Why does someone want an AR-15

[DOTR]

The gun control PR push is off the scale right now, a sure sign we're being lied to and misled.

A sure sign of a concerted propaganda effort is when Hollywood celebrities, media conglomerates, corporate CEOs, Silicon Valley billionaires and Congressional oligarchs speak with one voice.
Gun control, like socialism, is an affection of the rich and powerful.

 

[Tom Horn]

BTW, I ordered this Smith & Wesson 10202 M&P15 Sport II only to show solidarity with this dealer and US weapons manufacturers....I'm already well situated with firearms and haven't shouldered this type of weapon since the CAR issued me 50 years ago in the RVN. The reports on this Smith are excellent in accuracy and reliability...I may never fire it so it can't lose value... so why not?

Smith & Wesson 10202 M&P15 Sport II AR-15 Rifle 16in 5.56 30rd Black

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

I understand wanting guns for hunting or protection.
I know enough about guns that an AR-15 is not the best gun for hunting or protection.

I have no use for them and prefer my trusty shotgun but I do not care what someone owns.

 

[jc456]

Why does someone want an AR-15

Rambo mentality. The .223 is a nice little varmint caliber. The .223 caliber isn't the problem - the problem is having it in an assault weapon with huge magazine capacities.

What is an assuat weapon exactly? Define it?

I never heard of an "assuat" weapon.

The quote lost the "L" it was in his post....

Well, sparky, if we're gonna get technical - "assualt" is not how you spell "assault". Comprende...

Bye...

So define assault weapon?

 

[jc456]

I understand wanting guns for hunting or protection.
I know enough about guns that an AR-15 is not the best gun for hunting or protection.

I have no use for them and prefer my trusty shotgun but I do not care what someone owns.

Funny how the leftist do!

 

[ElmerMudd]

You are telling me you can not explain why anyone wants an AR-15.
It is a gun that requires absolute no skill to kill animals and humans with the greatest chance of collateral damage.

You don't know what you are talking about...it is a great self defense rifle....it is light, it is customizable, easy to shoot for all body types including women and the old, you can add both a light and a great optics for self defense.......you don't know what you are talking about....

In the 1920s Germany, the German people had no idea that in 20 years their soldiers would send 12 million innocent men, women and children to the gas chambers and mass graves.......20 years......and they registered guns and banned guns using the same arguments people like you are making now.........

Dittos Russia, china and all the other socialist countries where they murdered millions of innocent men, women and children...

There was an Armed Jewish Resistance, but it made little difference.
Anyone who thinks personal firearms would protect you from the military is delusional.

Worked pretty well for the Vietnamese. You must have forgot about that in your rush to disarm us all. But it don't matter, a lot of us will fight, no matter the odds while cowards like you collaborate with walking sacks of shit like Scott Israel.

Donald Trump is coming to get you, watch out. You are a paranoid whacko. God help you.

 

[2aguy]

You don't know what you are talking about...it is a great self defense rifle....it is light, it is customizable, easy to shoot for all body types including women and the old, you can add both a light and a great optics for self defense.......you don't know what you are talking about....

In the 1920s Germany, the German people had no idea that in 20 years their soldiers would send 12 million innocent men, women and children to the gas chambers and mass graves.......20 years......and they registered guns and banned guns using the same arguments people like you are making now.........

Dittos Russia, china and all the other socialist countries where they murdered millions of innocent men, women and children...

There was an Armed Jewish Resistance, but it made little difference.
Anyone who thinks personal firearms would protect you from the military is delusional.

You should really read your sources first..........then post...from your own link....the Germans registered their guns in the 1920s accepting the same arguments morons like you are making today...they would be safer without them, the police would protect them, they just want to know who has them...then, in the 30s, when the socialists took control, they used those lists to take the guns away from the Jews and other political opponents......please....do some research...

Despite great obstacles (such as lack of armaments

The article says no such thing. It has a picture of them with guns.
No citizen can defend itself from the best funded military in the world.

Dumb ass....that is a direct quote, from your own link..........

Despite great obstacles (such as lack of armaments

 

[2aguy]

Why does someone want an AR-15

Rambo mentality. The .223 is a nice little varmint caliber. The .223 caliber isn't the problem - the problem is having it in an assault weapon with huge magazine capacities.

