Why would anyone continue to claim the iraqi war was a failure?

[GoneBezerk]

When the 2008 election took place, the combat operations in Iraq were winding down.

Obamination won the election because he is black, period. Uneducated blacks and every other skin color wanted to "make history" by electing a dumbass with no experience. The dragging out of the Iraq war because of tactical political mistakes with the Baath party in the end helped put the dumbass in the White House.

Oh, you need to speak with the dumbasses in the White House since they claim Iraq was their shining moment. It's kinda hard for you to claim Iraq was a mistake while your messiah and his dumb sidekick brag about Iraq today.

Dumbass.....Powell showed our intel photos that showed Saddam's troops were moving stuff around prior to IAEA inspectors showing up at those sites.

He also brought up Saddam's human rights violations, support to suicide bombers, and violations of the ceasefire terms/UN resolutions.

But go on about how Saddam was innocent, etc.

Bush did not send Powell to the UN to tell them we were going into Iraq to get a few old WMD shells left from the 91 war, he sent him to tell the world that Saddam had re-started his WMD program, and they all lied.

Ritter said Iraq was not making new WMD and we had adequate monitoring to know if he did re-start the program, but he had not.

Ritter was correct, Bush, Cheney, Powell were wrong.

Your opinion counts for 1 vote. The american people looked at the whole situation, with years of discussion behind them, and concluded in the 2008 election of Obama, that the repubs were liars and fiscally irresponsible, that they had wasted our national treasure of lives and money in Iraq for something that was not justified nor worth the price we paid for it. That's the bottom line.

The screw up of the Iraq war and the economic collapse of 2008 cost the repubs the election, as it should have.

 

[JRK]

Each post shows the rants of a madman.

FYI....you forgot to mention the "number 2" in your post.

Dumbass.....Powell showed our intel photos that showed Saddam's troops were moving stuff around prior to IAEA inspectors showing up at those sites. He also brought up Saddam's human rights violations, support to suicide bombers, and violations of the ceasefire terms/UN resolutions.

But go on about how Saddam was innocent, etc.

Tardy, don't forget to notice how full of shit you are, in traffic. GWs gang used a lying informant, to dupe Congress. Nobody found WMDs. Saddam was a CIA client-asset, in 1958, and GWH konked out, on the road to Basra, so GW could be a lying hero.

You are a punk-fuck, who ducks issues and spams. Eat shit and die.

bobgnote has some serious anger issues as most libs do
I am not sure as to why Saddam being A CIA informant (if he was) has anything to do with invading Kuwait in 91
And lying
killing millions, many of his own for reasons that are as simple as dis agreeing with him

Saddam had to go after 9-11
the region could no longer allow him and Al Qaeda to take a foot hold
My god we did not start that mess, we ended it

 

[GoneBezerk]

Biden didn't get the memo that Iraq is the biggest disaster of mankind.....

Vice President Biden: Iraq “Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration” - ABC News

 

[GoneBezerk]

The hero of the kooks....Scott Ritter is in jail after being arrested for a second time trying to have sex with underage girls.

 

[GoneBezerk]

Dumbfuck, Powell showed intel pics Saddam's military digging and moving material at sites that were targeted by the IAEA inspectors. I even saw more beyond what he exposed, dumbfuck.

It is was discovered Iraq was being tipped off about where the IAEA inspectors were going since some Euro trash on the teams were pro-Saddam, probably getting kickbacks from the Oil for Food scam. Saddam knew where the IAEA inspectors wanted to go and so he would delay them until he could clean up the sites.

Why would he be sending out his military to these sites before the inspectors if nothing was there, eh dumbfuck?

Saddam would delay the inspectors until threatened with force during the Clinton Admin. He was playing games with IAEA inspectors for what fucking reason. Come on Cleatus tell us.

Dumbass.....Powell showed our intel photos that showed Saddam's troops were moving stuff around prior to IAEA inspectors showing up at those sites.

He also brought up Saddam's human rights violations, support to suicide bombers, and violations of the ceasefire terms/UN resolutions.

But go on about how Saddam was innocent, etc.

