Wonderful News: Trump To Allow Drilling In Obama's Marine Sanctuaries

This is indeed wonderful news. Drilling is much needed in these areas and the money the oilfield workers will make will be phenomenal. This is the right approach in helping America become great again.


www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article147492219.html
This is pretty much the only thing I dislike about the Trump administration. More polluting of this world and destroying its other inhabitants....animals, nature, etc.
Drilling is NOT needed in any place...especially the oceans. Keep this shit up and the whole united states will be like the easter islands. Empty and dead.
 
Yes....prosperity is crucial. Like the prosperity derived from the fishing industries and coastal tourism which many communities depend on and which are directly affected by off shore drilling.

It's a matter of balance.

The fact that you are gleeful over this - in a time where we have a glut of energy and record low profits is pretty much proof you don't give a shit about either pollution or a wise balance between energy production and environmental protection.
I fish all the time around offshore rig platforms in the gulf. Believe me, it's a treasure trove of fish around them. They love the rigs.

Yes, oil rigs can provide valuable fish habitat - there is an ongoing debate on whether it actually helps increase fish numbers or simply provides them a place to aggregate. There is also argument about whether we should remove them once production has ceased. Oil Rigs: Critical Fish Habitat or Environmental Liability?

But you also have to balance that against the environmental damage caused by leaks or explosions. No one is saying NO drilling, but rather take a rational and balanced approach. To push for drilling in Marine Sanctuaries at a time when we are glutted with energy is neither. It's purely petulant politics that hates the idea of any kind of wildlife/environmental sancutaries or that anything should be "off limits".
By making these areas into national monuments Obama said "no drilling " so your post is total bullshit.

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app



But at this time there is no reason to even push for drilling.
It is for the oilfield workers who need a paycheck.
Except they won't get a check anyway.
 
Why do rightwingers want to destroy nature? Why revel in destruction rather than a balanced approach?

The marine sanctuaries weren't just Obama's (I get that you hate him) - but Bush set them aside as well.

Sad times.
Drilling a hole in the ocean floor destroys nothing. Why do you leftwing fascists want to make Americans pay three times the current price for energy?

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

It certainly does when things go wrong...doesn't it?

What is wrong with conserving a little and using a little less?

What's wrong with having less to eat and a smaller house with no heat?
You must not have read what I said. Try again.
 
This is indeed wonderful news. Drilling is much needed in these areas and the money the oilfield workers will make will be phenomenal. This is the right approach in helping America become great again.


www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article147492219.html

Yup anywhere we have oil and natural gas in this country should be drilled and used.

Another good move by the POTUS.
Yeah, who needs untouched wilderness. Grand Canyon? Strip mine that sucker!

screen-shot-2014-12-03-at-10-47-15-am.png
 
This is indeed wonderful news. Drilling is much needed in these areas and the money the oilfield workers will make will be phenomenal. This is the right approach in helping America become great again.


www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article147492219.html
This is pretty much the only thing I dislike about the Trump administration. More polluting of this world and destroying its other inhabitants....animals, nature, etc.
Drilling is NOT needed in any place...especially the oceans. Keep this shit up and the whole united states will be like the easter islands. Empty and dead.



Take it easy. The Oscar nominations aren't for a while yet.
 
This is indeed wonderful news. Drilling is much needed in these areas and the money the oilfield workers will make will be phenomenal. This is the right approach in helping America become great again.


www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article147492219.html

Yup anywhere we have oil and natural gas in this country should be drilled and used.

Another good move by the POTUS.

Yellowstone?

Nope. Yellowstone is a giant cauldera that could explode at any time. No one should be drilling there at all.

If that cauldera ever blows it will destroy the US of A.
 
This is indeed wonderful news. Drilling is much needed in these areas and the money the oilfield workers will make will be phenomenal. This is the right approach in helping America become great again.


www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article147492219.html

Yup anywhere we have oil and natural gas in this country should be drilled and used.

