Penelope
Diamond Member
- Jul 15, 2014
- 60,260
- 15,767
- 2,210
- Thread starter
- #81
Those are less than 1%, even less than 1% of the population. Most are they done to save the MOM.Why is it different? You're ignoring what I said about killing an 8-month-old developing baby that could survive outside the womb. Basically, your viability argument is moot because of the number of people totally dependent on machines and other humans for survival.
Fossil fuel usage will dwindle over time due to intensive research and development of alternative sources of energy production. Nuclear certainly stands as the strongest candidate for the near future. And don't worry, there will be plenty of third world people to face the overpopulation axe for you while you continue preaching about there being too many people.
Fossil fuel that what should be, less is more than fine with me, fires galore, hurricanes too.