Why Are Liberals Always Trying to Silence Those With Opposing Viewpoints?

[drsmith1072]

You really want to aggravate a liberal? Ask them a question.

They go in retreat faster than a Democrat steals your family's money and jobs.

LOL You know what's funny is that I feel the same about asking a righty to substantiate their claims. Almost every single time I have asked a righty on this board to provide proof to substantiate their claims the primary response I get is that I am attacked personally as they run away from the debate. LOL

that's because you're an asshole.

it's nothing personal

LOL and this is a perfect example of the typical response from one of the several that I have asked for proof and in response it attacked me and then ran away. Thanks for the help. LOL

Stop trying so desperately to transfer your ineptitude in proving your assertions onto me.
It has NOTHING to do with me and EVERYTHING to do with the fact that you can't prove your claims. Then in response to being asked to prove claims that you know you can't you go to the old faithfull and dishonest fallback of attacking the messenger.

The sad thing is that if you started your claims based on the truth then you wouldn't have so many problems proving them when someone asks you to substantiate your claims. LOL

 

[Dr Gregg]

And since you have half a brain, you can verify that.

Yup, half a brain that got a PhD in genetics. Must be some brillant half a brain to be able to do that. You think you calling me stupid bothers me?

It obviously does brainiac.

BTW, I'm King of Sweden and bang Jessica Alba every night.

yeah, I go around making it up. Sorry, not everyone is a douchebag like many can be on this forum. Believe what you want, I could give a shit, i'm secure in my intelligence

 

[drsmith1072]

LOL You know what's funny is that I feel the same about asking a righty to substantiate their claims. Almost every single time I have asked a righty on this board to provide proof to substantiate their claims the primary response I get is that I am attacked personally as they run away from the debate. LOL

that's because you're an asshole.

it's nothing personal

Hmm, 90% of your posts are calling people stupid, hack, they suck, they are an asshole... .seems to anyone with half a brain that you are the asshole, you are the idiot, you are the hack.

Yeah he is. LOL
He is also one of the many on this board who stalk me around the board and attack me perosnally as they avoid the debate. The funny thing is that the ones whe stalk me tend to be the ones that I have called out for being dishonest after they have failed to substantiate their claims or I have proven them wrong as they continue to make the same unsubstantiated or disproven claims over and over again.

 

[Xenophon]

Yup, half a brain that got a PhD in genetics. Must be some brillant half a brain to be able to do that. You think you calling me stupid bothers me?

It obviously does brainiac.

BTW, I'm King of Sweden and bang Jessica Alba every night.

yeah, I go around making it up. Sorry, not everyone is a douchebag like many can be on this forum. Believe what you want, I could give a shit, i'm secure in my intelligence

Hey, i found your picture on the net!

 

[Father Time]

Where's the rationale in supporting policies that believe in killing the innocent yet supporting the rights of terrorists and murderers. They want to ban the death penalty...well then ban abortion because that is a death sentence.

I just don't understand this type of thinking.

They want to murder the unborn because it's a personal matter but they want to protect folks that are responsible for the death of thousands of Americans and in many cases other Muslims.

It just seems like they have a screw loose.

LOL Way to insert YOUR opinion over the opinions of the pro-choice movement as a whole. LOL Maybe the problem you have with understanding is based on the fact that you PRETEND to know what everyone who is pro-choice is thinking. LOL

BTW, why do you legally believe that terrorists shouldn't be afforded their rights as human beings?

I just got a pm regarding this ridiculous post, so i'm taking you off ignore for 5 seconds.

Why don't you take your sorry lil' faggot ass to Yemen, put on a t-shirt that says "HEY EVERYBODY, I'M AN AMERICAN AND PROUD OF IT!, and walk down the fucking street!

Lets just see the rights as a human being the terrorists give YOUR SORRY ASS!

Meanwhile, i'll be watching them saw your head right off that lil' pencil neck of yours, live on the web, while eating , sucking a , and !

Christ, you're a clueless fucking moron!

Now, back to ignore mode!.

So here's what we learned.

