Why do democrats want more people on foodstamps and welfare

[Papageorgio]

Only true socialists, say that. Capitalists don't care as long as capital circulates.

Only idiots like you post pure propaganda BS, that is all you post BS!

Capitalism doesn't care; why do you, socialist?

You're out of coherent replies, aren't you?

capitalism doesn't care. only true socialists care, how money is made.

You're just recycling failed excuses and incoherent word sequences.

He is back to trolling, not discussing but he fails so bad with his lack of communication skills. Anyone that believes they need government intervention to be happy has many mental issues.

 

[hadit]

Only idiots like you post pure propaganda BS, that is all you post BS!

Capitalism doesn't care; why do you, socialist?

You're out of coherent replies, aren't you?

capitalism doesn't care. only true socialists care, how money is made.

You're just recycling failed excuses and incoherent word sequences.

right wingers are usually just clueless and Causeless.

Money doesn't care how it is earned or spent.

Put the bong down.

 

[danielpalos]

No, it doesn't. Capital gains are unearned income. Only the right wing, never gets it.

You are the one that said EARN, not me. You deep down know what you want is so wrong, but hey I realize you want to be a lazy useless person.

that is a social concept from the Age of Iron when they really were clueless and Causeless about economics.

Yep, that is your social concept because you said EARNED. I didn’t post EARNED, you did. You seem to be the one clueless and Causeless because you refuse to obey the LAW.

You are the one who cares about how much others make or don't make; wealth envy?

The law is employment at will.

You can EARN (daniel’s word) whatever you want, the LAW tells us so. You want to earn millions, you go ahead and EARN it.

I object to the government doubling the spending to support people who don’t want to EARN their money. Stealing money from working class Americans to pay for others laziness is immoral.

how about, "earning equal protection of the law" under socialism, and converting it to capitalism?

 

[Papageorgio]

You are the one that said EARN, not me. You deep down know what you want is so wrong, but hey I realize you want to be a lazy useless person.

that is a social concept from the Age of Iron when they really were clueless and Causeless about economics.

Yep, that is your social concept because you said EARNED. I didn’t post EARNED, you did. You seem to be the one clueless and Causeless because you refuse to obey the LAW.

You are the one who cares about how much others make or don't make; wealth envy?

The law is employment at will.

You can EARN (daniel’s word) whatever you want, the LAW tells us so. You want to earn millions, you go ahead and EARN it.

I object to the government doubling the spending to support people who don’t want to EARN their money. Stealing money from working class Americans to pay for others laziness is immoral.

how about, "earning equal protection of the law" under socialism, and converting it to capitalism?

Again, you keep saying the same stupid thing and now we find out you don't even believe your own BS, you admit that money is EARNED, your words, not mine.

Also, the government giving away money to people who are too lazy to work IS socialism.

Here is a great idea, you work and keep the money you EARN and I work and keep the money I have EARNED. Both then would have equal protection.

 

[danielpalos]

that is a social concept from the Age of Iron when they really were clueless and Causeless about economics.

Yep, that is your social concept because you said EARNED. I didn’t post EARNED, you did. You seem to be the one clueless and Causeless because you refuse to obey the LAW.

You are the one who cares about how much others make or don't make; wealth envy?

The law is employment at will.

You can EARN (daniel’s word) whatever you want, the LAW tells us so. You want to earn millions, you go ahead and EARN it.

I object to the government doubling the spending to support people who don’t want to EARN their money. Stealing money from working class Americans to pay for others laziness is immoral.

how about, "earning equal protection of the law" under socialism, and converting it to capitalism?

Again, you keep saying the same stupid thing and now we find out you don't even believe your own BS, you admit that money is EARNED, your words, not mine.

Also, the government giving away money to people who are too lazy to work IS socialism.

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

 

[Papageorgio]

Yep, that is your social concept because you said EARNED. I didn’t post EARNED, you did. You seem to be the one clueless and Causeless because you refuse to obey the LAW.

You are the one who cares about how much others make or don't make; wealth envy?

The law is employment at will.

You can EARN (daniel’s word) whatever you want, the LAW tells us so. You want to earn millions, you go ahead and EARN it.

I object to the government doubling the spending to support people who don’t want to EARN their money. Stealing money from working class Americans to pay for others laziness is immoral.

how about, "earning equal protection of the law" under socialism, and converting it to capitalism?

Again, you keep saying the same stupid thing and now we find out you don't even believe your own BS, you admit that money is EARNED, your words, not mine.

