Who here thinks that running a real estate business is the same as running a country?

[BluesLegend]

Who here thinks you suck at math? Billionaire hello.

lol, billionaire minus the 23 million he had to give back to the people he screwed in his Trump University REAL ESTATE scam.

LOL Obama lost 20 times that on just one of his 'green' energy company failures. OH that's gonna leave a mark

Nice defense of Trump's criminal enterprise.

Let me ask you, why would a billionaire like Trump feel the need to screw ordinary Americans out of a few million bucks in a scam like Trump University?

What did he need that money for?

Obama screwed the taxpayers out of BILLIONS of dollars let that sink into your pea brain.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Who here thinks you suck at math? Billionaire hello.

lol, billionaire minus the 23 million he had to give back to the people he screwed in his Trump University REAL ESTATE scam.

LOL Obama lost 20 times that on just one of his 'green' energy company failures. OH that's gonna leave a mark

Nice defense of Trump's criminal enterprise.

Let me ask you, why would a billionaire like Trump feel the need to screw ordinary Americans out of a few million bucks in a scam like Trump University?

What did he need that money for?

Obama screwed the taxpayers out of BILLIONS of dollars let that sink into your pea brain.

Let me repeat the question:

why would a billionaire like Trump feel the need to screw ordinary Americans out of a few million bucks in a scam like Trump University?

What did he need that money for?

 

[BluesLegend]

Who here thinks you suck at math? Billionaire hello.

lol, billionaire minus the 23 million he had to give back to the people he screwed in his Trump University REAL ESTATE scam.

LOL Obama lost 20 times that on just one of his 'green' energy company failures. OH that's gonna leave a mark

Nice defense of Trump's criminal enterprise.

Let me ask you, why would a billionaire like Trump feel the need to screw ordinary Americans out of a few million bucks in a scam like Trump University?

What did he need that money for?

Obama screwed the taxpayers out of BILLIONS of dollars let that sink into your pea brain.

Let me repeat the question:

why would a billionaire like Trump feel the need to screw ordinary Americans out of a few million bucks in a scam like Trump University?

What did he need that money for?

Maybe Trump hates liberals as much as I do, oh wait I'd have you all confined to work camps never mind.

 

[nat4900]

Too bad Trump isn't black, or he could shut you all up with charges of racism

well, he is orange.....Trump (and you) can accuse us of racism against orange people.

 

[nat4900]

Right wingers on this thread alone, CANNOT openly admit the fact that they screwed themselves royally with support for this orange charlatan.....If you look at his proposed budget, it will be red states that will suffer the most; the cuts in Medicaid will hurt red states the most....while the HUGE tax breaks to millionaires will further enrich blue states...after all, where do these wealthy folks live (hint, NOT Alabama or Mississippi.....) ....Reality for these right wingers will be a venomous bitch.

 

[Correll]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

if you were confident in your attack, you would not have had to make a strawman to make your pretend point, you could have attacked what conservatives have actually been saying.


In doing that, you have tacitly admitted that you know you are in the wrong.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The two idiots above, simply love to openly admit that they're idiots.........Answer the fucking question, morons or go play with your guns.....LOL

One of them did answer the question.

Why don't you go post to a board where they actually have people who might care about the drivel you share.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Right wingers on this thread alone, CANNOT openly admit the fact that they screwed themselves royally with support for this orange charlatan.....If you look at his proposed budget, it will be red states that will suffer the most; the cuts in Medicaid will hurt red states the most....while the HUGE tax breaks to millionaires will further enrich blue states...after all, where do these wealthy folks live (hint, NOT Alabama or Mississippi.....) ....Reality for these right wingers will be a venomous bitch.

They don't admit it because they didn't do it.

So what if red states get hurt the most ? They will simply take it out of the hides of those who live off of the state. Bid deal.
They certainly won't be raising taxes.

Those billionares live where ? California ? The state with all the bankrupt cities ? Go for it.

 

[Crixus]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

Non starter. Half Black Jesus's never even held a job.

 

[kwc57]

You of course know why, but will never admit it. Congressional obstruction to appointments to prevent the administration from being able to function coupled with a complaint activist media working in concert with Republicans to take down a president because they are pissed they didn't win with their piss poor candidate. Too bad Trump isn't black, or he could shut you all up with charges of racism when you disagree with his policy like the left did for eight years.

How can there be Congressional obstruction to appointments when the opposing party is a minority in the House and Senate?

The only thing that is preventing the administration from being able to function is that it is a crappy administration lead by a worthless piece of shit.

And with regards to the media...how does the media prevent a President's administration from functioning? If there truly is nothing there, then the administration should be able to ignore the media and work on their policies.

Are you being purposely obtuse or are you seriously that stupid? Because either way, I'm not inclined to explain something so simple to you. I

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

If one good thing comes of the Trump disaster, it’s that the moronic notion that government can be ‘run like a business,’ and that an inexperienced businessman with no understanding of the law, sound governance, and wise public policy can 'succeed' as president, will finally be buried and forgotten.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

The US is the largest corporation in the world. Why wouldn't it be run better by a business man?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

If one good thing comes of the Trump disaster, it’s that the moronic notion that government can be ‘run like a business,’ and that an inexperienced businessman with no understanding of the law, sound governance, and wise public policy can 'succeed' as president, will finally be buried and forgotten.

And when it succeeds you're pretty well fucked.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I have to do one of my favorite scenes from Barney Miller, because it sort of fits...

They arrest this guy who claims he's a time traveler, from the future. At one point, Sgt. Harris asks him if he wants a lawyer, and the time traveler guy says...

"...you know, in the future, there are no lawyers. In the future, all legal matters are handled by real estate agents..."

pretty funny back then, even funnier now, in a way...

 

[nat4900]

The US is the largest corporation in the world. Why wouldn't it be run better by a business man?

Here's ONE example as to why you're not only wrong but clearly ignorant:
A governmental budget is also a "moral statement" of how a government treats its citizens. A business has NO moral compass (as one can clearly see in the charlatan Trump previous affairs) while a government MUST have morality and ethics in its allocation of funds..

 

[nat4900]

Who thinks that being a community organizer and a dope dealer is the same as running a country?

Believe it or not, nitwit, MANY black people are NOT dope dealers, contrary to what you learned growing up.

 

[nat4900]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

Well, my fellow posters.....somehow this thread is not looked upon too favorably by the right wing monitors of this forum......and I'm being threatened to be kicked off.....Don't you just love right wingers' interpretation of democracy?

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Who thinks that being a community organizer and a dope dealer is the same as running a country?

Believe it or not, nitwit, MANY black people are NOT dope dealers, contrary to what you learned growing up.

Sorry you are so butt hurt that you are triggered to insults.

Where did I say black darling?

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

Well, my fellow posters.....somehow this thread is not looked upon too favorably by the right wing monitors of this forum......and I'm being threatened to be kicked off.....Don;t you just love right wingers' interpretation of democracy?

you will not be missed except by your fellow insurgents

 

[danielpalos]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

The US is the largest corporation in the world. Why wouldn't it be run better by a business man?

don't we need an "infrastructure specialist" instead of a "real estate guy", in that case?