Bullypulpit said:As for you "sicentific slapstick", that is more appropriate to ID. Evolutionary science has a rather larger and more extensive body of evidence in support of it than ID, which has only opinion and hyperbole as its sole supports.
I still don't see how evidence in support of evolution denies that a Higher Power might have had a hand in that evolution...
I still think that Science is just a way to figure out how the Grand Architect did it, a Mystery Novel so to speak, rather than a way to disprove that there is a Grand Architect. There is no more evidence to support an active "theory" that there was not an Architect of the Universe, than there is to support there is one.
It seems more "slapstick" to me to attempt to use discoveries of science as "evidence" that a Creator doesn't exist...