Jester is a sadistic fuck who would enjoy seeing someone he disagrees with brutally murdered.

He believes two wrongs make a right (perhaps he was sick that day in 2nd grade).

 

[Father Time]

They can have an 'opposing viewpoint' by paying for and running their own ad, not trying to keep someone else's voice from being heard. Why is this a difficult concept to grasp?

why don't you tell that to FoF and other organizations like that that often threaten advertisers when they dont' like certain programming, complain about sexuality and violence on TV, try to ban video games and protest mustical artist if they have vulgar language, or how about the entire stupid nipple incident during the superbowl. that's where hypocrisy is, and the articles posted above these comments show that. It works both ways.

Why is that so hard to understand?

I do agree though, don't like something, don't watch it. plain and simple, both conservative or liberal. But how much you want to bet if CBS aired the pro gay ad, FoF would go nuts? Think CBS is a pussy for not doing so. They should of aired them back to back, that would of been nice.

LOL yeah the hypocrisy of not showing one ad because they deem it controversial and yet choosing to air another ad that is controversial kind of defeats their argument.

Then you have the hypocrisy of the right as they pretend to be outraged when a left leaning group attempts a boycott claiming it's anti free speech when the right boycotts things all the time and the righties don't seem to feel the same when their own do it. I wonder why?

BTW is CBS going to provide the timeslot that the ad is going to air in? It would be nice to know so I can change the channel and avoid it. LOL

NO ONE gets to be outraged when people exercise their rights to boycott things. It's our damn right to choose the things we consume, it's not an assault to free speech or any sort of liberty.

 

[drsmith1072]

LOL You know what's funny is that I feel the same about asking a righty to substantiate their claims. Almost every single time I have asked a righty on this board to provide proof to substantiate their claims the primary response I get is that I am attacked personally as they run away from the debate. LOL

that's because you're an asshole.

it's nothing personal

See Dr. Smith its not just me who thinks that about you and doesn't take it personal.

Plus del is way smarter than me so now I know i'm right (I'll take some rep now del )

LOL Funny but you have been attacking me ever since I called you out for lying about me when you claimed I edited your post and took things out of context all so you could avoid the debate that you were LOSING. When the fact is that I NEVER did anything that you accused me of doing. I even asked you to show me when and where I did and in response you called me a name and then ran away. LOL

You are merely one of the stalkers who follow me around and attack me at every opportunity while you offer nothing about any of the comments that I made concerning the topic. How typical. LOL

 

[Foxfyre]

I thought liberals preached tolerance and acceptance of all points of view?

Newsmax - Liberals Huddle Over Tim Tebow Ad

Try linking to a credible news source first....

Like this? Editorial - Super Bowl Censorship - NYTimes.com

I mean it was referred to in the linked post.

Wow! Thanks for that link Annie. Looks like the NYTimes is trying to save its rearend by actually taking a position that isn't radically partisan and by presenting a well reasoned and intelligent perspective. If it keeps that up, it may actually resume its standing as a respectable News Source.

I have probably held the Times in almost as much contempt as some hold News Max. But I will give the Times props for when they get it right. I'm pretty sure those criticizing News Max won't.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Because today's so-called "Liberals" are actually Socialists. Look at how most "Liberals" in this country have become such loyal Hugo Chavez Butt-Sniffers. No real Liberal would ever support a National Socialist who is closing down all media outlets who dare to disagree with him. People are just confused as to what a Liberal is. Today's Democrats are not real Liberals,they are instead Socialists. No Socialist/Communist on this Planet believes in Free Speech. There is a big difference between Liberalism and Socialism. People just need to start recognizing this big difference. The current Democratic Party is a long long way from being "The Party of JFK."

 

[Article 15]

Because today's so-called "Liberals" are actually Socialists. Look at how most "Liberals" in this country have become such loyal Hugo Chavez Butt-Sniffers. No real Liberal would ever support a National Socialist who is closing down all media outlets who dare to disagree with him. People are just confused as to what a Liberal is. Today's Democrats are not real Liberals,they are instead Socialists. No Socialists/Communists on this Planet believe in Free Speech. There is a big difference between Liberals and Socialists. People just need to start recognizing this big difference. The current Democratic Party is a long long way from being "The Party of JFK."

