Why GWB will be one of the greatest Presidents in MY LIFETIME...

Geez....
Don't you guys think for one minute when Bush took office WHY tax cuts were immediately in the offering? They knew a recession was coming!
Recessions means reduced business revenue.. means reduced tax revenue... SO if businesses need help in making it through recession.. tax cuts!
So you're calling Bush a liar??? Because he said the reason for the tax cuts was because of the surplus Clinton handed him. Don't you recall ....

Bush: Surplus Justifies Tax Cut

President Bush said Saturday that the most important number in the budget he sends to Congress next week is the $5.6 trillion surplus it projects over the next 10 years.

That huge projected surplus provides the underpinning of all the administration's tax-cut and spending plans, Mr. Bush said in his recorded weekly radio address.

"A surplus in tax revenue, after all, means that taxpayers have been overcharged," the president said. "And usually when you've been overcharged, you expect to get something back." The surplus figure "counts more than any other" in the budget, he said.
 
GWB was one of our worst presidents...and we have endured many really bad ones.

He was a stinking progressive who expanded the size and power of the federal government (only to be exceeded by the doofus in the WH now), exploded the deficit (again exponentially exceeded by Big Ears), and pursed an expensive, murderous, and iineffective interventionist foreign policy.

The only way Bush could be considered great, is for the historians to become a tool of the State, much as they have become with the worthless and ignorant FDR and tyrannical Dishonest Abe.
 
Last edited:
Geez....
Don't you guys think for one minute when Bush took office WHY tax cuts were immediately in the offering? They knew a recession was coming!
Recessions means reduced business revenue.. means reduced tax revenue... SO if businesses need help in making it through recession.. tax cuts!
So you're calling Bush a liar??? Because he said the reason for the tax cuts was because of the surplus Clinton handed him. Don't you recall ....

Bush: Surplus Justifies Tax Cut

President Bush said Saturday that the most important number in the budget he sends to Congress next week is the $5.6 trillion surplus it projects over the next 10 years.

That huge projected surplus provides the underpinning of all the administration's tax-cut and spending plans, Mr. Bush said in his recorded weekly radio address.

"A surplus in tax revenue, after all, means that taxpayers have been overcharged," the president said. "And usually when you've been overcharged, you expect to get something back." The surplus figure "counts more than any other" in the budget, he said.


Hey healthmyths, where did you go? I want you to show how the post above is incorrect.

You know, where did Bush say that a recession was coming (your words) and that tax cuts were needed to protect the companies from the recession.

I want to see you disprove what Faun posted.

If you can't do that, stfu with all your spamming and bull shit.
 
Bush was predicting a future surplus. Clinton did not leave him a true surplus. Clinton did leave him 9-11 which was directly related to his incompetence as CIC! That with an economic collapse associated with 9-11 and Clinton's policies largely caused the lack of a surplus later in Bush's presidency.

Liberal thinking is a lie, and defies common sense deduction!
 
Bush was predicting a future surplus. Clinton did not leave him a true surplus. Clinton did leave him 9-11 which was directly related to his incompetence as CIC! That with an economic collapse associated with 9-11 and Clinton's policies largely caused the lack of a surplus later in Bush's presidency.

Liberal thinking is a lie, and defies common sense deduction!


Oh that George he was a smart one wasn't he. Clinton didn't leave him a surplus yet somehow, someway ole George was so smart he knew a surplus was coming eh?

To bad he didn't "see" the housing collapse and the rising unemployment and the economic collapse.

Which year did Bush go blind? Or was it Cheney reading the goat entrails for Bush and somehow Dick messed up reading the entrails.

Yea that must be it. Well that and the fact that Bush and Cheney knew they had the backing of idiots like a bird dog and knew that bird dogs will believe anything. Even a decoy looks good to a bird dog.
 
Better yet dog, how come Bush didn't "see" the attack coming on 9/11? Or how about why he didn't "see" the disaster that Iraq would become?

When did Bush go blind? Was it right after he was elected? Is that why Cheney had to lead him around?

Hell Bush would have been better off with a seeing eye dog.
 
