Why can't liberals tell the difference between policy disagreement and hate?

Oh right, projection.
Because in general, the right wing can not debate what they supposedly disagree with, without including in their posts, "stupid liberals or, negro n chief, or nazi, communist , socialist, dictator, kenyan Obama, piece of shit, hater of America scumbag, Muslim n chief, Obamabots, Liberal scum, lying liberal, you don't love America", CRAPOLA in what ever it is that they say and NEVER EVER seem to be willing to discuss or debate anything, anything at all, without resorting to such infantile and hateful comments in near most all of their posts....

When the 'many' SPEW hatred all day long, it's hard not to think "the many" are just a group of hateful human beings....who disagree for the sake of hatred, and not for policy disagreements.....

IF it were truly policy disagreements, then posters would spend the time and 'argue, the argument'/'debate the issue', without using their vulgarity or insults, and explain why they believe the policy is wrong and why their way would be better, and explain what their way is, and just why their way would be better for all involved.... and try to win the person with the opposite stance over with solid argument. I used to make so many friends from your side of the aisle in the good ole days when we used to just "argue, the argument".
Those days are long gone it seems.... :(

And I am not talking about you Freewill in my rant, but I am talking about what seems to be as obvious as Daylight to me...
 
Sure, like the Right will ever admit their policy of hateful racism no matter how obvious it is.

October 9, 2008
RUSH: I call Obama a squirrel. What's a squirrel? Nothing but a rat with better PR.

October 15, 2008
RUSH: What sharply personal attacks? All they are is people telling the truth about the little squirrel. What personal attacks? "Well, see, Rush, there you go, that's a personal attack right there." No, no, no, no. Not a personal attack
What is racist about calling POTUS a rat with good PR?
Because racism and dehumanization go hand in hand.

Discrimination against blacks linked to dehumanization study finds

Discrimination against blacks linked to dehumanization, study finds
I read a couple paragraphs of that crap. Study seeks to prove whites associate apes and blacks. Could if be that the only reason whites identified blurry pictures as apes after seeing a photo of a black is because they saw blurry pictures of apes? and connection would likely be more on the basis of skin color than racism, or do you deny that an ape's face is more likely closer in color to the face of a negro?
I'm not white either but when I think of monkeys I think of kids. Mine in particular. And I call them that often. I can't wait until they get older and find out I've been calling them a racial slur all their lives.
 
Oh right, projection.
Because in general, the right wing can not debate what they supposedly disagree with, without including in their posts, "stupid liberals or, negro n chief, or nazi, communist , socialist, dictator, kenyan Obama, piece of shit, hater of America scumbag, Muslim n chief, Obamabots, Liberal scum, lying liberal, you don't love America", CRAPOLA in what ever it is that they say and NEVER EVER seem to be willing to discuss or debate anything, anything at all, without resorting to such infantile and hateful comments in near most all of their posts....

When the 'many' SPEW hatred all day long, it's hard not to think "the many" are just a group of hateful human beings....who disagree for the sake of hatred, and not for policy disagreements.....

IF it were truly policy disagreements, then posters would spend the time and 'argue, the argument'/'debate the issue', without using their vulgarity or insults, and explain why they believe the policy is wrong and why their way would be better, and explain what their way is, and just why their way would be better for all involved.... and try to win the person with the opposite stance over with solid argument. I used to make so many friends from your side of the aisle in the good ole days when we used to just "argue, the argument".
Those days are long gone it seems.... :(

And I am not talking about you Freewill in my rant, but I am talking about what seems to be as obvious as Daylight to me...

While I agree that the vitriol nature of many posts are over the top, such as SteveMcqueen's avatar, that does not necessarily mean they hate Obama. Hate what he does, absolutely without a doubt. Maybe even hate him personally, I don't know how they can when they don't really know him personally.

The problem is that hate is the come back too much from the liberal left. It is like if they have no come back just use words like hate, racist, dummy and others.

I think they accuse people of hating Obama because they are accusing them of them hating blacks. Which can't be true if anyone at all roots for an NBA or NFL team. Regardless of the rhetoric if Hillary would have been elected in 2008, or anyone else, and did what Obama has done they would have received the same treatment Obama has.

But thanks for the sane and polite reply, I am not sure how much I disagree if at all.
 
Because they're too stupid to debate actual policy and resort to racism and all the other bull they can come up with instead as reasons you don't like it. Left wingers claim they are really smart but in reality you are dealing with some of the most baseline retarded people in the world. They can never win policy debates on facts and therefore must always fall back on racism or any other stupid thing they can come up with other than the actual policy.

Look no further than the replies to this thread for evidence. There's even more evidence in other threads right here in this forum.

