Who Should Be Able to Pray on the Temple Mount/Noble Sanctuary?

[Divine Wind]

False question. The "Europeans" don't believe it's their holiest site. However, Christians, Jews and Muslims around the world do see it as a revered religious site.

I am asking specifically about the Europeans who started calling themselves Jews in the middle ages and who stole Palestine in just the last century.

Who the fuck cares? What does that have to do with holy sites?

It doesn't have anything to do with the holy sites but it does have a lot to do with antisemitism.

 

[Coyote]

False question. The "Europeans" don't believe it's their holiest site. However, Christians, Jews and Muslims around the world do see it as a revered religious site.

I am asking specifically about the Europeans who started calling themselves Jews in the middle ages and who stole Palestine in just the last century.

Who the fuck cares? What does that have to do with holy sites?

It doesn't have anything to do with the holy sites but it does have a lot to do with antisemitism.

Indeed.

 

[montelatici]

Anyone should be able to access and do whatever they want to do at the location. The UN or a neutral party should police the location.

 

[Divine Wind]

Anyone should be able to access and do whatever they want to do at the location. The UN or a neutral party should police the location.

The US? Agreed.

 

[montelatici]

Anyone should be able to access and do whatever they want to do at the location. The UN or a neutral party should police the location.

The US? Agreed.

The U.S. is not neutral.

 

[Divine Wind]

Anyone should be able to access and do whatever they want to do at the location. The UN or a neutral party should police the location.

The US? Agreed.

The U.S. is not neutral.

That's my little joke; who is? Even the UN is biased.

 

[montelatici]

Anyone should be able to access and do whatever they want to do at the location. The UN or a neutral party should police the location.

The US? Agreed.

The U.S. is not neutral.

That's my little joke; who is? Even the UN is biased.

If the UN are biased, they are biased towards Israel, or they would not have sanctioned the colonization of Palestine by the Jews and the dispossession of the Christian and Muslim lands.

For example, when Iraq tried to do the same thing to Kuwait, the UN came down hard and approved a coalition to go to war and remove the Iraqis from Kuwait.

But, there has to be a neutral party administering the place or there will always be conflict.

 

[Shusha]

So far, on this board, it is unanimous. Everyone should be allowed access and prayer on the Temple Mount / Noble Sanctuary. (Though I rather suspect a few certain someone's didn't vote).


Here's the question then. IF we all agree that everyone should be able to access this place -- why does the international community seem to support a status quo of Muslim exclusivity? Why do so many on this board demand a status quo of Muslim exclusivity?

 

[Shusha]

But, there has to be a neutral party administering the place or there will always be conflict.

So far, the most successful "neutral party" at fairly ensuring everyone access to the Temple Mount / Noble Sanctuary is Israel. They even went so far as to restricting their own people's religious freedoms in order to calm the murderous, tantruming Muslims. (You know what that is, right? That would be apartheid. Where one group -- based on their race, ethnicity or religion -- is prevented, by law, from exercising their rights).

 

[Coyote]

So far, on this board, it is unanimous. Everyone should be allowed access and prayer on the Temple Mount / Noble Sanctuary. (Though I rather suspect a few certain someone's didn't vote).


Here's the question then. IF we all agree that everyone should be able to access this place -- why does the international community seem to support a status quo of Muslim exclusivity? Why do so many on this board demand a status quo of Muslim exclusivity?

Good question...I think it's time for the Muslims in the ME consider how important shared religious sites be...shared.

Do so many here and in the international community demand Muslim exclusivity?

 

[Shusha]

Do so many here and in the international community demand Muslim exclusivity?

White House statement: Israel has assured the world that it has no intention to alter the status of this holy site, a decision which the United States applauds and welcomes.

UN statement: ...the secretary-general welcomed Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s swift condemnation of the attack and the assurances by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “that the status quo at the holy sites in Jerusalem will be respected.”

UN statement: The UN envoy said he welcomed repeated Israeli assurances that the status quo at the Temple Mount would be upheld...