Bush was predicting a future surplus. Clinton did not leave him a true surplus. Clinton did leave him 9-11 which was directly related to his incompetence as CIC! That with an economic collapse associated with 9-11 and Clinton's policies largely caused the lack of a surplus later in Bush's presidency.

Liberal thinking is a lie, and defies common sense deduction!


Oh that George he was a smart one wasn't he. Clinton didn't leave him a surplus yet somehow, someway ole George was so smart he knew a surplus was coming eh?

To bad he didn't "see" the housing collapse and the rising unemployment and the economic collapse.

Which year did Bush go blind? Or was it Cheney reading the goat entrails for Bush and somehow Dick messed up reading the entrails.

Yea that must be it. Well that and the fact that Bush and Cheney knew they had the backing of idiots like a bird dog and knew that bird dogs will believe anything. Even a decoy looks good to a bird dog.

Yea...Bush predicted he would find WMDs also
 
Bush was predicting a future surplus. Clinton did not leave him a true surplus. Clinton did leave him 9-11 which was directly related to his incompetence as CIC! That with an economic collapse associated with 9-11 and Clinton's policies largely caused the lack of a surplus later in Bush's presidency.

Liberal thinking is a lie, and defies common sense deduction!


Oh that George he was a smart one wasn't he. Clinton didn't leave him a surplus yet somehow, someway ole George was so smart he knew a surplus was coming eh?

To bad he didn't "see" the housing collapse and the rising unemployment and the economic collapse.

Which year did Bush go blind? Or was it Cheney reading the goat entrails for Bush and somehow Dick messed up reading the entrails.

Yea that must be it. Well that and the fact that Bush and Cheney knew they had the backing of idiots like a bird dog and knew that bird dogs will believe anything. Even a decoy looks good to a bird dog.

Yea...Bush predicted he would find WMDs also

Yeah, bad advice from Clinton's leftover CIA advisors. The WMDs were likely there, and were moved out to Syria and put to use later.

That said, I was never in favor of putting ground troops into Iraq, and I would have never kept troops in Afghanistan over six months!
 
Better yet dog, how come Bush didn't "see" the attack coming on 9/11? Or how about why he didn't "see" the disaster that Iraq would become?

When did Bush go blind? Was it right after he was elected? Is that why Cheney had to lead him around?

Hell Bush would have been better off with a seeing eye dog.

A) YOU never heard of the Gorelick Memo obviously! Get educated boob!!

"As Deputy Attorney General under Bill Clinton from 1994 to 1997
Jamie Gorelick wrote the memo that created the now infamous “Gorelick Wall.” A 1995 memo she wrote, stated explicitly that they would “go beyond what is legally required, [to] prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation.”

These rules were, shortly after their creation, expanded to regulate such communications in future counter-terrorism investigations.
It set a procedure where various intelligence operations could not share information with each other.

Jamie Gorelick’s wall barred anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation shortly before 9/11.
At the time, an enraged FBI investigator wrote a prophetic memo to headquarters about the wall
‘Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems…..especially since the biggest threat to us UBL [Usama bin Laden], is getting the most protection.
Breitbart News: Big Government

And this was done because Clinton had accepted Chinese donations in exchange for missile secrets!
Clinton sells missile technology to China - 1998
Thanks to the Cox Report, we now know that the seven years of the Clinton presidency have coincided with the most massive breach of military security in American history.
Clinton sells high tech missile technology to China - 1998 - Killingsworth Court, Formerly The General Forum - Killer Frogs

BLIND?? What you deaf,dumb and BLIND???


B) OH.. and you mean by " the disaster that Iraq would become"
28 million people NOW free!
28 million people who's standard of living and per person GDP has grown over 1,290% since Saddam was removed? THAT DISASTER??
So freeing 28 million people is a blunder?
The same people that have since being freed in 2003 Of course NONE of you Bush BASHERS EVER took time as I've done to study the economic impact of removing Saddam
when under Saddam Iraqi per person was $518! Today it is over $7,200! a 1,290% increase ! THAT is a blunder!
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/iz.html

The same "disaster" the kept 2,649,000 children from starvation??
In five years 576,000 children starved BECAUSE SADDAM refused to certify WMD destruction!
Iraq Sanctions Kill Children, U.N. Reports - NYTimes.com

Using 115,000 children starved a year because Saddam refused to certify WMD destruction -- From 1995 to 2013 is 18 years!
If Saddam was still in power i.e. Bush's Liberation of Iraq NEVER OCCURRED,
from 1990 to 2013 OVER 2,649,000 children would have STARVED because of Saddam!

