Why Hasn't Trump Been Impeached?

<Russian Active Measure>

How could the FBI say there's no connection if they are currently investigating the connection????
Smoke and mirrors designed to keep the focus off the Clintons/Podestas proven connections to the Russians and off the Obama administration's Felony Espionage.

It's really easy, snowflake - PRODUCE THE EVIDENCE RIGHT NOW OR ADMIT THERE IS NONE.
 
It's not a false accusation to say the FBI, Senate Intel Committee, House Intel Committee, and New York State Attorney General are investigating Trump-Russian collusion, because they are. The conclusions I am reaching are based on what those who are doing the investigating have said. And Comey said, just last month, the FBI is currently investigating the collusion.

You are too ignorant to know the difference between an investigation and evidence to support the claim being investigated.

The Directors of the NSA and FBI both testified before Congress and stated their investigations originated as a result of the 'initial collections' of the trump team. They also stated that at the time they made it clear to the Obama administration that the collected information SHOWED NOTHING ILLEGAL and further showed NONE OF THE INFORMATION WAS OF ANY INTEL VALUE.

1. NO CRIME. Nothing to investigate, but Obama used the fact that Trump team members had legally contacted Russian counterparts - as many other administrations have done in the past - to open a bogus investigation - Obama's own 'Watergate' during an election to spy on Trump and his team. (Don't even try to claim this is far-fetched because it has been proven that Obama already illegally spied on reporters, the media, US citizens, and even Congress in the past AND illegally used the IRS to target US Citizens!)

2. The SECOND the NSA and FBI Directors made it clear that the collected information had NO INTEL VALUE it became 'PROTECTED personal CLASSIFIED Information'. Obama's administration, according to RICE, turned that information over to 16 Intel Agencies. HAVING NO INTEL VALUE, besides making the information PROTECTED, meant there was NO REASON to hand it over to the Intel agencies....no reason EXCEPT for POLITICAL use against Trump. Doing so is a CRIME! Not only was giving the information to the Intel Agencies a CRIME, they also FACILITATED the Felony Espionage perpetrated by their loyalists in those agencies when those loyalists illegally released that information!

You said you are basing your conclusions based on TESTIMONY. Well, based on TESTIMONY from the Directors of the NSA and FBI, under oath before Congress, THERE NEVER WAS ANY CRIME COMMITTED BY TRUMP OR HIS TEAM, WAS NEVER ANY REASON TO OPEN AN INVESTIGATION, WAS NEVER ANY LEGAL REASON TO RELEASE PROTECTED PERSONAL CLASSIFIED INFORMATION THAT HAD NO INTEL VALUE TO INTEL AGENCIES, AND NEVER ANY LEGAL REASON TO LEAK THAT INFORMATION.

To date snowflakes continue to make false accusations while providing no evidence to support their claims or to refute the testimony of the Directors of both the NSA and FBI.
 
Prominent Russian businessmen who profited from Russia buying US Uranium,

There it is again. A Red lie. Where and when did this sale of US uranium to a Russian businessman happen? How much did he buy? Where did all this US uranium go?

Now of course the real story is that the Russians bought a Canadian mining company, and that company owned the mineral rights to some uranium mines in the US. Since the US does not allow the export of uranium, it is the US who buys the uranium produced at the US mines, not Russia.
 
Last edited:
There it is again. A Red lie. Where and when did this sale of US uranium to a Russian businessman happen? How much did he buy? Where did all this US uranium go?

Now of course the real story is that the Russians bought a Canadian mining company, and that company owned the mineral rights to some uranium mines in the US. Since the US does not allow the export of uranium, it is the US who buys the uranium produced at the US mines, not Russia.

There is no lie...just attempted distraction from the truth. You are trying to distract from the fact by trying to drag the focus into insignificant minutia.

According to the liberal NY Times:

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
- https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

"...the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President
Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One."

While Bill Clinton was working for Putin's Ex-KGB pals...while Hillary's campaign manager was accepting thousands of Russian stock shares without reporting it and 1/3rd of his company's board members were / are prominent Russian businessmen with ties to the Kremlin and Putin...while her campaign manager's brother was working for the KGB bank and the Russian Spy agency that hacked and released details from the DNC's e-mails....Hillary was accepting donations for the Clinton Slush Fund..er, Foundation from a very grateful Russian businessman who was part of the deal allowing Russians to buy US Uranium.

Coincidently, the on-going FBI investigation includes potential crimes of Influence Peddling....like granting access and doing favors for donors....
 
There it is again. A Red lie. Where and when did this sale of US uranium to a Russian businessman happen? How much did he buy? Where did all this US uranium go?

Now of course the real story is that the Russians bought a Canadian mining company, and that company owned the mineral rights to some uranium mines in the US. Since the US does not allow the export of uranium, it is the US who buys the uranium produced at the US mines, not Russia.

There is no lie...just attempted distraction from the truth. You are trying to distract from the fact by trying to drag the focus into insignificant minutia.

According to the liberal NY Times:

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
- https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

"...the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President
Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One."

