Why do democrats want more people on foodstamps and welfare

[Papageorgio]

More daniel BS, he doesn't want to work, well boohoo for little danny, suck it up buttercup, take responsibility for your life then you can really help others, all you currently are is a lazy bum who wants hard working Americans to support you being a lazy victim.

How socialist of you. Capitalism doesn't care as long as you circulate capital.

Take your socialist BS and shove it. I already told you I don't mind helping people out and the government should help those that enduring hardships, that doesn't mean that you have a right to steal from others and give to those that don't want to contribute.

lack of equal protection of the law is stealing from the poor to help the rich get richer faster.

More daniel BS, he doesn't want to work, well boohoo for little danny, suck it up buttercup, take responsibility for your life then you can really help others, all you currently are is a lazy bum who wants hard working Americans to support you being a lazy victim.

How socialist of you. Capitalism doesn't care as long as you circulate capital.

Take your socialist BS and shove it. I already told you I don't mind helping people out and the government should help those that enduring hardships, that doesn't mean that you have a right to steal from others and give to those that don't want to contribute.

lack of equal protection of the law is stealing from the poor to help the rich get richer faster.

Suck it up, moron. We have equal protection, you want special protection to be a lazy whiny victim.

no, we don't. Labor has a right to not work and be eligible for unemployment compensation in Any at-will employment State.

Been there and done that, you are misapplying the law and you absolutely know that you are. You have the opportunity to work or choose not to work, nothing anywhere says you have a right to be paid for choosing not to work. You are trying to make up a law that is clearly not there, if you thought it was a Constitutional right, then you already would have been to court to challenge the law. You haven't and the reason you haven't is because you will be laughed out of court. So all you have is this board and playing the poor victim role as you have been playing.

 

[danielpalos]

How socialist of you. Capitalism doesn't care as long as you circulate capital.

Take your socialist BS and shove it. I already told you I don't mind helping people out and the government should help those that enduring hardships, that doesn't mean that you have a right to steal from others and give to those that don't want to contribute.

lack of equal protection of the law is stealing from the poor to help the rich get richer faster.

How socialist of you. Capitalism doesn't care as long as you circulate capital.

Take your socialist BS and shove it. I already told you I don't mind helping people out and the government should help those that enduring hardships, that doesn't mean that you have a right to steal from others and give to those that don't want to contribute.

lack of equal protection of the law is stealing from the poor to help the rich get richer faster.

Suck it up, moron. We have equal protection, you want special protection to be a lazy whiny victim.

no, we don't. Labor has a right to not work and be eligible for unemployment compensation in Any at-will employment State.

It most certainly does not. You haven't posted a word of text from a law or a court case that supports your position, because you can't. You were wrong, you are wrong, and most likely will continue to be wrong on this subject. Society is under no obligation whatsoever to pay you to stay home and smoke pot. None.

The State law is employment at will in the State of California.

An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.

That is the law; there are no other restrictions.

 

[Papageorgio]

"Why do democrats want more people on foodstamps and welfare?"

Obvious. To satisfy the poor just enough to keep them from revolting but at the same time to firmly keep in the in the lower class "where they belong."

Petty felony conviction (yes we have such in fascist America) leads to lifelong classification as "a convicted felon." See RCW 9A.46.020: Definition—Penalties.

(2)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, a person who harasses another is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(b) A person who harasses another is guilty of a class C felony if any of the following apply: ... ... ... ... ...

Any involvement with mental health services leads to LIFELONG, IRREVOKABLE classification as "an adjudicated mental defective" having once upon a time been "committed to a mental institution." Federal Register :: Amended Definition of “Adjudicated as a Mental Defective” and “Committed to a Mental Institution” (2010R-21P)

For the poor: lifelong loss of ability to exercise the right to bear arms, and total exclusions from most professions, jobs, businesses, and any other way to make a living. This is the Democratic Party agenda.

IT IS A POVERTY TRAP. THERE IS NO WAY OUT.

all the right wing has is a, "work or die" ethic from the Age of Iron, in modern times.

Which is a damn site better than your moronic stupidity.

 

[Slyhunter]

You have to first take that money away from other people, who then cannot spend it.

He doesn’t care, he is a selfish greedy person who wants to take from those who have worked hard and give to those who are lazy. He believe the government is smarter than the people it governs. Very pessimistic view of the world.

Capitalism has a Natural Rate of Unemployment.

