2nd Impeachment? House counsel suggests Trump could be impeached again

EvilEyeFleegle

Dogpatch USA
Nov 2, 2017
15,804
8,914
1,280
Twin Falls Idaho
WTF? Another impeachment? We are now entering the Twilight zone:

House counsel suggests Trump could be impeached again

"The House is open to the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump a second time, lawyers for the Judiciary Committee said Monday.
House Counsel Douglas Letter said in a filing in federal court that a second impeachment could be necessary if the House uncovers new evidence that Trump attempted to obstruct investigations of his conduct. Letter made the argument as part of an inquiry by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals about whether Democrats still need testimony from former White House Counsel Don McGahn following the votes last week to charge Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
"If McGahn’s testimony produces new evidence supporting the conclusion that President Trump committed impeachable offenses that are not covered by the Articles approved by the House, the Committee will proceed accordingly—including, if necessary, by considering whether to recommend new articles of impeachment," Letter wrote."
 
so if new intel or docs or factual witness' testify that donny is knee deep in putin's shit, he should get a pass because of the current shit he is knee deep in?
 
so if new intel or docs or factual witness' testify that donny is knee deep in putin's shit, he should get a pass because of the current shit he is knee deep in?
The appearance of partisan piling-on--is not a good one for the Democrats..IMO. You are risking overloading the public and turning them against the left. Offend their sense of fair play at your own risk.
 
Impeach Impeach Impeach!
Impeach The Mothah #%*^>|¥!

upload_2019-12-23_14-54-53.jpeg


Wonder what all these Islamic Congressmen and Anti-Semetic Representatives want The President Impeached?

Hmm
 
Was it Omar, or one of the other Fab 4, that was experiencing multiple orgasms on her way to impeach Trump?

How many times has Rep Green, and others, vowed to impeach Trump and remove him from office, in his first 3 years?

They arent' going to stop til they remove him from office, or get removed themselves.
 
so if new intel or docs or factual witness' testify that donny is knee deep in putin's shit, he should get a pass because of the current shit he is knee deep in?
The appearance of partisan piling-on--is not a good one for the Democrats..IMO. You are risking overloading the public and turning them against the left. Offend their sense of fair play at your own risk.

the request for don mcghan's testimony came 8 months ago & donny refused to comply. & it has been publicly mentioned that the 'obstruction of congress' might encompass mueller to demonstrate a pattern.


Top House Democrat wants Mueller findings in impeachment articles against Trump
By Emma Dumain
December 03, 2019 08:47 PM
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article237826049.html

Mueller evidence likely to be included in articles of impeachment
Details may be used to show pattern of obstruction
Mueller evidence likely to be included in articles of impeachment

By:Manu Raju and Jeremy Herb, CNN
Posted:
Dec 06, 2019 01:02 AM CST
Updated: Dec 06, 2019 07:58 AM CST
 
WTF? Another impeachment? We are now entering the Twilight zone:

House counsel suggests Trump could be impeached again

"The House is open to the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump a second time, lawyers for the Judiciary Committee said Monday.
House Counsel Douglas Letter said in a filing in federal court that a second impeachment could be necessary if the House uncovers new evidence that Trump attempted to obstruct investigations of his conduct. Letter made the argument as part of an inquiry by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals about whether Democrats still need testimony from former White House Counsel Don McGahn following the votes last week to charge Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
"If McGahn’s testimony produces new evidence supporting the conclusion that President Trump committed impeachable offenses that are not covered by the Articles approved by the House, the Committee will proceed accordingly—including, if necessary, by considering whether to recommend new articles of impeachment," Letter wrote."

That sounds like double-jeopardy, a blatant violation of the Fifth Amendment.

Also, like possible grounds for having the collective Democratic portion of the House declared a vexatious litigator.

They were on very thin ice, bringing up the one impeachment proceeding that they did, with no actual evidence of any actual crimes; and now, having passed the Articles of Impeachment, refusing to allow the case to proceed to trial in a timely manner, depriving the defendant of any fair chance to defend himself or otherwise to receive due process of law.

If, having failed once, they try it a second time, this would certainly be grounds to bring legal proceedings against each and every corrupt one of them.
 
Amazing. Trump is trying to use the fact that he has made so many enemies by ignoring the rule of law as an excuse for him to ignore the rule of law. His dumb ass supporters fall for that crap.
 
so if new intel or docs or factual witness' testify that donny is knee deep in putin's shit, he should get a pass because of the current shit he is knee deep in?

They've already indicted him once on that bogus charge, but are refusing to allow the case to go to trial. At this point, the only thing that they can do that is not blatantly illegal is to pass the AoI on to the Senate, for a trial. And if the Senate acquits him, (which, given the lack of any credible evidence to support the absurd accusation, is pretty much assured) then that's the end of it. The Fifth Amendment explicitly forbids trying someone a second time for the same alleged crime, if he is acquitted the first time.
 
Yet not one word of The Mueller Report appears in the articles. And it was such an emergency for Nancy Pelosi that she abandoned all of their Subpoenas in The Courts because they were unwilling to allow Due Process to pay out.

so if new intel or docs or factual witness' testify that donny is knee deep in putin's shit, he should get a pass because of the current shit he is knee deep in?
The appearance of partisan piling-on--is not a good one for the Democrats..IMO. You are risking overloading the public and turning them against the left. Offend their sense of fair play at your own risk.

the request for don mcghan's testimony came 8 months ago & donny refused to comply. & it has been publicly mentioned that the 'obstruction of congress' might encompass mueller to demonstrate a pattern.
Top House Democrat wants Mueller findings in impeachment articles against Trump
By Emma Dumain
December 03, 2019 08:47 PM
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article237826049.html

Mueller evidence likely to be included in articles of impeachment
Details may be used to show pattern of obstruction
Mueller evidence likely to be included in articles of impeachment

By:Manu Raju and Jeremy Herb, CNN
Posted: Dec 06, 2019 01:02 AM CST
Updated: Dec 06, 2019 07:58 AM CST
 
Last edited:
The appearance of partisan piling-on--is not a good one for the Democrats..IMO. You are risking overloading the public and turning them against the left. Offend their sense of fair play at your own risk.

Too late. They should have thought about this before they began this mockery. The Democrats in the House have already irreparably ruined their public image, and will pay the price in the next election cycle.
 
so if new intel or docs or factual witness' testify that donny is knee deep in putin's shit, he should get a pass because of the current shit he is knee deep in?

They've already indicted him once on that bogus charge, but are refusing to allow the case to go to trial. At this point, the only thing that they can do that is not blatantly illegal is to pass the AoI on to the Senate, for a trial. And if the Senate acquits him, (which, given the lack of any credible evidence to support the absurd accusation, is pretty much assured) then that's the end of it. The Fifth Amendment explicitly forbids trying someone a second time for the same alleged crime, if he is acquitted the first time.

um, no. there was no impeachment inquiry or trial regarding mueller's investigation.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: xyz

Forum List

Back
Top