only lost three time when he ran in the past. And yet the Democrats nominated him.
I think Trump is going to win.
As for your post...you're trying to assign logic. Trump voters don't do logic. Think of any plot on All in the Family....it was written for Norman Lear for the sake of comedy. There are scant few things that Archie Bunker endorses that these guys would not endorse.
They believe that there is actually a responsible adult in the oval office. Hell, they think there is an adult in the oval office.
This is one of the reasons that you get such pushback when you want people like Milo to get a bullhorn. You think that the argument he makes falls on it's on stupidity when considered by smart people. Those listening aren't smart people in this aspect. Look no further than Q-Anon for confirmation.