You keep saying that like it's important. What you're really doing is looking for an excuse to take from those who have earned. If you don't want to be unemployed for a long time, you generally can do something about it.

lol. it is, because it is Natural, for Capitalism. only the right wing, never gets capital concepts.

You want to be permanently unemployed and to get paid for it. That's welfare, not unemployment. UE refers to people TEMPORARILY out of work, between jobs. You want welfare, you just don't want to call it that.

I want retirement.
Tired of being the dull square and boring guy who pays his bills on time and goes to work every day. Time for me to stay home and sleep all day and play games all night. Tired of being slammed into the wall.

 

[Papageorgio]

Take your socialist BS and shove it. I already told you I don't mind helping people out and the government should help those that enduring hardships, that doesn't mean that you have a right to steal from others and give to those that don't want to contribute.

lack of equal protection of the law is stealing from the poor to help the rich get richer faster.

Take your socialist BS and shove it. I already told you I don't mind helping people out and the government should help those that enduring hardships, that doesn't mean that you have a right to steal from others and give to those that don't want to contribute.

lack of equal protection of the law is stealing from the poor to help the rich get richer faster.

Suck it up, moron. We have equal protection, you want special protection to be a lazy whiny victim.

no, we don't. Labor has a right to not work and be eligible for unemployment compensation in Any at-will employment State.

It most certainly does not. You haven't posted a word of text from a law or a court case that supports your position, because you can't. You were wrong, you are wrong, and most likely will continue to be wrong on this subject. Society is under no obligation whatsoever to pay you to stay home and smoke pot. None.

The State law is employment at will in the State of California.

An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.

That is the law; there are no other restrictions.

Do you have a link to verify your quote? That is the TOS when on this board and quoting another source.

Also nothing you cited says anything about anyone being paid for not working. So you still have nothing. Silly danny.

 

[Papageorgio]

He doesn’t care, he is a selfish greedy person who wants to take from those who have worked hard and give to those who are lazy. He believe the government is smarter than the people it governs. Very pessimistic view of the world.

Capitalism has a Natural Rate of Unemployment.

You keep saying that like it's important. What you're really doing is looking for an excuse to take from those who have earned. If you don't want to be unemployed for a long time, you generally can do something about it.

lol. it is, because it is Natural, for Capitalism. only the right wing, never gets capital concepts.

You want to be permanently unemployed and to get paid for it. That's welfare, not unemployment. UE refers to people TEMPORARILY out of work, between jobs. You want welfare, you just don't want to call it that.

I want retirement.
Tired of being the dull square and boring guy who pays his bills on time and goes to work every day. Time for me to stay home and sleep all day and play games all night. Tired of being slammed into the wall.

Then quit and stay home, no one is making you do anything, you are responsible for you, the government, employers and family are not making you do anything you don't want to do. Just don't expect others to support your decisions, those are YOUR decisions.

 

[danielpalos]

"Why do democrats want more people on foodstamps and welfare?"

Obvious. To satisfy the poor just enough to keep them from revolting but at the same time to firmly keep in the in the lower class "where they belong."

Petty felony conviction (yes we have such in fascist America) leads to lifelong classification as "a convicted felon." See RCW 9A.46.020: Definition—Penalties.

(2)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, a person who harasses another is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(b) A person who harasses another is guilty of a class C felony if any of the following apply: ... ... ... ... ...

Any involvement with mental health services leads to LIFELONG, IRREVOKABLE classification as "an adjudicated mental defective" having once upon a time been "committed to a mental institution." Federal Register :: Amended Definition of “Adjudicated as a Mental Defective” and “Committed to a Mental Institution” (2010R-21P)

For the poor: lifelong loss of ability to exercise the right to bear arms, and total exclusions from most professions, jobs, businesses, and any other way to make a living. This is the Democratic Party agenda.

IT IS A POVERTY TRAP. THERE IS NO WAY OUT.

all the right wing has is a, "work or die" ethic from the Age of Iron, in modern times.

Which is a damn site better than your moronic stupidity.

that is Your opinion, right winger.

 

[hadit]

Take your socialist BS and shove it. I already told you I don't mind helping people out and the government should help those that enduring hardships, that doesn't mean that you have a right to steal from others and give to those that don't want to contribute.

lack of equal protection of the law is stealing from the poor to help the rich get richer faster.

Take your socialist BS and shove it. I already told you I don't mind helping people out and the government should help those that enduring hardships, that doesn't mean that you have a right to steal from others and give to those that don't want to contribute.

lack of equal protection of the law is stealing from the poor to help the rich get richer faster.

