254 US Marines killed

Delta4Embassy

Gold Member
Dec 12, 2013
25,744
3,044
280
Earth
in the Beirut barracks bombing. No one demanded Reagan resign, be impeached, or investigated. No hearings to smear Reagan or any other administration official occured. Only hearings were bipartisan and designed to improve security.

Fast foward to now and 4 die and everyone's smearing Clinton and the President over it.

Can you say politically-motivated hypocrisy?
 
in the Beirut barracks bombing. No one demanded Reagan resign, be impeached, or investigated. No hearings to smear Reagan or any other administration official occured. Only hearings were bipartisan and designed to improve security.

Fast foward to now and 4 die and everyone's smearing Clinton and the President over it.

Can you say politically-motivated hypocrisy?

Did those 254 marines ask for help and turned down several hundred times?
Did Reagan lie to the American people that a non-existing video prompted the attack?

Are you out of your mind comparing the two events?
An comparing Hillary to President Reagan?
 
in the Beirut barracks bombing. No one demanded Reagan resign, be impeached, or investigated. No hearings to smear Reagan or any other administration official occured. Only hearings were bipartisan and designed to improve security.

Fast foward to now and 4 die and everyone's smearing Clinton and the President over it.

Can you say politically-motivated hypocrisy?

Did those 254 marines ask for help and turned down several hundred times?
Did Reagan lie to the American people that a non-existing video prompted the attack?

Are you out of your mind comparing the two events?
An comparing Hillary to President Reagan?

Not me so much as The New Yorker, Daily Beast, BBC, Daily KOS, TIME, and about 30,000 other sources.
 
in the Beirut barracks bombing. No one demanded Reagan resign, be impeached, or investigated. No hearings to smear Reagan or any other administration official occured. Only hearings were bipartisan and designed to improve security.

Fast foward to now and 4 die and everyone's smearing Clinton and the President over it.

Can you say politically-motivated hypocrisy?

Apples and oranges. Reagan didn't lie about it and those Marines were not turned down for help. Stick to your idiotic homo comments
 
in the Beirut barracks bombing. No one demanded Reagan resign, be impeached, or investigated. No hearings to smear Reagan or any other administration official occured. Only hearings were bipartisan and designed to improve security.

Fast foward to now and 4 die and everyone's smearing Clinton and the President over it.

Can you say politically-motivated hypocrisy?

Apples and oranges. Reagan didn't lie about it and those Marines were not turned down for help. Stick to your idiotic homo comments

Entire media world seems to disagree with you.
 
in the Beirut barracks bombing. No one demanded Reagan resign, be impeached, or investigated. No hearings to smear Reagan or any other administration official occured. Only hearings were bipartisan and designed to improve security.

Fast foward to now and 4 die and everyone's smearing Clinton and the President over it.

Can you say politically-motivated hypocrisy?

Apples and oranges. Reagan didn't lie about it and those Marines were not turned down for help. Stick to your idiotic homo comments

Entire media world seems to disagree with you.

Link or quote Reagan's lie about the attack.
 
in the Beirut barracks bombing. No one demanded Reagan resign, be impeached, or investigated. No hearings to smear Reagan or any other administration official occured. Only hearings were bipartisan and designed to improve security.

Fast foward to now and 4 die and everyone's smearing Clinton and the President over it.

Can you say politically-motivated hypocrisy?

Apples and oranges. Reagan didn't lie about it and those Marines were not turned down for help. Stick to your idiotic homo comments

Entire media world seems to disagree with you.

So link where Reagan lied or the Marines asked for help and were denied. It's just that simple troll. I know you can't....and so do you
 
On Benghazi, Congress Could Take a Lesson From Beirut

Beirut vs. Benghazi: 4 Lessons

Benghazi v. Beirut

Beirut Barracks vs. Benghazi

Ronald Reagan’s Benghazi - The New Yorker

What Benghazi Tells Us About the GOP Brand

"The Hezbollah bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983 cost more American lives, by far, than the hostage crisis and botched rescue. Reagan pulled out of Lebanon—and invaded Grenada, which proved to be a quick, if not quite clean, intervention. It could have been seen cynically as an attempt to distract from the Lebanon debacle; that was certainly how the left saw it. But Reagan didn’t suffer much in the following year’s election for the deaths of over 200 Americans in Beirut or from any suspicion that Grenada was a smokescreen. Why did Reagan emerge unscathed from events that would have destroyed a Democratic administration like Carter’s?"

