Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 61,968
- 26,049
- 2,173
It’s not my fault you can’t use logic to see what’s going on.You have offered exactly zero evidence of a quid pro quo.
All you done is beg for me to accept your guesswork.
Why do you think Trump de-classified and released the transcript of his call with Ukraine so soon after that weasel Vindman became a whistle blower?
If there were ever any evidence of a quid pro quo, it would have been in that call that Vindman said was a quid pro quo. There was no evidence of quid pro quo in that call, but you cannot let it go because Vindman got your hopes up.
If we always thought like you, prosecuting crimes would be exceedingly difficult.
If $97.36 is stolen and so someone is found with $97.36, we’d logically infer that’s the stolen money.
But you’d call that guess work, at least as long as it’s Trump or someone you want to believe is innocent.
Trump may have released the summary of the call because you’re correct in saying it doesn’t call for an all and out quid pro quo.
There’s no logical explanation for why the foreign aid was held up.
And then the matter of withholding a state visit.
Can we just step back and remember how absurd it is for Trump to ask about investigating his political opponent at all?