37 Reasons Why "The Economic Recovery Of 2013" Is A Giant Lie

Geaux4it

Intensity Factor 4-Fold
May 31, 2009
22,873
4,294
290
Tennessee
Smoke and mirrors?

Perhaps

-Geaux

Submitted by Michael Snyder of The Economic Collapse blog,

"If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it." Sadly, that appears to be the approach that the Obama administration and the mainstream media are taking with the U.S. economy. They seem to believe that if they just keep telling the American people over and over that things are getting better, eventually the American people will believe that it is actually true.

On Friday, it was announced that the unemployment rate had fallen to "7 percent", and the mainstream media responded with a mix of euphoria and jubilation. For example, one USA Today article declared that "with today's jobs report, one really can say that our long national post-financial crisis nightmare is over." But is that actually the truth? As you will see below, if you assume that the labor force participation rate in the U.S. is at the long-term average, the unemployment rate in the United States would actually be 11.5 percent instead of 7 percent.

There has been absolutely no employment recovery. The percentage of Americans that are actually working has stayed between 58 and 59 percent for 51 months in a row. But most Americans don't understand these things and they just take whatever the mainstream media tells them as the truth.

And of course the reality of the matter is that we should have seen some sort of an economic recovery by now. Those running our system have literally been mortgaging the future in a desperate attempt to try to pump up our economic numbers. The federal government has been on the greatest debt binge in U.S. history and the Federal Reserve has been printing money like crazed lunatics. All of that "stimulus" should have had some positive short-term effects on the economy.

Sadly, all of those "emergency measures" do not appear to have done much at all. The percentage of Americans that have a job has stayed remarkably flat since the end of 2009, median household income has fallen for five years in a row, and the rate of homeownership in the United States has fallen for eight years in a row. Anyone that claims that the U.S. economy is experiencing a "recovery" is simply not telling the truth. The following are 37 reasons why "the economic recovery of 2013" is a giant lie...

#1 The only reason that the official unemployment rate has been declining over the past couple of years is that the federal government has been pretending that millions upon millions of unemployed Americans no longer want a job and have "left the labor force". As Zero Hedge recently demonstrated, if the labor force participation rate returned to the long-term average of 65.8 percent, the official unemployment rate in the United States would actually be 11.5 percent instead of 7 percent.

#2 The percentage of Americans that are actually working is much lower than it used to be. In November 2000, 64.3 percent of all working age Americans had a job. When Barack Obama first entered the White House, 60.6 percent of all working age Americans had a job. Today, only 58.6 percent of all working age Americans have a job. In fact, as you can see from the chart posted below, there has been absolutely no "employment recovery" since the depths of the last recession...

Read the rest here: 37 Reasons Why "The Economic Recovery Of 2013" Is A Giant Lie | Zero Hedge
 
Oh the horror of the thought. The unemployment rate actually dropping under President Obama. Consider what might be said if that number is at 5% in 2016? Quick, tell the Teabaggers in Congress to step up their efforts to destroy the US and world economy!
 
For a country in which the consumer is responsible for 70% of GDP, one wonders: without savings and without wages where will this "recovery" we hear so much propaganda about and which every investment bank this week went all in on (just like they did in the end of 2010 only to admit their error 4 months later) come from? Because every now and then it helps to step back from the trees and observe the forest. Behold: the forest.


Chart Of The Day: The Wageless, Savingsless US Consumer | Zero Hedge

Speaking as someone whose entire working career has been during a period when median wages lost purchasing power against inflation?

Telling me that DEMOCRATS or REPUBLICANS are going to fix this?


Shit folks!~ DEMS and REPB made this happen///they knew EXACTLy what the outcome would be, too.

They just don't give a fuck about ya'll.

:lol:
 
So, if a man had a fever of 106, and it goes down to 102, is the patient getting better or not? By the logic of the OP, the patient is not getting better at all because it'ts not back to 98.6 and he's not completely recovered.
 
So, if a man had a fever of 106, and it goes down to 102, is the patient getting better or not? By the logic of the OP, the patient is not getting better at all because it'ts not back to 98.6 and he's not completely recovered.

If the man had a fever of 106 and Obama says, "let's find a better thermometer because this one doesn't give me the reading I wanted", then the guy isn't getting better even if they find one that registers 98.6 all of the time.
 
So, if a man had a fever of 106, and it goes down to 102, is the patient getting better or not? By the logic of the OP, the patient is not getting better at all because it'ts not back to 98.6 and he's not completely recovered.

If the man had a fever of 106 and Obama says, "let's find a better thermometer because this one doesn't give me the reading I wanted", then the guy isn't getting better even if they find one that registers 98.6 all of the time.

I have no idea what you're talking about. The methodology for measuring the economy hasn't changed.
 
Oh the horror of the thought. The unemployment rate actually dropping under President Obama. Consider what might be said if that number is at 5% in 2016? Quick, tell the Teabaggers in Congress to step up their efforts to destroy the US and world economy!

Old Rocks...a broken clock is right more often than you are.
Is the UE really dropping or are the people searching for jobs just giving up?
Are there less people in the labor market as there was in 2008?
Is the middle class making less now than in 2008?
Is there 47 million on food stamps now vs the 30 million in 2008?

