Nope. I am trying to get through to some of you blockheads that Economics is only PART of the equation for a functional society.
"What doth it profit a man if he gaineth a booming economy yet he loseth representative democracy and suffer the birth of an autocracy?"
I am opposed to trading a booming economy in exchange for a family dynasty or President-for-Life scenario.
Next time, field a candidate who understands Cincinnatus instead of an ignorant arrogant orange piece-of-$hit who incited rebellion against the United States.
Nope. I am trying to get through to some of you blockheads that Economics is only PART of the equation for a functional society.
"What doth it profit a man if he gaineth a booming economy yet he loseth representative democracy and suffer the birth of an autocracy?"
I am opposed to trading a booming economy in exchange for a family dynasty or President-for-Life scenario.
Next time, field a candidate who understands Cincinnatus instead of an ignorant arrogant orange piece-of-$hit who incited rebellion against the United States.
Who in the hell are you? What are your credentials for your statements? NO LINKS. No experts, nothing just your juvenile mouthing! You spout MSM biased reports that Trump incited rebellion. WHERE is your proof?
NOW here is my proof that you are full of crap!
Democrats and news outlets have suggested that president Trump ordered military leadership to hold up the National Guard for over two hours after the Capitol Police chief requested assistance, with the New York Times falsely reporting that āTrump initially rebuffed and resisted requests to mobilize the National Guard to quell violent protests at the Capitol, according to a person with knowledge of the events.ā
But the 153-page IG report found that Pentagon leadershipās actions on the day of the riot āwere reasonable in light of the circumstances that existed on that day and requests from D.C. officials and the Capitol Policeā and found no indication that Trump spoke on Jan. 6 with then-acting secretary of defense Christopher Miller.
DOD Acted Appropriately in January 6 Response, Pentagon Watchdog Says The Department of Defense acted appropriately in its response to the Jan. 6 event on Capitol Hill, an investigatiā¦
Democrats and news outlets have suggested that president Trump ordered military leadership to hold up the National Guard for over two hours after the Capitol Police chief requested assistance, with the New York Times falsely reporting that āTrump initially rebuffed and resisted requests to mobilize the National Guard to quell violent protests at the Capitol, according to a person with knowledge of the events.ā
But the 153-page IG report found that Pentagon leadershipās actions on the day of the riot āwere reasonable in light of the circumstances that existed on that day and requests from D.C. officials and the Capitol Policeā and found no indication that Trump spoke on Jan. 6 with then-acting secretary of defense Christopher Miller.
DOD Acted Appropriately in January 6 Response, Pentagon Watchdog Says The Department of Defense acted appropriately in its response to the Jan. 6 event on Capitol Hill, an investigatiā¦
And that all goes to prove what? That there is nothing more to the social fabric of a nation than its economics? That Rump did not incite to Insurrection?>
You're hallucinating - and serving up entirely unrelated content... using your present rock-throwing as an excuse to go off on a rant of your own.
You're not exactly the Brightest Crayon in the box, are you? A common characteristic of Rumpian Minions.
Discover how U.S. LNG exports soared to new heights in the first half of 2021, meeting global demand with record-breaking numbers. Learn about the factors driving this growth and why the trend is expected to continue throughout the year.
US refiners have exported 802,000 barrels per day of gasoline on average in the first eight months of 2021, the highest for the period since 2018, with Brazil and Mexico as the top destinations. IHS Markit strategist Felipe Perez expects Latin America to continue to drive demand for US gasoline...
A) FACT: Prior to Biden In 2021, approximately 25% of total US oil production came from federal territory. In the same year, 12% of total natural gas production came from federal leases.
Roughly 25% of crude oil and more than 10% of natural gas produced in the US came from federal territory.
usafacts.org
B) FACT: Drilling Down On The Federal Leasing Facts
The Spin:
President Biden: āFirst, itās simply not true that my administration or policies are holding back domestic energy production. Thatās simply not true.ā
LIAR!!! The Fact:
The Biden administration started working to discourage the growth of natural gas and oil production in its first few weeks, setting the tone for the administration.
On his first day in office, Biden signed an Executive Order to impose a temporary moratorium on oil and gas lease activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, withdrew offshore areas in Arctic waters and the Bering Sea from oil and gas drilling, and revoked a key permit for the Keystone XL pipeline. In June 2021, the Biden administration went further in ANWR and suspended oil and gas leases.
In his second week in office,he signed another Order that put a āpauseā on new oil and gas leasing on federal lands and offshore waters. The Biden Administration violated Congressional statute by halting all federal oil and gas lease sales ā onshore and offshore ā and is thereby laying the groundwork for a decline in federal production over time.
Even where the administration hasnāt impeded natural gas and oil leasing, it has been an unwilling partner:
Interior Department Deputy Secretary Tommy Beaudreau on the Biden administrationās sole natural gas and oil lease sale: āThe fact is, the upcoming oil lease sale ā¦ is part of the legacy system that weāre here to reform. The administrative process for that lease sale had been completed during the previous administration. It is not the way that we would prefer to do business.ā
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki adds: āWeāre required to comply with the injunction; itās a legal case and legal process, but itās important for advocates and other people out there to understand that itās not aligned with our view, the Presidentās policies or the executive order that he signed.ā
President Biden: āFirst, itās simply not true that my administration or policies are holding back domestic energy production. Thatās simply not true.ā
AND YOU are so f...king ignorant!
Tell me what is the ONLY direct way a president can directly have an affect on gas prices, i.e. from oil...dummy?
Federal leases.
NOW DUMMY LOOK AT REALITY! From signing a federal oil lease to actual oil and gas production, the timeline can vary significantly, typically ranging from several years to over a decade.
FACTS dummy! Biden also did these oil/gas reduction efforts... ALL which he could control... on Federal lands.