What is an assuat weapon exactly? Define it?

I never heard of an "assuat" weapon.

The quote lost the "L" it was in his post....

Well, sparky, if we're gonna get technical - "assualt" is not how you spell "assault". Comprende...

Bye...

I saw his post.....there was an "L" in Assault, it went away in the quote box......

 

[2aguy]

You don't know what you are talking about...it is a great self defense rifle....it is light, it is customizable, easy to shoot for all body types including women and the old, you can add both a light and a great optics for self defense.......you don't know what you are talking about....

In the 1920s Germany, the German people had no idea that in 20 years their soldiers would send 12 million innocent men, women and children to the gas chambers and mass graves.......20 years......and they registered guns and banned guns using the same arguments people like you are making now.........

Dittos Russia, china and all the other socialist countries where they murdered millions of innocent men, women and children...

There was an Armed Jewish Resistance, but it made little difference.
Anyone who thinks personal firearms would protect you from the military is delusional.

You should really read your sources first..........then post...from your own link....the Germans registered their guns in the 1920s accepting the same arguments morons like you are making today...they would be safer without them, the police would protect them, they just want to know who has them...then, in the 30s, when the socialists took control, they used those lists to take the guns away from the Jews and other political opponents......please....do some research...

Despite great obstacles (such as lack of armaments

The article says no such thing. It has a picture of them with guns.
No citizen can defend itself from the best funded military in the world.

Except Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan.....any number of conflicts.....

And it is even better if they have actual guns to do it...

 

[Bob Blaylock]

ElmerMudd knows jack-sh•• about guns.

I disagree. Based on his postings, I would have to say that “jack-sh•• about guns” is much more than ElmerMudd knows on the subject.

 

[Yarddog]

I understand wanting guns for hunting or protection.
I know enough about guns that an AR-15 is not the best gun for hunting or protection.

If your a law abiding person who respects guns... why can't you own an AR15 if you simply like to go target practicing? its not much different from other semi-auto rifles in its function. I think it makes perfect sense. Then I've heard a lot of Hunters DO like them for hunting. It would be a matter of taste.... maybe the way the guns feels in their hands or kicks... just like some people prefer shooting a Barreta over a Glock, or vise versa... a matter of choice. But guess what.. the vast majority of gun owners are responsible vs being idiots with guns... if you are not factoring in criminals and gang members.

 

[tycho1572]

I understand wanting guns for hunting or protection.
I know enough about guns that an AR-15 is not the best gun for hunting or protection.

Why does it matter?

 

[miketx]

You don't know what you are talking about...it is a great self defense rifle....it is light, it is customizable, easy to shoot for all body types including women and the old, you can add both a light and a great optics for self defense.......you don't know what you are talking about....

In the 1920s Germany, the German people had no idea that in 20 years their soldiers would send 12 million innocent men, women and children to the gas chambers and mass graves.......20 years......and they registered guns and banned guns using the same arguments people like you are making now.........

Dittos Russia, china and all the other socialist countries where they murdered millions of innocent men, women and children...

There was an Armed Jewish Resistance, but it made little difference.
Anyone who thinks personal firearms would protect you from the military is delusional.

Worked pretty well for the Vietnamese. You must have forgot about that in your rush to disarm us all. But it don't matter, a lot of us will fight, no matter the odds while cowards like you collaborate with walking sacks of shit like Scott Israel.

Donald Trump is coming to get you, watch out. You are a paranoid whacko. God help you.

You get more insane with each rebuttal.

 

[miketx]

Why does someone want an AR-15

Rambo mentality. The .223 is a nice little varmint caliber. The .223 caliber isn't the problem - the problem is having it in an assault weapon with huge magazine capacities.

What is an assuat weapon exactly? Define it?

I never heard of an "assuat" weapon.

He meant "asshat weapon" like you have.

 

[tycho1572]

This looks like fun.....

 

[miketx]

You don't know what you are talking about...it is a great self defense rifle....it is light, it is customizable, easy to shoot for all body types including women and the old, you can add both a light and a great optics for self defense.......you don't know what you are talking about....

