who will christians discriminate against once gays have equal rights?

Well, the Christians have already started to go after the Muslims. See Murfreesboro TN and their mosque for that one.

Who will they discriminate against? Same people they've always discrimitated against, any person they percieve as not being "saved" by Jesus, they will tell them they are perverted and will burn in hell for eternity.

Only problem is, humans have a beginning, so they can't be somewhere for eternity.

Just the same ol' same 'ol discrimination...........same as it's been for a couple thousand years........
 
Well, the Christians have already started to go after the Muslims. See Murfreesboro TN and their mosque for that one.

Who will they discriminate against? Same people they've always discrimitated against, any person they percieve as not being "saved" by Jesus, they will tell them they are perverted and will burn in hell for eternity.

Only problem is, humans have a beginning, so they can't be somewhere for eternity.

Just the same ol' same 'ol discrimination...........same as it's been for a couple thousand years........
I say everybody should just discriminate against those Taoist, cultist types.....No different than the FLDS, actually.

:eusa_whistle::cool:
 
Well, the Christians have already started to go after the Muslims. See Murfreesboro TN and their mosque for that one.

Who will they discriminate against? Same people they've always discrimitated against, any person they percieve as not being "saved" by Jesus, they will tell them they are perverted and will burn in hell for eternity.

Only problem is, humans have a beginning, so they can't be somewhere for eternity.

Just the same ol' same 'ol discrimination...........same as it's been for a couple thousand years........
I say everybody should just discriminate against those Taoist, cultist types.....No different than the FLDS, actually.

:eusa_whistle::cool:

Actually, Taoists aren't "cultists". It's more of a philosophy than a religion.
 
Well, the Christians have already started to go after the Muslims. See Murfreesboro TN and their mosque for that one.

Who will they discriminate against? Same people they've always discrimitated against, any person they percieve as not being "saved" by Jesus, they will tell them they are perverted and will burn in hell for eternity.

Only problem is, humans have a beginning, so they can't be somewhere for eternity.

Just the same ol' same 'ol discrimination...........same as it's been for a couple thousand years........
I say everybody should just discriminate against those Taoist, cultist types.....No different than the FLDS, actually.

:eusa_whistle::cool:

Actually, Taoists aren't "cultists". It's more of a philosophy than a religion.
Yeah, those Buddhists aren't "cultists" either.:eusa_whistle::cool:
 
I say everybody should just discriminate against those Taoist, cultist types.....No different than the FLDS, actually.

:eusa_whistle::cool:

Actually, Taoists aren't "cultists". It's more of a philosophy than a religion.
Yeah, those Buddhists aren't "cultists" either.:eusa_whistle::cool:

Buddhists aren't Taoists, nor are they Confucianists.

Buddhism, Tao and Confucianism are the 3 schools of thought in the East.

The Vinegar Tasters (三酸圖, three sours; 嘗醋翁, vinegar tasting old-men; 嘗醋圖, 尝醋图), is a traditional subject in Chinese religious painting. The allegorical composition depicts the three founders of China's major religious and philosophical traditions: Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism. The theme in the painting has been interpreted as favoring Taoism and critical of the others.

The three men are dipping their fingers in a vat of vinegar and tasting it; one man reacts with a sour expression, one reacts with a bitter expression, and one reacts with a sweet expression. The three men are Confucius, Buddha, and Laozi, respectively. Each man's expression represents the predominant attitude of his religion: Confucianism saw life as sour, in need of rules to correct the degeneration of people; Buddhism saw life as bitter, dominated by pain and suffering; and Taoism saw life as fundamentally good in its natural state. Another interpretation of the painting is that, since the three men are gathered around one vat of vinegar, "the three teachings are one".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_vinegar_tasters

The Vinegar Tasters is an allegorical painting to describe the difference between the 3.
 
Last edited:
Actually, Taoists aren't "cultists". It's more of a philosophy than a religion.
Yeah, those Buddhists aren't "cultists" either.:eusa_whistle::cool:

Buddhists aren't Taoists, nor are they Confucianists.

Buddhism, Tao and Confucianism are the 3 schools of thought in the East.

The Vinegar Tasters (三酸圖, three sours; 嘗醋翁, vinegar tasting old-men; 嘗醋圖, 尝醋图), is a traditional subject in Chinese religious painting. The allegorical composition depicts the three founders of China's major religious and philosophical traditions: Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism. The theme in the painting has been interpreted as favoring Taoism and critical of the others.

The three men are dipping their fingers in a vat of vinegar and tasting it; one man reacts with a sour expression, one reacts with a bitter expression, and one reacts with a sweet expression. The three men are Confucius, Buddha, and Laozi, respectively. Each man's expression represents the predominant attitude of his religion: Confucianism saw life as sour, in need of rules to correct the degeneration of people; Buddhism saw life as bitter, dominated by pain and suffering; and Taoism saw life as fundamentally good in its natural state. Another interpretation of the painting is that, since the three men are gathered around one vat of vinegar, "the three teachings are one".