EU statement: The status quo at the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif must be preserved.

Jordan: Amman will continue using every diplomatic, legal and political tools in its disposal to thwart efforts to change the status quo.

Saudi Arabia: According to an Arab media report, Netanyahu invited Saudi officials to visit Jerusalem's al-Aksa Mosque to view firsthand that the status quo remains in place at the Temple Mount.

Shall I go on?


As for the posters on this board, I'd welcome any who normally argue for Palestinian side of conflict to openly state they believe all people should be permitted to pray on the site. It will only take a few seocnds to post such a statement.

 

[louie888]

White House statement: Israel has assured the world that it has no intention to alter the status of this holy site

Israel, like here idiotic supporters on the web, lie contantly.

Their end game is nothing short of the destruction of all Muslim structures and the "rebuilding" of the mythical temples on Muslim holy land.

The above, when it comes, not "if," will set off the next world war, the zionists' ultimate goal.

 

[louie888]

So far, the most successful "neutral party" at fairly ensuring everyone access to the Temple Mount / Noble Sanctuary is Israel. They even went so far as to restricting their own people's religious freedoms in order to calm the murderous, tantruming Muslims. (You know what that is, right? That would be apartheid. Where one group -- based on their race, ethnicity or religion -- is prevented, by law, from exercising their rights).

Complete and utter idiocy, but hey, it's shusha.

 

[Divine Wind]

Anyone should be able to access and do whatever they want to do at the location. The UN or a neutral party should police the location.

The US? Agreed.

The U.S. is not neutral.

That's my little joke; who is? Even the UN is biased.

If the UN are biased, they are biased towards Israel, or they would not have sanctioned the colonization of Palestine by the Jews and the dispossession of the Christian and Muslim lands.

For example, when Iraq tried to do the same thing to Kuwait, the UN came down hard and approved a coalition to go to war and remove the Iraqis from Kuwait.

But, there has to be a neutral party administering the place or there will always be conflict.

Ummm, the UN has no authority to declare war.

 

[Coyote]

White House statement: Israel has assured the world that it has no intention to alter the status of this holy site

Israel, like here idiotic supporters on the web, lie contantly.

Their end game is nothing short of the destruction of all Muslim structures and the "rebuilding" of the mythical temples on Muslim holy land.

The above, when it comes, not "if," will set off the next world war, the zionists' ultimate goal.

That isn't Israel's end goal. That's the view of a small extremist cult.

 

[Shusha]

Israel, like here idiotic supporters on the web, lie contantly.

Their end game is nothing short of the destruction of all Muslim structures and the "rebuilding" of the mythical temples on Muslim holy land.

The above, when it comes, not "if," will set off the next world war, the zionists' ultimate goal.

Interesting. So you use anti-semitic libel in order to justify actions against Israel and the Jewish people for deeds they have not committed and have shown no intention of committing (actually their actions have demonstrated the opposite).

 

[louie888]

Nope, their own words and actiuons speak to the truth.

Hell, you people come on here daily and champion ethnic cleansing and moving the Muslim structures there to some other Arab country, LOL.

 

[Weatherman2020]

White House statement: Israel has assured the world that it has no intention to alter the status of this holy site

Israel, like here idiotic supporters on the web, lie contantly.

Their end game is nothing short of the destruction of all Muslim structures and the "rebuilding" of the mythical temples on Muslim holy land.

The above, when it comes, not "if," will set off the next world war, the zionists' ultimate goal.

See? ISIS posts on USMB too!

 

[Divine Wind]

Nope, their own words and actiuons speak to the truth.

Hell, you people come on here daily and champion ethnic cleansing and moving the Muslim structures there to some other Arab country, LOL.

The only one championing genocide are those who hate the Jews.

 

[montelatici]

Nope, their own words and actiuons speak to the truth.

Hell, you people come on here daily and champion ethnic cleansing and moving the Muslim structures there to some other Arab country, LOL.

The only one championing genocide are those who hate the Jews.

The only ones practicing genocide in Palestine, are the Jews.