Why are Republicans silent?

[MACAULAY]

Silence of the Republican Lambs

"This is a perfect chance for Republicans to speak out, to push back. Public opinion is on their side. Democrats keep losing elections at the national, state, and local levels. Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC. A George Soros funded study found that Trump voters feel, “disconnected and disrupted by the conflation of economic and cultural change.” And that they “feel muzzled” by politically-correct dogma. These are winning issues for Trump. And for Republicans, if they choose to speak out about it."

Why are Republicans silent? Because they are Pussies who are scared to death of the New York Media. Surely, in the next election, we can find a few people with guts, like Jim Jordan, the Representative from Ohio, or Trey Gowdy, from South Carolina, to replace empty suits we have in the Senate now--like Wicker from Mississippi, Flake from Arizona, Heller from Nevada....and too many others.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Whining about the media solves nothing.

 

[forkup]

Well this is twice now in as many days that I'll comment on something written by " The American Thinker', not much evidence of thought though.

Public opinion is on their side.

Gallup Daily: Trump Job Approval Facts seem too disagree. This is what I find so interesting. This guy writes like he speaks for everybody, when all he does is speaking for the Trump base. Projecting your own values onto others is not facts, it's wishful thinking. It's why the Republicans are very cautious about getting to close to Trump. Doing so risks alienating beyond repair those people that aren't hyper partisan.

Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC.

Which brings me to this statement. He gives 4 of 5 of the most polarizing brands and not 5 of the most polarizing brands because that fifth, most extreme and catalyst of this divisiveness is Trump. You guys are celebrating the divisive nature of someone who's supposed to represent all Americans. I've seen countless OP's on this board celebrating the fact, that the other political ideology is getting screwed. The question of policy has changed from what's good for the country too, what pisses the other side off. You might think that a good evolution, but keep in mind that unrelenting hating and demonizing of political adversaries has invariably led to violence throughout history.

 

[MACAULAY]

Well this is twice now in as many days that I'll comment on something written by " The American Thinker', not much evidence of thought though.

Public opinion is on their side.

Gallup Daily: Trump Job Approval Facts seem too disagree. This is what I find so interesting. This guy writes like he speaks for everybody, when all he does is speaking for the Trump base. Projecting your own values onto others is not facts, it's wishful thinking. It's why the Republicans are very cautious about getting to close to Trump. Doing so risks alienating beyond repair those people that aren't hyper partisan.

Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC.

Which brings me to this statement. He gives 4 of 5 of the most polarizing brands and not 5 of the most polarizing brands because that fifth, most extreme and catalyst of this divisiveness is Trump. You guys are celebrating the divisive nature of someone who's supposed to represent all Americans. I've seen countless OP's on this board celebrating the fact, that the other political ideology is getting screwed. The question of policy has changed from what's good for the country too, what pisses the other side off. You might think that a good evolution, but keep in mind that unrelenting hating and demonizing of political adversaries has invariably led to violence throughout history.

________________

Sir:

It seems to me that "what's good for the country" is what heretofore made it the greatest country in the Human Experience. That it is not perfect, is no reason to go down the road of the collapsed Soviet Union or collapsing Venezuela.

And, with the election of the Marxist Barack Obama, the Democratic Party essentially became Bolsheviks, and undertook to fundamentally change America---you will remember that sound bite from the Community Organizer himself. And so, "what pisses the other side off"----the other side being a pack of poorly educated socialists who are rapidly becoming addicted to Free Stuff financed by a 20 trillion dollar debt---is a good thing, even if it results in uncivilized discussion, a cultural Civil War, or if the Socialists want it, an actual Civil War.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The Rs are spineless wonders.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Silence of the Republican Lambs

"This is a perfect chance for Republicans to speak out, to push back. Public opinion is on their side. Democrats keep losing elections at the national, state, and local levels. Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC. A George Soros funded study found that Trump voters feel, “disconnected and disrupted by the conflation of economic and cultural change.” And that they “feel muzzled” by politically-correct dogma. These are winning issues for Trump. And for Republicans, if they choose to speak out about it."