While Bill Clinton was working for Putin's Ex-KGB pals...while Hillary's campaign manager was accepting thousands of Russian stock shares without reporting it and 1/3rd of his company's board members were / are prominent Russian businessmen with ties to the Kremlin and Putin...while her campaign manager's brother was working for the KGB bank and the Russian Spy agency that hacked and released details from the DNC's e-mails....Hillary was accepting donations for the Clinton Slush Fund..er, Foundation from a very grateful Russian businessman who was part of the deal allowing Russians to buy US Uranium.

Coincidently, the on-going FBI investigation includes potential crimes of Influence Peddling....like granting access and doing favors for donors....

They would have to have an export license to ship uranium out of the USA. They don't have one. We can't supply all the uranium we need for our reactors. It's logical in that we only produce about 20% of what we need for fuel. But that exposes the Red lie that some Russian businessman was allowed to purchase US uranium.
 
They would have to have an export license to ship uranium out of the USA. They don't have one. We can't supply all the uranium we need for our reactors. It's logical in that we only produce about 20% of what we need for fuel. But that exposes the Red lie that some Russian businessman was allowed to purchase US uranium.

This ^^^^^^^^^^ is all horseshit. We bought the Ivan's depleted uranium after the soviet union fell to run our power plants. We have all the uranium ore we could possibly need, even after Hillary's criminal sale of 20% of it to Putin.
 
They would have to have an export license to ship uranium out of the USA. They don't have one. We can't supply all the uranium we need for our reactors. It's logical in that we only produce about 20% of what we need for fuel. But that exposes the Red lie that some Russian businessman was allowed to purchase US uranium.
Let me ask a 'silly' question.....you wouldn't happen to have a link to anything legitimate to support your diatribe above would you, like I did to support my statements?
 
Trump goes from Win to Win to Win ...... :thup:

It drives the loony liberals into a crazed frenzy because there is nothing they can do about it. ..... :cool:
all those wins lol the wall ,immigration hc, tax reform sanctuary cities,,,trump university etc etc etc
 
How could the FBI say there's no connection if they are currently investigating the connection????
Smoke and mirrors

Wow, dude. You are delusional. So Comey testified before the House Committee last month that he was investigating Trump's Russia connections, only he isn't? And when he said there was nothing wrong with the surveillance of the Russian spies Trump and the GOP were talking to, there is?

You seem to live in bizarro world.
 
<Russian Active Measure>

Comey said very plainly (I even linked the article in my post) that the FBI was investigating connections between Trump and Russia, and that there was nothing wrong with what the Obama administration did when it caught Trump's people on tape talking to Russian spies.
 
There is no lie...just attempted distraction from the truth. You are trying to distract from the fact by trying to drag the focus into insignificant minutia.

No, there is a lie. And you're the one making it. Maybe you just don't understand what words mean. Maybe you do and are being this way deliberately. Maybe you are a Russian and are just spamming the board in the hopes you can cloud the real issue here which is that Putin has a video of Trump getting peed on by Russian hookers, and is holding that over his head. That's why Trump called Putin ahead of the Syria attack, knowing Putin would just tell Assad who will move equipment and personnel away from the base until the strike is done. That's also why that plan was hatched in haste the day after Nunes had to recuse himself from the House Intel investigation. Speaking of which, why did he recuse himself if there was no wrong-doing????

Or maybe it's not about Trump getting peed upon, maybe it's about the fact that Russia is the only place with standards low enough to loan a person like Donald Trump money. After all, Trump was blacklisted by US banks because he is such a shitty businessman.
 
There is no lie...just attempted distraction from the truth. You are trying to distract from the fact by trying to drag the focus into insignificant minutia.

No, there is a lie. And you're the one making it. Maybe you just don't understand what words mean. Maybe you do and are being this way deliberately. Maybe you are a Russian and are just spamming the board in the hopes you can cloud the real issue here which is that Putin has a video of Trump getting peed on by Russian hookers, and is holding that over his head. That's why Trump called Putin ahead of the Syria attack, knowing Putin would just tell Assad who will move equipment and personnel away from the base until the strike is done. That's also why that plan was hatched in haste the day after Nunes had to recuse himself from the House Intel investigation. Speaking of which, why did he recuse himself if there was no wrong-doing????
Stop wasting everyone's time and produce evidence to support your false claims.
 
Wow, dude. You are delusional. So Comey testified before the House Committee last month that he was investigating Trump's Russia connections, only he isn't? And when he said there was nothing wrong with the surveillance of the Russian spies Trump and the GOP were talking to, there is?

You seem to live in bizarro world.

What world do you live in, Sorosbot? How many times you been banned from this site, loser?
 
This ^^^^^^^^^^ is all horseshit. We bought the Ivan's depleted uranium after the soviet union fell to run our power plants. We have all the uranium ore we could possibly need, even after Hillary's criminal sale of 20% of it to Putin.

No pal, you are the one full of horseshit here because you don't know the first thing about this subject, just what you've gleaned from the right-wing echo chamber, or in the memos from Putin.
 

Forum List

Back
Top