100 residents to be selected for basic income pilot program in Cal city

[Markle]

The rich and big business get tax breaks, subsidies, grants and other forms of welfare, but the world is going to come to an end because 100 people are getting some pittance in a private study.

It has been tried by entire countries and FAILED. What is the point of doing it again on a tiny sample of people?

What is the definition off INSANITY?

 

[danielpalos]

Giving people money for doing nothing is morally wrong.

employment is at the will of either party.

 

[danielpalos]

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment will act like an oil pump to ensure liquidity in our economy.

You keep saying that but have no idea what that means or how it works.

how dumb does it have to be for the right wing?

Projection at its finest.

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment will act like an oil pump to ensure liquidity in our economy.

Taking money out of the economy to put some back in is as useful as trying to fill a swimming pool by pumping water from the deep end into the shallow end.

why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics? landlords get it, the homeless get it; only the Right Wing, never gets it.

 

[danielpalos]

The rich and big business get tax breaks, subsidies, grants and other forms of welfare, but the world is going to come to an end because 100 people are getting some pittance in a private study.

It has been tried by entire countries and FAILED. What is the point of doing it again on a tiny sample of people?

What is the definition off INSANITY?

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is more rational and market friendly.

 

[georgephillip]

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is more rational and market friendly

Capital's "compensation package" relies heavily on a reserve army of labor dependent upon public subsidies for their survival; private (market) profits require socializing the costs:

Monthly Review | Disposable Workers: Today’s Reserve Army of Labor

"A reserve army makes an extensive welfare system necessary. Because workers have only one way to live under capitalism—by selling their labor power—a reserve army necessitates some mechanisms for maintaining the unemployed and those earning poverty wages in a state in which they are available and ready to work when capital calls.

"From the capitalist’s point of view, the government should maintain a minimal unemployment and welfare system so that it uses as little as possible of their corporate money and taxes.

"Of course, it is also to capital’s advantage to diffuse the costs of the welfare programs, with as much funding as possible coming from charitable donations or the workers themselves.

"Popular struggles may gain successes, such as the Great Society welfare programs of the 1960s, but, when conditions are favorable for reversing these gains (as they have been in recent decades), capital is ready to reduce or eliminate social programs."

 

[danielpalos]

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is more rational and market friendly

Capital's "compensation package" relies heavily on a reserve army of labor dependent upon public subsidies for their survival; private (market) profits require socializing the costs:

Monthly Review | Disposable Workers: Today’s Reserve Army of Labor

"A reserve army makes an extensive welfare system necessary. Because workers have only one way to live under capitalism—by selling their labor power—a reserve army necessitates some mechanisms for maintaining the unemployed and those earning poverty wages in a state in which they are available and ready to work when capital calls.

"From the capitalist’s point of view, the government should maintain a minimal unemployment and welfare system so that it uses as little as possible of their corporate money and taxes.

"Of course, it is also to capital’s advantage to diffuse the costs of the welfare programs, with as much funding as possible coming from charitable donations or the workers themselves.

"Popular struggles may gain successes, such as the Great Society welfare programs of the 1960s, but, when conditions are favorable for reversing these gains (as they have been in recent decades), capital is ready to reduce or eliminate social programs."

some on the left are advocating for solving simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

 

[georgephillip]

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is more rational and market friendly

Capital's "compensation package" relies heavily on a reserve army of labor dependent upon public subsidies for their survival; private (market) profits require socializing the costs:

Monthly Review | Disposable Workers: Today’s Reserve Army of Labor

"A reserve army makes an extensive welfare system necessary. Because workers have only one way to live under capitalism—by selling their labor power—a reserve army necessitates some mechanisms for maintaining the unemployed and those earning poverty wages in a state in which they are available and ready to work when capital calls.

"From the capitalist’s point of view, the government should maintain a minimal unemployment and welfare system so that it uses as little as possible of their corporate money and taxes.

"Of course, it is also to capital’s advantage to diffuse the costs of the welfare programs, with as much funding as possible coming from charitable donations or the workers themselves.

"Popular struggles may gain successes, such as the Great Society welfare programs of the 1960s, but, when conditions are favorable for reversing these gains (as they have been in recent decades), capital is ready to reduce or eliminate social programs."

some on the left are advocating for solving simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Right-to-work states are often confused with the right-to-starve states:

Financial Capitalism v. Industrial Capitalism | Michael Hudson

"What then has gone wrong?