Also, the government giving away money to people who are too lazy to work IS socialism.

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

We have "safety nets", and those are great tools to help a person until they get back on their feet.

The idea that you want government to control businesses and what they EARN and then want the government to give to those that have not EARNED is socialism at it's finest.

The government has no business interfering with what an employee or an employer make.

I ran several businesses and several months I paid employees and did not get paid. I mortgaged my home as a risk for opening a business. Now, I have since sold the businesses but you make it sound like a business owner has it made. you have no clue, if a person risks everything for a reward, then they should be rewarded not penalized because someone that risked nothing wants money for NOTHING.

 

[danielpalos]

You are the one who cares about how much others make or don't make; wealth envy?

The law is employment at will.

You can EARN (daniel’s word) whatever you want, the LAW tells us so. You want to earn millions, you go ahead and EARN it.

I object to the government doubling the spending to support people who don’t want to EARN their money. Stealing money from working class Americans to pay for others laziness is immoral.

how about, "earning equal protection of the law" under socialism, and converting it to capitalism?

Again, you keep saying the same stupid thing and now we find out you don't even believe your own BS, you admit that money is EARNED, your words, not mine.

Also, the government giving away money to people who are too lazy to work IS socialism.

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

We have "safety nets", and those are great tools to help a person until they get back on their feet.

The idea that you want government to control businesses and what they EARN and then want the government to give to those that have not EARNED is socialism at it's finest.

The government has no business interfering with what an employee or an employer make.

I ran several businesses and several months I paid employees and did not get paid. I mortgaged my home as a risk for opening a business. Now, I have since sold the businesses but you make it sound like a business owner has it made. you have no clue, if a person risks everything for a reward, then they should be rewarded not penalized because someone that risked nothing wants money for NOTHING.

Not at all. That is merely the means, not the end. The End, is solving simple poverty on an at-will basis as a promotion of the general welfare.

 

[Papageorgio]

You can EARN (daniel’s word) whatever you want, the LAW tells us so. You want to earn millions, you go ahead and EARN it.

I object to the government doubling the spending to support people who don’t want to EARN their money. Stealing money from working class Americans to pay for others laziness is immoral.

how about, "earning equal protection of the law" under socialism, and converting it to capitalism?

Again, you keep saying the same stupid thing and now we find out you don't even believe your own BS, you admit that money is EARNED, your words, not mine.

Also, the government giving away money to people who are too lazy to work IS socialism.

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

We have "safety nets", and those are great tools to help a person until they get back on their feet.

The idea that you want government to control businesses and what they EARN and then want the government to give to those that have not EARNED is socialism at it's finest.

The government has no business interfering with what an employee or an employer make.

I ran several businesses and several months I paid employees and did not get paid. I mortgaged my home as a risk for opening a business. Now, I have since sold the businesses but you make it sound like a business owner has it made. you have no clue, if a person risks everything for a reward, then they should be rewarded not penalized because someone that risked nothing wants money for NOTHING.

Not at all. That is merely the means, not the end. The End, is solving simple poverty on an at-will basis as a promotion of the general welfare.

Which is your standard BS for you getting money for not working and you not wanting to EARN your money. You want socialism to take care of you. I am fundamentally opposed, I believe you accept responsibility for your life and you go out and make it successful doing what you love to do, if someone will pay you for it, then you are a lot better off.

 

[danielpalos]

how about, "earning equal protection of the law" under socialism, and converting it to capitalism?

Again, you keep saying the same stupid thing and now we find out you don't even believe your own BS, you admit that money is EARNED, your words, not mine.

Also, the government giving away money to people who are too lazy to work IS socialism.

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

We have "safety nets", and those are great tools to help a person until they get back on their feet.

The idea that you want government to control businesses and what they EARN and then want the government to give to those that have not EARNED is socialism at it's finest.

The government has no business interfering with what an employee or an employer make.

I ran several businesses and several months I paid employees and did not get paid. I mortgaged my home as a risk for opening a business. Now, I have since sold the businesses but you make it sound like a business owner has it made. you have no clue, if a person risks everything for a reward, then they should be rewarded not penalized because someone that risked nothing wants money for NOTHING.

Not at all. That is merely the means, not the end. The End, is solving simple poverty on an at-will basis as a promotion of the general welfare.

Which is your standard BS for you getting money for not working and you not wanting to EARN your money. You want socialism to take care of you. I am fundamentally opposed, I believe you accept responsibility for your life and you go out and make it successful doing what you love to do, if someone will pay you for it, then you are a lot better off.

