When is rape not a crime?

Liability,

She had intercourse willingly with Mr. Polanski. Mr. Polanski will be freed and the US justice system again will be scoffed at.

She was 13 and thus legally unable to "consent" even if she actually had wanted to.

Also, she had been drugged, and thus separately unable to give a valid consent over and above the age impediment.

And she repeatedly said "no" to his expressed sexual desires which is not even remotely the same as "consent" in the first place. It is obviously quite the opposite, in fact.

Thus, as always, you are not just factually and legally wrong, and morally reprehnsible, but a fucking scumbag liar as well.

Pedophile Polanski will not be freed, either, of course.

And if the U.S. criminal justice system is going to be scoffed at, it is by those who scratch their heads and wonder why on Earth we are criminally prosecuting illegal enemy combatants as mere criminals. Only fucking scumbag shit-for-brain sewer rat filth desire to see Pedophile Polanksi "freed." Thankfully, he won't be.
 
Liability, Are you an expert on the subject of rape?

No, he is not.

He is merely engaging in reaction formation. In psychoanalytic theory, reaction formation is a defensive process (defense mechanism) in which anxiety-producing or unacceptable emotions and impulses are mastered by exaggeration (hypertrophy) of the directly opposing tendency.

So he wants us to believe that if he had been there with Lolita he would have politely refused. But we know better.

.

Neither are you. Matter of fact, you're pretty stupid on the topic. Sex with a 13 years old is rape. Period. End of story. I can't believe you're still here with your stupid defense of a pig.

OK then, there you said, you have impressed whomever you wanted to impressed.

Meanwhile Mr Polanski is out on bail and will never again see the inside of an American Taliban jail. Ever.

.
 
No, he is not.

He is merely engaging in reaction formation. In psychoanalytic theory, reaction formation is a defensive process (defense mechanism) in which anxiety-producing or unacceptable emotions and impulses are mastered by exaggeration (hypertrophy) of the directly opposing tendency.

So he wants us to believe that if he had been there with Lolita he would have politely refused. But we know better.

.

Neither are you. Matter of fact, you're pretty stupid on the topic. Sex with a 13 years old is rape. Period. End of story. I can't believe you're still here with your stupid defense of a pig.

OK then, there you said, you have impressed whomever you wanted to impressed.

Meanwhile Mr Polanski is out on bail and will never again see the inside of an American Taliban jail. Ever.

.

No. There are none.

But he will see the inside of an American prison, thankfully.

,
 
Thinking of laws, there has to be a rational reason why the law was passed in the first place.t.

Identify The RATIONAL - SECULAR reason for concluding that a 13 year old girl can not consent to sex.

.

She's too young.


.

So the RATIONAL SECULAR REASON is that she is "too young" but by her own admission her 17 y/o BFF was nailing her.

Mr. Polanski allegedly butt fucked her , yet there was no evidence of anal tears, no blood on the linen and Anjelica Huston , who was sitting just outside the room, heard no screams nor demands that Mr. Polanski stop.

So WHAT is the American Taliban trying to protect?

.
 
Last edited:
Identify The RATIONAL - SECULAR reason for concluding that a 13 year old girl can not consent to sex.

.

She's too young.


.

So the RATIONAL SECULAR REASON is that she is "too young" but by her own admission her 17 y/o BFF was nailing her.

Mr. Polanski allegedly butt fucked her , yet there was no evidence of anal tears, no blood on the linen and Anjelica Huston , who was sitting just outside the room, heard no screams nor demands that Mr. Polanski stop.

So WHAT is the American Taliban trying to protect?

.

You are -- as is always the case with you -- confusing things and conflating things.

She IS indeed too young to consent as is EVERY child her age.

Period.

That she may have desired sexual relations with a boyfriend and "nominally" consented to having sex with the boyfriend does not vchange the meaning of what I said (and I am quoting the law which is paying due deference to science, among other things). For ONE THING, the 17 y.o. b/f is less than 5 years older than she was at the time, and that matters in the eyes of the law.

For another thing, had her 17 y.o. b/f drugged her first, he would be guilty of rape EVEN if she had begged for sex, notwithstanding their minor age difference.

For another thing, your knowledge of human physiology is quite lacking. Vaginas permit whole babies to exit, and this does not always entail tearing. Simlarly, her anus could have been penetrated by Polanski's little pud and tearing would NOT necessarily be either expected or required.

As for your continued references to American "Taliban," let it be noted: you are a mindless asshole. Your form of shitty rhetoric is (i.e., your putrid polemics are)
utterly unpersausive.

You remain just a filthy vile scumbag.


.


,


!
 
In probably most European countries if you say you have been an inmate in Auschwitz, rape will be judged as merit. There is not in existence one person in Europe who was charged for rape giving this excuse, and who did not get away with it. So the common excuse: ''I was inside Auschwitz''! is the thing to go for, for those wanting to get away with it.
 
Last edited:
In probably most European countries if you say you have been an inmate in Auschwitz, rape will be judged as merit. There is not in existence one person in Europe who was charged for rape giving this excuse, and who did not get away with it. So the common excuse: ''I was inside Auschwitz''! is the thing to go for, for those wanting to get away with it.

That was a massively stupid reply.

By the way, just to clear up the OP's question:

Rape, by its very definition, is always a crime.
 
What ever happened here? Anyone know? I haven't heard..
 
Oh I see he is still under house arrest, wearing a electronic tag.
 
Liability,

She had intercourse willingly with Mr. Polanski. Mr. Polanski will be freed and the US justice system again will be scoffed at.

That is bullshit. She was 13, she was drunk and drugged, and LURED and TRICKED.

Sounds like you know all the "tricks" that pedophiles use on little kids, claiming that they "deserved it" or "wanted it", when all pedophiles DO is trick their young victims into "playing touching games" because "this is how people show other people that they love or care about them"... It is TRICKERY, and children that are victims of it are very confused and usually have not had sexual abuse explained to them fully.. But once they DO, they are honest about whether it happened or not.

Five Myths About Child Sexual Abuse: Common Misconceptions of Childhood Assault


Child Abuse Prevention - Childhelp

Children's Protection & Advocacy Coalition: Adult Porn Conflicts with Children's Advocacy
 
Yes, he just drugged up a 13 year old, fed her booze and anally fucked her while she begged him to stop.

But it wasn't 'rape-rape' or even a crime, ebcause he directed some movies.

I know its an old thread, but how is a left leaning director? By the way, I hate Goldberg for saying that. I will never, ever see or read anything she does. EVER. I still respect her more than hasleback of course, but fuck Whoopi. If it was her child being Rape Rape..d Lets see what she would call it.
 
Last edited:
Liability,

She had intercourse willingly with Mr. Polanski. Mr. Polanski will be freed and the US justice system again will be scoffed at.

Now I know why people call you a pedophile.

Do me a favor. Don't call yourself a Christian. For that matter, don't call yourself a human being. You give us ALL a bad name.
 
Liability,

She had intercourse willingly with Mr. Polanski. Mr. Polanski will be freed and the US justice system again will be scoffed at.

Now I know why people call you a pedophile.

Do me a favor. Don't call yourself a Christian. For that matter, don't call yourself a human being. You give us ALL a bad name.

You know that fucking Yukon piece of shit has been there. He's a fucking sicko child raper.
 

Forum List

Back
Top