"As labor productivity has risen and new technological horizons have opened up, why hasn’t everyone become wealthy?

"Why haven’t these innovations improved the quality of life proportionally..."

"The most serious problems lie in the financial sphere, where the economy’s debt overhead has grown more rapidly than the ‘real’ economy’s ability to carry this debt.

"One might call its demands for interest and amortization ‘debt pollution’, stifling the economic environment much as bad air and water plague the earth’s biosphere."

 

[danielpalos]

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is more rational and market friendly

Capital's "compensation package" relies heavily on a reserve army of labor dependent upon public subsidies for their survival; private (market) profits require socializing the costs:

Monthly Review | Disposable Workers: Today’s Reserve Army of Labor

"A reserve army makes an extensive welfare system necessary. Because workers have only one way to live under capitalism—by selling their labor power—a reserve army necessitates some mechanisms for maintaining the unemployed and those earning poverty wages in a state in which they are available and ready to work when capital calls.

"From the capitalist’s point of view, the government should maintain a minimal unemployment and welfare system so that it uses as little as possible of their corporate money and taxes.

"Of course, it is also to capital’s advantage to diffuse the costs of the welfare programs, with as much funding as possible coming from charitable donations or the workers themselves.

"Popular struggles may gain successes, such as the Great Society welfare programs of the 1960s, but, when conditions are favorable for reversing these gains (as they have been in recent decades), capital is ready to reduce or eliminate social programs."

some on the left are advocating for solving simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Right-to-work states are often confused with the right-to-starve states:

Financial Capitalism v. Industrial Capitalism | Michael Hudson

"What then has gone wrong?

"As labor productivity has risen and new technological horizons have opened up, why hasn’t everyone become wealthy?

"Why haven’t these innovations improved the quality of life proportionally..."

"The most serious problems lie in the financial sphere, where the economy’s debt overhead has grown more rapidly than the ‘real’ economy’s ability to carry this debt.

"One might call its demands for interest and amortization ‘debt pollution’, stifling the economic environment much as bad air and water plague the earth’s biosphere."

It is more about equal protection of the law. Equality. The law is employment at the will of either party. It is public policy merely for the capital bottom line. Simple compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and efficient as an automatic stabilizer that engenders a positive multiplier effect.

 

[hadit]

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is more rational and market friendly

Capital's "compensation package" relies heavily on a reserve army of labor dependent upon public subsidies for their survival; private (market) profits require socializing the costs:

Monthly Review | Disposable Workers: Today’s Reserve Army of Labor

"A reserve army makes an extensive welfare system necessary. Because workers have only one way to live under capitalism—by selling their labor power—a reserve army necessitates some mechanisms for maintaining the unemployed and those earning poverty wages in a state in which they are available and ready to work when capital calls.

"From the capitalist’s point of view, the government should maintain a minimal unemployment and welfare system so that it uses as little as possible of their corporate money and taxes.

"Of course, it is also to capital’s advantage to diffuse the costs of the welfare programs, with as much funding as possible coming from charitable donations or the workers themselves.

"Popular struggles may gain successes, such as the Great Society welfare programs of the 1960s, but, when conditions are favorable for reversing these gains (as they have been in recent decades), capital is ready to reduce or eliminate social programs."

some on the left are advocating for solving simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Right-to-work states are often confused with the right-to-starve states:

Financial Capitalism v. Industrial Capitalism | Michael Hudson

"What then has gone wrong?

"As labor productivity has risen and new technological horizons have opened up, why hasn’t everyone become wealthy?

"Why haven’t these innovations improved the quality of life proportionally..."

"The most serious problems lie in the financial sphere, where the economy’s debt overhead has grown more rapidly than the ‘real’ economy’s ability to carry this debt.

"One might call its demands for interest and amortization ‘debt pollution’, stifling the economic environment much as bad air and water plague the earth’s biosphere."

It is more about equal protection of the law. Equality. The law is employment at the will of either party. It is public policy merely for the capital bottom line. Simple compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and efficient as an automatic stabilizer that engenders a positive multiplier effect.

At it again. Stringing words together that don't mean what you want them to mean is not compelling.

 

[danielpalos]

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is more rational and market friendly

Capital's "compensation package" relies heavily on a reserve army of labor dependent upon public subsidies for their survival; private (market) profits require socializing the costs:

Monthly Review | Disposable Workers: Today’s Reserve Army of Labor

"A reserve army makes an extensive welfare system necessary. Because workers have only one way to live under capitalism—by selling their labor power—a reserve army necessitates some mechanisms for maintaining the unemployed and those earning poverty wages in a state in which they are available and ready to work when capital calls.

