4.8 Million Voters Purged in 2024 Election

[JoeB131]

Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.​

Here are the numbers...​

• Trump lost. That is, if all legal voters were allowed to vote, if all legal ballots were counted, Trump would have lost the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia. Vice-President Kamala Harris would have won the Presidency with 286 electoral votes.

Except according to the map you provided, PA, WI, and MI were not states that enacted new voter laws. Trump won them anyway. (And he only needed to win one to win.)

Let's get real. The Democrats pooched this election, first by not getting Biden to step aside a lot earlier, and then by insisting on nominating Harris with no debate or discussion.

Did racism and misogyny play roles in her losing? Absolutely.

Unforced error.

 

[justoffal]

My, my, my... the shoe's on the other foot now, isn't it?

Much easier to take the word of biased self-serving NPOs and NGOs with an axe to grind, eh?

Much easier to avoid looking in the mirror and realizing that it was your policies and social re-engineering and corruption.

Much easier to blame everybody else under the sun rather than yourselves and a corrupt candidate-replacement process.

Much easier to blame Whitey than it is to admit that your candidate was profoundly flawed and unsuited for the job.

You failed... you got your a$$e$ kicked good-and-proper... and now comes the whiney-bitch crybaby phase of your denial.

Go grab a bottle of tequila and curl-up in some obscure corner and cry yourself to sleep and leave the rest of us alone.

We really don't want to hear it and it's not going to do a damned bit of good anyway.

The Harry Reid effect

 

[justoffal]

Except according to the map you provided, PA, WI, and MI were not states that enacted new voter laws. Trump won them anyway. (And he only needed to win one to win.)

Let's get real. The Democrats pooched this election, first by not getting Biden to step aside a lot earlier, and then by insisting on nominating Harris with no debate or discussion.

Did racism and misogyny play roles in her losing? Absolutely.

Unforced error.

Having said that however I still think there may have been some scamming and maybe the GOP picked up a few tricks from the last time around.

Some of the questions That are being asked I see as legitimate.

We really need to modernize our voting system.

Jo

 

[jc456]

No. You explain how almost 4.8 million voters were purged.

because that's the law.

 

[jc456]

Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.​

Here are the numbers...​

• by Greg Palast
• for the Hartmann Report
• January 24, 2025

Trump lost. That is, if all legal voters were allowed to vote, if all legal ballots were counted, Trump would have lost the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia. Vice-President Kamala Harris would have won the Presidency with 286 electoral votes.

And, if not for the mass purge of voters of color, if not for the mass disqualification of provisional and mail-in ballots, if not for the new mass “vigilante” challenges in swing states, Harris would have gained at least another 3,565,000 votes, topping Trump’s official popular vote tally by 1.2 million.

Here are key numbers:

• 4,776,706 voters were wrongly purged from voter rolls according to US Elections Assistance Commission data.
• By August of 2024, for the first time since 1946, self-proclaimed “vigilante” voter-fraud hunters challenged the rights of 317,886 voters. The NAACP of Georgia estimates that by Election Day, the challenges exceeded 200,000 in Georgia alone.
• No less than 2,121,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified for minor clerical errors (e.g. postage due).
• At least 585,000 ballots cast in-precinct were also disqualified.
• 1,216,000 “provisional” ballots were rejected, not counted.
• 3.24 million new registrations were rejected or not entered on the rolls in time to vote.

If the purges, challenges and ballot rejections were random, it wouldn’t matter. It’s anything but random. For example, an audit by the State of Washington found that a Black voter was 400% more likely than a white voter to have their mail-in ballot rejected. Rejection of Black in-person votes, according to a US Civil Rights Commission study in Florida, ran 14.3% or one in seven ballots cast.

There are also the uncountable effects of the explosive growth of voter intimidation tactics including the bomb threats that closed 31 polling stations in Atlanta on Election Day.

Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.

Here are the numbers...

www.gregpalast.com

1 white Re[publican in Georgia changed 4,000 black voters' right to vote. His name is Alton Russell.

View attachment 1071663

This was made possible by so-called voter integrity laws passed in red states. In Georgia, the governor deputized people to challenge votes and you know they were not going to challenge whites. So Democrats don't have to do anything. There are no suggestions to be made but that voter suppression laws must be eradicated and legislators who continue to push such legislation should be tried and convicted for violations of the Constitution.

Now watch the usual suspects do everything but notice the real numbers that have been presented. This is what they do when they cannot offer a rebuttal.

ahem, show us one name of a person who didn't get to vote that was purged. One.