Yeah, it's the TEA party, because it sure couldn't be Obama is a failure, huh?
Before you spew your BS, just a reminder for you....Obama has been our president for nearly 5 years. He owns it all at this point in time.
 
So, if a man had a fever of 106, and it goes down to 102, is the patient getting better or not? By the logic of the OP, the patient is not getting better at all because it'ts not back to 98.6 and he's not completely recovered.

If the man had a fever of 106 and Obama says, "let's find a better thermometer because this one doesn't give me the reading I wanted", then the guy isn't getting better even if they find one that registers 98.6 all of the time.

I have no idea what you're talking about. The methodology for measuring the economy hasn't changed.

The method hasn't changed but the collateral damage has.
 
If the man had a fever of 106 and Obama says, "let's find a better thermometer because this one doesn't give me the reading I wanted", then the guy isn't getting better even if they find one that registers 98.6 all of the time.

I have no idea what you're talking about. The methodology for measuring the economy hasn't changed.

The method hasn't changed but the collateral damage has.
Ummm, what?
 
The method hasn't changed but the collateral damage has.
Ummm, what?

I'm sure it really is above your pay grade, Pingy.
It will take some critical thinking on your behalf.

I'll give you one hint: Obama

Obama has nothing to do with statistical methodology. I'm sure he doesn't understand it.
But since methodology doesn't cause any damage, i have no idea how it could cause any collaterall damage.

Do you really think you're clever for posting something that only makes sense to you, and then refusing to explain? I suppose you do.
 
Ummm, what?

I'm sure it really is above your pay grade, Pingy.
It will take some critical thinking on your behalf.

I'll give you one hint: Obama

Obama has nothing to do with statistical methodology. I'm sure he doesn't understand it.
But since methodology doesn't cause any damage, i have no idea how it could cause any collaterall damage.

Do you really think you're clever for posting something that only makes sense to you, and then refusing to explain? I suppose you do.

I said that the methodology hasn't changed. :eusa_whistle:
The collateral damage is those who have fallen off the rolls along with work force participation as a result of Obama's policies.


Critical thinking, son.....critical thinking.
 
I'm sure it really is above your pay grade, Pingy.
It will take some critical thinking on your behalf.

I'll give you one hint: Obama

Obama has nothing to do with statistical methodology. I'm sure he doesn't understand it.
But since methodology doesn't cause any damage, i have no idea how it could cause any collaterall damage.

Do you really think you're clever for posting something that only makes sense to you, and then refusing to explain? I suppose you do.

I said that the methodology hasn't changed. :eusa_whistle:
The collateral damage is those who have fallen off the rolls along with work force participation as a result of Obama's policies.


Critical thinking, son.....critical thinking.
Since there are no "rolls" used in labor force calculations and since it doesn't make any difference,to an individual what they would be classified as, let alone damage, you weren't making any sense to anyone who understands the methodology.
 
Submitted by Michael Snyder of The Economic Collapse blog
lol

I can't believe this guy is still getting his ad clicks. I mean I could sorta see it back in 2009-2010 when things were a lot more shakey but he's still making a living doing this? God bless America, the land of opportunity.
 
Obama has nothing to do with statistical methodology. I'm sure he doesn't understand it.
But since methodology doesn't cause any damage, i have no idea how it could cause any collaterall damage.

Do you really think you're clever for posting something that only makes sense to you, and then refusing to explain? I suppose you do.

I said that the methodology hasn't changed. :eusa_whistle:
The collateral damage is those who have fallen off the rolls along with work force participation as a result of Obama's policies.


Critical thinking, son.....critical thinking.
Since there are no "rolls" used in labor force calculations and since it doesn't make any difference,to an individual what they would be classified as, let alone damage, you weren't making any sense to anyone who understands the methodology.

You're stuck on methodology, my point was and has been the collateral damage.....which has screwed up the UE numbers. Never before have I seen low hiring numbers, increase in new unemployment applications and the UE numbers go down. That happened recently.
 
I said that the methodology hasn't changed. :eusa_whistle:
The collateral damage is those who have fallen off the rolls along with work force participation as a result of Obama's policies.


Critical thinking, son.....critical thinking.
Since there are no "rolls" used in labor force calculations and since it doesn't make any difference,to an individual what they would be classified as, let alone damage, you weren't making any sense to anyone who understands the methodology.

You're stuck on methodology, my point was and has been the collateral damage.
Well you did write " The method hasn't changed but the collateral damage has." And that seems to be talking about collateral damage from the methodology.

....which has screwed up the UE numbers. Never before have I seen low hiring numbers, increase in new unemployment applications and the UE numbers go down. That happened recently.
The recession changed a lot...beyond more retirees, more people went back to school, or went to a one income family. Fewer teenagers are looking for part time jobs.

The labor force has been increasing (bouncing up and down but generally up) and while the participation rate has gone down, a higher percentage of people don't want jobs.

Things are still bad, but they are improving.
 
Zero Hedge is a joke.


Yeah.. Did you see their latest update?

-Geaux

Tuesday (Un)Humor: Selfies At A Funeral

Tuesday (Un)Humor: Selfies At A Funeral | Zero Hedge

Probably the largest and most watched funeral (memorial service) of the modern era and it appears President Obama just could not resist a selfie with Denmark's leggy blond PM (oh and David Cameron)... as an aside, it seems FLOTUS was not amused.

20131210_FLOTUS_shun1.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top