That's a "blunder"??? Well thank GOD for that Blunder...
 
Bush was predicting a future surplus. Clinton did not leave him a true surplus. Clinton did leave him 9-11 which was directly related to his incompetence as CIC! That with an economic collapse associated with 9-11 and Clinton's policies largely caused the lack of a surplus later in Bush's presidency.

Liberal thinking is a lie, and defies common sense deduction!

Are you saying Bush, who did absolutely nothing to prevent a looming attack, bears no responsibilty in the massive failure to protect America that day?
 
wow, dude has whole notebooks of copy pastes.

I hope the nsa tips off Bush's security detail so they can watch out for this star struck clown
 
Bush was predicting a future surplus. Clinton did not leave him a true surplus. Clinton did leave him 9-11 which was directly related to his incompetence as CIC! That with an economic collapse associated with 9-11 and Clinton's policies largely caused the lack of a surplus later in Bush's presidency.

Liberal thinking is a lie, and defies common sense deduction!

Are you saying Bush, who did absolutely nothing to prevent a looming attack, bears no responsibilty in the massive failure to protect America that day?

How could the CIA tell the FBI about the bombers IF the Gorelick Memo created the WALL to prevent CIA sharing info with FBI??
Jamie Gorelick’s wall barred anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation shortly before 9/11.
At the time, an enraged FBI investigator wrote a prophetic memo to headquarters about the wall
‘Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems…..especially since the biggest threat to us UBL [Usama bin Laden], is getting the most protection.
Breitbart News: Big Government


By the way.. in just 25 words YOU couldn't spell correctly...EVEN with the help of the little dotted red line UNDER "responsibility" !

Who in the hell then are YOU to criticize Bush if you can't even when TOLD by spell check you have a misspelling and you still ignore it???
GEEZ this the reason we have illiterate people in this country...LAZY totally ignorant about something as simple as reading what you wrote!
 
Bush was predicting a future surplus. Clinton did not leave him a true surplus. Clinton did leave him 9-11 which was directly related to his incompetence as CIC! That with an economic collapse associated with 9-11 and Clinton's policies largely caused the lack of a surplus later in Bush's presidency.

Liberal thinking is a lie, and defies common sense deduction!

Are you saying Bush, who did absolutely nothing to prevent a looming attack, bears no responsibilty in the massive failure to protect America that day?

How could the CIA tell the FBI about the bombers IF the Gorelick Memo created the WALL to prevent CIA sharing info with FBI??
Jamie Gorelick’s wall barred anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation shortly before 9/11.
At the time, an enraged FBI investigator wrote a prophetic memo to headquarters about the wall
‘Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems…..especially since the biggest threat to us UBL [Usama bin Laden], is getting the most protection.
Breitbart News: Big Government


By the way.. in just 25 words YOU couldn't spell correctly...EVEN with the help of the little dotted red line UNDER "responsibility" !

Who in the hell then are YOU to criticize Bush if you can't even when TOLD by spell check you have a misspelling and you still ignore it???
GEEZ this the reason we have illiterate people in this country...LAZY totally ignorant about something as simple as reading what you wrote!
And yet, despite the Gorelick wall, the FBI still managed to get a memo to Bush, warning him of potential highjackings around the northeast.

What did Bush do about those warnings? Oh yeah, that's right .... absolutely nothing. Well, Attorney General John Ashcroft certainly got the warning -- he stopped flying commercially sometime in the summer of 2001.

As far as my typo ... this is yet another great example of how foolish you are. Just because your editor highlights spelling mistakes doesn't mean everyones' does. Depending on the device I'm posting from, I may or may not have that handy feature. Sometimes I just wing it. But then, content takes priority over appearance to me. Therefore, I could probably benefit from a good secretary to follow behind me to tidy up my posts -- do you want the job?
 
