Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is good to see that you don't buy into this "OH NOES! TEH GHEYS!" hysteria.If this is true based on someone here stating it. Why all the worry about being forced to accept it? Are you that worried about 2%? Regardless if you feel its abnormal, a choice or whatever. How can 2% Really be that mich of a threat to your way of life. At 2% the odds of you running into a gay person are rather slim.
Well slim if you dont actively go seeking it.
Who feels gays are a threat to their life? I don't and I run into many of them, as they are tourists who flock to art galleries. They are fun to be around, especially when sampling wine..lol. They usually come in, with their friends and we all have a good time. They are just people, people.
Also I have employed people who are gay. What matters to me when selecting an employee, is not their sexual preference but their ability and desire to do the job that is waiting for them. I hold all applicants equal and may the best man or woman for the job, receive it.
So is evolution a lie? You can't have it both ways.. Which is a lie???
You have the OP whining about gays and yet it's the librul LIE of homosexuality being an inherited gene- it's the DEMANDS of an absolute TINY minority who when any other group such as Christians or Jews, were they to DEMAND their religious dogma be taught in elementary schools would scream the loudest.
LMAO It's a joke.. the entire argument and emotional blackmail of the lie.. Militant homosexual cultists demand their way or none.
If this is true based on someone here stating it. Why all the worry about being forced to accept it? Are you that worried about 2%? Regardless if you feel its abnormal, a choice or whatever. How can 2% Really be that mich of a threat to your way of life. At 2% the odds of you running into a gay person are rather slim.
Well slim if you dont actively go seeking it.
In England they are already suing the churches for not letting them get married in the church.
We understand this has nothing to do with equality. Why don't you?
they are asking that their DEMANDS be bowed down to or they will SUE YOU..
That's a threat to peoples livelihoods in society
People have a right to challenge a law that they think is unconstitutional; see Loving vs. Virginia.
Loving was based upon bigotry- race based. If people can start suing over a sexual act, can Zoophiliacs sue over not being able to **** animals and marry them also?
- 2% of population (98th percentile; 1 person out of 50; IQ 130) is considered gifted and eligible for membership in the Mensa InternationalIf this is true based on someone here stating it. Why all the worry about being forced to accept it? Are you that worried about 2%? Regardless if you feel its abnormal, a choice or whatever. How can 2% Really be that mich of a threat to your way of life. At 2% the odds of you running into a gay person are rather slim.
Well slim if you dont actively go seeking it.
- 2% of the world population has green eyes
- 2% of adults in the world own more than half the world's wealth
- 2% of Americans live on farms although less than 1% claim farming as their major occupation
- 2 percent of the earths population are natural redheads
- 2% of the population is affected by compulsive hoarding
- 2% (620,000+) of US population died in the American Civil War
- approximately 2% of the world's households have internet access (http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2011.pdf)
- 2% of Americans consider themselves "vegans"
The point is that in some way we all belong to a 2% category that is part of a larger society - but we still want and except to be treated as equals.
No it was a good answer. You just dismiss it because it isnt the answer you want. That and the fact that you're stupid.Non answer. ...
Give me a break Rabbi - accommodate? Gays were being actively kicked out of the military for their sexual orientation and were simply asking for that to stop - because it's ridiculous.
They weren't asking for any special gay barracks, or gay shoes, or gay food, or any other sort of additional accommodation that wouldn't be accessible by straight people; they were simply asking for the right to exist in the military.
Was that "crossing the line" for you?
What planet are you on? No gays were kicked out, especially under DADT, unless they just wanted to be.
I notice the first result of the new policy is Bradley Manning. Or should I say Chelsea Manning?
Oh? Gay vets discharged under DADT can sue for full severance | Suits & Sentences blogNo it was a good answer. You just dismiss it because it isnt the answer you want. That and the fact that you're stupid.
Give me a break Rabbi - accommodate? Gays were being actively kicked out of the military for their sexual orientation and were simply asking for that to stop - because it's ridiculous.
They weren't asking for any special gay barracks, or gay shoes, or gay food, or any other sort of additional accommodation that wouldn't be accessible by straight people; they were simply asking for the right to exist in the military.
Was that "crossing the line" for you?
What planet are you on? No gays were kicked out, especially under DADT, unless they just wanted to be.
I notice the first result of the new policy is Bradley Manning. Or should I say Chelsea Manning?
2% of the population is forcing 98% of the population to make changes to their own lives to suit that 2%.
How have we forced YOUR life to change?
2% of the population is forcing 98% of the population to make changes to their own lives to suit that 2%.
How have we forced YOUR life to change?
They forced that photographer to change her life. Gays tried to force my life to change but it didn't work.
And they want to shove it up the A***s of anyone who isn't!!!![]()
Ok so no real serious answer yet..
How are 2% a threat to society...feel free to leave out silly hyperbole
What planet are you on? No gays were kicked out, especially under DADT, unless they just wanted to be.
Really - the only gay people that discharged from the military under DADT were guys/gals that "wanted to be"? Can you back up that claim?
I notice the first result of the new policy is Bradley Manning. Or should I say Chelsea Manning?
Yea and she really got off easy, right?