Why are Republicans silent? Because they are Pussies who are scared to death of the New York Media. Surely, in the next election, we can find a few people with guts, like Jim Jordan, the Representative from Ohio, or Trey Gowdy, from South Carolina, to replace empty suits we have in the Senate now--like Wicker from Mississippi, Flake from Arizona, Heller from Nevada....and too many others.

The Republican Party has long been known as the party of nutless pussies...choirboys....while Democrats are basically educated, pushy ghetto thugs with loud mouths in suits.

 

[forkup]

Well this is twice now in as many days that I'll comment on something written by " The American Thinker', not much evidence of thought though.

Public opinion is on their side.

Gallup Daily: Trump Job Approval Facts seem too disagree. This is what I find so interesting. This guy writes like he speaks for everybody, when all he does is speaking for the Trump base. Projecting your own values onto others is not facts, it's wishful thinking. It's why the Republicans are very cautious about getting to close to Trump. Doing so risks alienating beyond repair those people that aren't hyper partisan.

Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC.

Which brings me to this statement. He gives 4 of 5 of the most polarizing brands and not 5 of the most polarizing brands because that fifth, most extreme and catalyst of this divisiveness is Trump. You guys are celebrating the divisive nature of someone who's supposed to represent all Americans. I've seen countless OP's on this board celebrating the fact, that the other political ideology is getting screwed. The question of policy has changed from what's good for the country too, what pisses the other side off. You might think that a good evolution, but keep in mind that unrelenting hating and demonizing of political adversaries has invariably led to violence throughout history.

________________

Sir:

It seems to me that "what's good for the country" is what heretofore made it the greatest country in the Human Experience. That it is not perfect, is no reason to go down the road of the collapsed Soviet Union or collapsing Venezuela.

And, with the election of the Marxist Barack Obama, the Democratic Party essentially became Bolsheviks, and undertook to fundamentally change America---you will remember that sound bite from the Community Organizer himself. And so, "what pisses the other side off"----the other side being a pack of poorly educated socialists who are rapidly becoming addicted to Free Stuff financed by a 20 trillion dollar debt---is a good thing, even if it results in uncivilized discussion, a cultural Civil War, or if the Socialists want it, an actual Civil War.

Thanks for agreeing to literally everything I said. Btw what is your bases of judging that the US is the greatest country in the Human experience? Obama was Marxist? Democrats are socialists? And Civil War is a good thing? The thing with big sweeping statements is that you have to able to back it up. Can you?

 

[PredFan]

Well this is twice now in as many days that I'll comment on something written by " The American Thinker', not much evidence of thought though.

Public opinion is on their side.

Gallup Daily: Trump Job Approval Facts seem too disagree. This is what I find so interesting. This guy writes like he speaks for everybody, when all he does is speaking for the Trump base. Projecting your own values onto others is not facts, it's wishful thinking. It's why the Republicans are very cautious about getting to close to Trump. Doing so risks alienating beyond repair those people that aren't hyper partisan.

Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC.

Which brings me to this statement. He gives 4 of 5 of the most polarizing brands and not 5 of the most polarizing brands because that fifth, most extreme and catalyst of this divisiveness is Trump. You guys are celebrating the divisive nature of someone who's supposed to represent all Americans. I've seen countless OP's on this board celebrating the fact, that the other political ideology is getting screwed. The question of policy has changed from what's good for the country too, what pisses the other side off. You might think that a good evolution, but keep in mind that unrelenting hating and demonizing of political adversaries has invariably led to violence throughout history.

You could have written that between 2009 and 2016 with a simple reversal of the names and parties. Where were you then and how come we haven't seen your result?

 

[BrokeLoser]

Silence of the Republican Lambs

"This is a perfect chance for Republicans to speak out, to push back. Public opinion is on their side. Democrats keep losing elections at the national, state, and local levels. Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC. A George Soros funded study found that Trump voters feel, “disconnected and disrupted by the conflation of economic and cultural change.” And that they “feel muzzled” by politically-correct dogma. These are winning issues for Trump. And for Republicans, if they choose to speak out about it."

