16 parralle similarities between the 9/11 and covid ops hoax.

[Soupnazi630]

Explosions are typical in all fires especially in large office buildings witrh massive combustables on every floor.
No they were not insulted the firefighters overwhelmingly know the investigation was correct and view you, and ogthers like you, with contempt.

No expert in controlled demo said that crap. There is no evidence of controlled demo

No- they are typical IF and when fire reaches electrical boards- MOST EVERYTHING in an office bldg HAS to meet fire code-i.e., be flame retardant- I would strongly suggest you educate yourself- whatever education you have is failing you- big time-

Wrong they are typical whether or not the fire reaches the electrical boards which is irrelevant. Spray cans for cleaning, large bottles of cleaning fluid, gas lines for stoves and ovens in restaraunts, computer monitors, acetalyne torches for maintenance. The list goes on bvut any or all of these things explode in fire regardless of whether the elctric boxes are touched.

I am better educated than you junior and you are stating falsehoods which have been corrected.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The government never claim ed.Her fuel caused the collapse.

As.usually you have been owned and are in denial

I don't like picking on he weak and small- I'll leave you to your own devices with a bit of advice- there is, literally, a world of knowledge at your finger tips-

You cannot pick on a child as you are very weak.

I have accassed more of that knowledge than you and I stated fact

The government has never claimed that JET fuel brought down the towers which is why the fool LARAM is constantly defeated. He still thinks they said that. You clearly are as ignorant and uninformed as he is

 

[Soupnazi630]

The first question we must ask of any conspiracy is who gained the most? ...

It certainly wasn't the Rich ... we paid through our noses for that ... Saudi terrorists did very well, we invaded Iraq for them ... sold them $108 billion worth of military equipment ... economic embargo on Iran ... I'd say it was the Saudis who gained the most ... ISIS did it, clear and plain ...

I’m not sure on Covid but with 9/11 it follows the same pattern of the jfk assassination that there were several put options made in the prior days to the event,the fact those people were not even investigated proves what a joke of an investigation both cases were.

They were all investigated you lie again

 

[ReinyDays]

I’m not sure on Covid but with 9/11 it follows the same pattern of the jfk assassination that there were several put options made in the prior days to the event,the fact those people were not even investigated proves what a joke of an investigation both cases were.

Yeah ... the gunshots were still echoing around Dalley Plaza when the Warren Commission conclusions were written ... easy to spot the people who had the most to gain ... the ones not breathing fall out materials from all-out thermonuclear war ...

 

[Soupnazi630]

I’m not sure on Covid but with 9/11 it follows the same pattern of the jfk assassination that there were several put options made in the prior days to the event,the fact those people were not even investigated proves what a joke of an investigation both cases were.

Yeah ... the gunshots were still echoing around Dalley Plaza when the Warren Commission conclusions were written ... easy to spot the people who had the most to gain ... the ones not breathing fall out materials from all-out thermonuclear war ...

That is false.

The commission followed the mandate which was to find the truth REGARDLESS of where it led.

Whom had most to gain means nothing in this or any murder.

It is about the evidence which shows Oswald acted alone

 

[ReinyDays]

That is false.
The commission followed the mandate which was to find the truth REGARDLESS of where it led.
Whom had most to gain means nothing in this or any murder.
It is about the evidence which shows Oswald acted alone

If the Warren Commission found clear and convincing evidence that it was the Soviets who capped JFK ... would the Commission have told the public? ... mind you, this is less than two years after the Cuban Missile Crisis ...

Strictly coincidence the Commission got it right ... lucky break is all ...

 

[Soupnazi630]

That is false.
The commission followed the mandate which was to find the truth REGARDLESS of where it led.
Whom had most to gain means nothing in this or any murder.
It is about the evidence which shows Oswald acted alone

If the Warren Commission found clear and convincing evidence that it was the Soviets who capped JFK ... would the Commission have told the public? ... mind you, this is less than two years after the Cuban Missile Crisis ...

Strictly coincidence the Commission got it right ... lucky break is all ...

They got it right because.of the evidence which they diligently pursued and followed.

 

[ReinyDays]

They got it right because.of the evidence which they diligently pursued and followed.

They didn't go into the USSR ... they had no idea what Oswald was up to all the time here lived there ... and they sure weren't given free access to Soviet information ... or maybe they were ...

With this many people on the inside working the levels, what could go wrong? ... the Warren Commission was given their conclusions, their job was to make it look good ... I've never read the Warren Commission Report, so I'm entitled to have very strong opinions about it ...