Suck it up, moron. We have equal protection, you want special protection to be a lazy whiny victim.

no, we don't. Labor has a right to not work and be eligible for unemployment compensation in Any at-will employment State.

It most certainly does not. You haven't posted a word of text from a law or a court case that supports your position, because you can't. You were wrong, you are wrong, and most likely will continue to be wrong on this subject. Society is under no obligation whatsoever to pay you to stay home and smoke pot. None.

The State law is employment at will in the State of California.

An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.

That is the law; there are no other restrictions.

How does that support your contention that you have a right to the fruit of others' labor?

 

[danielpalos]

He doesn’t care, he is a selfish greedy person who wants to take from those who have worked hard and give to those who are lazy. He believe the government is smarter than the people it governs. Very pessimistic view of the world.

Capitalism has a Natural Rate of Unemployment.

You keep saying that like it's important. What you're really doing is looking for an excuse to take from those who have earned. If you don't want to be unemployed for a long time, you generally can do something about it.

lol. it is, because it is Natural, for Capitalism. only the right wing, never gets capital concepts.

You want to be permanently unemployed and to get paid for it. That's welfare, not unemployment. UE refers to people TEMPORARILY out of work, between jobs. You want welfare, you just don't want to call it that.

I want retirement.
Tired of being the dull square and boring guy who pays his bills on time and goes to work every day. Time for me to stay home and sleep all day and play games all night. Tired of being slammed into the wall.

Then what? You will have time to explore hobbies and see if you can do something you enjoy, and maybe make some money as well.

 

[danielpalos]

lack of equal protection of the law is stealing from the poor to help the rich get richer faster.

lack of equal protection of the law is stealing from the poor to help the rich get richer faster.

Suck it up, moron. We have equal protection, you want special protection to be a lazy whiny victim.

no, we don't. Labor has a right to not work and be eligible for unemployment compensation in Any at-will employment State.

It most certainly does not. You haven't posted a word of text from a law or a court case that supports your position, because you can't. You were wrong, you are wrong, and most likely will continue to be wrong on this subject. Society is under no obligation whatsoever to pay you to stay home and smoke pot. None.

The State law is employment at will in the State of California.

An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.

That is the law; there are no other restrictions.

Do you have a link to verify your quote? That is the TOS when on this board and quoting another source.

Also nothing you cited says anything about anyone being paid for not working. So you still have nothing. Silly danny.

California Labor Code 2922.

 

[danielpalos]

lack of equal protection of the law is stealing from the poor to help the rich get richer faster.

lack of equal protection of the law is stealing from the poor to help the rich get richer faster.

Suck it up, moron. We have equal protection, you want special protection to be a lazy whiny victim.

no, we don't. Labor has a right to not work and be eligible for unemployment compensation in Any at-will employment State.

It most certainly does not. You haven't posted a word of text from a law or a court case that supports your position, because you can't. You were wrong, you are wrong, and most likely will continue to be wrong on this subject. Society is under no obligation whatsoever to pay you to stay home and smoke pot. None.

The State law is employment at will in the State of California.

An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.

That is the law; there are no other restrictions.

How does that support your contention that you have a right to the fruit of others' labor?

That is Your socialist opinion; capitalism doesn't care.

 

[ph3iron]

Isn't it better for Americans to have jobs and self respect?

Democratic Party on Welfare & Poverty

I thought more whites than blacks were on welfare.
Seen the video toothless missippi white boy who never had a job in his life?

 

[ph3iron]

Suck it up, moron. We have equal protection, you want special protection to be a lazy whiny victim.

no, we don't. Labor has a right to not work and be eligible for unemployment compensation in Any at-will employment State.

It most certainly does not. You haven't posted a word of text from a law or a court case that supports your position, because you can't. You were wrong, you are wrong, and most likely will continue to be wrong on this subject. Society is under no obligation whatsoever to pay you to stay home and smoke pot. None.

The State law is employment at will in the State of California.

An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.

That is the law; there are no other restrictions.

How does that support your contention that you have a right to the fruit of others' labor?

That is Your socialist opinion; capitalism doesn't care.

Yup, good old American way
Got mine, screw you
Verychristian
I assume you are sucking off your socialist VA SS Medicare benefits?

 

[danielpalos]

no, we don't. Labor has a right to not work and be eligible for unemployment compensation in Any at-will employment State.