You may be correct but what it mostly is, in my opinion, that they don't have a come back. In other words there is no defense for what Obama or the left has done. And since their whole ideology is based on hate, for the most part, they assume, project, that thought onto others. If you have a person who just can't seem to trust you, don't trust them.
 
Because they're too stupid to debate actual policy and resort to racism and all the other bull they can come up with instead as reasons you don't like it. Left wingers claim they are really smart but in reality you are dealing with some of the most baseline retarded people in the world. They can never win policy debates on facts and therefore must always fall back on racism or any other stupid thing they can come up with other than the actual policy.

Look no further than the replies to this thread for evidence. There's even more evidence in other threads right here in this forum.

You may be correct but what it mostly is, in my opinion, that they don't have a come back. In other words there is no defense for what Obama or the left has done. And since their whole ideology is based on hate, for the most part, they assume, project, that thought onto others. If you have a person who just can't seem to trust you, don't trust them.
You just accused the liberal of hatred and then replied seriously to the most hateful post of the thread. Practice what you preach. If you find this stuff distasteful you should at least be consistent.
 
Because they're too stupid to debate actual policy and resort to racism and all the other bull they can come up with instead as reasons you don't like it. Left wingers claim they are really smart but in reality you are dealing with some of the most baseline retarded people in the world. They can never win policy debates on facts and therefore must always fall back on racism or any other stupid thing they can come up with other than the actual policy.

Look no further than the replies to this thread for evidence. There's even more evidence in other threads right here in this forum.

You may be correct but what it mostly is, in my opinion, that they don't have a come back. In other words there is no defense for what Obama or the left has done. And since their whole ideology is based on hate, for the most part, they assume, project, that thought onto others. If you have a person who just can't seem to trust you, don't trust them.
You just accused the liberal of hatred and then replied seriously to the most hateful post of the thread. Practice what you preach. If you find this stuff distasteful you should at least be consistent.

Exactly whom am I hating? What I posted is my observation of liberals in general. I have lots of liberal friends and I hate their positions on most anything.
 
Sure, like the Right will ever admit their policy of hateful racism no matter how obvious it is.

October 9, 2008
RUSH: I call Obama a squirrel. What's a squirrel? Nothing but a rat with better PR.

October 15, 2008
RUSH: What sharply personal attacks? All they are is people telling the truth about the little squirrel. What personal attacks? "Well, see, Rush, there you go, that's a personal attack right there." No, no, no, no. Not a personal attack
Mitt Romney murdered his dog carrying it in a cartop carrier in a blizzard.
 
Sure, like the Right will ever admit their policy of hateful racism no matter how obvious it is.

October 9, 2008
RUSH: I call Obama a squirrel. What's a squirrel? Nothing but a rat with better PR.

October 15, 2008
RUSH: What sharply personal attacks? All they are is people telling the truth about the little squirrel. What personal attacks? "Well, see, Rush, there you go, that's a personal attack right there." No, no, no, no. Not a personal attack
Mitt Romney murdered his dog carrying it in a cartop carrier in a blizzard.

His wife has MS and rides horses.
 
Sure, like the Right will ever admit their policy of hateful racism no matter how obvious it is.

October 9, 2008
RUSH: I call Obama a squirrel. What's a squirrel? Nothing but a rat with better PR.

October 15, 2008
RUSH: What sharply personal attacks? All they are is people telling the truth about the little squirrel. What personal attacks? "Well, see, Rush, there you go, that's a personal attack right there." No, no, no, no. Not a personal attack
Mitt Romney murdered his dog carrying it in a cartop carrier in a blizzard.

His wife has MS and rides horses.
Mitt Romney get a $1.5 billion EIC check from the IRS every year.
 
No, i f you want hate listen to the liberal commentators on TV sometime. I can't believe the things they say. Every Republican is owned by the evil Koch Brothers. Every policy is an attempt to starve poor people, kill sick people, or impoverish old people. There is no principled disagreement. There is only name calling and bse motives.
But it is not hate when GOP hate radio says every Democrat is owned by George Soros and every policy is an attempt to make people dependent on government and destroy the American family. That the Right passes off a "principled" disagreement.

And the below the Right passes off as NOT name calling.

Left wingers claim they are really smart but in reality you are dealing with some of the most baseline retarded people in the world.

Liberal = Hates America = Arrogance and conceit that is functionally idiotic.
Liberals have destroyed the black family with welfare. All to get a vote. That is hatred at it's worse. Oh and don't let one of them leave the plantation, by the left. They are house ni@gers.
 