In the 1920s Germany, the German people had no idea that in 20 years their soldiers would send 12 million innocent men, women and children to the gas chambers and mass graves.......20 years......and they registered guns and banned guns using the same arguments people like you are making now.........

Dittos Russia, china and all the other socialist countries where they murdered millions of innocent men, women and children...

There was an Armed Jewish Resistance, but it made little difference.
Anyone who thinks personal firearms would protect you from the military is delusional.

You should really read your sources first..........then post...from your own link....the Germans registered their guns in the 1920s accepting the same arguments morons like you are making today...they would be safer without them, the police would protect them, they just want to know who has them...then, in the 30s, when the socialists took control, they used those lists to take the guns away from the Jews and other political opponents......please....do some research...

Despite great obstacles (such as lack of armaments

The article says no such thing. It has a picture of them with guns.
No citizen can defend itself from the best funded military in the world.

So how did the Vietnamese do it then?

 

[ElmerMudd]

Anyone who thinks personal firearms would protect you from the military is delusional.

Not true....the Viet Minh defeated the French with stolen/found/captured weapons...they often took garrisons without firing a shot. Of course this is the French I'm talking about, but asymmetrical warfare chased us out of Vietnam and has us in Iraq and Afghanistan for 16 years. Most see rural America being able to hold off the US Military but I believe urban America would be more adept at it given public transportation and thousands of sniper nests. Don't believe for a minute the Army wouldn't open fire on Americans...they did it at Mt.Carmel (Waco) and in Detroit in 1967...that's why weapons like the AR and multiple round pistols can't be taken from us without a fight.

That and I don't think much of the US military wouldn't be on our side which is why jughead bastard obama started pushing for non-Americans to join. For that reason alone bastard should be tried and executed.

 

[WinterBorn]

I understand wanting guns for hunting or protection.
I know enough about guns that an AR-15 is not the best gun for hunting or protection.

How is it any of your business?

Have you not heard Markle, there is a gun debate going n in our country. Laws may be changed that will affect us all.

Yes, there is a gun debate. And your lack of knowledge on the subject is evident.

That there is a gun debate does not change the fact that it is none of your business why someone wants an AR, as long as they break no laws. There are between 5 and 10 million ARs in the USA for this discussion, lets use 8 million as the number of ARs out there in civilian hands). For the sake of argument, lets say 5,000 have been used to kill someone in the last 10 years (this is a gross exaggeration, of course).

This means that 0.063% of the ARs in civilian hands have committed a murder. So 99.938% of the ARs have never been used to commit any murder in the last 10 years. But banning them will change everything?

Nonsense.

 

[DOTR]

BTW, I ordered this Smith & Wesson 10202 M&P15 Sport II only to show solidarity with this dealer and US weapons manufacturers....I'm already well situated with firearms and haven't shouldered this type of weapon since the CAR issued me 50 years ago in the RVN. The reports on this Smith are excellent in accuracy and reliability...I may never fire it so it can't lose value... so why not?



Smith & Wesson 10202 M&P15 Sport II AR-15 Rifle 16in 5.56 30rd Black

Damn did you get the last one?

And for some reason they wont accept a backorder purchase. I'll check back in.

 

[WinterBorn]

I know what I call it. I call it bullshit.

In order to shoot 800 rounds a minute, you would have to pull the trigger 13 times per second. Think you can do that?

How you look at things has no real bearing on the facts. You keep talking about the AR like it is a machinegun, when it is certainly not.

I think anyone could do at least 300 to 400 rounds per minute. That is crazy. Even if it is 100 rounds a minute.
What the hell does anyone need that for unless you are doing a mass killing.

You don't think shit, fuck off, tard.

You have a way with words Marion, I am sure you let your guns do your talking because yor are articulate as a buzzard's turd.

You claim an AR can fire 800 rounds a minute, and you have the audacity to try and talk about someone else's use of words? Too funny.

Yes I have audacity, that is why I do not need a gun to protect myself, as do about 70% of the US population.

Whether people use guns to protect themselves is simply a dodge. You claim that a semi-auto AR will fire 800 rounds a minute. (obvious bullshit) And then you have the audacity to talk shit about what someone else posts? Did he post an outright lie?