Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You certainly don’t consider Gaza occupied, do you? The Israelis vacated the area close to 20 years ago.Why? We have barely begun this discussion. I am reconsidering my view regarding occupied vs. disputed.
We are DEFINITELY NOT saying that. We are saying that if we have to do a little land trading, we can.If we leave everything open, aren’t we saying the entire state of Israel is disputed territory?
Yep, these things would be expected. Resources (water) would have to have some level of careful mutual management agreements.I would think we would need some limitations if we are trying to be realistic (as in this could actually work) but I will go with this.
In general, the parameters would include:
Territorial integrity.
Access to resources.
A independent structure for governing.
A independent judicial system.
The ability to enter into treaties, agreements and trade with other nations.
One would hope the ability to maintain peaceful relations with other states, but the reality is most viable states do not consistently do this.
Undecided.Why? We have barely begun this discussion. I am reconsidering my view regarding occupied vs. disputed.
There are a lot of countries facing similar threats around the world, they just don’t get any attention. I also don’t think that has any bearing on how to resolve the issue of disputed territory.Ireland?
For a true model, we’d have to find a country in similar straights to Israel: a country that Iran is trying to destroy by funding terrorist attacks against it from surrounding areas.
I am going to add to this then: the non-negotiables need to be identified.We are DEFINITELY NOT saying that. We are saying that if we have to do a little land trading, we can.
Yep, these things would be expected. Resources (water) would have to have some level of careful mutual management agreements.
Nothing similar to Israel. What countries are facing terrorist attacks funded by the Islamic Terror State of Iran?There are a lot of countries facing similar threats around the world, they just don’t get any attention. I also don’t think that has any bearing on how to resolve the issue of disputed territory.
Non-negotiables:I am going to add to this then: the non-negotiables need to be identified.
It's just a thought experiment on a very limited aspect of the conflict.There should be no discussion about separate states until the Muslim terrorists 1) return the hostages, and 2) honor a cease-fire for one year.
Nothing similar?Nothing similar to Israel. What countries are facing terrorist attacks funded by the Islamic Terror State of Iran?
Excellent! I was actually trying to think of things that have been obstacles in prior negotiations because they were “nonnegotiable” such as “right of return “.Non-negotiables:
contiguous territory for each state (excluding Gaza)
right of return is limited: Jews to Israel, Arabs to Palestine (family reunification excepted)
mutual resource management
no forced ethnic cleansing (voluntary is fine)
How's that for a start?
And in none of those examples are there nationwide protests across America and Europe and Australia, with screams about “genocide,” and chants to kill those with the same ethnic heritage as the (perceived) perpetrator as there is with Israel and the Jews.Nothing similar?
Ukraine…which is facing a far worse existential threat against a much stronger enemy than Iran.
Taiwan and China…a balancing act.
South Sudan, struggling against multiple armed militia groups tearing it apart.
There are a number of armed conflicts around the world with militias and insurgency groups backed by outside states.
Now you are flailing all over the place with irrelevant nonsequiters. None of that has any bearing on what might be a comparable model for creating states.And in none of those examples are there nationwide protests, with screams about “genocide,” and chants to kill those with the same ethnic heritage as the (perceived) perpetrator as there is with Israel and the Jews.
Double standards.
No, I’m pointing out that Israel has no comparables, given how villainized it is - and now determined people are to side against it.Now you are flailing all over the place with irrelevant nonsequiters. None of that has any bearing on what might be a comparable model for creating states.
I gave you a number of comparables of states with similar threats. You just choose not to see it. Ireland might be comparable but I don’t know enough to be sure. Religious factions, separatist movements, long history of violence and terrorism, legacy of British rule.No, I’m pointing out that Israel has no comparables, given how villainized it is - and now determined people are to side against it.
It's just a thought experiment on a very limited aspect of the conflict.
What Caliphate? The Arabs have lived in Palestine for a long time, but they never had political control of Palestine.Maybe we’re looking at this all wrong. With regard to the Arabs.
I’ve been delving into the Sykes Picot Agreement, and the notion of created artificial nation states. Syria, Jordan, Iraq, you name it. Carved out of the former Ottoman Empire. The Arabs want their Caliphate back. It’s rooted deeply into their psyche.
Lots of material there to sift through. To anyone who is interested.
Did you watch Caroline's show yesterday? She is predicting impending demise of all the countries in the region, Syria only being the first.Maybe we’re looking at this all wrong. With regard to the Arabs.
I’ve been delving into the Sykes Picot Agreement, and the notion of created artificial nation states. Syria, Jordan, Iraq, you name it. Carved out of the former Ottoman Empire. The Arabs want their Caliphate back. It’s rooted deeply into their psyche.
Lots of material there to sift through. To anyone who is interested.