That is your opinion.

My opinion is, promoting the general welfare means finding solutions to our socioeconomic dilemmas.

 

[Papageorgio]

Again, you keep saying the same stupid thing and now we find out you don't even believe your own BS, you admit that money is EARNED, your words, not mine.

Also, the government giving away money to people who are too lazy to work IS socialism.

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

We have "safety nets", and those are great tools to help a person until they get back on their feet.

The idea that you want government to control businesses and what they EARN and then want the government to give to those that have not EARNED is socialism at it's finest.

The government has no business interfering with what an employee or an employer make.

I ran several businesses and several months I paid employees and did not get paid. I mortgaged my home as a risk for opening a business. Now, I have since sold the businesses but you make it sound like a business owner has it made. you have no clue, if a person risks everything for a reward, then they should be rewarded not penalized because someone that risked nothing wants money for NOTHING.

Not at all. That is merely the means, not the end. The End, is solving simple poverty on an at-will basis as a promotion of the general welfare.

Which is your standard BS for you getting money for not working and you not wanting to EARN your money. You want socialism to take care of you. I am fundamentally opposed, I believe you accept responsibility for your life and you go out and make it successful doing what you love to do, if someone will pay you for it, then you are a lot better off.

That is your opinion.

My opinion is, promoting the general welfare means finding solutions to our socioeconomic dilemmas.

Yours is sitting on your ass taking money away from hard working middle class American and giving hard working middle class Americans the finger because you think you are more important than they are. They EARN their income, you want to steal hard working middle class Americans EARNED income.

 

[danielpalos]

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

We have "safety nets", and those are great tools to help a person until they get back on their feet.

The idea that you want government to control businesses and what they EARN and then want the government to give to those that have not EARNED is socialism at it's finest.

The government has no business interfering with what an employee or an employer make.

I ran several businesses and several months I paid employees and did not get paid. I mortgaged my home as a risk for opening a business. Now, I have since sold the businesses but you make it sound like a business owner has it made. you have no clue, if a person risks everything for a reward, then they should be rewarded not penalized because someone that risked nothing wants money for NOTHING.

Not at all. That is merely the means, not the end. The End, is solving simple poverty on an at-will basis as a promotion of the general welfare.

Which is your standard BS for you getting money for not working and you not wanting to EARN your money. You want socialism to take care of you. I am fundamentally opposed, I believe you accept responsibility for your life and you go out and make it successful doing what you love to do, if someone will pay you for it, then you are a lot better off.

That is your opinion.

My opinion is, promoting the general welfare means finding solutions to our socioeconomic dilemmas.

Yours is sitting on your ass taking money away from hard working middle class American and giving hard working middle class Americans the finger because you think you are more important than they are. They EARN their income, you want to steal hard working middle class Americans EARNED income.

You could always cease work and be naturally unemployed. That is the difference.

 

[ph3iron]

Which has absolutely nothing to do with you and your wanting to sit on your ass all day and have hard working Americans pay your way.

Spending that money is all that matters.

That seems to be what you want to do, you want to take from people that work hard for a living and spend it on yourself.

They call people like you con men, you are a fraud.

Only true socialists, say that. Capitalists don't care as long as capital circulates.

Only idiots like you post pure propaganda BS, that is all you post BS!

Capitalism doesn't care; why do you, socialist?

Don't tell me you are sucking off VA SS Medicare benefits?

 

[ph3iron]

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

We have "safety nets", and those are great tools to help a person until they get back on their feet.

The idea that you want government to control businesses and what they EARN and then want the government to give to those that have not EARNED is socialism at it's finest.

The government has no business interfering with what an employee or an employer make.

I ran several businesses and several months I paid employees and did not get paid. I mortgaged my home as a risk for opening a business. Now, I have since sold the businesses but you make it sound like a business owner has it made. you have no clue, if a person risks everything for a reward, then they should be rewarded not penalized because someone that risked nothing wants money for NOTHING.

Not at all. That is merely the means, not the end. The End, is solving simple poverty on an at-will basis as a promotion of the general welfare.

Which is your standard BS for you getting money for not working and you not wanting to EARN your money. You want socialism to take care of you. I am fundamentally opposed, I believe you accept responsibility for your life and you go out and make it successful doing what you love to do, if someone will pay you for it, then you are a lot better off.

That is your opinion.