Better yet dog, how come Bush didn't "see" the attack coming on 9/11? Or how about why he didn't "see" the disaster that Iraq would become?

When did Bush go blind? Was it right after he was elected? Is that why Cheney had to lead him around?

Hell Bush would have been better off with a seeing eye dog.

A) YOU never heard of the Gorelick Memo obviously! Get educated boob!!

"As Deputy Attorney General under Bill Clinton from 1994 to 1997
Jamie Gorelick wrote the memo that created the now infamous “Gorelick Wall.” A 1995 memo she wrote, stated explicitly that they would “go beyond what is legally required, [to] prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation.”

These rules were, shortly after their creation, expanded to regulate such communications in future counter-terrorism investigations.
It set a procedure where various intelligence operations could not share information with each other.

Jamie Gorelick’s wall barred anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation shortly before 9/11.
At the time, an enraged FBI investigator wrote a prophetic memo to headquarters about the wall
‘Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems…..especially since the biggest threat to us UBL [Usama bin Laden], is getting the most protection.
Breitbart News: Big Government

And this was done because Clinton had accepted Chinese donations in exchange for missile secrets!
Clinton sells missile technology to China - 1998
Thanks to the Cox Report, we now know that the seven years of the Clinton presidency have coincided with the most massive breach of military security in American history.
Clinton sells high tech missile technology to China - 1998 - Killingsworth Court, Formerly The General Forum - Killer Frogs

BLIND?? What you deaf,dumb and BLIND???


B) OH.. and you mean by " the disaster that Iraq would become"
28 million people NOW free!
28 million people who's standard of living and per person GDP has grown over 1,290% since Saddam was removed? THAT DISASTER??
So freeing 28 million people is a blunder?
The same people that have since being freed in 2003 Of course NONE of you Bush BASHERS EVER took time as I've done to study the economic impact of removing Saddam
when under Saddam Iraqi per person was $518! Today it is over $7,200! a 1,290% increase ! THAT is a blunder!
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/iz.html

The same "disaster" the kept 2,649,000 children from starvation??
In five years 576,000 children starved BECAUSE SADDAM refused to certify WMD destruction!
Iraq Sanctions Kill Children, U.N. Reports - NYTimes.com

Using 115,000 children starved a year because Saddam refused to certify WMD destruction -- From 1995 to 2013 is 18 years!
If Saddam was still in power i.e. Bush's Liberation of Iraq NEVER OCCURRED,
from 1990 to 2013 OVER 2,649,000 children would have STARVED because of Saddam!

That's a "blunder"??? Well thank GOD for that Blunder...

@nsa
@cia
@fbi
[MENTION=23244]sec[/MENTION]ret service

:eek:
 
Are you saying Bush, who did absolutely nothing to prevent a looming attack, bears no responsibilty in the massive failure to protect America that day?

How could the CIA tell the FBI about the bombers IF the Gorelick Memo created the WALL to prevent CIA sharing info with FBI??
Jamie Gorelick’s wall barred anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation shortly before 9/11.
At the time, an enraged FBI investigator wrote a prophetic memo to headquarters about the wall
‘Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems…..especially since the biggest threat to us UBL [Usama bin Laden], is getting the most protection.
Breitbart News: Big Government


By the way.. in just 25 words YOU couldn't spell correctly...EVEN with the help of the little dotted red line UNDER "responsibility" !

Who in the hell then are YOU to criticize Bush if you can't even when TOLD by spell check you have a misspelling and you still ignore it???
GEEZ this the reason we have illiterate people in this country...LAZY totally ignorant about something as simple as reading what you wrote!
And yet, despite the Gorelick wall, the FBI still managed to get a memo to Bush, warning him of potential highjackings around the northeast.

What did Bush do about those warnings? Oh yeah, that's right .... absolutely nothing. Well, Attorney General John Ashcroft certainly got the warning -- he stopped flying commercially sometime in the summer of 2001.

