Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes. He also chickened out, and she told him to get back into the truck and do it (not her exact words).True. Maybe they should charge her with being an accessory instead of manslaughter. Regardless of what they call it, their case will be to show that she was an accessory in convincing her boyfriend to commit suicide.Read post 110. An accessory does not have to be at the scene.She was definitely not an accessory as she was nowhere near the scene.
She isn't being charged as an "accessory." She is being charged with involuntary MANSLAUGHTER.
He had already planned it and he was suicidal before he even met this girl.
Yes. He also chickened out, and she told him to get back into the truck and do it (not her exact words).True. Maybe they should charge her with being an accessory instead of manslaughter. Regardless of what they call it, their case will be to show that she was an accessory in convincing her boyfriend to commit suicide.Read post 110. An accessory does not have to be at the scene.She was definitely not an accessory as she was nowhere near the scene.
She isn't being charged as an "accessory." She is being charged with involuntary MANSLAUGHTER.
He had already planned it and he was suicidal before he even met this girl.
Accessories do not force people to commit crimes. They give council to help or encourage a person to commit a crime. So if you stick to that opinion, then you logically believe that its wrong to prosecute people for being accessories to crimes.Yes. He also chickened out, and she told him to get back into the truck and do it (not her exact words).True. Maybe they should charge her with being an accessory instead of manslaughter. Regardless of what they call it, their case will be to show that she was an accessory in convincing her boyfriend to commit suicide.Read post 110. An accessory does not have to be at the scene.
She isn't being charged as an "accessory." She is being charged with involuntary MANSLAUGHTER.
He had already planned it and he was suicidal before he even met this girl.
And did she force him to do anything against his will? No she did not. Sorry but the decision was his and he made his decision.
snowflakes will be snowflakes
that's how it is sadly
Accessories do not force people to commit crimes. They give council to help or encourage a person to commit a crime. So if you stick to that opinion, then you logically believe that its wrong to prosecute people for being accessories to crimes.Yes. He also chickened out, and she told him to get back into the truck and do it (not her exact words).True. Maybe they should charge her with being an accessory instead of manslaughter. Regardless of what they call it, their case will be to show that she was an accessory in convincing her boyfriend to commit suicide.She isn't being charged as an "accessory." She is being charged with involuntary MANSLAUGHTER.
He had already planned it and he was suicidal before he even met this girl.
And did she force him to do anything against his will? No she did not. Sorry but the decision was his and he made his decision.
it's one thing to not show compassion. it's another thing to actually encourage a suicidal person, someone you know is suicidal, to do the deed.If you go around telling people you are suicidal and they don't show you compassion and you commit suicide, it is NOT the fault of the people you told. Showing compassion is NOT a law and should not be a law.
snowflakes will be snowflakes
that's how it is sadly
Well, apparently the boy suffered from mental illness (depression to be exact), but it is still not up to anyone else to "save" him from himself. Perhaps his parents should have been working with him more?
it's one thing to not show compassion. it's another thing to actually encourage a suicidal person, someone you know is suicidal, to do the deed.If you go around telling people you are suicidal and they don't show you compassion and you commit suicide, it is NOT the fault of the people you told. Showing compassion is NOT a law and should not be a law.
Hello?? KNOCK KNOCK!! Can you grasp what mental illness is? No?Only idiots commit suicide because the girlfriend told him so...
Alpha men would never do that
they are strong they know better
Accessories do not force people to commit crimes. They give council to help or encourage a person to commit a crime. So if you stick to that opinion, then you logically believe that its wrong to prosecute people for being accessories to crimes.Yes. He also chickened out, and she told him to get back into the truck and do it (not her exact words).True. Maybe they should charge her with being an accessory instead of manslaughter. Regardless of what they call it, their case will be to show that she was an accessory in convincing her boyfriend to commit suicide.
He had already planned it and he was suicidal before he even met this girl.
And did she force him to do anything against his will? No she did not. Sorry but the decision was his and he made his decision.
No accessories are people who HELP commit the crime, not people who send text messages.
Hello?? KNOCK KNOCK!! Can you grasp what mental illness is? No?Only idiots commit suicide because the girlfriend told him so...
Alpha men would never do that
they are strong they know better
Ya know, for being so pretty, your soul sure is ugly from lack of empathy.snowflakes will be snowflakes
that's how it is sadly
Well, apparently the boy suffered from mental illness (depression to be exact), but it is still not up to anyone else to "save" him from himself. Perhaps his parents should have been working with him more?
My God
it's his problem if he suffered from a mental disease
his parents should have put in in a mental asylum
so its his parents fault.
whatever