Bush did not send Powell to the UN to tell them we were going into Iraq to get a few old WMD shells left from the 91 war, he sent him to tell the world that Saddam had re-started his WMD program, and they all lied.

Ritter said Iraq was not making new WMD and we had adequate monitoring to know if he did re-start the program, but he had not.

Ritter was correct, Bush, Cheney, Powell were wrong.

Showed Iraq moving WHAT STUFF around? Kaye and Duelfer reports both concluded no WMD, no active WMD development programs, and those were appointed by the Bush admin to do the inspections. You got nothing but your own spittle. Got any links?

 

[Bloodline]

Uh dumbfuck, you just said we found WMD in Iraq but then claim Scott Ritter said there was none. You need to read your own lies.

Scott Ritter is a fraud, didn't he get arrested after going on his rants? Where is he today....some mental ward?

Scott Ritter didn't have access to the intel photos that showed Saddam's troops doing weird work in the desert. If it was for show, then Saddam made a fatal mistake trying to fool us believing Bush wouldn't act out of fear Saddam had WMD.

The US military was expecting WMD attacks, asshole. The US Govt didn't know Saddam's WMD program was either shut down or mostly moved out of Iraq before the war.

But rant on about how you wish Saddam and his sons were still killing Iraqis, stealing their wealth and supporting terrorists blowing up "the Jews." Eh, Nazi....

You do realize the Saddam's political party was modeled by his uncle after the Nazis. They support your support of their efforts, despite both of your EPIC FAILS when the US military ruined it all for you and them.

Scott Ritter publicly and correctly told the world Iraq had no WMD, that we had adequate monitoring capability that we would know if Iraq restarted its WMD development.

Dumbfucks like you would rather listen to liars like Bush and Cheney, and don't even concern yourselves with the cost, 1 trillion to fight the war, 4500 americans killed, 30,000 wounded, and 2 trillion in future expenses to cover the wounded.

And for what?

Epic Fail!

Bush did not send Powell to the UN to tell them we were going into Iraq to get a few old WMD shells left from the 91 war, he sent him to tell the world that Saddam had re-started his WMD program, and they all lied.

Ritter said Iraq was not making new WMD and we had adequate monitoring to know if he did re-start the program, but he had not.

Ritter was correct, Bush, Cheney, Powell were wrong.

Messiah Obamination?

LMFAO

You know you might actually sound credible if you didn't spend so much time quoting Rush verbatim. You give your hand away by having to rely on someone else to tell you how to think and at the same time making it so OBVIOUS!

This is so retro-Bush era!

Don't like what someone says....attack them personally and discred them...."Scott Ritter wears girls underwear!"

Just because that worked for Karl Rove don't assume it will work for you.

EVERYBODY and anybody who dared tell the truth about the wrongs they saw within the Bush administration got the ax and then the inevitable tar and feather smear treatment from Rove and his conservative media puppets! And there were a LOT of them!

Colin Powell- for favoring diplomacy over the rush to war and later for daring to tell the truth about the Nigerian yellowcake uranium claims....that they were bullshit....even before Joseph Wilson published his op-ed piece in the New York times saying the same thing. By the way, Wilson was thoroughly smeared for his honesty as well and his wife's cover as a C.I.A. operative blown!

Paul O'Neil-for expressing misgivings about Bush's tax cuts in wartime. Of course he turned out to be RIGHT, but was slandered and smeared as well.

Lawrence Lindsey-for coming up with the first ACCURATE estimate of what the war in Iraq was actually going to cost. He turned out to be RIGHT of course but the administration didn't want to hear it and OF COURSE they didn't want the public to hear it so once again they had to distract with a lot of noise about his "credibility" just like you are trying to do here with Scott Ritter!

Then of course there were Generals Anthony Zinni and Eric Shinseki-they were just a little too TRUTHFUL for this administration!

And who can forget Richard Clarke? He was the frigging ANTI-TERRORISM chief! He dared tell the truth in his book that Bush had actually dropped the ball on Al Qaida in his obsession with Iraq. Boy! That REALLY pissed them off and sent the spin machine into high gear!

 

[GoneBezerk]

I see you have the Burger King late shift today.

Rush has never used the term Obamination, I coined that term HERE.