As far as my typo ... this is yet another great example of how foolish you are. Just because your editor highlights spelling mistakes doesn't mean everyones' does. Depending on the device I'm posting from, I may or may not have that handy feature. Sometimes I just wing it. But then, content takes priority over appearance to me. Therefore, I could probably benefit from a good secretary to follow behind me to tidy up my posts -- do you want the job?

What did Bush do about WHAT warnings?

On April 10, 2004, the Bush White House declassified that daily brief — and only that daily brief — in response to pressure from the 9/11 Commission, which was investigating the events leading to the attack. Administration officials dismissed the document’s significance, saying that, despite the jaw-dropping headline, it was only an assessment of Al Qaeda’s history, not a warning of the impending attack. While some critics considered that claim absurd, a close reading of the brief showed that the argument had some validity.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=0

NOW I'm going to use the TACTICS Obama administration uses!!!
Where in that above NYT article does it SAY GWB IGNORED the WARNINGS? Is there anything in the above paragraph that states that like Obama frequently does did GWB
say "I know nothing, I knew nothing.." no one told me!

HHS chief: President didn't know of Obamacare website woes beforehand
President Barack Obama didn't know of problems with the Affordable Care Act's website -- despite insurance companies' complaints and the site's crashing during a test run -- until after its now well-documented abysmal launch, the nation's health chief told CNN on Tuesday.

SO if we are allowed to accept Obama the smartest president ever ignorance... GEEZ what is the problem with accepting GWB?? AFTER all you people think he is the dumber then a flat rock!

Of people GWB should not be held accountable because all of YOU consider him a dumb shit... whereas ALL of you think Obama is the Messiah!
So how come it is OK for Obama to play dumb ? Is it because he's black!!!


Sebelius: President didn't know of Obamacare website's woes in advance - CNN.com
 
How could the CIA tell the FBI about the bombers IF the Gorelick Memo created the WALL to prevent CIA sharing info with FBI??
Jamie Gorelick’s wall barred anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation shortly before 9/11.
At the time, an enraged FBI investigator wrote a prophetic memo to headquarters about the wall
‘Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems…..especially since the biggest threat to us UBL [Usama bin Laden], is getting the most protection.
Breitbart News: Big Government


By the way.. in just 25 words YOU couldn't spell correctly...EVEN with the help of the little dotted red line UNDER "responsibility" !

Who in the hell then are YOU to criticize Bush if you can't even when TOLD by spell check you have a misspelling and you still ignore it???
GEEZ this the reason we have illiterate people in this country...LAZY totally ignorant about something as simple as reading what you wrote!
And yet, despite the Gorelick wall, the FBI still managed to get a memo to Bush, warning him of potential highjackings around the northeast.

What did Bush do about those warnings? Oh yeah, that's right .... absolutely nothing. Well, Attorney General John Ashcroft certainly got the warning -- he stopped flying commercially sometime in the summer of 2001.

As far as my typo ... this is yet another great example of how foolish you are. Just because your editor highlights spelling mistakes doesn't mean everyones' does. Depending on the device I'm posting from, I may or may not have that handy feature. Sometimes I just wing it. But then, content takes priority over appearance to me. Therefore, I could probably benefit from a good secretary to follow behind me to tidy up my posts -- do you want the job?

What did Bush do about WHAT warnings?

On April 10, 2004, the Bush White House declassified that daily brief — and only that daily brief — in response to pressure from the 9/11 Commission, which was investigating the events leading to the attack. Administration officials dismissed the document’s significance, saying that, despite the jaw-dropping headline, it was only an assessment of Al Qaeda’s history, not a warning of the impending attack. While some critics considered that claim absurd, a close reading of the brief showed that the argument had some validity.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=0

NOW I'm going to use the TACTICS Obama administration uses!!!
Where in that above NYT article does it SAY GWB IGNORED the WARNINGS? Is there anything in the above paragraph that states that like Obama frequently does did GWB
say "I know nothing, I knew nothing.." no one told me!

HHS chief: President didn't know of Obamacare website woes beforehand
President Barack Obama didn't know of problems with the Affordable Care Act's website -- despite insurance companies' complaints and the site's crashing during a test run -- until after its now well-documented abysmal launch, the nation's health chief told CNN on Tuesday.

