Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 27,716
- 13,002
- 973
Yes, it was publicly viewable. I wrote that in my post. Are you stupid?so it just wasn't publicly viewable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, it was publicly viewable. I wrote that in my post. Are you stupid?so it just wasn't publicly viewable.
Well find out. There are some suggesting that dorsey may not have known what was going on and that that vadjiya (whatever) woman may have been the driving force.Twitter Files two dropped last night, and along with it the proof of the blacklists used by Twitter to silence conservative voices in order to influence elections, specifically the 2020 presidential election.
{Following the second installment of the "Twitter Files" that revealed the platform's efforts to suppress prominent conservatives, a resurfaced September 2018 clip of Dorsey's testimony to a congressional committee was asked point-blank whether Twitter "censors" its users. }
Twitter Files flashback: Jack Dorsey testified under oath Twitter does not censor, 'shadow-ban' conservatives
2018 testimony of former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey claiming Twitter does not censor or shadow-ban users went viral following the latest batch of "Twitter Files" shared by Bari Weiss.www.foxnews.com
Dorsey lied under oath to Congress, we now know.
Conservative gadfly Roger Stone was accused of lying to Congress, and the FBI coordinated with CNN to create a media spectacular - with helicopter gun ships, nearly a hundred Gestapo commandos in full military body armor, armed with machine guns, Zodiac attack landing craft - all to arrest a 64 year old for a white collar process crime.
So will we see the same regarding Dorsey?
Same "crime." Will Garland execute a major military assault on Jack Dorsey's house? Or does Dorsey have the right politics, and is above the law?
People lie all the time.
The problem is being able to prove it in court.
You're right to be scared.The Twitter files is really just uninformed hacks making hysterical overblowing things we knew years ago.
Those aren’t shadow bans.This one isn't too hard. The testimony is on video, and viral across the net. The documents by Dorsey ordering the shadow bans were dumped last night
No, it was not publicly viewable - only those on the private page of the user could se the posts.Yes, it was publicly viewable. I wrote that in my post. Are you stupid?
You’re being fed lies by political hacks.You're right to be scared.
Blowing the lid off of the abuse by the government and the corruption of our elections through collusion between big tech, big media, and big government is the kind of thing that get the guillotines going.
And it's high time they do.
That’s not true. The page of the user is not private. It is readily accessible by anyone who types in the URL.No, it was not publicly viewable - only those on the private page of the user could se the posts.
So it all was reported by the NY Post, Fox, and all the right-wing sites. Are you saying the right wing sites really have no viewers? Do you really think Twitter censoring dick pics from a shady dude with no chain of custody would have swayed 7,000,000 votes?No, it was not publicly viewable - only those on the private page of the user could se the posts.
Why are you lying about this? It doesn't alter the fact that Dorsey lied under oath to Congress. Even if your lie were true - it isn't, but even if it were - Dorsey still lied to Congress.
View attachment 736969
Dorsey is obviously a.liberal who helped the Democrats and therefore is above the rule of law.Yes, we do.
You lying doesn't alter that.
Dorsey directly lied to congress. Asked point blank if Twitter shadow banned conservative voices - he lied and said "no." We have documents FROM DORSEY, that show him ordering shadow banning and censoring of conservative messages.
He lied to congress.
Well he be treated the way Roger Stone was for the same crime?
Pout all you want, you are exposed.
Will Dorsey be prosecuted at all, or as a Reich member is he above the law that was used so harshly against Roger Stone?
What law? Assume Dorsey turned Twitter into a wholly owned subsidiary of the DNC. so what?Dorsey is obviously a.liberal who helped the Democrats and therefore is above the rule of law.
That’s not true. The page of the user is not private. It is readily accessible by anyone who types in the URL.
Reducing people from showing up in the algorithm is not shadow banning according to the way Twitter uses the word.
So it all was reported by the NY Post, Fox, and all the right-wing sites. Are you saying the right wing sites really have no viewers? Do you really think Twitter censoring dick pics from a shady dude with no chain of custody would have swayed 7,000,000 votes?
Dorsey is obviously a.liberal who helped the Democrats and therefore is above the rule of law.
What law? Assume Dorsey turned Twitter into a wholly owned subsidiary of the DNC. so what?
The bIg problem is our liberal media who rarely if ever covers the fact that Democrats are above the rule of law.We can't do anything about the corruption of the DOI and the pile of shit Garland. But we can continue to highlight this.
Gaslighting by the fascists depends on silence from the rest of us.
When we speak up and LOUDLY point out the inequity of the injustice system, it exposes them.
That's what Musk is doing, that's what we must do. Zink and Marener need to lie this away - don't let them,.
Jack Dorsey for President 2024
Do you not understand how hyperlinks work?who types in the url...