"From the capitalist’s point of view, the government should maintain a minimal unemployment and welfare system so that it uses as little as possible of their corporate money and taxes.

"Of course, it is also to capital’s advantage to diffuse the costs of the welfare programs, with as much funding as possible coming from charitable donations or the workers themselves.

"Popular struggles may gain successes, such as the Great Society welfare programs of the 1960s, but, when conditions are favorable for reversing these gains (as they have been in recent decades), capital is ready to reduce or eliminate social programs."

some on the left are advocating for solving simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Right-to-work states are often confused with the right-to-starve states:

Financial Capitalism v. Industrial Capitalism | Michael Hudson

"What then has gone wrong?

"As labor productivity has risen and new technological horizons have opened up, why hasn’t everyone become wealthy?

"Why haven’t these innovations improved the quality of life proportionally..."

"The most serious problems lie in the financial sphere, where the economy’s debt overhead has grown more rapidly than the ‘real’ economy’s ability to carry this debt.

"One might call its demands for interest and amortization ‘debt pollution’, stifling the economic environment much as bad air and water plague the earth’s biosphere."

It is more about equal protection of the law. Equality. The law is employment at the will of either party. It is public policy merely for the capital bottom line. Simple compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and efficient as an automatic stabilizer that engenders a positive multiplier effect.

At it again. Stringing words together that don't mean what you want them to mean is not compelling.

nothing but fallacy from the right wing, like usual.

 

[hadit]

Capital's "compensation package" relies heavily on a reserve army of labor dependent upon public subsidies for their survival; private (market) profits require socializing the costs:

Monthly Review | Disposable Workers: Today’s Reserve Army of Labor

"A reserve army makes an extensive welfare system necessary. Because workers have only one way to live under capitalism—by selling their labor power—a reserve army necessitates some mechanisms for maintaining the unemployed and those earning poverty wages in a state in which they are available and ready to work when capital calls.

"From the capitalist’s point of view, the government should maintain a minimal unemployment and welfare system so that it uses as little as possible of their corporate money and taxes.

"Of course, it is also to capital’s advantage to diffuse the costs of the welfare programs, with as much funding as possible coming from charitable donations or the workers themselves.

"Popular struggles may gain successes, such as the Great Society welfare programs of the 1960s, but, when conditions are favorable for reversing these gains (as they have been in recent decades), capital is ready to reduce or eliminate social programs."

some on the left are advocating for solving simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Right-to-work states are often confused with the right-to-starve states:

Financial Capitalism v. Industrial Capitalism | Michael Hudson

"What then has gone wrong?

"As labor productivity has risen and new technological horizons have opened up, why hasn’t everyone become wealthy?

"Why haven’t these innovations improved the quality of life proportionally..."

"The most serious problems lie in the financial sphere, where the economy’s debt overhead has grown more rapidly than the ‘real’ economy’s ability to carry this debt.

"One might call its demands for interest and amortization ‘debt pollution’, stifling the economic environment much as bad air and water plague the earth’s biosphere."

It is more about equal protection of the law. Equality. The law is employment at the will of either party. It is public policy merely for the capital bottom line. Simple compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and efficient as an automatic stabilizer that engenders a positive multiplier effect.

At it again. Stringing words together that don't mean what you want them to mean is not compelling.

nothing but fallacy from the right wing, like usual.

You haven't shown anything I've said to be fallacious, so you might as well put down the shovel. You've dig the hole deep enough.

 

[danielpalos]

some on the left are advocating for solving simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Right-to-work states are often confused with the right-to-starve states:

Financial Capitalism v. Industrial Capitalism | Michael Hudson

"What then has gone wrong?

"As labor productivity has risen and new technological horizons have opened up, why hasn’t everyone become wealthy?

"Why haven’t these innovations improved the quality of life proportionally..."

"The most serious problems lie in the financial sphere, where the economy’s debt overhead has grown more rapidly than the ‘real’ economy’s ability to carry this debt.

"One might call its demands for interest and amortization ‘debt pollution’, stifling the economic environment much as bad air and water plague the earth’s biosphere."

It is more about equal protection of the law. Equality. The law is employment at the will of either party. It is public policy merely for the capital bottom line. Simple compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and efficient as an automatic stabilizer that engenders a positive multiplier effect.

