Yes, I found it. It was in a section explaining how specific legal definitions require more than two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other's actions or interests. The report did show that trump's campaign and Russia did take actions that were informed by and in response to the other's actions and interests but didn't reach the definition s they were using. I might try to make an excuse and say I was misinformed by AI, (I posted its response to the question) but I should have dug deeper into the facts. I grudgingly admit you were right. I was wrong. However, that still didn't exonerate trump for the issue. On the issue of obstruction Mueller said “we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.” In fact, the report says, his team would have exonerated Trump on obstruction charges if it could.
I hate admitting I'm wrong, but I'll grit my teeth and do it when I must. I never argue something I don't believe to be true. Thank you for the correction.