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Just talk to your average so-called Liberal and you will see that most really have become loyal Hugo Chavez Butt-Sniffers. Real Liberals truly believe in Free Speech. No real Liberal could ever support a National Socialist Dictator like Hugo Chavez. I'm sure Sean Penn still thinks of himself as a "Liberal" but in reality he has become a Socialist/Communist. No Socialists/Communists have ever supported Free Speech. Just think of today's Democrats as being Socialists/Communists rather than Liberals and you wont be confused anymore. This current Democratic Party is definitely not "The Party of JFK" anymore. It's sad but true.

 

[Annie]

Try linking to a credible news source first....

Like this? Editorial - Super Bowl Censorship - NYTimes.com

I mean it was referred to in the linked post.

Wow! Thanks for that link Annie. Looks like the NYTimes is trying to save its rearend by actually taking a position that isn't radically partisan and by presenting a well reasoned and intelligent perspective. If it keeps that up, it may actually resume its standing as a respectable News Source.

I have probably held the Times in almost as much contempt as some hold News Max. But I will give the Times props for when they get it right. I'm pretty sure those criticizing News Max won't.

Indeed. The NYT chose to print the unsigned editorial, hope their readers can read.

 

[Father Time]

Because today's so-called "Liberals" are actually Socialists. Look at how most "Liberals" in this country have become such loyal Hugo Chavez Butt-Sniffers. No real Liberal would ever support a National Socialist who is closing down all media outlets who dare to disagree with him. People are just confused as to what a Liberal is. Today's Democrats are not real Liberals,they are instead Socialists. No Socialist/Communist on this Planet believes in Free Speech. There is a big difference between Liberalism and Socialism. People just need to start recognizing this big difference. The current Democratic Party is a long long way from being "The Party of JFK."

Do you even know what's going on?

The liberals are complaining to CBS to not show the ad, that is not censorship and that is not curtailing free speech.

 

[Gadawg73]

A true conservative would never want to give the power to government in family health decisions. Allowing government the ability to pick and choose who gets prosecuted for having an abortion is tyranny.
Anyone that believes the wealthy will get prosecuted for an abortion is naive and gullible.
I M old enough to know what real world is. I M adamantly opposed to abortion.
But I have no right to force the power of government at the end of a gun barrel on another's family.
Abortion is a family matter and decision. Government has no business in those matters.
Amazing how the neo con wants government involved on some issues and then out of the other side of their mouth they claim they are "conservative".
Goldwater and Reagan had it right. They avoided those and the gay boogey man issues.

 

[Article 15]

Just talk to your average so-called Liberal and you will see that most really have become loyal Hugo Chavez Butt-Sniffers. Real Liberals truly believe in Free Speech. No real Liberal could ever support a National Socialist Dictator like Hugo Chavez. I'm sure Sean Penn still thinks of himself as a "Liberal" but in reality he has become a Socialist/Communist. No Socialists/Communists have ever supported Free Speech. Just think of today's Democrats as being Socialists/Communists rather than Liberals and you wont be confused anymore. This current Democratic Party is definitely not "The Party of JFK" anymore. It's sad but true.

It's just as dumb the second time around ...

Anyone who says that the average liberal is loyal to Hugo Chavez has zero credibility.

 

[del]

LOL You know what's funny is that I feel the same about asking a righty to substantiate their claims. Almost every single time I have asked a righty on this board to provide proof to substantiate their claims the primary response I get is that I am attacked personally as they run away from the debate. LOL

that's because you're an asshole.

it's nothing personal

LOL and this is a perfect example of the typical response from one of the several that I have asked for proof and in response it attacked me and then ran away. Thanks for the help. LOL

Stop trying so desperately to transfer your ineptitude in proving your assertions onto me.
It has NOTHING to do with me and EVERYTHING to do with the fact that you can't prove your claims. Then in response to being asked to prove claims that you know you can't you go to the old faithfull and dishonest fallback of attacking the messenger.