Why are Republicans silent? Because they are Pussies who are scared to death of the New York Media. Surely, in the next election, we can find a few people with guts, like Jim Jordan, the Representative from Ohio, or Trey Gowdy, from South Carolina, to replace empty suits we have in the Senate now--like Wicker from Mississippi, Flake from Arizona, Heller from Nevada....and too many others.

You are spot on...the establishment GOP cowards better allow their tiny little nuts to drop soon or they will miss an opportunity they may never get again. Toeing the line and bipartisanship no longer works with corrupt Democrats.

 

[forkup]

Well this is twice now in as many days that I'll comment on something written by " The American Thinker', not much evidence of thought though.

Public opinion is on their side.

Gallup Daily: Trump Job Approval Facts seem too disagree. This is what I find so interesting. This guy writes like he speaks for everybody, when all he does is speaking for the Trump base. Projecting your own values onto others is not facts, it's wishful thinking. It's why the Republicans are very cautious about getting to close to Trump. Doing so risks alienating beyond repair those people that aren't hyper partisan.

Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC.

Which brings me to this statement. He gives 4 of 5 of the most polarizing brands and not 5 of the most polarizing brands because that fifth, most extreme and catalyst of this divisiveness is Trump. You guys are celebrating the divisive nature of someone who's supposed to represent all Americans. I've seen countless OP's on this board celebrating the fact, that the other political ideology is getting screwed. The question of policy has changed from what's good for the country too, what pisses the other side off. You might think that a good evolution, but keep in mind that unrelenting hating and demonizing of political adversaries has invariably led to violence throughout history.

You could have written that between 2009 and 2016 with a simple reversal of the names and parties. Where were you then and how come we haven't seen your result?

-How exactly was Obama divisive? A favorite talking point of republicans that he was soft. ACA for instance was started by the Heritage foundation How the Heritage Foundation, a Conservative Think Tank, Promoted the Individual Mandate

 

[PredFan]

Well this is twice now in as many days that I'll comment on something written by " The American Thinker', not much evidence of thought though.

Public opinion is on their side.

Gallup Daily: Trump Job Approval Facts seem too disagree. This is what I find so interesting. This guy writes like he speaks for everybody, when all he does is speaking for the Trump base. Projecting your own values onto others is not facts, it's wishful thinking. It's why the Republicans are very cautious about getting to close to Trump. Doing so risks alienating beyond repair those people that aren't hyper partisan.

Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC.

Which brings me to this statement. He gives 4 of 5 of the most polarizing brands and not 5 of the most polarizing brands because that fifth, most extreme and catalyst of this divisiveness is Trump. You guys are celebrating the divisive nature of someone who's supposed to represent all Americans. I've seen countless OP's on this board celebrating the fact, that the other political ideology is getting screwed. The question of policy has changed from what's good for the country too, what pisses the other side off. You might think that a good evolution, but keep in mind that unrelenting hating and demonizing of political adversaries has invariably led to violence throughout history.

You could have written that between 2009 and 2016 with a simple reversal of the names and parties. Where were you then and how come we haven't seen your result?

-How exactly was Obama divisive? A favorite talking point of republicans that he was soft. ACA for instance was started by the Heritage foundation How the Heritage Foundation, a Conservative Think Tank, Promoted the Individual Mandate

How was 0bama divisive? Are you kidding??

 

[The Original Tree]

Silence of the Republican Lambs

"This is a perfect chance for Republicans to speak out, to push back. Public opinion is on their side. Democrats keep losing elections at the national, state, and local levels. Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC. A George Soros funded study found that Trump voters feel, “disconnected and disrupted by the conflation of economic and cultural change.” And that they “feel muzzled” by politically-correct dogma. These are winning issues for Trump. And for Republicans, if they choose to speak out about it."

