2019 Trump impeachment documents declassified

Trump often says one thing and does another.

Saying "no quid pro quo" is just covering his ass if he's still enforcing a quid pro quo which is substantiated by considerable evidence as already outlined.
Then how does one win with rules like that?

"You threatened to withold aid if Ukraine did not investigate Hunter Biden!"

"No. Here is proof that I said I want no quid pro quo."

"Aha! Exactly what a person who wanted quid pro quo would say!"

You remind me of Custer in this scene:


There's never been a rational alternative explanation for the sudden hold on the foreign aid.
What was the Trump White House's explanation?
 
Garland was always a horrible choice to be AG. Too scholarly, too mild-mannered, and way too cautious.

He should have been a law school professor or remained a judge. Anything but AG.
Agreed.
 
And you should be kissing his feet every day, since he did such a horrible job prosecuting Trump.
Well, he had nothing on Trump, so there is that minor issue.
 
There was no evidence.
God damn, creepy MAGA dude. You could literally trip over all the evidence that was in a bathroom at Mar-A-Lago.

And even Trump's VP Mike Pence testified how angry Trump was that he wouldn't help him steal the election on Jan 6.

Trump is deranged and evil. You are deranged and evil. That's not an adequate defense for your stupidity.
 
Then how does one win with rules like that?

"You threatened to withold aid if Ukraine did not investigate Hunter Biden!"

"No. Here is proof that I said I want no quid pro quo."

"Aha! Exactly what a person who wanted quid pro quo would say!"

You remind me of Custer in this scene:



What was the Trump White House's explanation?

It doesn’t get you very far if you lack any corroborating evidence. For example, you lack any tangible evidence of an actual investigation into Hunter Biden in Ukraine.

What we know is that Trump told Zelensky to announce an investigation and simultaneously put a halt to foreign aid to Ukraine. The most logical conclusion is that these were related.
 
  • Fact
Reactions: IM2
Well, he had nothing on Trump, so there is that minor issue.
God damn, creepy MAGA dude. You could literally trip over all the evidence that was in a bathroom at Mar-A-Lago.

And even Trump's VP Mike Pence testified how angry Trump was that he wouldn't help him steal the election on Jan 6.

Trump is deranged and evil. You are deranged and evil. That's not an adequate defense for your stupidity.
 
  • Fact
Reactions: IM2
God damn, creepy MAGA dude. You could literally trip over all the evidence that was in a bathroom at Mar-A-Lago.

And even Trump's VP Mike Pence testified how angry Trump was that he wouldn't help him steal the election on Jan 6.

Trump is deranged and evil. You are deranged and evil. That's not an adequate defense for your stupidity.
The only one having a meltdown is you. :abgg2q.jpg:
 
I read the transcript.

I think, making the shipment of weapons to an ally appropiated by congress contingent on an investigation into the son of your main political rival is pretty nefarious.
Great... here is the transcript.... please copy and paste the section showing "making the shipment of weapons to an ally appropiated by congress contingent on an investigation into the son of your main political rival"... Trump never mentioned weapons, Zelenskyy did.

 
God damn, creepy MAGA dude. You could literally trip over all the evidence that was in a bathroom at Mar-A-Lago.

And even Trump's VP Mike Pence testified how angry Trump was that he wouldn't help him steal the election on Jan 6.

Trump is deranged and evil. You are deranged and evil. That's not an adequate defense for your stupidity.
Listen fool, mewler spent 40,000,000 dollars and had 150 of the most unethical Trump haters he could find investigating him.

They found NOTHING!

TRUMP is the cleanest person out there.

Unlike your corrupt pieces of shit.
 
April 13, 2026
The report effectively documents serious flaws and apparent bias in how the 2019 whistleblower complaint was processed and escalated. It reinforces the “impeachment hoax” narrative by showing the evidentiary weaknesses at the foundation.
Then House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) Chairman, Schiff (along with Nancy Pelosi) is accused of using the false, second-hand whistleblower narrative to generate media attention and lay the groundwork for Trump’s first impeachment in December 2019. Schiff was one of the key Congressional figures who helped escalate and weaponize the hearsay complaint into the impeachment process.