 

[Care4all]

At least SEVEN MILLION phantom Biden voters from 2020 MYSTERIOUSLY VANISHED in 2024.

Nope! There was only a 2.3 million voter turn out difference between 2020 and 2024, NOT 7 Million.

 

[BlackSand]

Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.​

.

So ... What you are saying is that you don't care that they identified 4.8 million ineligible voters ...
And you think all, or at least most of the ineligible voters purged were probably Democrats.

You have to love it when people accidentally tell what they really think ...

.​

 

[SeaMajor7]

Nope! There was only a 2.3 million voter turn out difference between 2020 and 2024, NOT 7 Million.

81,L0L,L0L

 

[Scoutster]

Trump Domination!!

 

[j-mac]

Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.​

Here are the numbers...​

• by Greg Palast
• for the Hartmann Report
• January 24, 2025

Trump lost. That is, if all legal voters were allowed to vote, if all legal ballots were counted, Trump would have lost the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia. Vice-President Kamala Harris would have won the Presidency with 286 electoral votes.

And, if not for the mass purge of voters of color, if not for the mass disqualification of provisional and mail-in ballots, if not for the new mass “vigilante” challenges in swing states, Harris would have gained at least another 3,565,000 votes, topping Trump’s official popular vote tally by 1.2 million.

Here are key numbers:

• 4,776,706 voters were wrongly purged from voter rolls according to US Elections Assistance Commission data.
• By August of 2024, for the first time since 1946, self-proclaimed “vigilante” voter-fraud hunters challenged the rights of 317,886 voters. The NAACP of Georgia estimates that by Election Day, the challenges exceeded 200,000 in Georgia alone.
• No less than 2,121,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified for minor clerical errors (e.g. postage due).
• At least 585,000 ballots cast in-precinct were also disqualified.
• 1,216,000 “provisional” ballots were rejected, not counted.
• 3.24 million new registrations were rejected or not entered on the rolls in time to vote.

If the purges, challenges and ballot rejections were random, it wouldn’t matter. It’s anything but random. For example, an audit by the State of Washington found that a Black voter was 400% more likely than a white voter to have their mail-in ballot rejected. Rejection of Black in-person votes, according to a US Civil Rights Commission study in Florida, ran 14.3% or one in seven ballots cast.

There are also the uncountable effects of the explosive growth of voter intimidation tactics including the bomb threats that closed 31 polling stations in Atlanta on Election Day.

Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.

Here are the numbers...

www.gregpalast.com

1 white Re[publican in Georgia changed 4,000 black voters' right to vote. His name is Alton Russell.

View attachment 1071663

This was made possible by so-called voter integrity laws passed in red states. In Georgia, the governor deputized people to challenge votes and you know they were not going to challenge whites. So Democrats don't have to do anything. There are no suggestions to be made but that voter suppression laws must be eradicated andlegislators who continue to push such legislation should be tried and convicted for violations of the Constitution.

Now watch the usual suspects do everything but notice the real numbers that have been presented. This is what they do when they cannot offer a rebuttal.

Whining that you weren't allowed to cheat again?

 

[jc456]

Nope! There was only a 2.3 million voter turn out difference between 2020 and 2024, NOT 7 Million.

how many more in from 2016 vs 2020? We know the answer and why the purge occurred. Still waiting for one name of a valid voter whose name was purged and let's ask them if they voted.

 

[Nostra]

Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.​

Here are the numbers...​

• by Greg Palast
• for the Hartmann Report
• January 24, 2025

Trump lost. That is, if all legal voters were allowed to vote, if all legal ballots were counted, Trump would have lost the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia. Vice-President Kamala Harris would have won the Presidency with 286 electoral votes.

And, if not for the mass purge of voters of color, if not for the mass disqualification of provisional and mail-in ballots, if not for the new mass “vigilante” challenges in swing states, Harris would have gained at least another 3,565,000 votes, topping Trump’s official popular vote tally by 1.2 million.

Here are key numbers:

• 4,776,706 voters were wrongly purged from voter rolls according to US Elections Assistance Commission data.
• By August of 2024, for the first time since 1946, self-proclaimed “vigilante” voter-fraud hunters challenged the rights of 317,886 voters. The NAACP of Georgia estimates that by Election Day, the challenges exceeded 200,000 in Georgia alone.
• No less than 2,121,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified for minor clerical errors (e.g. postage due).
• At least 585,000 ballots cast in-precinct were also disqualified.
• 1,216,000 “provisional” ballots were rejected, not counted.
• 3.24 million new registrations were rejected or not entered on the rolls in time to vote.