Vinegar tasters - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Vinegar Tasters is an allegorical painting to describe the difference between the 3.
Dude, i'm just fuckin' with ya'!
 
CHOOSING to ram your dick up another mans stink hole is as perverted as it gets.

What about doing the same to a woman?



Or guys who hold women as hostage, torture them, rape them, and force them to give birth just to get raped again?
Choosing to ram your dick up a womans stink hole is as perverted as it get gets....It's a fuckin' exit for toxic waste.

CHOOSING to engage in sex with your own gender is as perverted as it gets. Those fuckin' perv's were not born that way. Despite their BS claims to the contrary.

As for your last point, that would be criminal activity, and should be death penalty offenses.

yea and the sun revolves around the earth...
 
There have been several studies showing that gay males and straight females not only share much of the same brain shape, but also are hormonally similar.

Same when gay females and straight males were compared.

Is there a "gay gene"? Probably not, as they would have found it by now, but, I'd be willing to bet that being gay isn't the result of just 1 gene, but rather the combination of several.

No, being gay isn't a choice.
 
What sick fucker would want to be a homo?

It has to be a mental disease.
 
No, being gay isn't a choice.

And even if it were, it wouldn’t mitigate the fact that laws criminalizing homosexuality are un-Constitutional; religious practice is a choice as well, and enjoys Constitutional protection just the same.

What sick fucker would want to be a homo?

It has to be a mental disease.

The APA hasn’t considered it such since 1973.
 
No, being gay isn't a choice.

And even if it were, it wouldn’t mitigate the fact that laws criminalizing homosexuality are un-Constitutional; religious practice is a choice as well, and enjoys Constitutional protection just the same.

What sick fucker would want to be a homo?

It has to be a mental disease.

The APA hasn’t considered it such since 1973.
Ya, I'm just going with some common sense on this one
 
The liberals who have been discriminating against the christians based of religious bigotry for decades now? Maybe the christians will start discriminating back?

Cite an example of ‘liberals’ ‘discriminating’ against Christians.

In fact, civil libertarians have been among the most ardent advocates of religious freedom:

The ACLU vigorously defends the rights of all Americans to practice their religion. But because the ACLU is often better known for its work preventing the government from promoting and funding selected religious activities, it is sometimes wrongly assumed that the ACLU does not zealously defend the rights of all religious believers to practice their faith. The actions described below – over half of which were brought on behalf of self-identified Christians, with the remaining cases defending the rights of a wide range of minority faiths – reveal just how mistaken such assumptions are. (The list below includes examples from the past decade only.)

The ACLU of Virginia (2011) defended the free religious expression of a group of Christian athletes in Floyd County High School who had copies of the Ten Commandments removed from their personal lockers.

The ACLU of Connecticut (2011) filed a lawsuit on behalf of a Naval officer who sought recognition as a conscientious objector because of his Christian convictions against war. After a period of intense religious study, reflection, and prayer, he had come to realize that his religious beliefs were in conflict with his military service. The officer’s request was subsequently granted and he received an honorable discharge.

The ACLU and the ACLU of Texas (2010) filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in support of a Texas state prisoner seeking damages after prison officials denied him the opportunity to participate in Christian worship services.

The ACLU of Maryland (2009) successfully settled a lawsuit on behalf of a Christian ministry for the homeless in the town of Elkton, Maryland, which had purchased a site for a religious day center to help the local community through job training, food, showers, and religious services. Though the site is legally zoned for the use of churches and centers that provide those services, the zoning board had refused to recognize the religious nature of the center, placing unreasonable limitations on the ministry. The ACLU of Maryland reached a favorable settlement with the town, affirming the church’s right to operate its day center for the homeless.

ACLU Defense of Religious Practice and Expression | American Civil Liberties Union

The mistake many Christian conservatives make is to incorrectly infer that Establishment Clause violations – where government entities are enjoined form conjoining with religion – constitute Free Exercise Clause violation, which it clearly does not. Indeed, ensuring separation between church and State, as authorized by the Constitution, ensures religious freedom for all Americans is maintained.
 
It used to be here in the south that blacks were at the bottom of the totem pole. Gays were also looked down upon but never really mentioned.
Then the blacks received equal rights and SISS BOOM BAH:
The right wing hack religous kooks had to have a new group to persecute because the bumper sticker on their Buick says so.
Enter the gay boogeyman. Everyone knows that giving them rights will ruin America as we know it.
Without someone, anyone, someplace, somewhere to persecute, most mega churches will not have enough vocal chords with fannies on pews each week to fill the plate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top