It most certainly does not. You haven't posted a word of text from a law or a court case that supports your position, because you can't. You were wrong, you are wrong, and most likely will continue to be wrong on this subject. Society is under no obligation whatsoever to pay you to stay home and smoke pot. None.

The State law is employment at will in the State of California.

An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.

That is the law; there are no other restrictions.

How does that support your contention that you have a right to the fruit of others' labor?

That is Your socialist opinion; capitalism doesn't care.

Yup, good old American way
Got mine, screw you
Verychristian
I assume you are sucking off your socialist VA SS Medicare benefits?

Equal protection of the law is in our Constitution.

 

[Papageorgio]

Suck it up, moron. We have equal protection, you want special protection to be a lazy whiny victim.

no, we don't. Labor has a right to not work and be eligible for unemployment compensation in Any at-will employment State.

It most certainly does not. You haven't posted a word of text from a law or a court case that supports your position, because you can't. You were wrong, you are wrong, and most likely will continue to be wrong on this subject. Society is under no obligation whatsoever to pay you to stay home and smoke pot. None.

The State law is employment at will in the State of California.

An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.

That is the law; there are no other restrictions.

Do you have a link to verify your quote? That is the TOS when on this board and quoting another source.

Also nothing you cited says anything about anyone being paid for not working. So you still have nothing. Silly danny.

California Labor Code 2922.

Thank you here is more info on the law.

At Will Employment

No where is there anything about a right to be paid for not working, lots of info about due process and equal protection.

 

[sedwin]

Isn't it better for Americans to have jobs and self respect?

Democratic Party on Welfare & Poverty

Why do republican's want the super rich to pay nothing in taxes while they poison our air/water and use unsafe practices?
Don't they want all American's to be safe and participate in the American Dream? It's funny that republican's believe the ultra rich should get corporate welfare and free private jets. Where's the self-respect in that?

 

[Papageorgio]

It most certainly does not. You haven't posted a word of text from a law or a court case that supports your position, because you can't. You were wrong, you are wrong, and most likely will continue to be wrong on this subject. Society is under no obligation whatsoever to pay you to stay home and smoke pot. None.

The State law is employment at will in the State of California.

An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.

That is the law; there are no other restrictions.

How does that support your contention that you have a right to the fruit of others' labor?

That is Your socialist opinion; capitalism doesn't care.

Yup, good old American way
Got mine, screw you
Verychristian
I assume you are sucking off your socialist VA SS Medicare benefits?

Equal protection of the law is in our Constitution.

Which has absolutely nothing to do with you and your wanting to sit on your ass all day and have hard working Americans pay your way.

 

[danielpalos]

no, we don't. Labor has a right to not work and be eligible for unemployment compensation in Any at-will employment State.

It most certainly does not. You haven't posted a word of text from a law or a court case that supports your position, because you can't. You were wrong, you are wrong, and most likely will continue to be wrong on this subject. Society is under no obligation whatsoever to pay you to stay home and smoke pot. None.

The State law is employment at will in the State of California.

An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.

That is the law; there are no other restrictions.

Do you have a link to verify your quote? That is the TOS when on this board and quoting another source.

Also nothing you cited says anything about anyone being paid for not working. So you still have nothing. Silly danny.

California Labor Code 2922.

Thank you here is more info on the law.

At Will Employment

No where is there anything about a right to be paid for not working, lots of info about due process and equal protection.

employment is at-will; why wouldn't unemployment compensation also be at-will?

 

[danielpalos]

The State law is employment at will in the State of California.

That is the law; there are no other restrictions.

How does that support your contention that you have a right to the fruit of others' labor?

That is Your socialist opinion; capitalism doesn't care.

Yup, good old American way
Got mine, screw you
Verychristian
I assume you are sucking off your socialist VA SS Medicare benefits?

Equal protection of the law is in our Constitution.

Which has absolutely nothing to do with you and your wanting to sit on your ass all day and have hard working Americans pay your way.

Spending that money is all that matters.

 

[Papageorgio]

How does that support your contention that you have a right to the fruit of others' labor?

That is Your socialist opinion; capitalism doesn't care.

Yup, good old American way
Got mine, screw you
Verychristian
I assume you are sucking off your socialist VA SS Medicare benefits?

Equal protection of the law is in our Constitution.

Which has absolutely nothing to do with you and your wanting to sit on your ass all day and have hard working Americans pay your way.

Spending that money is all that matters.

That seems to be what you want to do, you want to take from people that work hard for a living and spend it on yourself.

They call people like you con men, you are a fraud.