Another good move by the POTUS.
Yeah, who needs untouched wilderness. Grand Canyon? Strip mine that sucker!

screen-shot-2014-12-03-at-10-47-15-am.png

The pipeline has been in Alaska for decades and has never cause one bit of problem.

Use your head dumbass.
 
Why do rightwingers want to destroy nature? Why revel in destruction rather than a balanced approach?

The marine sanctuaries weren't just Obama's (I get that you hate him) - but Bush set them aside as well.

Sad times.
Drilling a hole in the ocean floor destroys nothing. Why do you leftwing fascists want to make Americans pay three times the current price for energy?

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

It certainly does when things go wrong...doesn't it?

What is wrong with conserving a little and using a little less?

What's wrong with having less to eat and a smaller house with no heat?
You must not have read what I said. Try again.

You said you wanted Americans to be poorer.
 
Yes....prosperity is crucial. Like the prosperity derived from the fishing industries and coastal tourism which many communities depend on and which are directly affected by off shore drilling.

It's a matter of balance.

The fact that you are gleeful over this - in a time where we have a glut of energy and record low profits is pretty much proof you don't give a shit about either pollution or a wise balance between energy production and environmental protection.
I fish all the time around offshore rig platforms in the gulf. Believe me, it's a treasure trove of fish around them. They love the rigs.

Yes, oil rigs can provide valuable fish habitat - there is an ongoing debate on whether it actually helps increase fish numbers or simply provides them a place to aggregate. There is also argument about whether we should remove them once production has ceased. Oil Rigs: Critical Fish Habitat or Environmental Liability?

But you also have to balance that against the environmental damage caused by leaks or explosions. No one is saying NO drilling, but rather take a rational and balanced approach. To push for drilling in Marine Sanctuaries at a time when we are glutted with energy is neither. It's purely petulant politics that hates the idea of any kind of wildlife/environmental sancutaries or that anything should be "off limits".
By making these areas into national monuments Obama said "no drilling " so your post is total bullshit.

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Obama and Bush both.

But at this time there is no reason to even push for drilling.

Are you against preserving any of the marine environment as a sanctuary?

There is a vary good reason to repeal Obama and Bush's national monuments: because we may never get another chance.

Look commando keyboard. Give one drip of oil ------------ Why we need more of shore drilling?
 
I fish all the time around offshore rig platforms in the gulf. Believe me, it's a treasure trove of fish around them. They love the rigs.

Yes, oil rigs can provide valuable fish habitat - there is an ongoing debate on whether it actually helps increase fish numbers or simply provides them a place to aggregate. There is also argument about whether we should remove them once production has ceased. Oil Rigs: Critical Fish Habitat or Environmental Liability?

But you also have to balance that against the environmental damage caused by leaks or explosions. No one is saying NO drilling, but rather take a rational and balanced approach. To push for drilling in Marine Sanctuaries at a time when we are glutted with energy is neither. It's purely petulant politics that hates the idea of any kind of wildlife/environmental sancutaries or that anything should be "off limits".
By making these areas into national monuments Obama said "no drilling " so your post is total bullshit.

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Obama and Bush both.

But at this time there is no reason to even push for drilling.

Are you against preserving any of the marine environment as a sanctuary?

There is a vary good reason to repeal Obama and Bush's national monuments: because we may never get another chance.

Look commando keyboard. Give one drip of oil ------------ Why we need more of shore drilling?
shore drilling?
 
This is indeed wonderful news. Drilling is much needed in these areas and the money the oilfield workers will make will be phenomenal. This is the right approach in helping America become great again.


www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article147492219.html

Yup anywhere we have oil and natural gas in this country should be drilled and used.

Another good move by the POTUS.
Yeah, who needs untouched wilderness. Grand Canyon? Strip mine that sucker!

screen-shot-2014-12-03-at-10-47-15-am.png

The pipeline has been in Alaska for decades and has never cause one bit of problem.

Use your head dumbass.

I'm sure you heard some of these oil pipelines accidents------- or you are just playing dumb.