People jumped off the Iraq War bandwagon once it was no longer "hip" among the Democraps and cocktail party circuit. They are sellouts that put their own popularity above the nation.

Scum like you put getting Democraps re-elected over the security of this nation.

LMFAO

You know you might actually sound credible if you didn't spend so much time quoting Rush verbatim. You give your hand away by having to rely on someone else to tell you how to think and at the same time making it so OBVIOUS!

This is so retro-Bush era!

Don't like what someone says....attack them personally and discred them...."Scott Ritter wears girls underwear!"

Just because that worked for Karl Rove don't assume it will work for you.

EVERYBODY and anybody who dared tell the truth about the wrongs they saw within the Bush administration got the ax and then the inevitable tar and feather smear treatment from Rove and his conservative media puppets! And there were a LOT of them!

Colin Powell- for favoring diplomacy over the rush to war and later for daring to tell the truth about the Nigerian yellowcake uranium claims....that they were bullshit....even before Joseph Wilson published his op-ed piece in the New York times saying the same thing. By the way, Wilson was thoroughly smeared for his honesty as well and his wife's cover as a C.I.A. operative blown!

Paul O'Neil-for expressing misgivings about Bush's tax cuts in wartime. Of course he turned out to be RIGHT, but was slandered and smeared as well.

Lawrence Lindsey-for coming up with the first ACCURATE estimate of what the war in Iraq was actually going to cost. He turned out to be RIGHT of course but the administration didn't want to hear it and OF COURSE they didn't want the public to hear it so once again they had to distract with a lot of noise about his "credibility" just like you are trying to do here with Scott Ritter!

Then of course there were Generals Anthony Zinni and Eric Shinseki-they were just a little too TRUTHFUL for this administration!

And who can forget Richard Clarke? He was the frigging ANTI-TERRORISM chief! He dared tell the truth in his book that Bush had actually dropped the ball on Al Qaida in his obsession with Iraq. Boy! That REALLY pissed them off and sent the spin machine into high gear!

 

[GoneBezerk]

That scumbag lives in his parent's basement with his blow up girlfriend. He spends his day inventing wild conspiracy stories about Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and soon Romney.

Bush will soon be tied to helping Saddam's uncle rise to power within the Baath party.

Each post shows the rants of a madman.

FYI....you forgot to mention the "number 2" in your post.

Tardy, don't forget to notice how full of shit you are, in traffic. GWs gang used a lying informant, to dupe Congress. Nobody found WMDs. Saddam was a CIA client-asset, in 1958, and GWH konked out, on the road to Basra, so GW could be a lying hero.

You are a punk-fuck, who ducks issues and spams. Eat shit and die.

bobgnote has some serious anger issues as most libs do
I am not sure as to why Saddam being A CIA informant (if he was) has anything to do with invading Kuwait in 91
And lying
killing millions, many of his own for reasons that are as simple as dis agreeing with him

Saddam had to go after 9-11
the region could no longer allow him and Al Qaeda to take a foot hold
My god we did not start that mess, we ended it

 

[finebead]

Dumbfuck, Powell showed intel pics Saddam's military digging and moving material at sites that were targeted by the IAEA inspectors. I even saw more beyond what he exposed, dumbfuck.

It is was discovered Iraq was being tipped off about where the IAEA inspectors were going since some Euro trash on the teams were pro-Saddam, probably getting kickbacks from the Oil for Food scam. Saddam knew where the IAEA inspectors wanted to go and so he would delay them until he could clean up the sites.

Why would he be sending out his military to these sites before the inspectors if nothing was there, eh dumbfuck?

Saddam would delay the inspectors until threatened with force during the Clinton Admin. He was playing games with IAEA inspectors for what fucking reason. Come on Cleatus tell us.

Dumbass.....Powell showed our intel photos that showed Saddam's troops were moving stuff around prior to IAEA inspectors showing up at those sites.

He also brought up Saddam's human rights violations, support to suicide bombers, and violations of the ceasefire terms/UN resolutions.

But go on about how Saddam was innocent, etc.

Showed Iraq moving WHAT STUFF around? Kaye and Duelfer reports both concluded no WMD, no active WMD development programs, and those were appointed by the Bush admin to do the inspections. You got nothing but your own spittle. Got any links?