Why are Republicans silent? Because they are Pussies who are scared to death of the New York Media. Surely, in the next election, we can find a few people with guts, like Jim Jordan, the Representative from Ohio, or Trey Gowdy, from South Carolina, to replace empty suits we have in the Senate now--like Wicker from Mississippi, Flake from Arizona, Heller from Nevada....and too many others.

The OP is a pussy who's mother never let him date any "whores" and who lives in his mother's basement.
But besides that, the GOP establishment are just fine with taking a paycheck and doing nothing, and President Trump speaks out on Social Media forcing the Lame Stream Hollywood Pervert Media Alliance to cover his statements.

The message is getting out.....or haven't you heard the term FAKE NEWS before?

Pound Salt TROLL.

 

[forkup]

Well this is twice now in as many days that I'll comment on something written by " The American Thinker', not much evidence of thought though.

Public opinion is on their side.

Gallup Daily: Trump Job Approval Facts seem too disagree. This is what I find so interesting. This guy writes like he speaks for everybody, when all he does is speaking for the Trump base. Projecting your own values onto others is not facts, it's wishful thinking. It's why the Republicans are very cautious about getting to close to Trump. Doing so risks alienating beyond repair those people that aren't hyper partisan.

Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC.

Which brings me to this statement. He gives 4 of 5 of the most polarizing brands and not 5 of the most polarizing brands because that fifth, most extreme and catalyst of this divisiveness is Trump. You guys are celebrating the divisive nature of someone who's supposed to represent all Americans. I've seen countless OP's on this board celebrating the fact, that the other political ideology is getting screwed. The question of policy has changed from what's good for the country too, what pisses the other side off. You might think that a good evolution, but keep in mind that unrelenting hating and demonizing of political adversaries has invariably led to violence throughout history.

You could have written that between 2009 and 2016 with a simple reversal of the names and parties. Where were you then and how come we haven't seen your result?

-How exactly was Obama divisive? A favorite talking point of republicans that he was soft. ACA for instance was started by the Heritage foundation How the Heritage Foundation, a Conservative Think Tank, Promoted the Individual Mandate

How was 0bama divisive? Are you kidding??

Not at all, give me policy issues that you found divisive. I've asked this before. If you have a problem with what he did and how he did it I want specifics.

 

[PredFan]

Well this is twice now in as many days that I'll comment on something written by " The American Thinker', not much evidence of thought though.

Public opinion is on their side.

Gallup Daily: Trump Job Approval Facts seem too disagree. This is what I find so interesting. This guy writes like he speaks for everybody, when all he does is speaking for the Trump base. Projecting your own values onto others is not facts, it's wishful thinking. It's why the Republicans are very cautious about getting to close to Trump. Doing so risks alienating beyond repair those people that aren't hyper partisan.

Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC.

Which brings me to this statement. He gives 4 of 5 of the most polarizing brands and not 5 of the most polarizing brands because that fifth, most extreme and catalyst of this divisiveness is Trump. You guys are celebrating the divisive nature of someone who's supposed to represent all Americans. I've seen countless OP's on this board celebrating the fact, that the other political ideology is getting screwed. The question of policy has changed from what's good for the country too, what pisses the other side off. You might think that a good evolution, but keep in mind that unrelenting hating and demonizing of political adversaries has invariably led to violence throughout history.

You could have written that between 2009 and 2016 with a simple reversal of the names and parties. Where were you then and how come we haven't seen your result?

-How exactly was Obama divisive? A favorite talking point of republicans that he was soft. ACA for instance was started by the Heritage foundation How the Heritage Foundation, a Conservative Think Tank, Promoted the Individual Mandate

How was 0bama divisive? Are you kidding??

Not at all, give me policy issues that you found divisive. I've asked this before. If you have a problem with what he did and how he did it I want specifics.

You can't be serious and I'm too lazy today to bother. You don't really matter so convincing you is likely a waste of my time. He was more divisive than any POTUS in modern history. I don't give a shit if you disagree.

