Why does someone want an AR-15

I understand wanting guns for hunting or protection.
I know enough about guns that an AR-15 is not the best gun for hunting or protection.
Why do you need to know? Why’s it your business?
 
Miketx, you appear to be very fearful person. You have shown you are scared they may take your guns away from you and their goes your manhood. You are fearful of those who have different political views than yours. You appear to be fearful of gays. Are you fearful you wil be gay if you do not have many big guns. That will not happen unless you are already gay. Many gays have lots of guns and that does not make them hetero. You appear to be fearful of the educated. It must be tough being you. There are many just like you on this thread.

Suck it up guys. Do not be so fearful. If there are common sense gun laws put into effect you will be OK.

Okay, the others knew what a fruitcake you are....now I do so don't expect another civil reply me.
 
Why does someone want an AR-15

Rambo mentality. The .223 is a nice little varmint caliber. The .223 caliber isn't the problem - the problem is having it in an assault weapon with huge magazine capacities. You can even get 100-round drum magazines.

AR15100C.jpg
 
Again, your understanding is neither required nor relevant.
You are telling me you can not explain why anyone wants an AR-15.
It is a gun that requires absolute no skill to kill animals and humans with the greatest chance of collateral damage.

No, they're telling you it none of your business why
I understand wanting guns for hunting or protection.
I know enough about guns that an AR-15 is not the best gun for hunting or protection.

They are people that are insecure inside. Like gang members you put a gun in their hand and they feel strong and tough. Like they finally feel like equals to everyone else.

I don’t want or own a gun, I don’t care if you want to own a gun, that is your business.


It becomes our business when there are these horrific massacres all the time, which other countries (like in Europe) don't have.
Am I the shooter?
No.
Was my weapon used?
No.
Therefore, why is none of your business
 
Why does someone want an AR-15

Rambo mentality. The .223 is a nice little varmint caliber. The .223 caliber isn't the problem - the problem is having it in an assault weapon with huge magazine capacities.
What is an assault weapon exactly? Define it?
 
Last edited:
Why does someone want an AR-15

Rambo mentality. The .223 is a nice little varmint caliber. The .223 caliber isn't the problem - the problem is having it in an assault weapon with huge magazine capacities. You can even get 100-round drum magazines.

AR15100C.jpg

Typical hysterical reaction from a Boy named Sioux. BTW, drum mags take forever to load, usually jam, and are a waste of ammunition given that they are made for "spray and pray" and not practical to carry and impossible to keep clean. But then you're a sissy extremist prone to outbursts and openly treasonous rooting for the president of Mehico to disrespect our President.
 
Again, your understanding is neither required nor relevant.
You are telling me you can not explain why anyone wants an AR-15.
It is a gun that requires absolute no skill to kill animals and humans with the greatest chance of collateral damage.


You don't know what you are talking about...it is a great self defense rifle....it is light, it is customizable, easy to shoot for all body types including women and the old, you can add both a light and a great optics for self defense.......you don't know what you are talking about....
aqn1z4zejfi01.jpg


In the 1920s Germany, the German people had no idea that in 20 years their soldiers would send 12 million innocent men, women and children to the gas chambers and mass graves.......20 years......and they registered guns and banned guns using the same arguments people like you are making now.........

Dittos Russia, china and all the other socialist countries where they murdered millions of innocent men, women and children...
There was an Armed Jewish Resistance, but it made little difference.
Anyone who thinks personal firearms would protect you from the military is delusional.


This is what actual armed resistance looks like and how you stop mass murder...

THE SWISS WERE PREPARED TO FIGHT FACISM TO THE BITTER END | FRONTLINE | PBS



That is why the Nazis despised Switzerland. Joseph Goebbels called Switzerland "this stinking little state" where "sentiment has turned very much against us." Adolf Hitler decided that "all the rubbish of small nations still existing in Europe must be liquidated," even if it meant he would later "be attacked as the 'Butcher of the Swiss.'"



The 1940 Nazi invasion plan, Operation Tannenbaum, was not executed, and SS Oberst Hermann Bohme's 1943 memorandum warned that an invasion of Switzerland would be too costly because every man was armed and trained to shoot. This did not stop the Gestapo from preparing lists of Swiss to be liquidated once the Nazis overran the country.



The other European nations were easily toppled and had little means to wage a partisan war against the occupation. Once their standing armies were defeated, the governments capitulated and the populaces were defenseless.



Only in Switzerland was the entire populace armed and prepared to wage a relentless guerrilla war against an invader. When the war began in 1939, Switzerland mobilized 435,000 citizen soldiers out of a population of 4.2 million.

Production figures for Swiss service rifles, which had firepower equal to those of the Germans, demonstrate an ample supply of small arms.

Swiss militiamen were instructed to disregard any alleged "official" surrender as enemy propaganda and, if necessary, to fight individually. This meant that a nation of sharpshooters would be sniping at German soldiers at long ranges from every mountain.



While neutral, Switzerland was prepared to fight a Nazi invasion to the end. The celebrated Swiss Gen. Henri Guisan developed the strategy known as defense du reduit--an initial opposition followed by a retreat into the Alps, where a relentless war to the death would be waged. Most Swiss strongly opposed Nazism. Death sentences were issued for fifth-column activities, and proclamations against anti-Semitism were passed at various official levels. There was no Holocaust on Swiss soil, something that can not be said for France, the Netherlands, Poland or most of Europe.

 
Why does someone want an AR-15

Rambo mentality. The .223 is a nice little varmint caliber. The .223 caliber isn't the problem - the problem is having it in an assault weapon with huge magazine capacities.
What is an assuat weapon exactly? Define it?

I never heard of an "assuat" weapon.
Me either, if you actually had a brain, you’d have figured it was a typo. But alas we know better!
 
I understand wanting guns for hunting or protection.
I know enough about guns that an AR-15 is not the best gun for hunting or protection.
Because the "best" gun was likely already made illegal by dumbass liberals like you, so the folks who want something good for home protection have to settle for the next best thing like an AR-15.
 
Why does someone want an AR-15

Rambo mentality. The .223 is a nice little varmint caliber. The .223 caliber isn't the problem - the problem is having it in an assault weapon with huge magazine capacities. You can even get 100-round drum magazines.

AR15100C.jpg


And yet, they aren't talking about banning actual military rifles, since the AR-15 isn't a military rifle, and they aren't talking banning 100 round drums, they are talking about banning standard capacity 30 round magazines and 15-19 round magazines for pistols......you are demonstrating the Bait and Switch....you show a 100 round drum magazine...but when you pass the law, all of a sudden common rifle and pistol magazines are banned instead.....

We don't trust you, you guys lie...
 
I understand wanting guns for hunting or protection.
I know enough about guns that an AR-15 is not the best gun for hunting or protection.

Again, your understanding is neither required nor relevant.
You are telling me you can not explain why anyone wants an AR-15.
It is a gun that requires absolute no skill to kill animals and humans with the greatest chance of collateral damage.
Why do you think an AR-15 has the "greatest chance of collateral damage" compared to, presumably, a deer hunting rifle?
 
You are telling me you can not explain why anyone wants an AR-15.
It is a gun that requires absolute no skill to kill animals and humans with the greatest chance of collateral damage.


You don't know what you are talking about...it is a great self defense rifle....it is light, it is customizable, easy to shoot for all body types including women and the old, you can add both a light and a great optics for self defense.......you don't know what you are talking about....
aqn1z4zejfi01.jpg


In the 1920s Germany, the German people had no idea that in 20 years their soldiers would send 12 million innocent men, women and children to the gas chambers and mass graves.......20 years......and they registered guns and banned guns using the same arguments people like you are making now.........

Dittos Russia, china and all the other socialist countries where they murdered millions of innocent men, women and children...
There was an Armed Jewish Resistance, but it made little difference.
Anyone who thinks personal firearms would protect you from the military is delusional.


This is what actual armed resistance looks like and how you stop mass murder...

THE SWISS WERE PREPARED TO FIGHT FACISM TO THE BITTER END | FRONTLINE | PBS



That is why the Nazis despised Switzerland. Joseph Goebbels called Switzerland "this stinking little state" where "sentiment has turned very much against us." Adolf Hitler decided that "all the rubbish of small nations still existing in Europe must be liquidated," even if it meant he would later "be attacked as the 'Butcher of the Swiss.'"



The 1940 Nazi invasion plan, Operation Tannenbaum, was not executed, and SS Oberst Hermann Bohme's 1943 memorandum warned that an invasion of Switzerland would be too costly because every man was armed and trained to shoot. This did not stop the Gestapo from preparing lists of Swiss to be liquidated once the Nazis overran the country.



The other European nations were easily toppled and had little means to wage a partisan war against the occupation. Once their standing armies were defeated, the governments capitulated and the populaces were defenseless.



Only in Switzerland was the entire populace armed and prepared to wage a relentless guerrilla war against an invader. When the war began in 1939, Switzerland mobilized 435,000 citizen soldiers out of a population of 4.2 million.

Production figures for Swiss service rifles, which had firepower equal to those of the Germans, demonstrate an ample supply of small arms.

Swiss militiamen were instructed to disregard any alleged "official" surrender as enemy propaganda and, if necessary, to fight individually. This meant that a nation of sharpshooters would be sniping at German soldiers at long ranges from every mountain.