My opinion is, promoting the general welfare means finding solutions to our socioeconomic dilemmas.

Yours is sitting on your ass taking money away from hard working middle class American and giving hard working middle class Americans the finger because you think you are more important than they are. They EARN their income, you want to steal hard working middle class Americans EARNED income.

Keep the gov out of my Medicare, as the trumpie said
Incredible stupidity.
I must confess as a corporate millionaire I've been sucking off the uneducated hard working rubes for years

 

[ph3iron]

Yup, good old American way
Got mine, screw you
Verychristian
I assume you are sucking off your socialist VA SS Medicare benefits?

That's the Boomer Generation who first circumcised their "kids" in the U.S., who are now "choosing" to be rich and deaf rather than poor and hearing, rich and blind rather than poor and seeing, rich and missing legs, rather than poor and walking, rich with dentures rather than poor with teeth, etc., etc.

VA, SS, Medicare, Medicaid, the whole disgusting pig trough is a giant con. A "long con" the criminals call it, because it's been going on ever since they passed the Gun Control Act of 1968.

So are you sucking off them?
Or maybe over in the Middle East battling the terrorists?
Or whining from your double wide?
Long con? You are a C grabber supporter?

 

[danielpalos]

Spending that money is all that matters.

That seems to be what you want to do, you want to take from people that work hard for a living and spend it on yourself.

They call people like you con men, you are a fraud.

Only true socialists, say that. Capitalists don't care as long as capital circulates.

Only idiots like you post pure propaganda BS, that is all you post BS!

Capitalism doesn't care; why do you, socialist?

Don't tell me you are sucking off VA SS Medicare benefits?

Why do you care; did you get a tax break?

 

[ph3iron]

The fawning left wing media actually praised Barry Hussein for his part in increasing the usage of food stamps and the same media is virtually silent about unemployment at almost a 20 year low under President Trump. What the hell is going on?

Barry Hussein ? Why don't you have a few balls and call him what you say to your white uneducated friends, an uppity nixxer?
Unemployment was low under Barry.
GNP growth last Barry year 2.2%
First C grabber year 2.1%

 

[ph3iron]

That seems to be what you want to do, you want to take from people that work hard for a living and spend it on yourself.

They call people like you con men, you are a fraud.

Only true socialists, say that. Capitalists don't care as long as capital circulates.

Only idiots like you post pure propaganda BS, that is all you post BS!

Capitalism doesn't care; why do you, socialist?

Don't tell me you are sucking off VA SS Medicare benefits?

Why do you care; did you get a tax break?

Of course I have so much money I don't know what to do with it now
And do I care about the increased deficit?
naaaah.
They only were important under the uppity nixxer

 

[ph3iron]

That seems to be what you want to do, you want to take from people that work hard for a living and spend it on yourself.

They call people like you con men, you are a fraud.

Only true socialists, say that. Capitalists don't care as long as capital circulates.

Only idiots like you post pure propaganda BS, that is all you post BS!

Capitalism doesn't care; why do you, socialist?

Don't tell me you are sucking off VA SS Medicare benefits?

Why do you care; did you get a tax break?

So you are sucking off socialist benefits ?
Let me guess an old white fart?

 

[hadit]

Yep, that is your social concept because you said EARNED. I didn’t post EARNED, you did. You seem to be the one clueless and Causeless because you refuse to obey the LAW.

You are the one who cares about how much others make or don't make; wealth envy?

The law is employment at will.

You can EARN (daniel’s word) whatever you want, the LAW tells us so. You want to earn millions, you go ahead and EARN it.

I object to the government doubling the spending to support people who don’t want to EARN their money. Stealing money from working class Americans to pay for others laziness is immoral.

how about, "earning equal protection of the law" under socialism, and converting it to capitalism?

Again, you keep saying the same stupid thing and now we find out you don't even believe your own BS, you admit that money is EARNED, your words, not mine.

Also, the government giving away money to people who are too lazy to work IS socialism.

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

Because it's not the employer's responsibility to make sure you have a job.

 

[danielpalos]

Only true socialists, say that. Capitalists don't care as long as capital circulates.

Only idiots like you post pure propaganda BS, that is all you post BS!

Capitalism doesn't care; why do you, socialist?

Don't tell me you are sucking off VA SS Medicare benefits?

Why do you care; did you get a tax break?

Of course I have so much money I don't know what to do with it now
And do I care about the increased deficit?
naaaah.
They only were important under the uppity nixxer

that is why the left is for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage.