19 more days till trump solves Ukraine war.

The investigation “identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign” and established that the Trump Campaign “showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton”

  • In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President.[5] Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent.
  • Senior members of the Trump campaign, including Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, New York, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”[6]
  • Beginning in June 2016, a Trump associate “forecast to senior [Trump] Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton.”[7] A section of the Report that remains heavily redacted suggests that Roger Stone was this associate and that he had significant contacts with the campaign about Wikileaks.[8]
  • The Report described multiple occasions where Trump associates lied to investigators about Trump associate contacts with Russia. Trump associates George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts. In addition, Roger Stone faces trial this fall for obstruction of justice, five counts of making false statements, and one count of witness tampering.
  • The Report contains no evidence that any Trump campaign official reported their contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks to U.S. law enforcement authorities during the campaign or presidential transition, despite public reports on Russian hacking starting in June 2016 and candidate Trump’s August 2016 intelligence briefing warning him that Russia was seeking to interfere in the election.
  • The Report raised questions about why Trump associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia.[9]

Special Counsel Mueller declined to exonerate President Trump and instead detailed multiple episodes in which he engaged in obstructive conduct

  • The Mueller Report states that if the Special Counsel’s Office felt they could clear the president of wrongdoing, they would have said so. Instead, the Report explicitly states that it “does not exonerate” the President[10] and explains that the Office of Special Counsel “accepted” the Department of Justice policy that a sitting President cannot be indicted.[11]
  • The Mueller report details multiple episodes in which there is evidence that the President obstructed justice. The pattern of conduct and the manner in which the President sought to impede investigations—including through one-on-one meetings with senior officials—is damning to the President.
  • Five episodes of obstructive conduct stand out as being particularly serious:
    • In June 2017 President Trump directed White House Counsel Don McGahn to order the firing of the Special Counsel after press reports that Mueller was investigating the President for obstruction of justice;[12] months later Trump asked McGahn to falsely refute press accounts reporting this directive and create a false paper record on this issue – all of which McGahn refused to do.[13]
    • After National Security Advisor Michael Flynn was fired in February 2017 for lying to FBI investigators about his contacts with Russian Ambassador Kislyak, Trump cleared his office for a one-on-one meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey and asked Comey to “let [Flynn] go;” he also asked then-Deputy National Security Advisor K.T. McFarland to draft an internal memo saying Trump did not direct Flynn to call Kislyak, which McFarland did not do because she did not know whether that was true.[14]
    • In July 2017, the President directed former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski to instruct the Attorney General to limit Mueller’s investigation, a step the Report asserted “was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct.”[15]
    • In 2017 and 2018, the President asked the Attorney General to “un-recuse” himself from the Mueller inquiry, actions from which a “reasonable inference” could be made that “the President believed that an unrecused Attorney General would play a protective role and could shield the President from the ongoing Russia Investigation.”[16]
    • The Report raises questions about whether the President, by and through his private attorneys, floated the possibility of pardons for the purpose of influencing the cooperation of Flynn, Manafort, and an unnamed person with law enforcement.[17]
All minor shit that means almost nothing and I’d never vote for Trump, if I did vote.

Your hatred for him clouds your judgement.
 
Why do you rely on leftist interpretations of the Mueller report, and not the actual words in the report?

Here is the actual report.


In it you will find these words…



did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts,
Wrong. The report was submitted to William Barr on March 22, and did not include that phrase. Bill Barr released his personal summary of the report on March 24 with that phrase included as part of personal summary. Those that actually did the investigation and prepared the report vehemently disagreed with Barr's summary.
Here is what AI said concerning the quote.
The words "did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts" are from a letter written by Attorney General William Barr to Congress on March 24, 2019. This letter summarized his principal conclusions of the Mueller Report.
 
Just posted a link to the actual report, and a quote proving you are a lying sack of shit.
Again, You should have read the actual report instead of just what fox told you. Barrs summary was erroneous.
 
Really? Not a follower of history, huh?

Obama - Putin invades and takes over Crimea
Trump - Putin behaves
Biden - Putin invades Ukraine.
Really

Heil Shitler! - The pootin still murders people in Syria thru Assad.

Heil Shitler! - Signs Doha Agreement cutting deal in Afghanistan with muslim terrorists.
 
Just posted a link to the actual report, and a quote proving you are a lying sack of shit.
Identify where that remark is included anywhere in the report other than Bill Barr's letter which was written two days after the report was completed and presented to him.
 
Identify where that remark is included anywhere in the report other than Bill Barr's letter which was written two days after the report was completed and presented to him.
Page 10 you moron.

“The investigation did not establish that the Trump campaign coordinate with the Russian government in its election interference activities”.

Now, sit down and STFU, Simp.

:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
 
Page 10 you moron.

“The investigation did not establish that the Trump campaign coordinate with the Russian government in its election interference activities”.

Now, sit down and STFU, Simp.

:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
Please identify which line you are referencing. I just read page 10 --- twice, and failed to find either of the quotes you posted.
 