 

[forkup]

Well this is twice now in as many days that I'll comment on something written by " The American Thinker', not much evidence of thought though.
Gallup Daily: Trump Job Approval Facts seem too disagree. This is what I find so interesting. This guy writes like he speaks for everybody, when all he does is speaking for the Trump base. Projecting your own values onto others is not facts, it's wishful thinking. It's why the Republicans are very cautious about getting to close to Trump. Doing so risks alienating beyond repair those people that aren't hyper partisan.

Which brings me to this statement. He gives 4 of 5 of the most polarizing brands and not 5 of the most polarizing brands because that fifth, most extreme and catalyst of this divisiveness is Trump. You guys are celebrating the divisive nature of someone who's supposed to represent all Americans. I've seen countless OP's on this board celebrating the fact, that the other political ideology is getting screwed. The question of policy has changed from what's good for the country too, what pisses the other side off. You might think that a good evolution, but keep in mind that unrelenting hating and demonizing of political adversaries has invariably led to violence throughout history.

You could have written that between 2009 and 2016 with a simple reversal of the names and parties. Where were you then and how come we haven't seen your result?

-How exactly was Obama divisive? A favorite talking point of republicans that he was soft. ACA for instance was started by the Heritage foundation How the Heritage Foundation, a Conservative Think Tank, Promoted the Individual Mandate

How was 0bama divisive? Are you kidding??

Not at all, give me policy issues that you found divisive. I've asked this before. If you have a problem with what he did and how he did it I want specifics.

You can't be serious and I'm too lazy today to bother. You don't really matter so convincing you is likely a waste of my time. He was more divisive than any POTUS in modern history. I don't give a shit if you disagree.

Lol, sure Predfan keep on telling yourself that. It always comes down to the same thing. When asked to back up claims I always hear excuses, deflections or simply silence. You're right though that I don't matter, neither do facts to people who only have rhetoric.

 

[Johann]

Silence of the Republican Lambs

"This is a perfect chance for Republicans to speak out, to push back. Public opinion is on their side. Democrats keep losing elections at the national, state, and local levels. Four of the five most polarizing brands in the U.S. are CNN, NY Times, NBC News and MSNBC. A George Soros funded study found that Trump voters feel, “disconnected and disrupted by the conflation of economic and cultural change.” And that they “feel muzzled” by politically-correct dogma. These are winning issues for Trump. And for Republicans, if they choose to speak out about it."

Why are Republicans silent? Because they are Pussies who are scared to death of the New York Media. Surely, in the next election, we can find a few people with guts, like Jim Jordan, the Representative from Ohio, or Trey Gowdy, from South Carolina, to replace empty suits we have in the Senate now--like Wicker from Mississippi, Flake from Arizona, Heller from Nevada....and too many others.

speak for yourself, i'm not afraid of these New York jews.

 

[PredFan]

You could have written that between 2009 and 2016 with a simple reversal of the names and parties. Where were you then and how come we haven't seen your result?

-How exactly was Obama divisive? A favorite talking point of republicans that he was soft. ACA for instance was started by the Heritage foundation How the Heritage Foundation, a Conservative Think Tank, Promoted the Individual Mandate

How was 0bama divisive? Are you kidding??

Not at all, give me policy issues that you found divisive. I've asked this before. If you have a problem with what he did and how he did it I want specifics.

You can't be serious and I'm too lazy today to bother. You don't really matter so convincing you is likely a waste of my time. He was more divisive than any POTUS in modern history. I don't give a shit if you disagree.

Lol, sure Predfan keep on telling yourself that. It always comes down to the same thing. When asked to back up claims I always hear excuses, deflections or simply silence. You're right though that I don't matter, neither do facts to people who only have rhetoric.

It's already been done here dozens of times. Yet still, know-nothings like you crawl out from under a rock and insist on the obvious being proven again. I'll end my part in this inane discussion by re stating that I don't give a shit if you agree. You don't matter. Dismissed.