So you are truly dumb to think he had any affect on NON-FEDERAL land/offshore oil production!
The Fact:
The Biden administration started working to discourage the growth of natural gas and oil production in its first few weeks, setting the tone for the administration.
On his first day in office, Biden signed an Executive Order to impose a temporary moratorium on oil and gas lease activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, withdrew offshore areas in Arctic waters and the Bering Sea from oil and gas drilling, and revoked a key permit for the Keystone XL pipeline. In June 2021, the Biden administration went further in ANWR and suspended oil and gas leases.
In his second week in office,he signed another Order that put a āpauseā on new oil and gas leasing on federal lands and offshore waters. The Biden Administration violated Congressional statute by halting all federal oil and gas lease sales ā onshore and offshore ā and is thereby laying the groundwork for a decline in federal production over time.
Even where the administration hasnāt impeded natural gas and oil leasing, it has been an unwilling partner:
Interior Department Deputy Secretary Tommy Beaudreau on the Biden administrationās sole natural gas and oil lease sale: āThe fact is, the upcoming oil lease sale ā¦ is part of the legacy system that weāre here to reform. The administrative process for that lease sale had been completed during the previous administration. It is not the way that we would prefer to do business.ā
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki adds: āWeāre required to comply with the injunction; itās a legal case and legal process, but itās important for advocates and other people out there to understand that itās not aligned with our view, the Presidentās policies or the executive order that he signed.ā
AND YOU are so f...king ignorant!
Tell me what is the ONLY direct way a president can directly have an affect on gas prices, i.e. from oil...dummy?
Federal leases.
NOW DUMMY LOOK AT REALITY! From signing a federal oil lease to actual oil and gas production, the timeline can vary significantly, typically ranging from several years to over a decade.
FACTS dummy! Biden also did these oil/gas reduction efforts... ALL which he could control... on Federal lands.
So you are truly dumb to think he had any affect on NON-FEDERAL land/offshore oil production!
The Fact:
The Biden administration started working to discourage the growth of natural gas and oil production in its first few weeks, setting the tone for the administration.
On his first day in office, Biden signed an Executive Order to impose a temporary moratorium on oil and gas lease activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, withdrew offshore areas in Arctic waters and the Bering Sea from oil and gas drilling, and revoked a key permit for the Keystone XL pipeline. In June 2021, the Biden administration went further in ANWR and suspended oil and gas leases.
In his second week in office,he signed another Order that put a āpauseā on new oil and gas leasing on federal lands and offshore waters. The Biden Administration violated Congressional statute by halting all federal oil and gas lease sales ā onshore and offshore ā and is thereby laying the groundwork for a decline in federal production over time.
Even where the administration hasnāt impeded natural gas and oil leasing, it has been an unwilling partner:
Interior Department Deputy Secretary Tommy Beaudreau on the Biden administrationās sole natural gas and oil lease sale: āThe fact is, the upcoming oil lease sale ā¦ is part of the legacy system that weāre here to reform. The administrative process for that lease sale had been completed during the previous administration. It is not the way that we would prefer to do business.ā
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki adds: āWeāre required to comply with the injunction; itās a legal case and legal process, but itās important for advocates and other people out there to understand that itās not aligned with our view, the Presidentās policies or the executive order that he signed.ā
You can't bring yourself to admit that energy production under Biden has been booming and all of your repetetive posting of pages and pages of half-baked thesis about how Biden will cripple American energy production didn't add up to anything worth a damn.
Simple question for you! Does the President have a direct control over leases signed on Federal lands? YES or No?
Next question for you... The USA has over 20% of all oil/gas productions on Federal lands. Biden stopped explorations as these facts point out! The Fact:
The Biden administration started working to discourage the growth of natural gas and oil production in its first few weeks, setting the tone for the administration.
On his first day in office, Biden signed an Executive Order to impose a temporary moratorium on oil and gas lease activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, withdrew offshore areas in Arctic waters and the Bering Sea from oil and gas drilling, and revoked a key permit for the Keystone XL pipeline. In June 2021, the Biden administration went further in ANWR and suspended oil and gas leases.
In his second week in office,he signed another Order that put a āpauseā on new oil and gas leasing on federal lands and offshore waters. The Biden Administration violated Congressional statute by halting all federal oil and gas lease sales ā onshore and offshore ā and is thereby laying the groundwork for a decline in federal production over time.
Even where the administration hasnāt impeded natural gas and oil leasing, it has been an unwilling partner:
Interior Department Deputy Secretary Tommy Beaudreau on the Biden administrationās sole natural gas and oil lease sale: āThe fact is, the upcoming oil lease sale ā¦ is part of the legacy system that weāre here to reform. The administrative process for that lease sale had been completed during the previous administration. It is not the way that we would prefer to do business.ā
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki adds: āWeāre required to comply with the injunction; itās a legal case and legal process, but itās important for advocates and other people out there to understand that itās not aligned with our view, the Presidentās policies or the executive order that he signed.ā
SO DUMMY if the President signs leases on Federal lands and according to these FACTS:
Biden signed nearly 1,600 FEWER Leases than Trump...i.e. fewer production of oil because of Biden!
Moron leases are a product of SUPPLY AND DEMAND, not just what President wants. Simply counting their number, without any consideration of quality and saying president-did-this is stupidity itself.
If oil is worth less companies will have less interest in signing leases. DUH
In 2020 there is a big fat -942for Trump. Yet you simply ignore that while making a whole thesis about Biden based on these numbers. Why because at the end of the day you are not looking at data to learn something, you are looking at data to confirm your forgone primitive politico conclusions that Rs are great and Ds suck.
Historic record is that American energy has been booming under both Obama and Biden - you can't deny even a word of that, so get lost.