Hey dumbfuck, there was the entire period AFTER the war, when we had conquered the whole nation, Saddam was dead, and we could go where we wanted and find anything. That's when we found the other 5% of components of Saddams WMD program from pre-'91, that the UNSCOM team did not find. Kaye and Deulfer wrote there reports, with FULL ACCESS to everything, they never found any new WMD. That is why the public turned on Bush and the repubs, led us into an expensive war over WMD that did not exist.

 

[JRK]

Uh dumbfuck, you just said we found WMD in Iraq but then claim Scott Ritter said there was none. You need to read your own lies.

Scott Ritter is a fraud, didn't he get arrested after going on his rants? Where is he today....some mental ward?

Scott Ritter didn't have access to the intel photos that showed Saddam's troops doing weird work in the desert. If it was for show, then Saddam made a fatal mistake trying to fool us believing Bush wouldn't act out of fear Saddam had WMD.

The US military was expecting WMD attacks, asshole. The US Govt didn't know Saddam's WMD program was either shut down or mostly moved out of Iraq before the war.

But rant on about how you wish Saddam and his sons were still killing Iraqis, stealing their wealth and supporting terrorists blowing up "the Jews." Eh, Nazi....

You do realize the Saddam's political party was modeled by his uncle after the Nazis. They support your support of their efforts, despite both of your EPIC FAILS when the US military ruined it all for you and them.

Bush did not send Powell to the UN to tell them we were going into Iraq to get a few old WMD shells left from the 91 war, he sent him to tell the world that Saddam had re-started his WMD program, and they all lied.

Ritter said Iraq was not making new WMD and we had adequate monitoring to know if he did re-start the program, but he had not.

Ritter was correct, Bush, Cheney, Powell were wrong.

Messiah Obamination?

LMFAO

You know you might actually sound credible if you didn't spend so much time quoting Rush verbatim. You give your hand away by having to rely on someone else to tell you how to think and at the same time making it so OBVIOUS!

This is so retro-Bush era!

Don't like what someone says....attack them personally and discred them...."Scott Ritter wears girls underwear!"

Just because that worked for Karl Rove don't assume it will work for you.

EVERYBODY and anybody who dared tell the truth about the wrongs they saw within the Bush administration got the ax and then the inevitable tar and feather smear treatment from Rove and his conservative media puppets! And there were a LOT of them!

Colin Powell- for favoring diplomacy over the rush to war and later for daring to tell the truth about the Nigerian yellowcake uranium claims....that they were bullshit....even before Joseph Wilson published his op-ed piece in the New York times saying the same thing. By the way, Wilson was thoroughly smeared for his honesty as well and his wife's cover as a C.I.A. operative blown!

Paul O'Neil-for expressing misgivings about Bush's tax cuts in wartime. Of course he turned out to be RIGHT, but was slandered and smeared as well.

Lawrence Lindsey-for coming up with the first ACCURATE estimate of what the war in Iraq was actually going to cost. He turned out to be RIGHT of course but the administration didn't want to hear it and OF COURSE they didn't want the public to hear it so once again they had to distract with a lot of noise about his "credibility" just like you are trying to do here with Scott Ritter!

Then of course there were Generals Anthony Zinni and Eric Shinseki-they were just a little too TRUTHFUL for this administration!

And who can forget Richard Clarke? He was the frigging ANTI-TERRORISM chief! He dared tell the truth in his book that Bush had actually dropped the ball on Al Qaida in his obsession with Iraq. Boy! That REALLY pissed them off and sent the spin machine into high gear!

As I recall it was 9-15-2001 when GWB told Saddam and the world
Clean it up or else
Congress agreed that force maybe needed to enforce the terms of surrender, Oct 2002
Hans Blix infamous speech of just how far Saddam was out of compliance was 1-27-2003
We invaded 3-2003

RUSH? RUSH to war?
That was 18 months

 

[GoneBezerk]

You're such a fucking idiot.

The IAEA inspections were BEFORE we invaded in Iraq in 2003.

The Iraq and Sryria border was not monitored by the IAEA, so whatever Saddam was moving most likely went across that border. Assad and Saddam had a common enemy in Israel, so working together to maintain their power was in both's best interests.

