there4eyeM
unlicensed metaphysician
- Jul 5, 2012
- 20,966
- 5,501
- 280
- Thread starter
- #21
If representation can be ameliorated so that small groups can be defended against larger (House versus Senate for example), what is wrong with the concept of limiting economic influence over disadvantaged voices?
Free speech is not synonymous with expenditure. Having a voice is guaranteed; having the only voice (or voices, if we think there is a difference between Republicans and Democrats) is not desirable. Anti-democratic forces should be limited in practice once they are recognized.
Free speech is not synonymous with expenditure. Having a voice is guaranteed; having the only voice (or voices, if we think there is a difference between Republicans and Democrats) is not desirable. Anti-democratic forces should be limited in practice once they are recognized.