1. Trying to expose hypocrisy because the other side did it in the past doesn't justify or excuse problematic actions from your party.I have yet to hear a non-political non-BS reason for the GOP's hold out from meeting and voting on a Supreme Court Nominee. If there was a president Trump and the same situation presented itself in 4 years is there any doubt that they would flip a 180 and support a vote for the nominee??
If the GOP doesn't like the nominated justice then they can simply vote NO. The gridlock is ridiculous and the source for much frustration from Americans... Why can't they just do their jobs?
Maybe Joe Biden could explain it to you, Obama and the leftist media then:
Biden in 1992, if there was an opening on the Supreme Court, HW should “not name a nominee until after the November election is completed,” and if he did, “the Senate Judiciary Committee should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until after the political campaign season is over.”
Oh fuck you, libertarians had nothing to do with it. It was you and your twin Republicans who did it. BTW, I'm not a member of the Libertarian Party either, but since I generally vote for them whatever
So what if the left did it? That doesn't give you a pass to do it. They teach us this principle in elementary school
You're the one screaming hypocrisy while you're a hypocrite. You don't get to ignore that, sorry, Nancy. Man up to your own actions first
2. Biden's was referring to a totally different situation that involved coordinating a Justice to retire at the end of a presidential term so that president could replace him with a like minded candidate. He was trying to block political manipulation of the system. This is a different case then this vacancy that was cause because of a death.
The pundants and politicians are totally politicizing this situation... Its an embarrassment.
you made that up. He didn't say that, he said any nomination. Listen to the clip, it's all over the internet