There are WMD in Syria....

Hey dumbfuck, there was the entire period AFTER the war, when we had conquered the whole nation, Saddam was dead, and we could go where we wanted and find anything. That's when we found the other 5% of components of Saddams WMD program from pre-'91, that the UNSCOM team did not find. Kaye and Deulfer wrote there reports, with FULL ACCESS to everything, they never found any new WMD. That is why the public turned on Bush and the repubs, led us into an expensive war over WMD that did not exist.

 

[finebead]

You're such a fucking idiot.

The IAEA inspections were BEFORE we invaded in Iraq in 2003.

The Iraq and Sryria border was not monitored by the IAEA, so whatever Saddam was moving most likely went across that border. Assad and Saddam had a common enemy in Israel, so working together to maintain their power was in both's best interests.

There are WMD in Syria....

Hey dumbfuck, there was the entire period AFTER the war, when we had conquered the whole nation, Saddam was dead, and we could go where we wanted and find anything. That's when we found the other 5% of components of Saddams WMD program from pre-'91, that the UNSCOM team did not find. Kaye and Deulfer wrote there reports, with FULL ACCESS to everything, they never found any new WMD. That is why the public turned on Bush and the repubs, led us into an expensive war over WMD that did not exist.

You are such a fucking idiot, because it does make a fucking bit of difference WHEN the fucking IAEA inspections were, they didn't find anything, AND after the war when we could freely inspect where ever we wanted Kaye and Deulfer didn't find anything. In fact nobody found anything anytime, but Bush and Cheney said Iraq had WDM, they sent Powell to tell the UN their lies, and they were wrong. They were always wrong, and it is proven now. The public handed the repubs their hats as they should have. Stop trying to obfuscate by jumbling timeframes, that won't work.

 

[bobgnote]

Tardy, don't forget to notice how full of shit you are, in traffic. GWs gang used a lying informant, to dupe Congress. Nobody found WMDs. Saddam was a CIA client-asset, in 1958, and GWH konked out, on the road to Basra, so GW could be a lying hero.

You are a punk-fuck (Tardzerk), who ducks issues and spams. Eat shit and die.

bobgnote has some serious anger issues as most libs do
I am not sure as to why Saddam being A CIA informant (if he was) has anything to do with invading Kuwait in 91
And lying
killing millions, many of his own for reasons that are as simple as dis agreeing with him

Saddam had to go after 9-11
the region could no longer allow him and Al Qaeda to take a foot hold
My god we did not start that mess, we ended it

You are a punk-fuck, who ducks the following issues, on any thread you post:
1. Saddam was a CIA client, so the US teed him up, during the Iran-Iraq War, during Desert Storm, and during Iraqi Freedom, and they teed off on Iraq, twice, complete with a lot of d.u. damage;
2. GHW Bush got cold feet on the road to Basra, so GW Bush could use a lying Iraqi informant, from Operation Curveball, to lie to Congress, about WMDs;
3. Nobody found WMDs;
4. You keep lying and circle-jerking with your wingpunk Tardzerk, about anything at all, including yellowcake, which was lying around in drums, since the 1981 Israeli raid.

Fuck you, you illiterate piece of shit. Why don't you and your Log Cabin buddy Tardzerk roll your daisy chain down the road, and see if you can pull your heads out of each others' asses in time, to vote for Meat? He's barbecuing himself, for President.

 

[GoneBezerk]

Idiot....odds are Saddam moved the WMD out of Iraq under the nose of the IAEA with help from the Russians.

Why the hell was Saddam sending his military to sites to move stuff BEFORE the inspectors arrived a day or more later??? Why did he have spies on the IAEA if he had nothing to hide.

Come on dumbfuck.....explain it.

You're such a fucking idiot.

The IAEA inspections were BEFORE we invaded in Iraq in 2003.

The Iraq and Sryria border was not monitored by the IAEA, so whatever Saddam was moving most likely went across that border. Assad and Saddam had a common enemy in Israel, so working together to maintain their power was in both's best interests.

There are WMD in Syria....