The investigation “identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign” and established that the Trump Campaign “showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton”

  • In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President.[5] Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent.
  • Senior members of the Trump campaign, including Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, New York, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”[6]
  • Beginning in June 2016, a Trump associate “forecast to senior [Trump] Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton.”[7] A section of the Report that remains heavily redacted suggests that Roger Stone was this associate and that he had significant contacts with the campaign about Wikileaks.[8]
  • The Report described multiple occasions where Trump associates lied to investigators about Trump associate contacts with Russia. Trump associates George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts. In addition, Roger Stone faces trial this fall for obstruction of justice, five counts of making false statements, and one count of witness tampering.
  • The Report contains no evidence that any Trump campaign official reported their contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks to U.S. law enforcement authorities during the campaign or presidential transition, despite public reports on Russian hacking starting in June 2016 and candidate Trump’s August 2016 intelligence briefing warning him that Russia was seeking to interfere in the election.
  • The Report raised questions about why Trump associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia.[9]

Special Counsel Mueller declined to exonerate President Trump and instead detailed multiple episodes in which he engaged in obstructive conduct

  • The Mueller Report states that if the Special Counsel’s Office felt they could clear the president of wrongdoing, they would have said so. Instead, the Report explicitly states that it “does not exonerate” the President[10] and explains that the Office of Special Counsel “accepted” the Department of Justice policy that a sitting President cannot be indicted.[11]
  • The Mueller report details multiple episodes in which there is evidence that the President obstructed justice. The pattern of conduct and the manner in which the President sought to impede investigations—including through one-on-one meetings with senior officials—is damning to the President.
  • Five episodes of obstructive conduct stand out as being particularly serious:
    • In June 2017 President Trump directed White House Counsel Don McGahn to order the firing of the Special Counsel after press reports that Mueller was investigating the President for obstruction of justice;[12] months later Trump asked McGahn to falsely refute press accounts reporting this directive and create a false paper record on this issue – all of which McGahn refused to do.[13]
    • After National Security Advisor Michael Flynn was fired in February 2017 for lying to FBI investigators about his contacts with Russian Ambassador Kislyak, Trump cleared his office for a one-on-one meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey and asked Comey to “let [Flynn] go;” he also asked then-Deputy National Security Advisor K.T. McFarland to draft an internal memo saying Trump did not direct Flynn to call Kislyak, which McFarland did not do because she did not know whether that was true.[14]
    • In July 2017, the President directed former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski to instruct the Attorney General to limit Mueller’s investigation, a step the Report asserted “was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct.”[15]
    • In 2017 and 2018, the President asked the Attorney General to “un-recuse” himself from the Mueller inquiry, actions from which a “reasonable inference” could be made that “the President believed that an unrecused Attorney General would play a protective role and could shield the President from the ongoing Russia Investigation.”[16]
    • The Report raises questions about whether the President, by and through his private attorneys, floated the possibility of pardons for the purpose of influencing the cooperation of Flynn, Manafort, and an unnamed person with law enforcement.[17]
Ummmm, no evidence of anything. Just opinions.

Do you understand the difference between opinions and facts?

It seems you don’t.
 
Ummmm, no evidence of anything. Just opinions.

Do you understand the difference between opinions and facts?

It seems you don’t.
So, it should be easy for you to point out where the quote that Nostra gave can be found.
 
Page 10 you moron.

“The investigation did not establish that the Trump campaign coordinate with the Russian government in its election interference activities”.

Now, sit down and STFU, Simp.

:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
the investigation did not establish that the
Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.

A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.

"coordination" does not have a settled definition in federal criminal law. We understood coordination to require an agreement-tacit or express- between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference. That requires more than the two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other's actions or interests. We applied the term coordination in that sense when stating in the report that the investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.
 
Again, You should have read the actual report instead of just what fox told you. Barrs summary was erroneous.
I showed you the report, stupid. You brought some lefty spin of the actual report.

How about you quote the actual report saying the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to influence the election BULLDOG

GO!
 
the investigation did not establish that the
Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.

A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.

"coordination" does not have a settled definition in federal criminal law. We understood coordination to require an agreement-tacit or express- between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference. That requires more than the two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other's actions or interests. We applied the term coordination in that sense when stating in the report that the investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.
Thanks for confirming there was no collusion. :113: :113:
 
I showed you the report, stupid. You brought some lefty spin of the actual report.

How about you quote the actual report saying the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to influence the election BULLDOG

GO!
Actually you edited out the important caveats in the report that explain what the single sentence you posted actual meant.

Read the accompanying parts of Muellers statement explaining what you posted had to be done in context with how they defined coordination.
 
Actually you edited out the important caveats in the report that explain what the single sentence you posted actual meant.

Read the accompanying parts of Muellers statement explaining what you posted had to be done in context with how they defined coordination.
Quote where I edited out the part where they found the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to influence the election, Simp.

GO!
 
15th post
Thanks for confirming there was no collusion. :113: :113:
Once more, you are leaving out the caveats that Mueller gave to his definition.

It's similar to claiming that Trump did not "rape" E. Jean Carroll with a quote from the trial. But leave out that the New York Court of Appeals upheld the judgement against Trump being consistent with "rape", because the New York penal code's archaic definition was inconsistent with the majority of states or federal definitions.
 
Once more, you are leaving out the caveats that Mueller gave to his definition.

It's similar to claiming that Trump did not "rape" E. Jean Carroll with a quote from the trial. But leave out that the New York Court of Appeals upheld the judgement against Trump being consistent with "rape", because the New York penal code's archaic definition was inconsistent with the majority of states or federal definitions.
Get back to me when you have an answer, Simp.
 
If he ends that war while still president elect, as he claims, it will be a great accomplishment worthy of praise. If not, it's just another of his lies that only his supporters believed. What will you do if he fails at ending the war? Will you acknowledge it was just another lie?
Nope, we will acknowledge that the Biden administration was so screwed up, that undoing the damage caused was going to be almost impossible if not purely un-doable. The investigations will probably take decades to find out how bad the damage truly was.

The people better think long and hard about ever letting a militant leftist Democrat from hell, ever gain power in this country again. Some diabolical chit has gone on in this country, and also out in the world while under their watch or rather indirectly due to their acts committed.
 
Back
Top Bottom