Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
.we will have to die
to know
here on earth we can not know anything
.we will have to die
to know
here on earth we can not know anything
here on earth we can not know anything
- nothing could be further from the truth ...
we have the timespan of our physiology to find the answers - the Apex of Knowledge is assailable and from its Apex can a freed Spirit accomplish Admission to the Everlasting.
.
.
there is the Triumph of Good vs Evil - ignoring the Almighty is at your own peril.
.
we have the timespan of our physiology to find the answers.we will have to die
to know
here on earth we can not know anything
here on earth we can not know anything
- nothing could be further from the truth ...
we have the timespan of our physiology to find the answers - the Apex of Knowledge is assailable and from its Apex can a freed Spirit accomplish Admission to the Everlasting.
.
.we have the timespan of our physiology to find the answers.we will have to die
to know
here on earth we can not know anything
here on earth we can not know anything
- nothing could be further from the truth ...
we have the timespan of our physiology to find the answers - the Apex of Knowledge is assailable and from its Apex can a freed Spirit accomplish Admission to the Everlasting.
.
And yet... even when we believe we've found the answers, the best we can ever do is THINK we know.
skye is 100% correct... we can never KNOW.
the Apex of Knowledge is assailable
Knowledge is simply faith in evidence.
No, faith is the belief in something unprovable.Knowledge is simply faith in evidence.
1+1=2. You lose.[
That's the point. You can't prove anything absolutely. You can believe you have. In fact, that is what Science provides... evidence to have faith in. I don't expect you to get this, you're not smart enough. You'll sit here and argue with examples of things we believe we know for certain. But I never claimed we couldn't believe we know for certain.
1+1=2. You lose.
I know that 1+1=2. It might be too hard for you to grasp, but not for the rest of us. You lose again.1+1=2. You lose.
No, you lose. As I said, you're not smart enough to grasp this.
"1+1=2" is simply an equation we use to determine a result we believe. Many things have to be assumed. You've not defined absolutely what "one" is... what "two" is... what is meant by "equal" or what is meant by "plus." All of these have to be defined as we believe we know them. Does 1+1 always equal 2, or sometimes, can 2x1=2? Or 3-1=2? Or 1.5+.5? -- As you can see, 2 may not always equal 1+1. And again... One what? How about an electron? What if I told you, at the subatomic level, 1 electron + 1 electron could = 3 electrons? Or 1 electron? Or no electrons? And it might only depend on whether you are observing them.
You want to throw out another example of something we THINK we know?
It dawned on me you are right that humans were spiritual for as far back as we can see.Because without the organized religion you REALLY have no evidence.
Human spirituality has existed for as long as humans have been civilized. Religion came much later and is evidence of strong and abiding human spiritual connection. Humans DID invent Religion, they did NOT invent human spirituality. That's why you have no evidence it was invented.
It dawned on me you are right that humans were spiritual for as far back as we can see.Because without the organized religion you REALLY have no evidence.
Human spirituality has existed for as long as humans have been civilized. Religion came much later and is evidence of strong and abiding human spiritual connection. Humans DID invent Religion, they did NOT invent human spirituality. That's why you have no evidence it was invented.
The professor on Gilligan island said it best this morning. The more primitive the tribe the more superstitious.
1+1=2. You lose.
No, you lose. As I said, you're not smart enough to grasp this.
"1+1=2" is simply an equation we use to determine a result we believe. Many things have to be assumed. You've not defined absolutely what "one" is... what "two" is... what is meant by "equal" or what is meant by "plus." All of these have to be defined as we believe we know them. Does 1+1 always equal 2, or sometimes, can 2x1=2? Or 3-1=2? Or 1.5+.5? -- As you can see, 2 may not always equal 1+1. And again... One what? How about an electron? What if I told you, at the subatomic level, 1 electron + 1 electron could = 3 electrons? Or 1 electron? Or no electrons? And it might only depend on whether you are observing them.
You want to throw out another example of something we THINK we know?
.1+1=2. You lose.
No, you lose. As I said, you're not smart enough to grasp this.
"1+1=2" is simply an equation we use to determine a result we believe. Many things have to be assumed. You've not defined absolutely what "one" is... what "two" is... what is meant by "equal" or what is meant by "plus." All of these have to be defined as we believe we know them. Does 1+1 always equal 2, or sometimes, can 2x1=2? Or 3-1=2? Or 1.5+.5? -- As you can see, 2 may not always equal 1+1. And again... One what? How about an electron? What if I told you, at the subatomic level, 1 electron + 1 electron could = 3 electrons? Or 1 electron? Or no electrons? And it might only depend on whether you are observing them.
You want to throw out another example of something we THINK we know?
Please...tell me you are not an Engineer or an Architect.......and if you are please tell me what you have built with your mathematical theories so I can avoid them......
It's called power.1+1=2. You lose.
No, you lose. As I said, you're not smart enough to grasp this.
"1+1=2" is simply an equation we use to determine a result we believe. Many things have to be assumed. You've not defined absolutely what "one" is... what "two" is... what is meant by "equal" or what is meant by "plus." All of these have to be defined as we believe we know them. Does 1+1 always equal 2, or sometimes, can 2x1=2? Or 3-1=2? Or 1.5+.5? -- As you can see, 2 may not always equal 1+1. And again... One what? How about an electron? What if I told you, at the subatomic level, 1 electron + 1 electron could = 3 electrons? Or 1 electron? Or no electrons? And it might only depend on whether you are observing them.
You want to throw out another example of something we THINK we know?
Please...tell me you are not an Engineer or an Architect.......and if you are please tell me what you have built with your mathematical theories so I can avoid them......
the universe is fundamentally ... irrefutable. Spirituality is of its own interpretation with hopefully an Almighty to keep it straight.
.
In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable – what then?"1+1=2. You lose.
No, you lose. As I said, you're not smart enough to grasp this.
"1+1=2" is simply an equation we use to determine a result we believe. Many things have to be assumed. You've not defined absolutely what "one" is... what "two" is... what is meant by "equal" or what is meant by "plus." All of these have to be defined as we believe we know them. Does 1+1 always equal 2, or sometimes, can 2x1=2? Or 3-1=2? Or 1.5+.5? -- As you can see, 2 may not always equal 1+1. And again... One what? How about an electron? What if I told you, at the subatomic level, 1 electron + 1 electron could = 3 electrons? Or 1 electron? Or no electrons? And it might only depend on whether you are observing them.
"You want to throw out another example of something we THINK we know?