Hey dumbfuck, there was the entire period AFTER the war, when we had conquered the whole nation, Saddam was dead, and we could go where we wanted and find anything. That's when we found the other 5% of components of Saddams WMD program from pre-'91, that the UNSCOM team did not find. Kaye and Deulfer wrote there reports, with FULL ACCESS to everything, they never found any new WMD. That is why the public turned on Bush and the repubs, led us into an expensive war over WMD that did not exist.

You are such a fucking idiot, because it does make a fucking bit of difference WHEN the fucking IAEA inspections were, they didn't find anything, AND after the war when we could freely inspect where ever we wanted Kaye and Deulfer didn't find anything. In fact nobody found anything anytime, but Bush and Cheney said Iraq had WDM, they sent Powell to tell the UN their lies, and they were wrong. They were always wrong, and it is proven now. The public handed the repubs their hats as they should have. Stop trying to obfuscate by jumbling timeframes, that won't work.

 

[GoneBezerk]

You're just insane.

You should be locked up by the Feds for mankind's sake.

Tardy, don't forget to notice how full of shit you are, in traffic. GWs gang used a lying informant, to dupe Congress. Nobody found WMDs. Saddam was a CIA client-asset, in 1958, and GWH konked out, on the road to Basra, so GW could be a lying hero.

You are a punk-fuck (Tardzerk), who ducks issues and spams. Eat shit and die.

bobgnote has some serious anger issues as most libs do
I am not sure as to why Saddam being A CIA informant (if he was) has anything to do with invading Kuwait in 91
And lying
killing millions, many of his own for reasons that are as simple as dis agreeing with him

Saddam had to go after 9-11
the region could no longer allow him and Al Qaeda to take a foot hold
My god we did not start that mess, we ended it

You are a punk-fuck, who ducks the following issues, on any thread you post:
1. Saddam was a CIA client, so the US teed him up, during the Iran-Iraq War, during Desert Storm, and during Iraqi Freedom, and they teed off on Iraq, twice, complete with a lot of d.u. damage;
2. GHW Bush got cold feet on the road to Basra, so GW Bush could use a lying Iraqi informant, from Operation Curveball, to lie to Congress, about WMDs;
3. Nobody found WMDs;
4. You keep lying and circle-jerking with your wingpunk Tardzerk, about anything at all, including yellowcake, which was lying around in drums, since the 1981 Israeli raid.

Fuck you, you illiterate piece of shit. Why don't you and your Log Cabin buddy Tardzerk roll your daisy chain down the road, and see if you can pull your heads out of each others' asses in time, to vote for Meat? He's barbecuing himself, for President.

 

[GoneBezerk]

So let's just sum up the dumbfucks on this thread to end this shit.

1) Saddam didn't have WMD despite using it on the Kurds and some WMD found in post-2003 Iraq.
2) Saddam played hide and seek with the IAEA inspectors for over a decade for really no reason.
3) Saddam had spies inside the IAEA teams and sent his military to sites before the IAEA to move stuff for no reason.
4) The Syrian and Iraqi border wasn't monitored by the IAEA but of course Saddam would never move his WMD across that border with help from Russia.
5) Democraps supported the war effort until it was dragging out and no longer cool, so Bush is a war criminal for starting the war.

 

[JRK]

So let's just sum up the dumbfucks on this thread to end this shit.

1) Saddam didn't have WMD despite using it on the Kurds and some WMD found in post-2003 Iraq.
2) Saddam played hide and seek with the IAEA inspectors for over a decade for really no reason.
3) Saddam had spies inside the IAEA teams and sent his military to sites before the IAEA to move stuff for no reason.
4) The Syrian and Iraqi border wasn't monitored by the IAEA but of course Saddam would never move his WMD across that border with help from Russia.
5) Democraps supported the war effort until it was dragging out and no longer cool, so Bush is a war criminal for starting the war.

