18 Democrat State Attorneys General Sue to Stop Trump’s Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

In a USSC case about illegals having babies?

You sure about that?

See, that's part of your codicil no one is buying.

 

[AsherN]

Then why doesn’t the 14th of the constitution say “in the jurisdiction?”

Because children born of citizens abroad are also subject to the jurisdiction of the US. if you work abroad, you still need to pay income tax.

 

[AsherN]

With the exception of diplomats having immunity because they are not subject to US jurisdiction.

Correct. And diplomats and their family are explicitly excluded in the 14th.

 

[martybegan]

Anchor babies do not exist. Parents of children born here can and will be deported. Where is the anchor part?

Just wait for the yelling and screaming from the left saying we are deporting American Citizens.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

We will not deport American citizens against their will.

Children are legally held by parents, so if they go their kids will, too, unless legal arrangements are made otherwise.

 

[martybegan]

We will not deport American citizens against their will.

Children are legally held by parents, so if they go their kids will, too, unless legal arrangements are made otherwise.

They can come back when they are 18.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Just wait for the yelling and screaming from the left saying we are deporting American Citizens.

Well, that would be nice if it were true, except that it is not. Liberals always lie when it is to their advantage.

 

[martybegan]

Well, that would be nice if it were true, except that it is not. Liberals always lie when it is to their advantage.

If an illegal mother is deported with her 1 year old born here, and we send them back with her, they will use it as a rallying point.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If an illegal mother is deported with her 1 year old born here, and we send them back with her, they will use it as a rallying point.

Who gives a shit? They are just as wrong as they would have been 5 years ago. Nothing changed. Liberals are always hysterically wrong on most things, all the time. This will not change. The simple fact is the kid is a citizen and if the parents want to give them up for adoption, that is their prerogative if they are being deported. It is also their option to take the child with them and can return when they are of age. That is especially true if the parents have other children born outside the US being deported with them. To some it sucks, like those liberal airheads, but it is the law as it currently stands.

Want to change it? Change the Constitution to eliminate jus soli birthright. That way no one can ever reinterpret the wording easily as it is being attempted now.

 

[jbrownson0831]

Doesn't matter. He's going lose. You sycophants should start early preparing yourselves for the losses coming your way.

I thought you were the suckophant skrewey.....

 

[johnwk]

Well, that would be nice if it were true, except that it is not. Liberals always lie when it is to their advantage.

So, you finally reveal why you lie so much.

 

[johnwk]

Correct. And diplomats and their family are explicitly excluded in the 14th.

But these will be . . . along with their so-called 'anchor baby'

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Admiral is a liberal? I wondered.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Ahhhhh, the wild screeching of the progressive fascists....
, they don't get to come to our country and drop a baby and become legal overnight.

It doesn't work like that in ANY country on Earth.

So it shouldn't happen here.

Constitution? What Constitution?? This guy‘s theory is that we should just do things that a lot of other countries do because….they’re a lot!

 

[j-mac]

Constitution? What Constitution?? This guy‘s theory is that we should just do things that a lot of other countries do because….they’re a lot!
View attachment 1206913

Well, we will have to file this post under a topic where liberals actually love the constitution...Unlike a former hero of the like this one....

Justice​

Justice Stephen Breyer of the U.S. Supreme Court is known for his cosmopolitan views and his ability to understand and apply the laws of other nations. In his book, "The Court and the World," he discusses how U.S. courts can adapt to foreign legal practices and how foreign judges can learn from U.S. legal systems. Breyer's work highlights the importance of considering international practices and the influence of foreign legal doctrines on U.S. law.

<em>Judiciaries Worldwide</em>: A Resource on Comparative Judicial Practice

judicature.duke.edu

 

[WEATHER53]

Whatever happened to JohnESloWit?

 

[Harry Dresden]

Whatever happened to JohnESloWit?

yea havent seen him around,,,,,same with moonglow....or bart simpson...

 

[j-mac]

yea havent seen him around,,,,,same with moonglow....or bart simpson...

Busy with their 'sock' accounts?

 

[westwall]

Constitution? What Constitution?? This guy‘s theory is that we should just do things that a lot of other countries do because….they’re a lot!
View attachment 1206913

Showing yet again that leftoids, like you, have no sense of humor.

 

[drudge X]

If the SC continues to allow birthright citizenship such as anchor baby, tourism birth, or this bullshit asylum birth, the US may as well declare the country got rid of its borders. All are welcome including ISIS, Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iranian hardliners so they can make America great.