Why do democrats want more people on foodstamps and welfare

[hadit]

I call shenanigans. You've been posting here about not wanting to work long enough for us to know two things:

1. If a job dropped in your lap, you wouldn't take it.
2. You're not looking for one, or you would already be working.

How hard do you think it would be for someone to find a job where you live if they were actually looking for one?

No employer is legally required to hire me; how am I not, naturally unemployed?

Because you aren't even looking for a job. Society has no obligation to support you.

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

No. There's no reason to do that at all.

The poor simply cannot afford to pay for it.

Whose responsibility is that?

 

[Papageorgio]

I call shenanigans. You've been posting here about not wanting to work long enough for us to know two things:

1. If a job dropped in your lap, you wouldn't take it.
2. You're not looking for one, or you would already be working.

How hard do you think it would be for someone to find a job where you live if they were actually looking for one?

No employer is legally required to hire me; how am I not, naturally unemployed?

Because you aren't even looking for a job. Society has no obligation to support you.

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

LMAO!! You go with that buddy, why don't you go into the employment office today and tell them you want $14 to sit on your butt and do nothing. I'm sure they will cave into your demands.

Don't complain if someone comes up with creative excuses to go on welfare.

Not complaining at all, I am laughing, just go down to the welfare office and tell them you want $14 an hour to sit on your ass all day and let us know how far you get. I’m sure they will fall all over themselves to give it to you.

 

[danielpalos]

No employer is legally required to hire me; how am I not, naturally unemployed?

Because you aren't even looking for a job. Society has no obligation to support you.

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

No. There's no reason to do that at all.

The poor simply cannot afford to pay for it.

Whose responsibility is that?

Societies'. It is why even the poor have the affirmative action of the franchise and should vote at every opportunity.

 

[danielpalos]

No employer is legally required to hire me; how am I not, naturally unemployed?

Because you aren't even looking for a job. Society has no obligation to support you.

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

LMAO!! You go with that buddy, why don't you go into the employment office today and tell them you want $14 to sit on your butt and do nothing. I'm sure they will cave into your demands.

Don't complain if someone comes up with creative excuses to go on welfare.

Not complaining at all, I am laughing, just go down to the welfare office and tell them you want $14 an hour to sit on your ass all day and let us know how far you get. I’m sure they will fall all over themselves to give it to you.

That is what I mean; it costs more because of the "creative endeavors" employed.

 

[Papageorgio]

Because you aren't even looking for a job. Society has no obligation to support you.

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

LMAO!! You go with that buddy, why don't you go into the employment office today and tell them you want $14 to sit on your butt and do nothing. I'm sure they will cave into your demands.

Don't complain if someone comes up with creative excuses to go on welfare.

Not complaining at all, I am laughing, just go down to the welfare office and tell them you want $14 an hour to sit on your ass all day and let us know how far you get. I’m sure they will fall all over themselves to give it to you.

That is what I mean; it costs more because of the "creative endeavors" employed.

Good for you, you are blowing smoke and you won't do a damn thing other than to sit on this board and cry to others that you are a victim.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

LMAO!! You go with that buddy, why don't you go into the employment office today and tell them you want $14 to sit on your butt and do nothing. I'm sure they will cave into your demands.

Don't complain if someone comes up with creative excuses to go on welfare.

Not complaining at all, I am laughing, just go down to the welfare office and tell them you want $14 an hour to sit on your ass all day and let us know how far you get. I’m sure they will fall all over themselves to give it to you.

That is what I mean; it costs more because of the "creative endeavors" employed.

Good for you, you are blowing smoke and you won't do a damn thing other than to sit on this board and cry to others that you are a victim.

We have a Constitution and a Commerce clause.

 

[hadit]

Because you aren't even looking for a job. Society has no obligation to support you.

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

No. There's no reason to do that at all.

The poor simply cannot afford to pay for it.

Whose responsibility is that?

Societies'. It is why even the poor have the affirmative action of the franchise and should vote at every opportunity.

That's welfare and it's not the employer's responsibility.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

No. There's no reason to do that at all.

The poor simply cannot afford to pay for it.

Whose responsibility is that?

Societies'. It is why even the poor have the affirmative action of the franchise and should vote at every opportunity.

That's welfare and it's not the employer's responsibility.

Yes, it is. Social costs are also public policy due to our general welfare clause.

 

[hadit]

No. There's no reason to do that at all.

The poor simply cannot afford to pay for it.

Whose responsibility is that?

Societies'. It is why even the poor have the affirmative action of the franchise and should vote at every opportunity.

That's welfare and it's not the employer's responsibility.

Yes, it is. Social costs are also public policy due to our general welfare clause.

No. That says nothing about employers being responsible. Your fantasy doesn't hold up.

 

[danielpalos]

The poor simply cannot afford to pay for it.

Whose responsibility is that?

Societies'. It is why even the poor have the affirmative action of the franchise and should vote at every opportunity.

That's welfare and it's not the employer's responsibility.

Yes, it is. Social costs are also public policy due to our general welfare clause.

No. That says nothing about employers being responsible. Your fantasy doesn't hold up.

The People are responsible.

 

[hadit]

Whose responsibility is that?

Societies'. It is why even the poor have the affirmative action of the franchise and should vote at every opportunity.

That's welfare and it's not the employer's responsibility.