Al Qaeda was in Iraq, pre war
Saddam had open the gates through Syria for any and all terror groups to kill Coalition troops

The Iraq Survey Group was told that Saddam Hussein periodically removed guards from the Syrian border and replaced them with his intelligence agents who then supervised the movement of banned materials between Syria and Iraq, according to two unnamed defense sources that spoke with The Washington Times. They reported heavy traffic in large trucks on the border before the United States invasion.[24] Earlier, in a telephone interview with The Daily Telegraph, the former head of the Iraqi Survey Group, David Kay, said: "[W]e know from some of the interrogations of former Iraqi officials that a lot of material went to Syria before the war, including some components of Saddam's WMD program. Precisely what went to Syria, and what has happened to it, is a major issue that needs to be resolved."[25] Satellite imagery also picked up activity on the Iraq-Syria border before and during the invasion. James R. Clapper, who headed the National Imagery and Mapping Agency in 2003, has said U.S. intelligence tracked a large number of vehicles, mostly civilian trucks, moving from Iraq into Syria. Clapper suggested the trucks may have contained materiel related to Iraq's WMD programs.[26]

ISG formed a special working group to investigate and consider these claims. Charles Duelfer, head of inspectorate at time of publication, summarized the group's conclusion: "Based on the evidence available at present, ISG judged that it was unlikely that an official transfer of WMD material from Iraq to Syria took place. However, ISG was unable to rule out unofficial movement of limited WMD-related materials."[27][28][29]

WMD conjecture in the aftermath of the 2003 invasion of Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Libs have showed nothing but hate, for reasons that make no sense
GWB was at best a blue dog democrat. I supported W and feel that he was a much better president than the media reported 7 days a week, 24 hours a day

 

[bobgnote]

Let's sum up some more:

The British wouldn't give Kurds or Palestinians a homeland, after WWI, and Wilson let them fuck up, so now, Americans want to shoot up the Middle East with depleted uranium or nuke it. Now the Americans guarantee Israel's oil supply, and they put up guys like Saddam and the Shah, with the CIA, so Maliki supports the Shiite Assads, with Iran, now. We should never support Israel, since that rolls all this shit into balls, you wingnazis can goose-step into and track around.

Saddam was even around in the first place because the CIA was behind him. But claiming he killed Kurds wasn't a reason to go to Iraq and stay there, given GHW Bush chickened out, after Basra.

Democrats are dirtbags for Israel, but some of them noticed GW Bush lied in his 2003 State of the Union address and speeches to Congress, claiming WMDs. Operation Iraqi Freedom was just a circle-jerk, by lying, murdering ripoffs. Using Kurds as an excuse to invade in the 21st Century is shit, since GHW Bush kak'd out, when Schwarzkopf had Saddam on the run, but then GHW Bush tells Iraqis to revolt, they did it, and Saddam fucked the Kurds and southern Shiites right up.

Crimes of Saddam Hussein

All Saddam's majors are in the 1980s, except for the GHW Bush-incited rebellion, when the US didn't help anybody, after starting the shit. So then, you think it's OK to go over there, in 2003, stay around, shoot up the place, and pretend some sort of costly but stupid objective was accomplished.

That's great, Tardzerk! Stay the dumbfuck course, you lying dumbshit. Quit lying about the fucking yellowcake, since Saddam had no way to get new yellowcake, after the Israelis bombed his nuclear facility in 1981, and the Russians weren't helping him. He didn't have any new cake, wingpunk!

 

[Billo_Really]

Al Qaeda was in Iraq, pre war

I'm still waiting for you to show proof of a cooperative relationship.

Saddam had open the gates through Syria for any and all terror groups to kill Coalition troops.

So you're saying Syria would come to the rescue of one of its enemies?

The Iraq Survey Group was told that Saddam Hussein periodically removed guards from the Syrian border and replaced them with his intelligence agents who then supervised the movement of banned materials between Syria and Iraq, according to two unnamed defense sources that spoke with The Washington Times. They reported heavy traffic in large trucks on the border before the United States invasion.

You gotta love those "unnamed sources".

 

[bobgnote]

Look, let's stay the dumbfuck course for Jerkoffski of the Illiterati, who pasted 'conjecture.'

And what does your Zionist source of conjecture have to say about how Israel bombed Saddam in 1981, so he had no way to get new yellowcake? Trucks go to Syria, so I guess we'd better get over there and bomb Bashar Assad to shit, since now there's no end of shit, happening, including planes flying to Iran, to keep the US from trashing them, during any invasion.