No, i f you want hate listen to the liberal commentators on TV sometime. I can't believe the things they say. Every Republican is owned by the evil Koch Brothers. Every policy is an attempt to starve poor people, kill sick people, or impoverish old people. There is no principled disagreement. There is only name calling and bse motives.
But it is not hate when GOP hate radio says every Democrat is owned by George Soros and every policy is an attempt to make people dependent on government and destroy the American family. That the Right passes off a "principled" disagreement.

And the below the Right passes off as NOT name calling.

Left wingers claim they are really smart but in reality you are dealing with some of the most baseline retarded people in the world.

Liberal = Hates America = Arrogance and conceit that is functionally idiotic.
Liberals have destroyed the black family with welfare. All to get a vote. That is hatred at it's worse. Oh and don't let one of them leave the plantation, by the left. They are house ni@gers.

And what do conservatives have to offer the black families that are currently on welfare?
 
No, i f you want hate listen to the liberal commentators on TV sometime. I can't believe the things they say. Every Republican is owned by the evil Koch Brothers. Every policy is an attempt to starve poor people, kill sick people, or impoverish old people. There is no principled disagreement. There is only name calling and bse motives.
But it is not hate when GOP hate radio says every Democrat is owned by George Soros and every policy is an attempt to make people dependent on government and destroy the American family. That the Right passes off a "principled" disagreement.

And the below the Right passes off as NOT name calling.

Left wingers claim they are really smart but in reality you are dealing with some of the most baseline retarded people in the world.

Liberal = Hates America = Arrogance and conceit that is functionally idiotic.
Liberals have destroyed the black family with welfare. All to get a vote. That is hatred at it's worse. Oh and don't let one of them leave the plantation, by the left. They are house ni@gers.

And what do conservatives have to offer the black families that are currently on welfare?
An education you stupid twit. School vouchers that you liberals hate.
 
We do know that almost all black voters voted for Obama. If welfare recipients were no different, then Obama could have counted on a little more than a third of welfare recipients' votes. That's a maximum of about 1 percent of his base.

Adding the figures in the last two paragraphs together, I got my final estimate:welfare recipients probably made up no more than 1.5% of Obama's overall voter base in 2008.



Yes sir that welfare sure did get Obama elected. When the welfare voters represented 1.5% of those voting for Obama.

Ever notice how, according to right wing crazies, that welfare recipients accounted for 100% of the Republicans loss. LMAO.
 
No, i f you want hate listen to the liberal commentators on TV sometime. I can't believe the things they say. Every Republican is owned by the evil Koch Brothers. Every policy is an attempt to starve poor people, kill sick people, or impoverish old people. There is no principled disagreement. There is only name calling and bse motives.
But it is not hate when GOP hate radio says every Democrat is owned by George Soros and every policy is an attempt to make people dependent on government and destroy the American family. That the Right passes off a "principled" disagreement.

And the below the Right passes off as NOT name calling.

Left wingers claim they are really smart but in reality you are dealing with some of the most baseline retarded people in the world.

Liberal = Hates America = Arrogance and conceit that is functionally idiotic.
Liberals have destroyed the black family with welfare. All to get a vote. That is hatred at it's worse. Oh and don't let one of them leave the plantation, by the left. They are house ni@gers.
You are a house ass hole...
 
We do know that almost all black voters voted for Obama. If welfare recipients were no different, then Obama could have counted on a little more than a third of welfare recipients' votes. That's a maximum of about 1 percent of his base.

Adding the figures in the last two paragraphs together, I got my final estimate:welfare recipients probably made up no more than 1.5% of Obama's overall voter base in 2008.



Yes sir that welfare sure did get Obama elected. When the welfare voters represented 1.5% of those voting for Obama.

Ever notice how, according to right wing crazies, that welfare recipients accounted for 100% of the Republicans loss. LMAO.
Being black got Obama elected. Are you really that stupid?
 
No, i f you want hate listen to the liberal commentators on TV sometime. I can't believe the things they say. Every Republican is owned by the evil Koch Brothers. Every policy is an attempt to starve poor people, kill sick people, or impoverish old people. There is no principled disagreement. There is only name calling and bse motives.
But it is not hate when GOP hate radio says every Democrat is owned by George Soros and every policy is an attempt to make people dependent on government and destroy the American family. That the Right passes off a "principled" disagreement.

And the below the Right passes off as NOT name calling.

Left wingers claim they are really smart but in reality you are dealing with some of the most baseline retarded people in the world.

Liberal = Hates America = Arrogance and conceit that is functionally idiotic.
Liberals have destroyed the black family with welfare. All to get a vote. That is hatred at it's worse. Oh and don't let one of them leave the plantation, by the left. They are house ni@gers.

And what do conservatives have to offer the black families that are currently on welfare?
An education you stupid twit. School vouchers that you liberals hate.

So you want to give them MORE taxpayer money?

lol
 

Forum List

Back
Top