If the purges, challenges and ballot rejections were random, it wouldn’t matter. It’s anything but random. For example, an audit by the State of Washington found that a Black voter was 400% more likely than a white voter to have their mail-in ballot rejected. Rejection of Black in-person votes, according to a US Civil Rights Commission study in Florida, ran 14.3% or one in seven ballots cast.

There are also the uncountable effects of the explosive growth of voter intimidation tactics including the bomb threats that closed 31 polling stations in Atlanta on Election Day.

Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.

Here are the numbers...

www.gregpalast.com

1 white Re[publican in Georgia changed 4,000 black voters' right to vote. His name is Alton Russell.

View attachment 1071663

This was made possible by so-called voter integrity laws passed in red states. In Georgia, the governor deputized people to challenge votes and you know they were not going to challenge whites. So Democrats don't have to do anything. There are no suggestions to be made but that voter suppression laws must be eradicated and legislators who continue to push such legislation should be tried and convicted for violations of the Constitution.

Now watch the usual suspects do everything but notice the real numbers that have been presented. This is what they do when they cannot offer a rebuttal.

Your hack assumes all people removed from the voter rolls would vote Dimwinger.

Oh, and they use Washington State as an example?

Governer: Dimwinger
Lt. Governor: Dimwinger.
AG: Dimwinger
Sec of State: Dimwinger

BUT IT WAS ALL A REPUBLICAN PLOT!

Dimwingers have always been election deniers. Every time they lose they claim the election was stolen.

 

[jc456]

Your hack assumes all people removed from the voter rolls would vote Dimwinger.

Oh, and they use Washington State as an example?

Governer: Dimwinger
Lt. Governor: Dimwinger.
AG: Dimwinger
Sec of State: Dimwinger

BUT IT WAS ALL A REPUBLICAN PLOT!

Dimwingers have always been election deniers. Every time they lose they claim the election was stolen.

Well if he believes that, then 2020 was stolen with his post as internal evidence in here.

 

[BlackSand]

Your hack assumes all people removed from the voter rolls would vote Dimwinger.

Oh, and they use Washington State as an example?

Governer: Dimwinger
Lt. Governor: Dimwinger.
AG: Dimwinger
Sec of State: Dimwinger

BUT IT WAS ALL A REPUBLICAN PLOT!

Dimwingers have always been election deniers. Every time they lose they claim the election was stolen.

.

There is something both Democrats and Republicans agree upon ... Possibly without knowing they agree.
Remove the political desires from what occurs ... And look what both sides are saying.

In 2020 the Republicans thought possible ineligible votes from Democrats were counted.
In 2024 the Democrats thought possible ineligible votes from Democrats were not counted.

What's the same in those two things ... Everyone is talking about possible ineligible Democrat votes.

Neither party is really cares about the fact they both believe the questionable ineligible voters are Democrats ...
They are just interested in whether or not the possible ineligible votes were counted.

If you think there might be a reason they are both talking about possibly ineligible Democrat votes ...
Well, there is ...

.​

 

[Independent thinker]

Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.​

Here are the numbers...​

• by Greg Palast
• for the Hartmann Report
• January 24, 2025

Trump lost. That is, if all legal voters were allowed to vote, if all legal ballots were counted, Trump would have lost the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia. Vice-President Kamala Harris would have won the Presidency with 286 electoral votes.

And, if not for the mass purge of voters of color, if not for the mass disqualification of provisional and mail-in ballots, if not for the new mass “vigilante” challenges in swing states, Harris would have gained at least another 3,565,000 votes, topping Trump’s official popular vote tally by 1.2 million.

Here are key numbers:

• 4,776,706 voters were wrongly purged from voter rolls according to US Elections Assistance Commission data.
• By August of 2024, for the first time since 1946, self-proclaimed “vigilante” voter-fraud hunters challenged the rights of 317,886 voters. The NAACP of Georgia estimates that by Election Day, the challenges exceeded 200,000 in Georgia alone.
• No less than 2,121,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified for minor clerical errors (e.g. postage due).
• At least 585,000 ballots cast in-precinct were also disqualified.
• 1,216,000 “provisional” ballots were rejected, not counted.
• 3.24 million new registrations were rejected or not entered on the rolls in time to vote.

If the purges, challenges and ballot rejections were random, it wouldn’t matter. It’s anything but random. For example, an audit by the State of Washington found that a Black voter was 400% more likely than a white voter to have their mail-in ballot rejected. Rejection of Black in-person votes, according to a US Civil Rights Commission study in Florida, ran 14.3% or one in seven ballots cast.

