Public accommodations laws with provisions for sexual orientation have nothing to do with the First Amendment, religious liberty, or free association.
Public accommodations laws are perfectly necessary, proper, and Constitutional pursuant to Commerce Clause jurisprudence (Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States (1964)).
No, these laws are gross oppression and abnegation of the right of association. And new: I remember when businesses could choose whom they did or didn't want to service. That was a lot better. Free.
We are now forced to service dreadful people we would never have anything to do with if we could avoid it. This is plainly gross oppression.