SO if we are allowed to accept Obama the smartest president ever ignorance... GEEZ what is the problem with accepting GWB?? AFTER all you people think he is the dumber then a flat rock!

Of people GWB should not be held accountable because all of YOU consider him a dumb shit... whereas ALL of you think Obama is the Messiah!
So how come it is OK for Obama to play dumb ? Is it because he's black!!!


Sebelius: President didn't know of Obamacare website's woes in advance - CNN.com

It wasn't just the alarming title of memo, it was the contents as well.....

"Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."

... and you're beyond stupid if you think the administration wasn't concerned about hijackings .... John Ashcroft stopped flying commercially. They just did nothing about it to protect the rest of the nation.

Your other silliness about the left thinking of Obama as a messiah is easily dismissed as the false narrative it is.
 
from 1990 to 2013 OVER 2,649,000 children would have STARVED because of Saddam!
(edit for bandwith and space)
Big fonts and pretty colors does not make histrionic statements fact. What is fact is that the historical record on sanctions is that they strengthen targeted regimes while starving and punishing the most vulnerable.
 
Last edited:
from 1990 to 2013 OVER 2,649,000 children would have STARVED because of Saddam!
(edit for bandwith and space)
Big fonts and pretty colors does not make histrionic statements fact. What is fact is that the historical record on sanctions is that they strengthen targeted regimes while starving and punishing the most vulnerable.

I was waiting for the DEFENDERS of Saddam to BLAME EVERYONE else!

IDIOT!
Saddam built 91 palaces with the Oil for Food! AND YOU defend Saddam???

Short of going into Iraq which is what ultimately DID keep 2,649,000 kids from starving based on Saddam's past record of ignoring sanctions ...
WHAT would you have suggested be done to save the 2,649,000 kids and free 28 million from Saddam who did things like this:

You obviously never heard about these actions by Saddam the guy you would LOVE to be a slave to!!

Ahmad was Uday's chief executioner. Last week, as Iraqis celebrated the death of his former boss and his equally savage younger brother Qusay, he nervously revealed a hideous story. His instructions that day in 1999 were to arrest the two 19-year-olds on the campus of Baghdad's Academy of Fine Arts and deliver them at Radwaniyah. On arrival at the sprawling compound, he was directed to a farm where he found a large cage. Inside, two lions waited. They belonged to Uday. Guards took the two young men from the car and opened the cage door. One of the victims collapsed in terror as they were dragged, screaming and shouting, to meet their fate. Ahmad watched as the students frantically looked for a way of escape. There was none. The lions pounced. 'I saw the head of the first student literally come off his body with the first bite and then had to stand and watch the animals devour the two young men. By the time they were finished there was little left but for the bones and bits and pieces of unwanted flesh,' he recalled last week."
-- Sunday Times, London, July 27, 2003


"Ali would then draw out a pair of pliers and a sharp knife. Gripping the tongue with pliers, he would slice it up with the knife, tossing severed pieces into the street. "'Those punished were too terrified to move, even though they knew I was about to chop off their tongue,' said Ali in his matter-of-fact voice. 'They would just stand there, often praying and calling out for Saddam and Allah to spare them. By then it was too late.

"'I would read them out the verdict and cut off their tongue without any form of anaesthetic. There was always a lot of blood. Some offenders passed out. Others screamed in pain. They would then be given basic medical assistance in an ambulance which would always come with us on such punishment runs. Then they would be thrown in jail.'"

-- Fedayeen Saddam member interviewed in The Sunday Times (London), April 20, 2003
Saddam has reduced his people to abject poverty.
He wiped out families, villages, cities and cultures, and drove four million people into exile.
He killed between 100,000 and 200,000 Kurds. He killed as many as 300,000 Shiites in the uprising after the Persian Gulf war.
He killed or displaced 200,000 of the 250,000 marsh Arabs who had created a unique, centuries-old culture in the south. He drained the marshes, an environmental treasure, and turned them into a desert.