The sad thing is that if you started your claims based on the truth then you wouldn't have so many problems proving them when someone asks you to substantiate your claims. LOL

i don't have to prove an opinion, asshole.

 

[Xenophon]

that's because you're an asshole.

it's nothing personal

LOL and this is a perfect example of the typical response from one of the several that I have asked for proof and in response it attacked me and then ran away. Thanks for the help. LOL

Stop trying so desperately to transfer your ineptitude in proving your assertions onto me.
It has NOTHING to do with me and EVERYTHING to do with the fact that you can't prove your claims. Then in response to being asked to prove claims that you know you can't you go to the old faithfull and dishonest fallback of attacking the messenger.

The sad thing is that if you started your claims based on the truth then you wouldn't have so many problems proving them when someone asks you to substantiate your claims. LOL

i don't have to prove an opinion, asshole.

You bubble headed booby!

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Sean Penn probably still thinks of himself as a "Liberal" but he of course is not. He is a loyal Hugo Chavez Butt-Sniffer which makes him a Socialist/Communist. There is a big difference. I have seen many other so-called "Liberals" expressing their worship of Chavez as well. Chavez is not a Liberal. He is a National Socialist which actually makes him a Nazi. He certainly doesn't believe in Free Speech. What Socialist/Communist does? Be very wary of people calling themselves "Liberals" or "Progressives." Most often they are neither. They are more likely to be Socialists instead.

 

[Wicked Jester]

LOL Way to insert YOUR opinion over the opinions of the pro-choice movement as a whole. LOL Maybe the problem you have with understanding is based on the fact that you PRETEND to know what everyone who is pro-choice is thinking. LOL

BTW, why do you legally believe that terrorists shouldn't be afforded their rights as human beings?

I just got a pm regarding this ridiculous post, so i'm taking you off ignore for 5 seconds.

Why don't you take your sorry lil' faggot ass to Yemen, put on a t-shirt that says "HEY EVERYBODY, I'M AN AMERICAN AND PROUD OF IT!, and walk down the fucking street!

Lets just see the rights as a human being the terrorists give YOUR SORRY ASS!

Meanwhile, i'll be watching them saw your head right off that lil' pencil neck of yours, live on the web, while eating , sucking a , and !

Christ, you're a clueless fucking moron!

Now, back to ignore mode!.

LOL poor chefjester running away AGAIN. You know I looked at his post for anything of substance and found no substantive answers to the question that i asked. All jester has to offer is his typical personal attacks.

BTW aren't we as a nation supposed to be better than that bad guys?? Based on jester's comments we should be and act the same. How sad is that?
I guess, unlike some, I still believe that America is a great country whose foundation is based on the rights guaranteed by our constitution and we should hold ourselves to a higher standard than the terrorists hold themselves.

BTW I think it's funny that you righties keep track of my postings. LOL Thanks for admitting that you are stalking me.

You're such a clueless fucking moron.
The terrorist are ENEMY COMBATENTS at war with the united states. A war that was declared by Bin laden ,their leader, and it's a god damn fact, back in october of 1998.

The only rights the terrorists are entitled to are those set forth in a military tribunal.

Holder is playing politics with this shit, and it WILL end up with more attacks on our soil.

You're just a bootlicking Obamabot who will march lockstep with that moron no matter what!

 

[Article 15]

Sean Penn probably still thinks of himself as a "Liberal" but he of course is not. He is a loyal Hugo Chavez Butt-Sniffer which makes him a Socialist/Communist. There is a big difference. I have seen many other so-called "Liberals" expressing their worship of Chavez as well. Chavez is not a Liberal. He is a National Socialist which actually makes him a Nazi. He certainly doesn't believe in Free Speech. What Socialist/Communist does? Be very wary of people calling themselves "Liberals" or "Progressives." Most often they are neither. They are more likely to be Socialists instead.

The record is skipping again.

Anybody got a penny?