List of pipeline accidents in the United States in the 21st century - Wikipedia
 
Why do rightwingers want to destroy nature? Why revel in destruction rather than a balanced approach?

The marine sanctuaries weren't just Obama's (I get that you hate him) - but Bush set them aside as well.

Sad times.
Drilling a hole in the ocean floor destroys nothing. Why do you leftwing fascists want to make Americans pay three times the current price for energy?

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Yes it does------- you are just in denial.

Just like that dumb signature from mobile phone. Is that flip phone?. Those oil platforms are very annoying every time I go to the ocean.
 
This is indeed wonderful news. Drilling is much needed in these areas and the money the oilfield workers will make will be phenomenal. This is the right approach in helping America become great again.


www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article147492219.html

Yup anywhere we have oil and natural gas in this country should be drilled and used.

Another good move by the POTUS.
Yeah, who needs untouched wilderness. Grand Canyon? Strip mine that sucker!

screen-shot-2014-12-03-at-10-47-15-am.png

The pipeline has been in Alaska for decades and has never cause one bit of problem.

Use your head dumbass.

I'm sure you heard some of these oil pipelines accidents------- or you are just playing dumb.

List of pipeline accidents in the United States in the 21st century - Wikipedia

Of course they have had accidents but nothing that caused one bit of damage that wasn't easily repaired. You are the one playing dumb, dumbass.
 
This is indeed wonderful news. Drilling is much needed in these areas and the money the oilfield workers will make will be phenomenal. This is the right approach in helping America become great again.


www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article147492219.html

Yup anywhere we have oil and natural gas in this country should be drilled and used.

Another good move by the POTUS.
Yeah, who needs untouched wilderness. Grand Canyon? Strip mine that sucker!

screen-shot-2014-12-03-at-10-47-15-am.png

The pipeline has been in Alaska for decades and has never cause one bit of problem.

Use your head dumbass.

I'm sure you heard some of these oil pipelines accidents------- or you are just playing dumb.

List of pipeline accidents in the United States in the 21st century - Wikipedia

Of course they have had accidents but nothing that caused one bit of damage that wasn't easily repaired. You are the one playing dumb, dumbass.
Louisiana five years after BP oil spill: 'It's not going back to normal no time soon'
 
Yes, oil rigs can provide valuable fish habitat - there is an ongoing debate on whether it actually helps increase fish numbers or simply provides them a place to aggregate. There is also argument about whether we should remove them once production has ceased. Oil Rigs: Critical Fish Habitat or Environmental Liability?

But you also have to balance that against the environmental damage caused by leaks or explosions. No one is saying NO drilling, but rather take a rational and balanced approach. To push for drilling in Marine Sanctuaries at a time when we are glutted with energy is neither. It's purely petulant politics that hates the idea of any kind of wildlife/environmental sancutaries or that anything should be "off limits".
By making these areas into national monuments Obama said "no drilling " so your post is total bullshit.

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Obama and Bush both.

But at this time there is no reason to even push for drilling.

Are you against preserving any of the marine environment as a sanctuary?

There is a vary good reason to repeal Obama and Bush's national monuments: because we may never get another chance.

Look commando keyboard. Give one drip of oil ------------ Why we need more of shore drilling?
shore drilling?

Wrong answer bud.

For 2016 there are approximately close to 700,000 of hybrid cars roaming Americas road. Toyota Prius a sold about 36,000 and Tesla around 25,000 just this year alone.
BMW, Mercedes Benz, Ferrari, Maserati, Ford, GMC, Chevrolet, Honda etc etc etc etc had already entered this market vying for top sales.
These cars will use a lot of less oil. In 2 or 4 years there will be millions of these cars in our streets. Plus regular cars have improved or better fuel efficiency.
These means:
1. That oil industry will suffer more than just the oil glut.
2. We have more oil than we can consumes.
3. We do not need more of those ugly oil platform.
 

Forum List

Back
Top