DNI Tulsi Gabbard Exposes Conspiracy Used By Congress To Impeach President Trump | Office of the Director of National Intelligence
DNI Tulsi Gabbard Exposes Conspiracy Used By Congress To Impeach President Trump | Office of the Director of National Intelligence

1776300842232.webp
 
  • Funny
Reactions: IM2
It doesn’t get you very far if you lack any corroborating evidence. For example, you lack any tangible evidence of an actual investigation into Hunter Biden in Ukraine.
Corroborating evidence for what?

I'm not claiming that Trump insisted on quid pro quo, I thought you were.

Why would I need evidence of an actual investigation of Hunter Biden by Ukraine? If Ukraine never investigated Hunter Biden and Trump gave them the money anyway, that is case closed on the great quid pro quo mystery.
What we know is that Trump told Zelensky to announce an investigation
What were Trump's exact words?
and simultaneously put a halt to foreign aid to Ukraine. The most logical conclusion is that these were related.
You mean your most hopeful guess is that these were related.

You lack any tangible evidence of an actual connection between the two.
 
Listen fool, mewler spent 40,000,000 dollars and had 150 of the most unethical Trump haters he could find investigating him.

They found NOTHING!

TRUMP is the cleanest person out there.


Unlike your corrupt pieces of shit.
Crazy. Radicalized. Deranged. Evil.

All adjectives that describe your mentally ill ass.
 
Corroborating evidence for what?

I'm not claiming that Trump insisted on quid pro quo, I thought you were.

Why would I need evidence of an actual investigation of Hunter Biden by Ukraine? If Ukraine never investigated Hunter Biden and Trump gave them the money anyway, that is case closed on the great quid pro quo mystery.

What were Trump's exact words?

You mean your most hopeful guess is that these were related.

You lack any tangible evidence of an actual connection between the two.
Trump released the funds immediately upon learning of the whistleblower report.

This only adds further evidence to the claim that the funds were being used as leverage. He was caught and trying to clean up the mess. If the funds were being held for a legitimate reason, he wouldn’t have done so.

Again, based on the totality of information, this is by far the most likely explanation.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2
Crazy. Radicalized. Deranged. Evil.

All adjectives that describe your mentally ill ass.
Yeah, describes you and your cult to a "T"
 
15th post
Trump released the funds immediately upon learning of the whistleblower report.

This only adds further evidence to the claim that the funds were being used as leverage. He was caught and trying to clean up the mess. If the funds were being held for a legitimate reason, he wouldn’t have done so.

Again, based on the totality of information, this is by far the most likely explanation.
That's an opinion.

What has been proven?
 
That's an opinion.

What has been proven?
It’s perfectly rational and hardly the only piece of evidence.

Taken in totality, the evidence all points to their being a quid pro quo.

If sufficiently motivated, anyone can deny even the most obvious evidence. And you’re highly motivated to believe in Trump’s innocence.
 
No, I don't vote for a mentally ill man-child like Trump who tries to steal elections and tries to kill his own freaking VP.

That's what deranged MAGAs such as yourself do.
No, you vote for a mentally retarded leftist.
 
It’s perfectly rational and hardly the only piece of evidence.

Taken in totality, the evidence all points to their being a quid pro quo.

If sufficiently motivated, anyone can deny even the most obvious evidence. And you’re highly motivated to believe in Trump’s innocence.
You have offered exactly zero evidence of a quid pro quo.

All you done is beg for me to accept your guesswork.

Why do you think Trump de-classified and released the transcript of his call with Ukraine so soon after that weasel Vindman became a whistle blower?

If there were ever any evidence of a quid pro quo, it would have been in that call that Vindman said was a quid pro quo. There was no evidence of quid pro quo in that call, but you cannot let it go because Vindman got your hopes up.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom