CitizenSeven
Senior Member
- Apr 27, 2014
- 128
- 31
- 46
It is effective, of course, under certain circumstances against certain classes of attack, but then again so would being in a box built of half inch steel. Both are inconvenient, and not conducive to comfort in everyday activities. If people want to wear them, more power to them, I just think the inconvenience and discomfort factor overwhelms the safety factor in most situations. YMMV. And certainly, wearing body armor is not a substitute for carrying, rather an additional safety step. It's far better if you neutralize the danger prior to being under fire, or attacked in any way.In addition to being bulky, hot, and uncomfortable, body armor does nothing for head or extremity shots, nor does it offer much in the way of protection from non-firearm attacks. Also, even protecting against a shot, it's still a painful injury leaving very severe bruising and possibly internal damage. Much easier, more discreet, more conducive to everyday activities, and more effective to stop the attack before it gets to the point of actually harming you by carrying.
So, you are saying that it is not effective for protecting your life. Yet, the police wear them, and they put themselves in harms way every day. It would seem to me that if you are so concerned about your safety, you would do something defensive. Of course, there is nothing macho about wearing a vest, but....
Never mind. I think that I answered my own question.
Not all police wear them daily, though some searching indicates that is changing. Hmmm. Perhaps re-evaluation in their efficacy and convenience is warranted. Thanks!