In a recent Frontline documentary, a woman who fled Iraq recounted how she and others had been forced
to witness the public beheadings of 15 women who had been rounded up for prostitution and other crimes against the state. One of the women was a doctor who had been misreported as speaking against the regime.
"They put her head in a trash can," she said.

AND YOU dumb f..ks totally FORGET THIS!
2.7 million kids would have starved to death by now BECAUSE of Saddam AND YOU wouldn't CARE!
28 million people are FREE today... BUT YOU SADDAM butt kissers loved that!
BUTCHERS that you are!!!
 
from 1990 to 2013 OVER 2,649,000 children would have STARVED because of Saddam!
(edit for bandwith and space)
Big fonts and pretty colors does not make histrionic statements fact. What is fact is that the historical record on sanctions is that they strengthen targeted regimes while starving and punishing the most vulnerable.

I was waiting for<snip>u are!!!

Drooling hysterics aside, locating anybody who defends Saddam, or any other butchering tyrant, is going to be a long fruitless search.
Wasting blood and treasure where there is no compelling national interest only replaced the tyrant with never ending sectarian violence.
 
(edit for bandwith and space)
Big fonts and pretty colors does not make histrionic statements fact. What is fact is that the historical record on sanctions is that they strengthen targeted regimes while starving and punishing the most vulnerable.

I was waiting for<snip>u are!!!

Drooling hysterics aside, locating anybody who defends Saddam, or any other butchering tyrant, is going to be a long fruitless search.
Wasting blood and treasure where there is no compelling national interest only replaced the tyrant with never ending sectarian violence.

Then you are a defender because YOU say "wasting blood and treasure where there is no compelling"..
Obviously you are the type of person that enters agreements with the intent NOT to keep them right?
You signed a mortgage/rent agreement but you aren't paying right?
You buy a car and don't make the payments?
These are ALL agreements that obviously you have no intention of keeping as you are not a person who when signing a document intend on keeping the terms!
So obviously YOU don't think the 1991 CEASE FIRE" that Saddam agreed to in order to keep troops from deposing him in 1991 Gulf WAR was a valid agreement?
THAT agreement was Saddam would not:
1) torture his people.. starve the children... shoot at Allied planes.. other wise KEEP an agreement.
2) But after so many years of NOT holding Saddam to the agreement AND after these Democrats encouraged deposing Saddam BUSH did it!


32 democrat quotes indicate even before GWB that Saddam was a threat!

"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger Clinton Ntl. Secur. Advr 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998 WHERE'D SHE GET THIS INFORMATION BEFORE BUSH?
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999
"Saddam to refine delivery systems, that will threaten the US..."Graham 2001
"Saddam has ignored the mandate of the UN and is building WMDs and the means to deliver.." Levin 2002
"Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002
"Saddam retains stockpiles of WMDS.."Byrd 2002
"..give President authority to use force..to disarm Saddam because an arsenal of WMDs..threat our security"..Kerry 2002
"..Unmistakable evidence Saddam developing nuclear weapons next 5 years.."Rockefeller 2002
"Violated over 11 years every UN resolution demanding disarming WMDs.."Waxman 2002
"He's given aid,comfort & sanctuary to al Qaeda members..and keep developing WMDs"..Hillary 2002
"Compelling evidence Saddam has WMDs production storage capacity.." Graham 2002
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003.



"Between 1999 and 2001, the U.S. and British-led air forces in Iraq dropped 1.3 million pounds of bombs in response to purported violations of the no-fly zones and anti-aircraft fire from Saddam Hussein.

A sweeping attack, conducted in January of 1999, rained down 25 missiles on Iraqi soil, killing civilians. Clinton said the attack was in response to four planes violating the no-fly zones.

Clinton and British Prime Minister Tony Blair authorized air strikes on more than 100 days in 1999, sometimes several times per day. The bombings were ostensibly in response to Husseins refusal to allow UN weapons inspectors into the country, though critics alleged the move was aimed at deflecting attention from impeachment.
The Raw Story | Clinton bombing of Iraq far exceeded Bush's in run-up to war; Bush 'spikes of activity' questioned


BUT YOU don't believe the above people's comments much less the FACT Clinton bombed the hell out of Saddam and it did no good!
 

Forum List

Back
Top