 

[Care4all]

Personally, I never put much stock in the 9/11 conspiracy stuff for a number of reasons.
#1- No way could an operation that intricate get carried out without us finding & Murphys Law taking effect.
#2- The main idea a jet fuel fire won't compromise steel completely ignores the other sources of fuel packed into the buildings. Wood, paper, fabrics, plastics, oxygen, etc... would increase the heat tremendously.

Evidence and facts mean nothing to you?- but, let's keep it simple- ALL office material is and was "fire retardant", except paper, which means it would melt, not burn- all real wood products would be minimal to be in compliance with building/fire code ordinances- it would make white smoke at best- most of the smoke was black which is an oil based fire- jet fuel is oil based-
Jet fuel burns at approximately 425 deg fahrenheit- the steel beams supporting the structures had 5 inch thick flanges- at approximately 425 degrees the time it would require to weaken 5 inch thick flanged steel beams would be days, at best, of (now this is important) *continued* temperature sustained- initial ignition of the fuel is due to contacting *hot* engines- ignition temp is more than sustained temp and immediate- sustained temp is far less and decreases with fuel burned away- ignition burns away a lot of fuel *immediately* - 3 bldgs collapsed in near identical fashion at near free fall speed into their own foot print= UNPRECEDENTED in structure *failure* and happens only with "controlled demolition" - on the scene fire fighters heard "explosions"- torch like steams of molten steel were visible coming from the twin towers, which lends credence to thermite use- there were pictures of perfectly sliced beams in the rubble- ignition of nor sustained temp of jet fuel will slice steel- jet fuel will not turn 5 inch thick flanged steel molten under any circumstances it just doen't burn hot enough- only 2 were hit by airplanes- oxygen goes away at ignition and is replaced with fresh oxygen- fuel burned is gone- up in smoke, literally-

The office furniture etc would make white smoke, not black-

there is an abundance of information available IF one wants to educate themselves- it's at the finger tips and knowledge is not biased in it's origin- all counter points to the "official lies" are easily verifiable-

World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11?

action.ae911truth.org

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."~ John Adams

Open air burn temp of jet fuel is over 4000 degrees F, is what it says???

Jet fuel - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[Soupnazi630]

They got it right because.of the evidence which they diligently pursued and followed.

They didn't go into the USSR ... they had no idea what Oswald was up to all the time here lived there ... and they sure weren't given free access to Soviet information ... or maybe they were ...

With this many people on the inside working the levels, what could go wrong? ... the Warren Commission was given their conclusions, their job was to make it look good ... I've never read the Warren Commission Report, so I'm entitled to have very strong opinions about it ...

They did not have to because actually yes we do know what he was up to that whole time. They ( the soviets ) were very forthcoming with the details of his stay. In gthe aftermath of the fall of the USSR their aqrchives were released and every document pertaining to Oswald merely confirmed what they had always told us about his stay,

The commision was not given its conclusions they were told to investigate and find the truth PERIOD.

Yes you are entitled to your opinion, but facts are facts regardless of opinion and the commission had no prewritten conclusion. Unlike conspiracy theorists who always do while claiming otherwise.

 

[ReinyDays]

They did not have to because actually yes we do know what he was up to that whole time. They ( the soviets ) were very forthcoming with the details of his stay. In gthe aftermath of the fall of the USSR their aqrchives were released and every document pertaining to Oswald merely confirmed what they had always told us about his stay,

The commision was not given its conclusions they were told to investigate and find the truth PERIOD.

Yes you are entitled to your opinion, but facts are facts regardless of opinion and the commission had no prewritten conclusion. Unlike conspiracy theorists who always do while claiming otherwise.

Nonsense ... if we had facts about a conspiracy, we wouldn't need theories ... now would we? ...

Ever notice all Gandalf's political enemies experienced horrific painful deaths? ... every, single, one ...

 

[Soupnazi630]

They did not have to because actually yes we do know what he was up to that whole time. They ( the soviets ) were very forthcoming with the details of his stay. In gthe aftermath of the fall of the USSR their aqrchives were released and every document pertaining to Oswald merely confirmed what they had always told us about his stay,

The commision was not given its conclusions they were told to investigate and find the truth PERIOD.

Yes you are entitled to your opinion, but facts are facts regardless of opinion and the commission had no prewritten conclusion. Unlike conspiracy theorists who always do while claiming otherwise.

Nonsense ... if we had facts about a conspiracy, we wouldn't need theories ... now would we? ...

Ever notice all Gandalf's political enemies experienced horrific painful deaths? ... every, single, one ...

Wrong.

Theories can be tested. Otherwise they are not theory. Facts are facts and fact is the commission had no preordained conclusion. We can document what they were estblished to do. No one has evidence to the contrary.

Gandalf is imaginary

 

[Gdjjr]

Open air burn temp of jet fuel is over 4000 degrees F, is what it says???

wikipedia is not a reliable source- How Hot Did The Jet Fuel Heat The World Trade Center?