While neutral, Switzerland was prepared to fight a Nazi invasion to the end. The celebrated Swiss Gen. Henri Guisan developed the strategy known as defense du reduit--an initial opposition followed by a retreat into the Alps, where a relentless war to the death would be waged. Most Swiss strongly opposed Nazism. Death sentences were issued for fifth-column activities, and proclamations against anti-Semitism were passed at various official levels. There was no Holocaust on Swiss soil, something that can not be said for France, the Netherlands, Poland or most of Europe.
And that my friends is why we need AR15’s
 
Anyone who thinks personal firearms would protect you from the military is delusional.

Not true....the Viet Minh defeated the French with stolen/found/captured weapons...they often took garrisons without firing a shot. Of course this is the French I'm talking about, but asymmetrical warfare chased us out of Vietnam and has us in Iraq and Afghanistan for 16 years. Most see rural America being able to hold off the US Military but I believe urban America would be more adept at it given public transportation and thousands of sniper nests. Don't believe for a minute the Army wouldn't open fire on Americans...they did it at Mt.Carmel (Waco) and in Detroit in 1967...that's why weapons like the AR and multiple round pistols can't be taken from us without a fight.
That and I don't think much of the US military wouldn't be on our side which is why jughead bastard obama started pushing for non-Americans to join. For that reason alone bastard should be tried and executed.
 
Why does someone want an AR-15

Rambo mentality. The .223 is a nice little varmint caliber. The .223 caliber isn't the problem - the problem is having it in an assault weapon with huge magazine capacities.
What is an assuat weapon exactly? Define it?

I never heard of an "assuat" weapon.


The quote lost the "L" it was in his post....

Well, sparky, if we're gonna get technical - "assualt" is not how you spell "assault". Comprende...

Bye...
 
"It is a gun that requires absolute no skill to kill animals and humans with the greatest chance of collateral damage"???? WTF? No skill? Maybe at point blank range. But then, any firearm can do that. Tell you what. How about we meet at a range. I'll borrow and AR for you to shoot. I'll bring a lever action rifle in .44 Magnum. We will see who will be the first to hit 10 soda cans at 100 yards, shooting offhand. I'll bet you'd change you mind about the "absolutely no skill" requirement.

And there are numerous calibers that will do far more collateral damage.
It is the automatic feature that provides the ability for any idiot to spray an area without much skill and do huge damage.
The first restictive gun laws were placed on machine guns for that reason.
None of these school shooters were trained marksman and their weapon of choice is a semi-automatic or automatic weapon to do as much damage as possible in a short amount of time with no skill.
Your ignorance knows no bounds does it liar. You can't just go by an automatic weapon.
Tell me how what I said is untrue.

I'm still waiting for you to tell me which school shooter used an automatic rifle.
I look at semi-automatic weapons nothing more than a civilians automatic weapon.
An AR-15 can shoot up to 800 rounds a minute. You can call it what you want.
I bet your internet can go pretty fast, too. Unless you can show me that you really need it, meaning you'd die if you didn't have internet access, you shouldn't be allowed to have it.
 
Why does someone want an AR-15

Rambo mentality. The .223 is a nice little varmint caliber. The .223 caliber isn't the problem - the problem is having it in an assault weapon with huge magazine capacities. You can even get 100-round drum magazines.

AR15100C.jpg


And yet, they aren't talking about banning actual military rifles, since the AR-15 isn't a military rifle, and they aren't talking banning 100 round drums, they are talking about banning standard capacity 30 round magazines and 15-19 round magazines for pistols......you are demonstrating the Bait and Switch....you show a 100 round drum magazine...but when you pass the law, all of a sudden common rifle and pistol magazines are banned instead.....

We don't trust you, you guys lie...
I trust no leftist EVAH
 
You are telling me you can not explain why anyone wants an AR-15.
It is a gun that requires absolute no skill to kill animals and humans with the greatest chance of collateral damage.


You don't know what you are talking about...it is a great self defense rifle....it is light, it is customizable, easy to shoot for all body types including women and the old, you can add both a light and a great optics for self defense.......you don't know what you are talking about....
aqn1z4zejfi01.jpg


In the 1920s Germany, the German people had no idea that in 20 years their soldiers would send 12 million innocent men, women and children to the gas chambers and mass graves.......20 years......and they registered guns and banned guns using the same arguments people like you are making now.........

Dittos Russia, china and all the other socialist countries where they murdered millions of innocent men, women and children...
There was an Armed Jewish Resistance, but it made little difference.
Anyone who thinks personal firearms would protect you from the military is delusional.


You should really read your sources first..........then post...from your own link....the Germans registered their guns in the 1920s accepting the same arguments morons like you are making today...they would be safer without them, the police would protect them, they just want to know who has them...then, in the 30s, when the socialists took control, they used those lists to take the guns away from the Jews and other political opponents......please....do some research...

Despite great obstacles (such as lack of armaments
The article says no such thing. It has a picture of them with guns.
No citizen can defend itself from the best funded military in the world.
 

Forum List

Back
Top