At it again. Stringing words together that don't mean what you want them to mean is not compelling.

nothing but fallacy from the right wing, like usual.

You haven't shown anything I've said to be fallacious, so you might as well put down the shovel. You've dig the hole deep enough.

lol. only in right wing fantasy.

 

[georgephillip]

t is more about equal protection of the law. Equality. The law is employment at the will of either party. It is public policy merely for the capital bottom line. Simple compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and efficient as an automatic stabilizer that engenders a positive multiplier effect.

As I see it, there is no equality between capital and labor in capitalism; those who "own" the means of production hold all the high cards. Finance capitalism seeks capital gains, primarily in rising land and other asset prices, while inflicting levels of public and private debt that strangle economic activity for 90% of workers.

 

[danielpalos]

t is more about equal protection of the law. Equality. The law is employment at the will of either party. It is public policy merely for the capital bottom line. Simple compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and efficient as an automatic stabilizer that engenders a positive multiplier effect.

As I see it, there is no equality between capital and labor in capitalism; those who "own" the means of production hold all the high cards. Finance capitalism seeks capital gains, primarily in rising land and other asset prices, while inflicting levels of public and private debt that strangle economic activity for 90% of workers.

in this case, it is about equal protection of the law for a legal concept. employment is at the will of either party. unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States is simply more cost effective.

 

[hadit]

Right-to-work states are often confused with the right-to-starve states:

Financial Capitalism v. Industrial Capitalism | Michael Hudson

"What then has gone wrong?

"As labor productivity has risen and new technological horizons have opened up, why hasn’t everyone become wealthy?

"Why haven’t these innovations improved the quality of life proportionally..."

"The most serious problems lie in the financial sphere, where the economy’s debt overhead has grown more rapidly than the ‘real’ economy’s ability to carry this debt.

"One might call its demands for interest and amortization ‘debt pollution’, stifling the economic environment much as bad air and water plague the earth’s biosphere."

It is more about equal protection of the law. Equality. The law is employment at the will of either party. It is public policy merely for the capital bottom line. Simple compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and efficient as an automatic stabilizer that engenders a positive multiplier effect.

At it again. Stringing words together that don't mean what you want them to mean is not compelling.

nothing but fallacy from the right wing, like usual.

You haven't shown anything I've said to be fallacious, so you might as well put down the shovel. You've dig the hole deep enough.

lol. only in right wing fantasy.

Aka reality.

 

[hadit]

t is more about equal protection of the law. Equality. The law is employment at the will of either party. It is public policy merely for the capital bottom line. Simple compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and efficient as an automatic stabilizer that engenders a positive multiplier effect.

As I see it, there is no equality between capital and labor in capitalism; those who "own" the means of production hold all the high cards. Finance capitalism seeks capital gains, primarily in rising land and other asset prices, while inflicting levels of public and private debt that strangle economic activity for 90% of workers.

in this case, it is about equal protection of the law for a legal concept. employment is at the will of either party. unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States is simply more cost effective.

Show the numbers. It should be easy, you've been bleating it long enough.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

At it again. Stringing words together that don't mean what you want them to mean is not compelling.

That's pretty much all that danielpalos ever does.

 

[longknife]

A special letter mail carriers are delivering to hundreds of homes in Stockton will hopefully bring a little financial relief in the New Year.
100 Residents To Be Selected For Basic Income Pilot Program in Cal City ⋆ The Savage Nation




When you are an uninformed moron you will think this is amazing good lmfao!!!! Here is a news flash the under , uninformed loons don't get sooner or later your RUN OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE's money you idiots.

Just saw and read this morning that nobody is signing up for it!

 

[danielpalos]

t is more about equal protection of the law. Equality. The law is employment at the will of either party. It is public policy merely for the capital bottom line. Simple compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and efficient as an automatic stabilizer that engenders a positive multiplier effect.

As I see it, there is no equality between capital and labor in capitalism; those who "own" the means of production hold all the high cards. Finance capitalism seeks capital gains, primarily in rising land and other asset prices, while inflicting levels of public and private debt that strangle economic activity for 90% of workers.

in this case, it is about equal protection of the law for a legal concept. employment is at the will of either party. unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States is simply more cost effective.

Show the numbers. It should be easy, you've been bleating it long enough.

it should be a self-evident truth, that more money will circulate.

 

[danielpalos]

At it again. Stringing words together that don't mean what you want them to mean is not compelling.

That's pretty much all that danielpalos ever does.

i ask questions; i don't make excuses.