Temperature and heat generated are not the same thing- to damage 5 in think flanges enough to weaken them would take sustained/continuous "heat" generated- IF 4000 deg was reached it was momentarily and lessened as the fuel went away- as in gone as in smoke- ignition temperature is far less, and once ignited a momentary temperature increase is imminent. With no chamber to contain it the energy is rapidly dispersed and spreads further decreasing the temperature- the link provides the math for the question/remark about all the fuel-

 

[Soupnazi630]

Open air burn temp of jet fuel is over 4000 degrees F, is what it says???

wikipedia is not a reliable source- How Hot Did The Jet Fuel Heat The World Trade Center?

Temperature and heat generated are not the same thing- to damage 5 in think flanges enough to weaken them would take sustained/continuous "heat" generated- IF 4000 deg was reached it was momentarily and lessened as the fuel went away- as in gone as in smoke- ignition temperature is far less, and once ignited a momentary temperature increase is imminent. With no chamber to contain it the energy is rapidly dispersed and spreads further decreasing the temperature- the link provides the math for the question/remark about all the fuel-

All.of which ignored that burning met fuel only started the fire and massive amounts of other material continued to burn.

 

[Gdjjr]

JFK AUTOPSY

Here are additional authoritative evidentiary resources to assist readers in examining this seminal event —

• Harvey and Lee — Book by John Armstrong.
• Rush To Judgment — Documentary and Book

21 JFK cops who heard a grassy knoll shot

 

[Soupnazi630]

JFK AUTOPSY

Here are additional authoritative evidentiary resources to assist readers in examining this seminal event —

• Harvey and Lee — Book by John Armstrong.
• Rush To Judgment — Documentary and Book

21 JFK cops who heard a grassy knoll shot

Your first link is not authoritativ e or evidentiary it is in fact a tiresome list of the same old same old debunked claims of conspiracy theorists.

The second is at least accurate or at least mostly accurate.

It is true that some witnesses heard shots coming from the knoll.

But there are several problems. First of all they are ear witnesses which by definition are always unreliable. Second there are always dissenting wigtnesses who see, hear or remember things wrong. Whenever you have two or more witrnesses to ANYTHING there will be disagrement. In this particular case over 100 ear witnesses were identified and gave testimony. The large majority ( 69 % ) positively identified the source of the shots as the area or location of OSwald's nest. The third problem is that ALL of the forensic and ballistic evidence proves the shot did not come Oswald's rifle to the exclusion of any other. No evidence of any kind supports a shot from the front.

FInally we have eyewitnesses such as Lee Bowers who SAW the back of the fence of the knoll during the shooting and consistently reported the same thing. Which was no one was there, least of all someone shooting a rifle.

The small 5 of people who heard the shots coming from the knoll or anywhere else other than the TSBD were simply wrong.

This is why the Warren commision report has never been challenged. They did a comprehensive and thorough investigation which INCLUDED the list of witnesses from your link. They were not ommited. But when considering all of the evidence their conclusion was correct and still stands.

This is why conspiracy theorists and their believers are such fools it is the conspiracy theorists who actually do what they accuse the Warren Commision of doing. They selectively look only at what evidence might fit their theory and ignore the rest.

 

[Gdjjr]

The credentials the linked have far outweigh your opinions.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The credentials the linked have far outweigh your opinions.

No they do not actually and I stated fact not opinion.

They have no credentials they are nothing more than conspiracy kooks who have ideas which have been disproven

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Open air burn temp of jet fuel is over 4000 degrees F, is what it says???

wikipedia is not a reliable source- How Hot Did The Jet Fuel Heat The World Trade Center?

Temperature and heat generated are not the same thing- to damage 5 in think flanges enough to weaken them would take sustained/continuous "heat" generated- IF 4000 deg was reached it was momentarily and lessened as the fuel went away- as in gone as in smoke- ignition temperature is far less, and once ignited a momentary temperature increase is imminent. With no chamber to contain it the energy is rapidly dispersed and spreads further decreasing the temperature- the link provides the math for the question/remark about all the fuel-

exactly,wikepedia is the worst source in the world to go to on facts about 9/11 or the corona virus.they are about as reliable as the warren commission. same as the msm media,they are just a TOOL for the government,nothing more.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

JFK AUTOPSY

Here are additional authoritative evidentiary resources to assist readers in examining this seminal event —

• Harvey and Lee — Book by John Armstrong.
• Rush To Judgment — Documentary and Book

21 JFK cops who heard a grassy knoll shot

I appreciate the links and everything,believe me i REALLY do, but lets stay on topic.Lets talk about the smilarities in 9/11 and covid.