1887 Electoral Count Act (ECA)

task0778

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2017
12,309
11,413
2,265
Texas hill country
This legislation allows members of Congress to dispute presidential election results, which provided the basis for an effort by former President Donald Trump and his Republican allies to overturn the presidential election on Jan. 6, 2021. Remember? Trump wanted Pence to use this Act to throw out the 2020 election in his capacity as the President of the Senate.

A bipartisan group of U.S. senators is discussing a scaled-back law focused on safeguarding election results and protecting election officials from harassment following Democrats' twin defeats on their voting-rights bills. Lawmakers led by Republican Senator Susan Collins and including conservative Democrats Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, are due to meet virtually on Friday to discuss reform of the ECA. Collins, who said her group includes six Democrats, told reporters that the aim is "an election reform bill that is truly bipartisan, that would address many of the problems that arose on Jan. 6 and that would help restore confidence in our elections."

Senator Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, is separately preparing to introduce ECA reform legislation that would curb the role of Congress and place responsibility for resolving disputes and challenges with states, according to an aide.

Manchin said he wants threatening or accosting an election official to be a federal crime.

After the Democratic voting-rights effort failed on Wednesday, senators said there could be scope to meet the 60-vote threshold with more limited legislation aimed at curbing congressional intervention in presidential elections through ECA reform. "The people who tried to overturn the last election focused on using that act in a way that would have subverted the will of the people. And so there's interest in clarifying the act," Republican Senator Mitt Romney, a member of the Collins group, told reporters.

The Collins group is also considering proposals to protect elected officials from harassment and unwarranted removal from office, address election security and improve election management, according to a person familiar with the matter.



"Unwarranted removal from office", I dunno what that means. Maybe they're talking about removal from office of someone who was confirmed to be the winner and sworn in and then subsequently found out to have fraudulently won. That's just a guess though, we already have the means to remove people from office as necessary.

I will say though that I like the attempts at bipartisanship, this is the way Congress oughta work. And this is why I opposed the end of the filibuster.
 
Threatening any federal official is already a federal crime. What Manchin is talking about is having manditory election crime charges against anyone who attempts to coerce a federal or state official to illegally sway the outcome of an election. If this law was on the books, they could have charged Trump for threatening state officials.
 
Negatory Will, the VP is the President of the Senate and casts a tiebreaking vote if necessary. There is no President of the House, just the Speaker. And that ain't the VP.
sorry, long day
 
Threatening any federal official is already a federal crime. What Manchin is talking about is having manditory election crime charges against anyone who attempts to coerce a federal or state official to illegally sway the outcome of an election. If this law was on the books, they could have charged Trump for threatening state officials.


What state official did Emanuel Goldstien threaten?
 
This legislation allows members of Congress to dispute presidential election results
I believe it's exactly the opposite.

Electoral Count Act changes being circulated aimed at limiting ability of a joint session of Congress to throw out electoral votes. Updates process for states’ electors, clarifies Congress’ and VP’s limited role and narrows ability of lawmakers to challenge results, per summary

 
Seeing as how some states are making it possible to throw out the results of an election tying the hands of congress to dispute these shenanigans seems like a calculated attack on our elections rather than a safeguard.
 

Forum List

Back
Top