Yes, it is. Social costs are also public policy due to our general welfare clause.

No. That says nothing about employers being responsible. Your fantasy doesn't hold up.

The People are responsible.

Good, you agree that employers are not responsible, so we won't be seeing you try to claim that employers should be compelled to subsidize welfare by being forced to pay wages higher than what the job is worth?

 

[danielpalos]

Societies'. It is why even the poor have the affirmative action of the franchise and should vote at every opportunity.

That's welfare and it's not the employer's responsibility.

Yes, it is. Social costs are also public policy due to our general welfare clause.

No. That says nothing about employers being responsible. Your fantasy doesn't hold up.

The People are responsible.

Good, you agree that employers are not responsible, so we won't be seeing you try to claim that employers should be compelled to subsidize welfare by being forced to pay wages higher than what the job is worth?

The People have a general welfare clause.

 

[Papageorgio]

LMAO!! You go with that buddy, why don't you go into the employment office today and tell them you want $14 to sit on your butt and do nothing. I'm sure they will cave into your demands.

Don't complain if someone comes up with creative excuses to go on welfare.

Not complaining at all, I am laughing, just go down to the welfare office and tell them you want $14 an hour to sit on your ass all day and let us know how far you get. I’m sure they will fall all over themselves to give it to you.

That is what I mean; it costs more because of the "creative endeavors" employed.

Good for you, you are blowing smoke and you won't do a damn thing other than to sit on this board and cry to others that you are a victim.

We have a Constitution and a Commerce clause.

And now go prove it cupcake and quit being the victim, take it to court, go do it, if you are as right as you claim you are this is a slam dunk for you.

 

[hadit]

That's welfare and it's not the employer's responsibility.

Yes, it is. Social costs are also public policy due to our general welfare clause.

No. That says nothing about employers being responsible. Your fantasy doesn't hold up.

The People are responsible.

Good, you agree that employers are not responsible, so we won't be seeing you try to claim that employers should be compelled to subsidize welfare by being forced to pay wages higher than what the job is worth?

The People have a general welfare clause.

Then The People should be able to get welfare legislation passed, right?

 

[danielpalos]

Don't complain if someone comes up with creative excuses to go on welfare.

Not complaining at all, I am laughing, just go down to the welfare office and tell them you want $14 an hour to sit on your ass all day and let us know how far you get. I’m sure they will fall all over themselves to give it to you.

That is what I mean; it costs more because of the "creative endeavors" employed.

Good for you, you are blowing smoke and you won't do a damn thing other than to sit on this board and cry to others that you are a victim.

We have a Constitution and a Commerce clause.

And now go prove it cupcake and quit being the victim, take it to court, go do it, if you are as right as you claim you are this is a slam dunk for you.

You have no competing solutions, only more socialism on a national basis.

The right wing is for more, socialized government and don't want to pay for it.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, it is. Social costs are also public policy due to our general welfare clause.

No. That says nothing about employers being responsible. Your fantasy doesn't hold up.

The People are responsible.

Good, you agree that employers are not responsible, so we won't be seeing you try to claim that employers should be compelled to subsidize welfare by being forced to pay wages higher than what the job is worth?

The People have a general welfare clause.

Then The People should be able to get welfare legislation passed, right?

Let's put it this way, common offense and general warfare spending has to be cut before general welfare spending.

 

[hadit]

No. That says nothing about employers being responsible. Your fantasy doesn't hold up.

The People are responsible.

Good, you agree that employers are not responsible, so we won't be seeing you try to claim that employers should be compelled to subsidize welfare by being forced to pay wages higher than what the job is worth?

The People have a general welfare clause.

Then The People should be able to get welfare legislation passed, right?

Let's put it this way, common offense and general warfare spending has to be cut before general welfare spending.

Congress decides what gets spent and what gets cut.

 

[Dschrute3]

Folks need to watch 'Agenda.' It's a fascinating enlightening documentary. It explains Communist Globalist tactics perfectly. They do have an agenda, and it's 100yrs in the making. You can see the movie on places like Amazon Prime. It's two parts. Check it out.

 

[danielpalos]

The People are responsible.

Good, you agree that employers are not responsible, so we won't be seeing you try to claim that employers should be compelled to subsidize welfare by being forced to pay wages higher than what the job is worth?

The People have a general welfare clause.

Then The People should be able to get welfare legislation passed, right?

Let's put it this way, common offense and general warfare spending has to be cut before general welfare spending.

Congress decides what gets spent and what gets cut.

Congress is delegated the the power to tax, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States.

 

[Papageorgio]

Not complaining at all, I am laughing, just go down to the welfare office and tell them you want $14 an hour to sit on your ass all day and let us know how far you get. I’m sure they will fall all over themselves to give it to you.

That is what I mean; it costs more because of the "creative endeavors" employed.

Good for you, you are blowing smoke and you won't do a damn thing other than to sit on this board and cry to others that you are a victim.

We have a Constitution and a Commerce clause.

And now go prove it cupcake and quit being the victim, take it to court, go do it, if you are as right as you claim you are this is a slam dunk for you.

You have no competing solutions, only more socialism on a national basis.

The right wing is for more, socialized government and don't want to pay for it.

Poor guy, you don't have a solution either, otherwise you would be working on it instead of crying here.