Guess the cons here who think it's not an apt comparison aren't on any conservative group's email list huh. Seem out of the loop.
 
On Benghazi, Congress Could Take a Lesson From Beirut

Beirut vs. Benghazi: 4 Lessons

Benghazi v. Beirut

Beirut Barracks vs. Benghazi

Ronald Reagan’s Benghazi - The New Yorker

What Benghazi Tells Us About the GOP Brand

"The Hezbollah bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983 cost more American lives, by far, than the hostage crisis and botched rescue. Reagan pulled out of Lebanon—and invaded Grenada, which proved to be a quick, if not quite clean, intervention. It could have been seen cynically as an attempt to distract from the Lebanon debacle; that was certainly how the left saw it. But Reagan didn’t suffer much in the following year’s election for the deaths of over 200 Americans in Beirut or from any suspicion that Grenada was a smokescreen. Why did Reagan emerge unscathed from events that would have destroyed a Democratic administration like Carter’s?"

Guess the cons here who think it's not an apt comparison aren't on any conservative group's email list huh. Seem out of the loop.

I'm not seeing a lie or where they asked for help and were denied. Epic fail
 
in the Beirut barracks bombing. No one demanded Reagan resign, be impeached, or investigated. No hearings to smear Reagan or any other administration official occured. Only hearings were bipartisan and designed to improve security.

Fast foward to now and 4 die and everyone's smearing Clinton and the President over it.

Can you say politically-motivated hypocrisy?

Apples and oranges. Reagan didn't lie about it and those Marines were not turned down for help. Stick to your idiotic homo comments

Entire media world seems to disagree with you.

So link where Reagan lied or the Marines asked for help and were denied. It's just that simple troll. I know you can't....and so do you

That never happened in Benghazi.

Reagan needlessly killed those Marines and for some ghoulish reason people like you hold him blameless.
 
You loons problem is you listen to the media too much. Incapable of thought, sheep being led around by the nose
 
On Benghazi, Congress Could Take a Lesson From Beirut

Beirut vs. Benghazi: 4 Lessons

Benghazi v. Beirut

Beirut Barracks vs. Benghazi

Ronald Reagan’s Benghazi - The New Yorker

What Benghazi Tells Us About the GOP Brand

"The Hezbollah bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983 cost more American lives, by far, than the hostage crisis and botched rescue. Reagan pulled out of Lebanon—and invaded Grenada, which proved to be a quick, if not quite clean, intervention. It could have been seen cynically as an attempt to distract from the Lebanon debacle; that was certainly how the left saw it. But Reagan didn’t suffer much in the following year’s election for the deaths of over 200 Americans in Beirut or from any suspicion that Grenada was a smokescreen. Why did Reagan emerge unscathed from events that would have destroyed a Democratic administration like Carter’s?"

Guess the cons here who think it's not an apt comparison aren't on any conservative group's email list huh. Seem out of the loop.

I'm not seeing a lie or where they asked for help and were denied. Epic fail

Never happened in Benghazi.

Why did Reagan put the marines there in the first place? What was our vital interest? What was worth 250 dead marines?
 
On Benghazi, Congress Could Take a Lesson From Beirut

Beirut vs. Benghazi: 4 Lessons

Benghazi v. Beirut

Beirut Barracks vs. Benghazi

Ronald Reagan’s Benghazi - The New Yorker

What Benghazi Tells Us About the GOP Brand

"The Hezbollah bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983 cost more American lives, by far, than the hostage crisis and botched rescue. Reagan pulled out of Lebanon—and invaded Grenada, which proved to be a quick, if not quite clean, intervention. It could have been seen cynically as an attempt to distract from the Lebanon debacle; that was certainly how the left saw it. But Reagan didn’t suffer much in the following year’s election for the deaths of over 200 Americans in Beirut or from any suspicion that Grenada was a smokescreen. Why did Reagan emerge unscathed from events that would have destroyed a Democratic administration like Carter’s?"

Guess the cons here who think it's not an apt comparison aren't on any conservative group's email list huh. Seem out of the loop.

Only the most dishonest liberal, (but I repeat myself) would claim that Ronald Reagan needed an ulterior motive to invade a nation taken over by communists.
 

Forum List

Back
Top