There are also the uncountable effects of the explosive growth of voter intimidation tactics including the bomb threats that closed 31 polling stations in Atlanta on Election Day.

Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.

Here are the numbers...

www.gregpalast.com

1 white Re[publican in Georgia changed 4,000 black voters' right to vote. His name is Alton Russell.

View attachment 1071663

This was made possible by so-called voter integrity laws passed in red states. In Georgia, the governor deputized people to challenge votes and you know they were not going to challenge whites. So Democrats don't have to do anything. There are no suggestions to be made but that voter suppression laws must be eradicated and legislators who continue to push such legislation should be tried and convicted for violations of the Constitution.

Now watch the usual suspects do everything but notice the real numbers that have been presented. This is what they do when they cannot offer a rebuttal.

I love how you guys attack Trump for questioning election results and then when you lose you question election results.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Did racism and misogyny play roles in her losing? Absolutely.

It's true, lots of democrats wouldn't vote for the unqualified black woman.

 

[Nostra]

I love how you guys attack Trump for questioning election results and then when you lose you question election results.

This thread is an INSURRECTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.​

Here are the numbers...​

• by Greg Palast
• for the Hartmann Report
• January 24, 2025

Trump lost. That is, if all legal voters were allowed to vote, if all legal ballots were counted, Trump would have lost the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia. Vice-President Kamala Harris would have won the Presidency with 286 electoral votes.

And, if not for the mass purge of voters of color, if not for the mass disqualification of provisional and mail-in ballots, if not for the new mass “vigilante” challenges in swing states, Harris would have gained at least another 3,565,000 votes, topping Trump’s official popular vote tally by 1.2 million.

Here are key numbers:

• 4,776,706 voters were wrongly purged from voter rolls according to US Elections Assistance Commission data.
• By August of 2024, for the first time since 1946, self-proclaimed “vigilante” voter-fraud hunters challenged the rights of 317,886 voters. The NAACP of Georgia estimates that by Election Day, the challenges exceeded 200,000 in Georgia alone.
• No less than 2,121,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified for minor clerical errors (e.g. postage due).
• At least 585,000 ballots cast in-precinct were also disqualified.
• 1,216,000 “provisional” ballots were rejected, not counted.
• 3.24 million new registrations were rejected or not entered on the rolls in time to vote.

If the purges, challenges and ballot rejections were random, it wouldn’t matter. It’s anything but random. For example, an audit by the State of Washington found that a Black voter was 400% more likely than a white voter to have their mail-in ballot rejected. Rejection of Black in-person votes, according to a US Civil Rights Commission study in Florida, ran 14.3% or one in seven ballots cast.

There are also the uncountable effects of the explosive growth of voter intimidation tactics including the bomb threats that closed 31 polling stations in Atlanta on Election Day.

Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won.

Here are the numbers...

www.gregpalast.com

1 white Re[publican in Georgia changed 4,000 black voters' right to vote. His name is Alton Russell.

View attachment 1071663

This was made possible by so-called voter integrity laws passed in red states. In Georgia, the governor deputized people to challenge votes and you know they were not going to challenge whites. So Democrats don't have to do anything. There are no suggestions to be made but that voter suppression laws must be eradicated and legislators who continue to push such legislation should be tried and convicted for violations of the Constitution.

Now watch the usual suspects do everything but notice the real numbers that have been presented. This is what they do when they cannot offer a rebuttal.

Voter ID is racist because….

 

[BlackSand]

Voter ID is racist because….

.

That's just another opportunity for Democrats to tell you what they think about their own ...
As well as how concerned they are about ensuring the integrity of the vote.

It's not that hard to get a State issued ID ...
And you have 2-4 years to figure it the fuck out ...

.​

 

[jc456]

.

There is something both Democrats and Republicans agree upon ... Possibly without knowing they agree.
Remove the political desires from what occurs ... And look what both sides are saying.

In 2020 the Republicans thought possible ineligible votes from Democrats were counted.
In 2024 the Democrats thought possible ineligible votes from Democrats were not counted.

What's the same in those two things ... Everyone is talking about possible ineligible Democrat votes.

Neither party is really cares about the fact they both believe the questionable ineligible voters are Democrats ...
They are just interested in whether or not the possible ineligible votes were counted.

If you think there might be a reason they are both talking about possibly ineligible Democrat votes ...
Well, there is ...

.​